0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views17 pages

Module 5 Notes

The document discusses the importance of governance structures for Human-Centered AI (HCAI), emphasizing the need for government interventions and regulations to ensure safety, fairness, and ethical practices in AI development. It outlines various international principles and challenges in AI regulation, including the need for transparency and accountability. Additionally, it addresses the assessment of trustworthiness in AI systems, highlighting key attributes and evaluation methods to ensure that AI aligns with human values.

Uploaded by

DARK'S GAMING
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views17 pages

Module 5 Notes

The document discusses the importance of governance structures for Human-Centered AI (HCAI), emphasizing the need for government interventions and regulations to ensure safety, fairness, and ethical practices in AI development. It outlines various international principles and challenges in AI regulation, including the need for transparency and accountability. Additionally, it addresses the assessment of trustworthiness in AI systems, highlighting key attributes and evaluation methods to ensure that AI aligns with human values.

Uploaded by

DARK'S GAMING
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

​Human-Centered AI (BAI613)​

​MODULE 5​
​GOVERNANCE STRUCTURES - 2​
​ opics:​ ​Government​ ​Interventions​ ​and​ ​Regulations,​ ​Introduction:​ ​Driving​ ​HCAI​ ​Forward,​
T
​Assessing Trustworthiness, caring for and Learning from Older Adults​

​1. Government Interventions and Regulations​


​Introduction​
​ overnments​ ​across​ ​the​ ​world​​now​​recognize​​AI​​as​​a​​critical​​technology​​for​​economic​​growth,​
G
​national​ ​power,​ ​and​ ​societal​ ​development.​ ​Earlier,​ ​there​​was​​resistance​​to​​regulation​​because​​it​
​might​​slow​​innovation,​​but​​now​​it​​is​​understood​​that​​without​​regulation,​​AI​​can​​cause​​harm,​​bias,​
​and misuse. Hence, controlled intervention is necessary.​
​Global AI Leadership and Policies​
​Different countries are shaping AI in different ways:​
​●​ ​ hina​ ​focuses​ ​on​ ​rapid​ ​development​ ​with​ ​strong​ ​government​ ​support​ ​and​ ​large-scale​
C
​data collection.​
​●​ ​ nited​ ​States​ ​emphasizes​ ​innovation​ ​through​ ​private​ ​companies​ ​and​ ​research​
U
​institutions.​
​●​ ​European Union​​focuses on strict privacy laws and​​ethical AI practices.​
​This shows that AI governance depends heavily on cultural values and political systems.​
​Need for Regulation​
​AI systems are different from traditional software because they are:​
​●​ ​Adaptive (learn from data)​
​●​ ​Autonomous (make decisions)​
​●​ ​Intelligent (simulate human thinking)​
​ ecause​​of​​these​​characteristics,​​existing​​laws​​are​​not​​sufficient,​​and​​new​​regulatory​​frameworks​
B
​are required to ensure safety and fairness.​
​Human-Centered AI in Policies​
​Modern policies emphasize​​Human-Centered AI (HCAI)​​,​​meaning:​

​HARSH VERMA​ ​1​


​Human-Centered AI (BAI613)​

​●​ ​Humans must remain in control​


​●​ ​AI decisions should be explainable​
​●​ ​Systems should be fair and unbiased​
​The goal is to build trustworthy AI systems that benefit society.​
​Government Role in Research​
​ overnments influence AI through funding programs.​
G
​For example, research initiatives now require:​
​●​ ​Real-world impact (not just theory)​
​●​ ​Collaboration with industry and society​
​This shift is called use-inspired research, focusing on solving real problems.​
​International Principles​
​European Union Principles​
​EU defines 7 key principles like:​
​●​ ​Human oversight​
​●​ ​Transparency​
​●​ ​Fairness​
​●​ ​Accountability​
​These principles guide developers in building ethical AI.​
​OECD Principles​
​These emphasize:​
​●​ ​Inclusive growth​
​●​ ​Sustainability​
​●​ ​Transparency​
​●​ ​International cooperation​
​These are widely accepted globally.​
​Role of International Organizations​

​HARSH VERMA​ ​2​


​Human-Centered AI (BAI613)​

​Organizations like the​​United Nations (UN)​​promote AI for global good through initiatives like:​
​●​ ​Sustainable Development Goals​
​●​ ​AI for Good programs​
​However, they currently lack strong enforcement power.​
​Real-World Regulation Examples​
​Tesla Accident​
​A fatal accident showed that over-reliance on automation is dangerous.​
​Lesson: Human supervision is always necessary.​
​Medical AI (FDA)​
​The FDA regulates AI-based medical devices to ensure:​
​●​ ​Safety​
​●​ ​Effectiveness​
​This is important because mistakes can be life-threatening.​
​Aviation AI​
​AI in aircraft systems must be:​
​●​ ​Predictable​
​●​ ​Transparent​
​●​ ​Controlled​
​Even small errors can lead to disasters.​
​Key Challenges​
​Surveillance Capitalism​
​Companies collect user data and use AI to:​
​●​ ​Predict behavior​
​●​ ​Target ads​
​Raises serious privacy concerns.​
​Misinformation​

​HARSH VERMA​ ​3​


​Human-Centered AI (BAI613)​

​AI helps spread:​


​●​ ​Fake news​
​●​ ​Hate speech​
​Governments may regulate platforms to protect society.​
​Regulatory Capture​
​ ometimes companies influence regulators, leading to weak rules.​
S
​This reduces the effectiveness of governance.​

​2. Introduction: Driving HCAI Forward​


​Core Idea​
​AI should not only be powerful but also:​
​●​ ​Safe​
​●​ ​Reliable​
​●​ ​Human-friendly​
​HCAI ensures that technology aligns with human values.​
​Research Directions​

​HARSH VERMA​ ​4​


​Human-Centered AI (BAI613)​

​Interdisciplinary Approach​
​HCAI combines:​
​●​ ​Technology​
​●​ ​Ethics​
​●​ ​Design​
​●​ ​Social sciences​
​This ensures AI works well in real-world environments.​

​HARSH VERMA​ ​5​


​Human-Centered AI (BAI613)​

​Grand Challenges​
​Citizen Science​
​ I helps ordinary people contribute to research (e.g., environmental monitoring).​
A
​This increases public participation and awareness.​
​Misinformation Control​
​ I + human moderation is needed to detect and reduce fake content.​
A
​This is crucial for protecting democracy and society.​
​Healthcare Innovation​
​AI helps in:​
​●​ ​Drug discovery​
​●​ ​Disease prediction​
​ xample: Protein folding (AlphaFold).​
E
​Improves medical research significantly.​
​Education and Industry​
​●​ ​Universities are adding AI ethics courses​
​●​ ​Companies use ethical AI as a competitive advantage​
​Trustworthy systems attract more users.​
​Key Insight​
​Best innovation happens when:​
​●​ ​Research + real-world problems combine​
​Practical impact improves both research and society.​

​3. Assessing Trustworthiness​


​Core Idea​
​Trustworthiness means an AI system deserves trust, not just appears trustworthy.​
​1.​ ​General Virtues of the System​

​HARSH VERMA​ ​6​


​Human-Centered AI (BAI613)​

​Attribute​ ​Description / Meaning​

​Trustworthy​ ​Can users trust the system to perform correctly?​

​Responsible / Humane​ I​ s​ ​the​ ​system​ ​designed,​ ​developed,​ ​and​ ​tested​


​responsibly?​

​Ethical Design​ ​ ere​ ​stakeholders​ ​involved​ ​during​ ​the​ ​design​


W
​process?​

​Ethical Data​ ​Was the data collected in a fair and ethical manner?​

​Ethical Use​ ​ ill​ ​the​ ​system​ ​be​ ​used​ ​ethically​ ​in​ ​real-world​
W
​scenarios?​

​ ell-being​
W ​/​ ​ oes​​the​​system​​support​​human​​health,​​comfort,​​and​
D
​Benevolence​ ​values?​

​Secure​ ​ ow​ ​resistant​ ​is​ ​the​ ​system​ ​to​ ​cyber​ ​attacks​ ​or​
H
​misuse?​

​Private​ ​ oes​ ​the​ ​system​ ​protect​ ​user​ ​identity​ ​and​ ​personal​


D
​data?​

​2.​ ​Performs Well in Practice​

​Attribute​ ​Description / Meaning​

​Robust / Agile​ ​ oes​ ​the​ ​system​ ​perform​ ​well​ ​even​​when​


D
​inputs change?​

​Reliable / Dependable​ ​ oes​ ​the​ ​system​ ​consistently​ ​produce​


D
​correct results?​

​Available​ I​ s​ ​the​ ​system​ ​accessible​ ​and​ ​functioning​


​when needed?​

​Resilient / Adaptive​ ​ an​ ​the​ ​system​ ​recover​ ​from​ ​failures​ ​or​


C
​disruptions?​

​ estable​
T ​/​ ​Verifiable​ ​/​ ​ an​ ​the​ ​system​ ​be​ ​tested​ ​and​ ​validated​
C
​Validatable / Certifiable​ ​against requirements?​

​HARSH VERMA​ ​7​


​Human-Centered AI (BAI613)​

​Safe​ ​ oes​ ​the​ ​system​ ​have​ ​a​​proven​​history​​of​


D
​safe operation?​

​3.​ ​Clarity to Stakeholders​

​Attribute​ ​Description / Meaning​

​Accurate​ ​ oes​​the​​system​​provide​​correct​​results​​in​​both​
D
​tests and real-world use?​

​Fair / Unbiased​ ​ re​ ​biases​


A ​identified,​ ​minimized,​ ​and​
​reported?​

​Accountable / Liable​ I​ s​ ​responsibility​ ​clearly​ ​assigned​ ​for​ ​system​


​outcomes?​

​Transparent​ ​ an​ ​external​ ​observers​ ​understand​ ​how​ ​the​


C
​system works?​

I​ nterpretable​​/​​Explainable​​/​ ​ an​ ​the​ ​system​ ​explain​ ​how​ ​it​ ​arrived​ ​at​


C
​Intelligible​ ​decisions?​

​Usable​ I​ s​ ​the​ ​system​ ​easy​​and​​efficient​​for​​humans​​to​


​use?​

​4. Enables Independent Oversight​

​Attribute​ ​Description / Meaning​

​Auditable​ ​Can the system be reviewed after failures for analysis?​

​Trackable​ ​ oes​​the​​system​​show​​current​​status​​and​​next​​actions​​for​​human​
D
​intervention?​

​Traceable​ ​Can outcomes be traced back to their root cause?​

​Redressable​ I​ s​ ​there​ ​a​ ​mechanism​ ​for​ ​users​ ​to​ ​report​ ​harm​ ​and​ ​seek​
​compensation?​

​Insurable​ ​Can insurance be provided based on system reliability?​

​Recorded​ ​Does the system maintain logs for future analysis?​

​Open​ ​Are code and data accessible for review and transparency?​

​HARSH VERMA​ ​8​


​Human-Centered AI (BAI613)​

​Certifiable​ ​Can the system be officially approved for use?​

​5.​ ​Complies with Accepted Practices​

​Attribute​ ​Description / Meaning​

​Compliant with Standards​ ​ oes​ ​the​ ​system​ ​follow​ ​recognized​


D
​standards (e.g., IEEE guidelines)?​

​ ompliant​ ​with​ ​Software​


C ​ as​​the​​system​​developed​​using​​proper​​and​
W
​Engineering Workflows​ ​trusted engineering processes?​

​Table 1: Attributes of HCAI Systems (Organized into Five Categories)​

​Step​ C
​ omponen​ ​Description​
​t​

​1​ ​Definitions​ A
​ gree​ ​on​ ​a​ ​clear​ ​and​ ​limited​ ​set​ ​of​ ​terms​ ​(e.g.,​ ​fairness,​ ​transparency,​
​reliability)​​that​​can​​be​​assessed.​​These​​definitions​​should​​be​​precise​​and​
​may use scoring methods for evaluation.​

​2​ ​Methods​ ​ ecide​​how​​trustworthiness​​will​​be​​assessed​​using​​multiple​​approaches:​


D
​•​ ​Static​ ​analysis​ ​of​ ​code​ ​and​ ​training​ ​data​ ​•​ ​Benchmark​ ​testing​
​performance​​•​​Real-world​​system​​performance​​•​​Stakeholder​​perceptions​
​(subjective evaluation) • Reviews by internal/external experts​

​3​ ​Assessors​ ​ ecide​ ​who​ ​will​ ​evaluate​ ​the​ ​system​ ​and​ ​how​ ​many​ ​evaluators​ ​are​
D
​needed.​​Possible​​assessors​​include:​​•​​System​​developers​​(may​​have​​bias)​
​•​​Independent​​developers​​with​​similar​​expertise​​•​​Project​​managers​​using​
​the​ ​system​ ​•​ ​End​ ​users​ ​affected​ ​by​ ​the​ ​system​ ​•​ ​Independent​ ​oversight​
​experts​

​4​ ​Audience​ I​ dentify​ ​who​ ​will​ ​use​ ​or​ ​benefit​ ​from​ ​the​ ​assessment​ ​results:​ ​•​
​Developers​ ​(to​ ​improve​ ​the​ ​system)​ ​•​ ​Other​ ​developers​ ​(to​ ​learn​ ​from​
​findings)​ ​•​ ​Managers​ ​(to​ ​refine​ ​usage​ ​strategies)​ ​•​ ​Users​ ​or​ ​affected​
​stakeholders (for awareness and trust)​

​Table 2: HCAI Trustworthiness Assessment Process​


​Trust vs Trustworthiness​
​●​ ​Trust → User belief​

​HARSH VERMA​ ​9​


​Human-Centered AI (BAI613)​

​●​ ​Trustworthiness → System reliability​


​A system may look trustworthy but fail in reality.​

​Sl. No.​ ​Evaluation Criteria​

​1​ ​Openly available, thorough report​

​2​ ​Report contains positive results​

​3​ ​Internal independent review before implementation​

​4​ ​Audit trail implemented​

​5​ ​Training data collected and properly assessed (e.g., datasheets)​

​6​ ​Software verified and validated​

​7​ ​Fairness testing conducted​

​8​ ​Explainability implemented and tested​

​9​ ​Performance evaluated in first two months of usage​

​10​ ​Performance evaluated in first six months of usage​

​11​ ​Stakeholder involvement (feedback, incident reporting, suggestions)​

​12​ ​Internal review process with redress mechanisms​

​13​ ​Continuous reviews for system improvement​

​14​ ​External review by independent oversight body​

​Table 3: Proposed HCAI Trustworthiness Scale​


​Important Attributes​
​System Quality​
​AI should be:​
​●​ ​Safe​
​●​ ​Reliable​
​●​ ​Secure​
​Performance​

​​
1
​HARSH VERMA​
​0​
​Human-Centered AI (BAI613)​

​System must:​
​●​ ​Work correctly​
​●​ ​Adapt to changes​
​Transparency​
​Users should understand:​
​●​ ​How decisions are made​
​Oversight​
​System should allow:​
​●​ ​Auditing​
​●​ ​Tracking​
​●​ ​Accountability​
​Compliance​
​System must follow:​
​●​ ​Standards​
​●​ ​Regulations​
​Evaluation Methods​
​Objective Measurement​
​Difficult because ethics cannot be measured like numbers.​
​Scoring by Components​
​Similar to rating systems:​
​●​ ​Divide into factors​
​●​ ​Assign scores​
​Helps compare systems.​

​​
1
​HARSH VERMA​
​1​
​Human-Centered AI (BAI613)​

​Social Processes​
​Includes:​
​●​ ​Expert reviews​
​●​ ​Committees​
​●​ ​Audits​
​Important for critical systems.​
​Trustworthiness Scale​
​Evaluation includes:​
​●​ ​Data quality​
​●​ ​Fairness​
​●​ ​Explainability​
​●​ ​Real-world performance​
​Score helps judge system reliability.​

​​
1
​HARSH VERMA​
​2​
​Human-Centered AI (BAI613)​

​Challenge​
​AI systems:​
​●​ ​Change over time​
​●​ ​Depend on data​
​So trustworthiness is not fixed it evolves.​

​4. Caring for and Learning from Older Adults​


​Importance​
​Older adults:​
​●​ ​Need support​
​●​ ​Also provide knowledge and experience​
​AI should support both roles.​
​HCAI Approach​
​Instead of focusing on technology, focus on:​
​●​ ​User needs​
​●​ ​Real-life problems​
​Needs of Older Adults​
​Includes:​
​●​ ​Mobility​
​●​ ​Healthcare​
​●​ ​Communication​
​●​ ​Safety​
​●​ ​Daily tasks​
​Needs vary widely among individuals.​

​Older Adult Needs​ ​Example Tasks with Devices that Serve Needs​

​​
1
​HARSH VERMA​
​3​
​Human-Centered AI (BAI613)​

​Mobility​ ​ se​​canes,​​walkers,​​powered​​wheelchairs,​​public​​transportation,​
U
​car driving, taxi services​

​ ood​
F ​Preparation,​ U
​ se​ ​simple/safe​ ​preparation​ ​tools,​​cooking​​appliances,​​clearing​
​Cooking, and Cleaning​ ​tables, cleaning dishes​

​Personal Care​ ​ ash,​ ​bathe,​ ​care​ ​for​ ​teeth,​ ​mouth,​ ​and​ ​skin,​ ​brush​ ​hair,​
W
​dress/undress, manage personal appearance​

​Medical Care​ ​ nsure​ ​medication​ ​adherence;​ ​use​ ​medical​ ​devices​ ​like​​insulin​


E
​pumps, pacemakers, prosthetics; attend telehealth appointments​

​Medical Monitoring​ ​ se​ ​and​ ​record​​data​​from​​weight​​scale,​​thermometer,​​oximeter,​


U
​blood​​pressure​​monitor,​​heart​​rate​​monitor,​​insulin​​testing,​​ECG,​
​EEG​

​ ellness​ ​and​ ​Emotional​ T


W ​ rack​​nutrition,​​sleep,​​exercise,​​yoga,​​mood,​​social​​interactions,​
​Support​ ​cognitive and physical health​

​Shopping​ ​ rder​​food,​​medicines,​​clothes,​​and​​other​​essentials;​​receive​​and​
O
​store deliveries​

​Finances​ ​ rack​ ​income​ ​and​ ​expenses,​ ​prepare​ ​taxes,​ ​pay​ ​bills,​ ​manage​
T
​financial assets​

I​ nformation​ ​and​ A
​ ccess​​online​​information​​on​​medical,​​legal,​​financial​​services,​
​Education​ ​and learning platforms​

​News and Entertainment​ ​ ccess​​news,​​sports,​​music,​​movies,​​hobbies,​​games,​​books,​​and​


A
​photos​

​ ommunication​
C ​and​ U
​ se​ ​email,​​messaging,​​video​​calls,​​social​​media,​​calendars,​​and​
​Human Connection​ ​digital communication tools​

​Security​ ​ se​ ​intrusion​ ​detection​ ​systems,​ ​monitoring​ ​devices,​ ​fire​


U
​alarms; request help in emergencies​

​House Cleaning​ ​ se​ ​vacuum​ ​cleaners,​ ​mops,​ ​dusting​ ​tools,​ ​bathroom​ ​cleaning​
U
​devices, garbage disposal systems​

​House Maintenance​ ​ aintain​ ​appliances,​ ​furniture,​ ​plumbing,​ ​electrical​ ​systems,​


M
​heating, ventilation, and air conditioning​

​​
1
​HARSH VERMA​
​4​
​Human-Centered AI (BAI613)​

​Gardening and Pet Care​ ​ ater​ ​plants,​ ​gardening,​ ​maintaining​ ​outdoor​ ​spaces,​ ​pet​ ​care,​
W
​dog walking​

​Mentoring​ ​ uide​ ​younger​ ​people,​ ​tutor​ ​students,​ ​deliver​ ​lectures,​ ​mentor​


G
​professionals​

​Contributing​ ​ articipate​ ​in​ ​volunteering,​ ​community​ ​service,​ ​religious​


P
​activities, citizen science, writing memoirs​

​Creative Projects​ ​ ngage​ ​in​ ​writing,​ ​music,​ ​crafts,​ ​painting,​ ​photography,​


E
​cooking, and family/community history projects​

​Table 4: Older Adult Needs and Supporting Tasks/Devices​


​Design Philosophy​
​Technology-Centered (Wrong Approach)​
​●​ ​Focus only on robots​
​Human-Centered (Correct Approach)​
​●​ ​Support independence​
​●​ ​Improve quality of life​
​Issues with Care Robots​
​●​ ​Lack emotional connection​
​●​ ​Reduce human interaction​
​Not always suitable as replacements.​
​Better Solutions​
​Smart Devices​
​●​ ​Medication reminders​
​●​ ​ utomatic appliances​
A
​Help users stay independent.​
​Example 1: Smart Wheelchairs​
​●​ ​Combine human control + AI​
​●​ ​Provide navigation assistance​

​​
1
​HARSH VERMA​
​5​
​Human-Centered AI (BAI613)​

​●​

​Example 2: Smart Dining Solutions​


​●​ ​ uilt-in dishwasher tables​
B
​Reduce physical effort.​

​​
1
​HARSH VERMA​
​6​
​Human-Centered AI (BAI613)​

​Example 3: AI Yoga Apps​


​●​ ​Personalized exercise​
​●​ ​Health tracking​
​Improves physical and mental well-being.​
​Social Integration​
​Human support is essential:​
​●​ ​Family​
​●​ ​Caregivers​
​●​ ​Community​

​AI should support, not replace humans.​

​​
1
​HARSH VERMA​
​7​

You might also like