Group Assignment
Group Assignment
1
Part 1 ( MD Aslam)
Trade & Economic Structure of the Sultanate Period (1206–1526 CE)
The economic system of the Delhi Sultanate, established by Qutb al-Din Aibak and ending
with Ibrahim Lodi, was a highly organized and revenue-oriented structure. Though
fundamentally agrarian, it gradually developed into a monetized and trade-supported
economy. The system blended Islamic fiscal principles with older Indian agrarian traditions.
Agriculture formed the economic base of the Sultanate. Nearly 80–90% of the population
lived in villages and depended directly on cultivation. The prosperity of the state depended on
agricultural surplus.
Satish Chandra emphasizes that agrarian revenue was the “financial pillar” of the Sultanate
state (Chandra, 2004).
2
1.2 Crop Pattern & Commercialization
Gradually, cash crops such as cotton, sugarcane, and indigo increased, showing early
commercialization of agriculture.
This indicates that the Sultanate economy was not purely subsistence-based but had growing
market orientation.
The state demanded a significant share of produce (often 1/3 to 1/2). Revenue collection was
systematic and centrally supervised.
3
2.2 Religious & Commercial Taxes
Irfan Habib argues that taxation aimed at “maximum extraction of surplus for sustaining
military power” (Habib, 1963).
Descriptively:
4
• Ensured loyalty of nobles.
• Linked economy with military organization.
• Delhi
• Lahore
• Multan
developed as:
• Administrative capitals.
• Trade hubs.
• Craft production centers.
5
This was one of the earliest examples of state-controlled market economy in medieval India.
5. Internal Trade
River systems like the Ganga and Yamuna played a crucial role.
6
Trade encouraged regional economic integration and specialization.
• Central Asia.
• Persia.
• Arabia.
• China.
• Cambay
• Calicut
• Sonargaon
Exports:
Imports:
7
• Arabian horses (essential for cavalry).
• Luxury goods.
• Precious metals.
K.M. Ashraf (1959) states that foreign trade strengthened monetary circulation and urban
prosperity.
7.1 Coinage
• Silver Tanka.
• Copper Jital.
This shows transition from a purely agrarian economy to a partially monetized commercial
system.
8
State-controlled production centers manufactured:
• Weapons.
• Luxury goods.
• Garments for court.
• Introduction of paper-making.
• Improved metalwork.
• Architectural stone carving.
9. Socio-Economic Hierarchy
The trade and economic structure of the Sultanate period was a centralized, revenue-driven,
and militarily oriented system. Agriculture provided the foundation, while trade,
monetization, and market regulation strengthened the structure.
Through the Iqta system, controlled markets, expanding maritime trade, and standardized
coinage, the Sultanate developed a complex economic framework. This model later
influenced Mughal administrative and fiscal systems.
9
Thus, the Sultanate economy was not static; it was dynamic, commercializing, and
structurally integrated with political authority.
References
Chandra, S. (2004). Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals. New Delhi: Har-Anand
Publications.
Habib, I. (1963). The Agrarian System of Mughal India. Bombay: Asia Publishing House.
Ashraf, K. M. (1959). Life and Conditions of the People of Hindustan. Delhi: Munshiram
Manoharlal.
10
Part 2 ( Asif Fardous Zidnee)
The Mudra System of Sultanate Bengal
The history of medieval Bengal is deeply tied to its Mudra System, or money system, which began in
1204 AD when the Sultanate was established. Before this time, people mostly used simple sea shells
for trade, but the Sultans introduced a sophisticated system of gold, silver, and copper coins. These
coins weren't just for buying things; they were powerful tools that showed the world Bengal was an
independent and stable kingdom. Famous historians like Dr. A.K.M. Shahnawaz and Professor Abdul
Karim have studied these ancient coins to understand how people lived hundreds of years ago. By
looking at the writing and the metal on these coins, they have reconstructed the story of Bengal’s rich
culture and politics. This shift from shells to official coins marked the beginning of a new era, turning
Bengal into a major economic power that lasted until the Mughal conquest in the late 1500s. (ড. এ কে
এম শাহনাওয়াজ, 1999)
11
more reliable chronology than the often biased or incomplete written chronicles of the [Link]
the content of Sultanate coins was largely predetermined and standardized, they offer an
unadulterated record of a Sultan's name, his titles, his lineage, and the exact date and location of his
authority. Through the deep research of Shahnawaz and Abdul Karim, the succession of Sultans and
the territorial extent of their power have been meticulously reconstructed using the Hijri years and
mint names found on these metallic artifacts. (Sarkar, 2015)
A standard Tanka was designed to contain 96 ratis of high-purity silver. Modern numismatic calculations
convert this to approximately 172.8 grains, or [Link] -grain standard
remained remarkably stable throughout the Sultanate period, though some minor variations
occurred due to localized minting practices or periods of intense warfare. (ড. এ কে এম
শাহনাওয়াজ, 1999)
This stability was essential for Bengal’s participation in the "silver-for-goods" trade. As the delta
lacked significant indigenous silver mines, the silver for the Mudra system had to be imported from
Upper Burma, Arakan, and Southwest China. The high purity and consistent weight of the Bengal
Tanka ensured that it was a favored currency for merchants across the Indian Ocean.
12
Petty trade, fractional value
Copper Fals Pure Copper Variable
Types of Coins
The Mudra System was built on a hierarchical metallic structure. Each metal served a specific
purpose within the administrative and social framework of the Sultanate, ranging from the declaration
of royal legitimacy to the simple purchase of food in a local market. I will show you the different types
of coins found in the bengali sultanate period and their features bellow:
Gold Coins
In the Bengal Sultanate, gold coins were much rarer than silver ones and weren't used for everyday
shopping. Instead, they were special "commemorative" pieces, much like a limited-edition medal
today. Rulers minted them in small numbers to celebrate big moments, like a major victory in battle or
an important anniversary of their reign. Because they were so rare, these coins were mainly used as
prestigious gifts for high-ranking generals, scholars, or even foreign leaders to show off the Sultan's
immense wealth and power. Interestingly, these gold coins followed the exact same weight as the
silver Tanka, making it easier for the government to track their value. In the very beginning, some
Muslim rulers even kept local Hindu symbols, like the Goddess Lakshmi, on the coins to help people
feel more comfortable with the new currency. However, as time went on, the coins shifted toward
featuring beautiful Arabic titles. Today, finding one of these gold coins is very rare for historians,
proving they were always meant for royal prestige rather than the pockets of ordinary people. (ড. এ কে
এম শাহনাওয়াজ, 1999)
13
1995)
1. The Kalima
The most sacred part of every coin in the Bengal Sultanate was the Kalima, which is the Islamic
statement of faith. By putting these holy words on their money, the Sultans were telling everyone that
they didn't just rule by their own power, but under the authority of God. In the early days of the
kingdom, this prayer was placed right in the center of the coin so it was the first thing people would
see. It made the money feel official, blessed, and deeply respected by the public. As politics changed,
some Sultans began replacing the prayer with the name of the Caliph, the supreme leader of the
Muslim world at the time. Even after the central government in Baghdad fell, the rulers in Bengal kept
using these titles on their coins to show they were still connected to a global community of believers.
(Abdul Karim, 1995)By calling themselves the "Commander of the Faithful," the Sultans proved they
were legitimate and powerful leaders. This tradition of using coins to show spiritual loyalty lasted for
over a hundred years, making the currency a mix of both money and faith. (ড. এ কে এম শাহনাওয়াজ,
1999)
The front and back of the silver Tanka were used like a royal billboard to broadcast the Sultan’s
power. Instead of just a name, the coins featured grand titles that told everyone exactly how
important the ruler was compared to other kings. For example, some called themselves the "Sun of
the World and the Faith," while others used the title "Father of Victory." (ড. এ কে এম শাহনাওয়াজ,
1999)
These weren't just nicknames; they were bold statements designed to show that the Sultan was the
supreme leader of the region. One ruler, Sultan Ruknuddin Kaikaus, even used the title "Sultan, son
of a Sultan." This was a clever way to remind people that he didn't just take the throne by force, he
inherited it rightfully from his father. To make these titles look as grand as possible, artists used
beautiful styles of handwriting called "Naskh" or "Tughra." These elegant, flowing scripts turned every
coin into a tiny piece of art, making the Sultan’s message look both holy and sophisticated to anyone
who held it. (Sarkar, 2015)
14
territorial expansion of the Sultanate. The Sultanate of Bengal operated a decentralized network of
at least 22 mint towns. Each mint town (Takshal) served as an administrative and economic hub for
its respective region. Lakhnauti was the first and most important mint, established immediately after
the Turko-Afghan conquest of the Gaur [Link] the Sultans extended their control into the
"Vanga" (East) and "Rarh" (West) regions, new mint towns like Sonargaon and Satgaon were
established to handle the local agrarian revenue and integrate these regions into the "Mudra
System". (ড. এ কে এম শাহনাওয়াজ, 1999)
15
they provide profound insights into the "socio-cultural fabric" of medieval Bengal.1
Conclusion
The "Mudra System" of Sultanate Bengal represents one of the most successful and enduring
monetary architectures in pre-modern South Asia. By introducing and maintaining a standardized,
high-purity silver coinage—the 172.8-grain Tanka—the Sultans of Bengal provided the fiscal stability
necessary for the region to flourish as a global trade hub.
16
References
ড. এ কে এম শাহনাওয়াজ. (1999). মুদ্রায় ও শিলালিপিতে মধ্যযুগের বাংলার সমাজ- সংস্কৃতি.
Abdul Karim. (1995). Corpus of the Arabic and Persian Inscriptions of Bengal (Vol. Vol. 58, No. 1). Cambridge
Mohammad Abdur Rahim, & Md. Shariful Islam. (2020). The Sultānate Period COINS OF BENGAL Focus on the
Sarkar, H. R. (2015). সুলতানী বাংলার মুদ্রা ও টাকশাল (2nd ed.). Annesha Prokashon.
17
PART 3 ( Shariful Islam Tiash)
The Delhi Sultanate (1206–1526 CE) developed a well-organized
monetary system as part of its administrative structure. The mint, known
as Takshal, was the official institution responsible for the production of
coins under strict state supervision. Coinage during the Sultanate period
was not only an economic instrument but also a powerful symbol of
political authority and sovereignty.
In Islamic political tradition, sovereignty was expressed through two
main symbols:
Khutba – Reading the ruler’s name during Friday prayers.
Sikka – Issuing coins in the ruler’s name.
Thus, control over minting was directly linked to the legitimacy and
authority of the Sultan.
2. Royal Authority Over Coinage
The Sultan had the exclusive right to issue coins. No individual, noble,
or provincial authority could legally mint coins without royal
permission. The issuance of coins in the Sultan’s name symbolized:
Political independence
Legitimacy of rule
Control over economic life
Coins generally carried:
The name of the Sultan
Islamic religious inscriptions (Kalima)
Sometimes the name of the Abbasid Caliph
Date and place of minting
Whenever a new Sultan ascended the throne, issuing coins in his name
was one of his first acts to assert authority.
3. Administrative Structure of the Mint
The mint functioned under the financial administration of the state. It was
supervised by the Diwan-i-Wizarat (Department of Finance), headed by
the Wazir.
Important Officials
Daroga-i-Takshal – Superintendent of the mint, responsible for overall
functioning.
18
Wazir – Head of financial administration.
Mushrif – Accountant who maintained records of production and
expenditure.
Zarrab – Assayer who tested the purity of metals.
Diwan-i-Wizarat – Controlled revenue and financial matters, including
mint operations.
These officials ensured that coins were minted according to prescribed
standards of weight and purity.
4. Types of Coins Issued
The Delhi Sultanate introduced a structured coinage system consisting
mainly of gold, silver, and copper coins.
(a) Gold
Dinar High-
value coin
Used for large commercial transactions
Issued mainly during economically stable reigns
(b) Silver Tanka
Introduced by
Iltutmish
Standard weight: approximately 175 grains
Became the principal currency of the
Sultanate Widely accepted in trade
(c) Copper Jital
Used for small and everyday
transactions Common among ordinary
people Circulated widely in markets
The silver tanka became the backbone of the Sultanate’s monetary
system and influenced later Mughal coinage.
5. Minting Process
The minting of coins involved several systematic steps:
Collection of Metal – Obtained through taxes, trade, war booty, or
melting old coins.
Refining and Purification – Removal of impurities to achieve required
standards.
Standard Weighing – Accurate measurement according to fixed
standards. Engraving Dies – Preparation of metal dies bearing
inscriptions.
Striking the Coin – Coins were manually struck using hammer techniques.
19
Quality Inspection – Final verification by assayers before circulation.
Strict procedures helped maintain uniformity across different mints.
6. Control and Regulatory Measures
The Delhi Sultanate maintained strict control over mint administration
through:
Fixed standards of weight and
purity Severe punishment for
counterfeiting Regular inspection
of mints Standardized inscriptions
Centralized supervision over provincial mints
Major mint centers included Delhi, Lahore, Multan, Lakhnauti, and
Daulatabad. Though located in different regions, all mints followed
uniform standards imposed by the central authority.
7. Muhammad bin Tughlaq’s Token Currency Experiment
One of the most notable monetary experiments was introduced by
Muhammad bin Tughlaq (1325–1351 CE).
He introduced copper token currency with the same value as silver
coins. The objective was to overcome the shortage of silver.
However, due to weak administrative control, people began forging
coins. Counterfeiting became widespread.
The experiment failed and caused financial instability.
Eventually, the Sultan withdrew the token currency and compensated
holders.
This episode demonstrates the importance of strict administrative control in
maintaining a stable currency system.
8. Importance of Mint Administration
The effective management of the Takshal contributed to:
Strengthening central authority
Promoting internal and external
trade Ensuring economic stability
Preventing inflation and forgery
Demonstrating Islamic legitimacy of the Sultan
The Sultanate’s standardized currency system laid the foundation for
later monetary reforms under the Mughal Empire.
9. Conclusion
20
The Mint (Takshal) Management under the Delhi Sultanate was a
centrally controlled and well-structured administrative system. Coinage
was closely linked with sovereignty, financial stability, and political
legitimacy. Despite certain experimental failures like the token currency
of Muhammad bin Tughlaq, the overall mint administration remained
organized and influential. The system not only strengthened the
authority of the Sultan but also facilitated economic growth and trade
across the empire.
21