0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views8 pages

Sampling Topic

This document discusses ratio and product methods of estimation in sampling theory, focusing on unbiased ratio-type estimators and the Jackknife method for reducing bias. It outlines the derivation of unbiased estimators for population means and presents formulas for calculating bias in these estimators. The Jackknife method is introduced as a technique to mitigate bias in ratio estimates by averaging multiple group estimators.

Uploaded by

sujithkarnati9
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views8 pages

Sampling Topic

This document discusses ratio and product methods of estimation in sampling theory, focusing on unbiased ratio-type estimators and the Jackknife method for reducing bias. It outlines the derivation of unbiased estimators for population means and presents formulas for calculating bias in these estimators. The Jackknife method is introduced as a technique to mitigate bias in ratio estimates by averaging multiple group estimators.

Uploaded by

sujithkarnati9
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Sampling Theory

MODULE V
LECTURE - 18
RATIO AND PRODUCT
METHODS OF ESTIMATION

DR. SHALABH
DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KANPUR

1
Ratio estimators with reduced Bias:

The ratio type estimators that are unbiased or have smaller bias than Rˆ , YˆR or YˆRc ( tot ) are useful in sample surveys . There

are several approaches to derive such estimators. We consider here two such approaches:

1. Unbiased ratio-type estimators:


y
Under SRS, the ratio estimator has form X to estimate the population mean Y . As an alternative to this, we consider
x
following as an estimator of population mean

1 n Y 
YˆRo = ∑  i  X .
n i =1  X i 

Let
Yi
=Ri = , i 1, 2,.., N ,
Xi
then
1 n
YR 0 = ∑ Ri X
ˆ
n i =1
= rX
where
1 n
r = ∑ Ri .
n i =1

2
Now
(YˆR 0 ) E (YˆR 0 ) − Y
Bias=
= E (rX ) − Y
= E (r ) X − Y .

Since

1 n 1 N
E (r ) =
n
∑ ( ∑ Ri )
=i 1 =N i1
N
1
=
N
∑R
i =1
i

= R.
So

Bias (YˆR=
0) RX − Y .

3
N −n
Using the result that under SRSWOR, Cov( x , y ) = S XY , it also follows that
Nn
N −n 1 N
=
Cov(r , x ) ∑ ( Ri − R )( X i − X )
Nn N − 1 i =1
N −n 1  N 
=  ∑
Nn N − 1  i =1
Ri X i − NRX 

N − n 1  N Yi 
= ∑ X i − NRX 
Nn N − 1  i =1 X i 
N −n 1
= ( NY − NRX )
Nn N − 1
N −n 1  ˆ ) .
= − Bias (Y
n N − 1 
R0 

N −n
Thus using the result that in SRSWOR, Cov( x , y ) = S XY , we have
Nn
n( N − 1)
Bias (YˆRo ) = − Cov(r , x )
N −n
n( N − 1) N − n
= − S RX
N − n Nn
 N −1 
= −  S RX
 N 
1 N
where =
S RX ∑ ( Ri − R )( X i − X ).
N − 1 i =1

4
The following result helps is obtaining an unbiased estimator of population mean:.

Since under SRSWOR set up,

E ( sxy ) = S xy
where
1 n
=
sxy ∑ ( xi − x )( yi − y ),
n − 1 i =1
1 N
=
S xy ∑ ( X i − X )(Yi − Y ).
N − 1 i =1

ˆ
So an unbiased estimator of the bias is Bias (YR 0 ) =
−( N − 1) S RX which is obtained as follows:

 (Yˆ ) =
Bias −( N − 1) srx
R0

N −1 n
=
− ∑ (ri − r )( xi − x )
N ( n − 1) i =1
N −1 n
=
− (∑ ri xi − n r x )
N ( n − 1) i =1

N − 1  n yi 
=
−  ∑ xi − nr x 
N ( n − 1)  i =1 xi 
N −1
=
− (ny − nr x ).
N ( n − 1)

5
So

 (Yˆ ) = n( N − 1)
Bias E (YˆR 0 ) − Y =− ( y − r x ).
N ( n − 1)
R0

Thus

E YˆR 0 − Bias (YˆR 0 )  =


Y
 
 n( N − 1) 
or E YˆR 0 + ( y − r x ) =
Y.
 N (n − 1) 
Thus
n( N − 1) n( N − 1)
YˆR 0 + (y − r x) =
rX + (y − r x)
N ( n − 1) N ( n − 1)

is an unbiased estimator of population mean.

6
2. Jackknife method for obtaining a ratio estimate with lower bias
Jackknife method, is used to get rid of the term of order 1/n from the bias of an estimator. Suppose the E ( Rˆ ) can be

expanded after ignoring finite population correction as


a a
E ( Rˆ ) = R + 1 + 22 + ...
n n
Let n = mg and the sample is divided at random into g groups, each of size m. Then
ga ga
E ( gRˆ ) =gR + 1 + 2 2 2 + ...
gm g m
a1 a
= gR + + 2 2 + ...
m gm

Let Rˆi* = ∑ *
yi
where the ∑ *
denotes the summation over all values of the sample except the ith group. So Rˆi* is
∑ *
xi
based on a simple random sample of size m(g - 1), so we can express
a1 a
E ( Rˆi* ) =
R+ + 2 2 2 + ...
m( g − 1) m ( g − 1)
or
a a
E ( g − 1) Rˆi*  = ( g − 1) R + 1 + 2 2 + ...
m m ( g − 1)
Thus
a2
E  gRˆ − ( g − 1) Rˆi*  =R − + ...
g ( g − 1)m 2
or
a g
E  gRˆ − ( g − 1) Rˆi*  =R − 22 + ...

7
n g −1
1
Hence the bias of  gRˆ − ( g − 1) Rˆi*  is of order 2 .
n

Now g estimates of this form can be obtained, one estimator for each group. Then the jackknife or Quenouille’s estimator is
the average of these of estimators

∑ Rˆ i
RˆQ = gRˆ − ( g − 1) i =1
.
g

You might also like