Human-Centered AI (BAI613)
MODULE 5
GOVERNANCE STRUCTURES - 2
opics: Government Interventions and Regulations, Introduction: Driving HCAI Forward,
T
Assessing Trustworthiness, caring for and Learning from Older Adults
1. Government Interventions and Regulations
Introduction
overnments across the worldnowrecognizeAIasacriticaltechnologyforeconomicgrowth,
G
national power, and societal development. Earlier, therewasresistancetoregulationbecauseit
mightslowinnovation,butnowitisunderstoodthatwithoutregulation,AIcancauseharm,bias,
and misuse. Hence, controlled intervention is necessary.
Global AI Leadership and Policies
Different countries are shaping AI in different ways:
● hina focuses on rapid development with strong government support and large-scale
C
data collection.
● nited States emphasizes innovation through private companies and research
U
institutions.
● European Unionfocuses on strict privacy laws andethical AI practices.
This shows that AI governance depends heavily on cultural values and political systems.
Need for Regulation
AI systems are different from traditional software because they are:
● Adaptive (learn from data)
● Autonomous (make decisions)
● Intelligent (simulate human thinking)
ecauseofthesecharacteristics,existinglawsarenotsufficient,andnewregulatoryframeworks
B
are required to ensure safety and fairness.
Human-Centered AI in Policies
Modern policies emphasizeHuman-Centered AI (HCAI),meaning:
HARSH VERMA 1
Human-Centered AI (BAI613)
● Humans must remain in control
● AI decisions should be explainable
● Systems should be fair and unbiased
The goal is to build trustworthy AI systems that benefit society.
Government Role in Research
overnments influence AI through funding programs.
G
For example, research initiatives now require:
● Real-world impact (not just theory)
● Collaboration with industry and society
This shift is called use-inspired research, focusing on solving real problems.
International Principles
European Union Principles
EU defines 7 key principles like:
● Human oversight
● Transparency
● Fairness
● Accountability
These principles guide developers in building ethical AI.
OECD Principles
These emphasize:
● Inclusive growth
● Sustainability
● Transparency
● International cooperation
These are widely accepted globally.
Role of International Organizations
HARSH VERMA 2
Human-Centered AI (BAI613)
Organizations like theUnited Nations (UN)promote AI for global good through initiatives like:
● Sustainable Development Goals
● AI for Good programs
However, they currently lack strong enforcement power.
Real-World Regulation Examples
Tesla Accident
A fatal accident showed that over-reliance on automation is dangerous.
Lesson: Human supervision is always necessary.
Medical AI (FDA)
The FDA regulates AI-based medical devices to ensure:
● Safety
● Effectiveness
This is important because mistakes can be life-threatening.
Aviation AI
AI in aircraft systems must be:
● Predictable
● Transparent
● Controlled
Even small errors can lead to disasters.
Key Challenges
Surveillance Capitalism
Companies collect user data and use AI to:
● Predict behavior
● Target ads
Raises serious privacy concerns.
Misinformation
HARSH VERMA 3
Human-Centered AI (BAI613)
AI helps spread:
● Fake news
● Hate speech
Governments may regulate platforms to protect society.
Regulatory Capture
ometimes companies influence regulators, leading to weak rules.
S
This reduces the effectiveness of governance.
2. Introduction: Driving HCAI Forward
Core Idea
AI should not only be powerful but also:
● Safe
● Reliable
● Human-friendly
HCAI ensures that technology aligns with human values.
Research Directions
HARSH VERMA 4
Human-Centered AI (BAI613)
Interdisciplinary Approach
HCAI combines:
● Technology
● Ethics
● Design
● Social sciences
This ensures AI works well in real-world environments.
HARSH VERMA 5
Human-Centered AI (BAI613)
Grand Challenges
Citizen Science
I helps ordinary people contribute to research (e.g., environmental monitoring).
A
This increases public participation and awareness.
Misinformation Control
I + human moderation is needed to detect and reduce fake content.
A
This is crucial for protecting democracy and society.
Healthcare Innovation
AI helps in:
● Drug discovery
● Disease prediction
xample: Protein folding (AlphaFold).
E
Improves medical research significantly.
Education and Industry
● Universities are adding AI ethics courses
● Companies use ethical AI as a competitive advantage
Trustworthy systems attract more users.
Key Insight
Best innovation happens when:
● Research + real-world problems combine
Practical impact improves both research and society.
3. Assessing Trustworthiness
Core Idea
Trustworthiness means an AI system deserves trust, not just appears trustworthy.
1. General Virtues of the System
HARSH VERMA 6
Human-Centered AI (BAI613)
Attribute Description / Meaning
Trustworthy Can users trust the system to perform correctly?
Responsible / Humane I s the system designed, developed, and tested
responsibly?
Ethical Design ere stakeholders involved during the design
W
process?
Ethical Data Was the data collected in a fair and ethical manner?
Ethical Use ill the system be used ethically in real-world
W
scenarios?
ell-being
W / oesthesystemsupporthumanhealth,comfort,and
D
Benevolence values?
Secure ow resistant is the system to cyber attacks or
H
misuse?
Private oes the system protect user identity and personal
D
data?
2. Performs Well in Practice
Attribute Description / Meaning
Robust / Agile oes the system perform well evenwhen
D
inputs change?
Reliable / Dependable oes the system consistently produce
D
correct results?
Available I s the system accessible and functioning
when needed?
Resilient / Adaptive an the system recover from failures or
C
disruptions?
estable
T / Verifiable / an the system be tested and validated
C
Validatable / Certifiable against requirements?
HARSH VERMA 7
Human-Centered AI (BAI613)
Safe oes the system have aprovenhistoryof
D
safe operation?
3. Clarity to Stakeholders
Attribute Description / Meaning
Accurate oesthesystemprovidecorrectresultsinboth
D
tests and real-world use?
Fair / Unbiased re biases
A identified, minimized, and
reported?
Accountable / Liable I s responsibility clearly assigned for system
outcomes?
Transparent an external observers understand how the
C
system works?
I nterpretable/Explainable/ an the system explain how it arrived at
C
Intelligible decisions?
Usable I s the system easyandefficientforhumansto
use?
4. Enables Independent Oversight
Attribute Description / Meaning
Auditable Can the system be reviewed after failures for analysis?
Trackable oesthesystemshowcurrentstatusandnextactionsforhuman
D
intervention?
Traceable Can outcomes be traced back to their root cause?
Redressable I s there a mechanism for users to report harm and seek
compensation?
Insurable Can insurance be provided based on system reliability?
Recorded Does the system maintain logs for future analysis?
Open Are code and data accessible for review and transparency?
HARSH VERMA 8
Human-Centered AI (BAI613)
Certifiable Can the system be officially approved for use?
5. Complies with Accepted Practices
Attribute Description / Meaning
Compliant with Standards oes the system follow recognized
D
standards (e.g., IEEE guidelines)?
ompliant with Software
C asthesystemdevelopedusingproperand
W
Engineering Workflows trusted engineering processes?
Table 1: Attributes of HCAI Systems (Organized into Five Categories)
Step C
omponen Description
t
1 Definitions A
gree on a clear and limited set of terms (e.g., fairness, transparency,
reliability)thatcanbeassessed.Thesedefinitionsshouldbepreciseand
may use scoring methods for evaluation.
2 Methods ecidehowtrustworthinesswillbeassessedusingmultipleapproaches:
D
• Static analysis of code and training data • Benchmark testing
performance•Real-worldsystemperformance•Stakeholderperceptions
(subjective evaluation) • Reviews by internal/external experts
3 Assessors ecide who will evaluate the system and how many evaluators are
D
needed.Possibleassessorsinclude:•Systemdevelopers(mayhavebias)
•Independentdeveloperswithsimilarexpertise•Projectmanagersusing
the system • End users affected by the system • Independent oversight
experts
4 Audience I dentify who will use or benefit from the assessment results: •
Developers (to improve the system) • Other developers (to learn from
findings) • Managers (to refine usage strategies) • Users or affected
stakeholders (for awareness and trust)
Table 2: HCAI Trustworthiness Assessment Process
Trust vs Trustworthiness
● Trust → User belief
HARSH VERMA 9
Human-Centered AI (BAI613)
● Trustworthiness → System reliability
A system may look trustworthy but fail in reality.
Sl. No. Evaluation Criteria
1 Openly available, thorough report
2 Report contains positive results
3 Internal independent review before implementation
4 Audit trail implemented
5 Training data collected and properly assessed (e.g., datasheets)
6 Software verified and validated
7 Fairness testing conducted
8 Explainability implemented and tested
9 Performance evaluated in first two months of usage
10 Performance evaluated in first six months of usage
11 Stakeholder involvement (feedback, incident reporting, suggestions)
12 Internal review process with redress mechanisms
13 Continuous reviews for system improvement
14 External review by independent oversight body
Table 3: Proposed HCAI Trustworthiness Scale
Important Attributes
System Quality
AI should be:
● Safe
● Reliable
● Secure
Performance
1
HARSH VERMA
0
Human-Centered AI (BAI613)
System must:
● Work correctly
● Adapt to changes
Transparency
Users should understand:
● How decisions are made
Oversight
System should allow:
● Auditing
● Tracking
● Accountability
Compliance
System must follow:
● Standards
● Regulations
Evaluation Methods
Objective Measurement
Difficult because ethics cannot be measured like numbers.
Scoring by Components
Similar to rating systems:
● Divide into factors
● Assign scores
Helps compare systems.
1
HARSH VERMA
1
Human-Centered AI (BAI613)
Social Processes
Includes:
● Expert reviews
● Committees
● Audits
Important for critical systems.
Trustworthiness Scale
Evaluation includes:
● Data quality
● Fairness
● Explainability
● Real-world performance
Score helps judge system reliability.
1
HARSH VERMA
2
Human-Centered AI (BAI613)
Challenge
AI systems:
● Change over time
● Depend on data
So trustworthiness is not fixed it evolves.
4. Caring for and Learning from Older Adults
Importance
Older adults:
● Need support
● Also provide knowledge and experience
AI should support both roles.
HCAI Approach
Instead of focusing on technology, focus on:
● User needs
● Real-life problems
Needs of Older Adults
Includes:
● Mobility
● Healthcare
● Communication
● Safety
● Daily tasks
Needs vary widely among individuals.
Older Adult Needs Example Tasks with Devices that Serve Needs
1
HARSH VERMA
3
Human-Centered AI (BAI613)
Mobility secanes,walkers,poweredwheelchairs,publictransportation,
U
car driving, taxi services
ood
F Preparation, U
se simple/safe preparation tools,cookingappliances,clearing
Cooking, and Cleaning tables, cleaning dishes
Personal Care ash, bathe, care for teeth, mouth, and skin, brush hair,
W
dress/undress, manage personal appearance
Medical Care nsure medication adherence; use medical devices likeinsulin
E
pumps, pacemakers, prosthetics; attend telehealth appointments
Medical Monitoring se and recorddatafromweightscale,thermometer,oximeter,
U
bloodpressuremonitor,heartratemonitor,insulintesting,ECG,
EEG
ellness and Emotional T
W racknutrition,sleep,exercise,yoga,mood,socialinteractions,
Support cognitive and physical health
Shopping rderfood,medicines,clothes,andotheressentials;receiveand
O
store deliveries
Finances rack income and expenses, prepare taxes, pay bills, manage
T
financial assets
I nformation and A
ccessonlineinformationonmedical,legal,financialservices,
Education and learning platforms
News and Entertainment ccessnews,sports,music,movies,hobbies,games,books,and
A
photos
ommunication
C and U
se email,messaging,videocalls,socialmedia,calendars,and
Human Connection digital communication tools
Security se intrusion detection systems, monitoring devices, fire
U
alarms; request help in emergencies
House Cleaning se vacuum cleaners, mops, dusting tools, bathroom cleaning
U
devices, garbage disposal systems
House Maintenance aintain appliances, furniture, plumbing, electrical systems,
M
heating, ventilation, and air conditioning
1
HARSH VERMA
4
Human-Centered AI (BAI613)
Gardening and Pet Care ater plants, gardening, maintaining outdoor spaces, pet care,
W
dog walking
Mentoring uide younger people, tutor students, deliver lectures, mentor
G
professionals
Contributing articipate in volunteering, community service, religious
P
activities, citizen science, writing memoirs
Creative Projects ngage in writing, music, crafts, painting, photography,
E
cooking, and family/community history projects
Table 4: Older Adult Needs and Supporting Tasks/Devices
Design Philosophy
Technology-Centered (Wrong Approach)
● Focus only on robots
Human-Centered (Correct Approach)
● Support independence
● Improve quality of life
Issues with Care Robots
● Lack emotional connection
● Reduce human interaction
Not always suitable as replacements.
Better Solutions
Smart Devices
● Medication reminders
● utomatic appliances
A
Help users stay independent.
Example 1: Smart Wheelchairs
● Combine human control + AI
● Provide navigation assistance
1
HARSH VERMA
5
Human-Centered AI (BAI613)
●
Example 2: Smart Dining Solutions
● uilt-in dishwasher tables
B
Reduce physical effort.
1
HARSH VERMA
6
Human-Centered AI (BAI613)
Example 3: AI Yoga Apps
● Personalized exercise
● Health tracking
Improves physical and mental well-being.
Social Integration
Human support is essential:
● Family
● Caregivers
● Community
AI should support, not replace humans.
1
HARSH VERMA
7