Last Name 1

First Name Last Name

Student ID Number

Date of Submission

CCT109 H5F
 Last Name 2

Algorithms & Knowledge

The debate on the effects of algorithmic processes, machine learning, and artificial

intelligence in the public discourse has been prevalent for quite some time. Algorithms, machine

learning, and artificial intelligence are being used by a growing number of businesses to facilitate

rapid retrieval of data. Algorithms can assist in identifying information and gaining knowledge

about specific topics, engaging with political and social conversations, and familiarizing with our

audience members. Algorithmic processes have worsened how people access knowledge and

information because they are used in the promotion and suppression of content, exclusion and

demotion of database information and the threat of invisibility in social media apps like

Facebook.

Algorithmic processes are used in the suppression and promotion of content. For

instance, social networking websites are required to adhere to the legal framework. However, it

is widely accepted that they themselves are regulators and that this governance is more important

in terms of the structure of online behavior and content. Algorithmic governance is a

sociotechnical system that categorizes users and content, assigning them positive relevance or

deeming them as (potentially) risky or “unacceptable. Issues such as shadow banning are signs of

algorithmic platform governance implemented by social media companies to suppress content

using automated techniques that combine human and machine activity. The term "shadow

banning" describes a contentious and elusive form of social media regulation. Moderators are

said to have invented the word to describe the behavior of concealing content from public view.

Because the troublesome user is unaware of the prohibition, he or she continues to post to a

fictitious audience. In contemporary internet culture, shadow banning—or maybe more correctly,

the debates about it—have become commonplace. In the meantime, social media sites like
 Last Name 3

Twitter, Instagram, and TikTok strongly dispute that the practice even exists (Savolainen, 2022).

According to (Crawford, 2016) Algorithms play an increasingly important role in selecting what

information is considered most relevant to us - a crucial feature of our participation in public life.

Search engines help us navigate massive databases of information, through their undisclosed

algorithm they constitute the conditions that make some pages attractive and others not.

Recommendation algorithms map our preferences against others, suggesting new or forgotten

bits of culture for us to encounter. They manage our interactions on social networking sites,

highlighting the news of one friend while excluding another’s (Gillespie, 2014). The promotion

of and content removal are closely intertwined, with both activities being governed by specific

regulations and principles, some more transparent than others. The rules governing risky and

inappropriate content/behavior of users are not fully explained in contracts or public documents,

including terms of service and content type descriptions. If there is any content that cannot be

promoted through algorithms, this can result in negative publicity.

Algorithmic processes are used in the demotion of database information on social media

sites. The desire to gather information is present in all database manufacturers, but their

preferences for excluding certain data are more distinct than others. Websites have the ability to

prohibit crawlers, such as search engines, from indexing their sites. Government organizations

have used code that was originally designed to defend the privacy of individual creators by

blocking search engines from indexing public documents. Prior to being accessed by another

user, infringing content may be removed from the account's index or suspended temporarily.

However, in parallel with the algorithm, problematic content can be addressed in more

sophisticated ways. YouTube's algorithm decrease the number of suggested videos on its

homepage and prevents them from appearing in the most viewed list. This is done automatically
 Last Name 4

for new users. Twitter does not censor profanity from public tweets, but it does remove it from

the algorithm that evaluates "trending" terms (Gillespie, 2014). Due to Facebook's algorithm,

visibility is established in a more unpredictable manner, with no opportunity for complete

visibility or reduced visibility. As expected, just like the Panopticon, Facebook users occupy an

equally restricted space. Like carefully and uniformly designed cells, user profiles demonstrate a

pattern that provides fixed locations and allows for circulation. The general structure of

Facebook user profile does not provide too much room for specific individuals, but the space

makes the standardized organization of personal data facile and more manageable. While the

visibility afforded by the panopticon arrangement is rich and considered an external threat, the

visibility within the Facebook system is said to work in the opposite direction. The policies of

the platforms are based on the belief that a global business must be attractive to advertisers and

provide an exciting atmosphere for users with diverse cultural and demographic backgrounds as

well as maintain public confidence in their ability to self-govern. Social media enforces

disciplinary measures by using algorithmically encoded criteria and assessments to guide

individuals in their digital self.

Algorithmic and machine learning processes are associated with the threat of invisibility

in social media apps like Facebook. The particular attributes of a device or system serve as

enabling factors for the establishment of power and authority, with actors being the primary

drivers behind their development (Crawford, 2016). By virtue of its technical architecture, the

Panopticon's behavior is able to adjust itself and capture any uncertainty caused by permanent

visibility that may be present in the subject. There is no clearly centralized inspectorate that can

monitor and place everyone under the same constant scrutiny. On Facebook, there is a “threat of

invisibility” that seems to dominate the act of subjects. The issue that arises is not the possibility
 Last Name 5

of being constantly observed, but the likelihood of consistently vanishing and the absence of

sufficient significance. To appear, to be visible, a user must follow a certain platform logic tied to

Facebook's architecture (Bucher, 2012). The mode of visibility associated with Web 2.0 is linked

to the concept of empowerment, to the extent that it has significantly expanded the social sphere.

Nevertheless, the increasing prevalence on computing and surveillance technologies is a sense of

powerlessness. As a result, the growing surveillance potential of new media technologies is often

portrayed negatively.

It is evident that algorithmic processes are significant in identifying information and

gaining knowledge. However, algorithms are also convenient in the promotion and suppression

of content like suggestion ban, action block and a decrease in follower engagement, exclusion

and demotion of database information put in place by a newspaper publisher or search engine

indexer, and the threat of invisibility in social media apps like Facebook. Therefore, algorithms

have worsened how ordinary people access knowledge and information in the public discourse.

Changes Made

I made a couple of changes from the outline in order to furnish the final paper. The

outline acted as a visual aid for me to develop the final paper and I had to alter it to fit the

requirements of the assignment. In my first argument, I had to include more research from the

coursework material to strengthen arguments. Since the outline contained a summary of the main

paper, I delved into more research in order to meet the wording requirements and at the same

time adhere to the strict guidelines of the paper.

Secondly, I included supporting ideas from the main ideas with significant explanations and

illustrations for the arguments to be authentic. I clustered similar ideas in a coherent way with

appropriate explanations in a logical manner.

I also re-constructed my paragraphs, deleted the outline formatting and enjoined sentences into

proper paragraphs. I considered the introduction of more transitional phrases to aid the reader

follow the arguments precisely. After that, I proofread and revised my paper to ascertain that it

met the guidelines, structure and argumentation planning as set out in the source requirements.
 Last Name 7

References
Bucher, T. (2012). Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on
Facebook. New Media & Society, 14(7), 1164–1180.
Crawford, K. (2016). Can an algorithm be agonistic? Ten scenes from life in calculated publics.
Science, Technology & Human Values, 41(1), 77-92.
Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, K. A. Foot
(Eds.), Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society (167-
194). MIT Press.
Savolainen, L. (2022). The shadow banning controversy: perceived governance and algorithmic
folklore. Media, Culture & Society, 1-19.