Evolution (Notes) 1
Evolution (Notes) 1
1. Theories of Evolution
Origin of Life (Contributions of Oparin, Haldane, Stanley Miller’s experiment).
Historical review of evolutionary concept: Lamarckism, Darwinism, Modern synthetic
theory.
Adaptive radiations: Patterns of evolution (Divergence, Convergence, Parallel evolution, Co-
evolution).
2. Population genetics
Microevolution and Macroevolution allele frequencies, genotype frequencies, Hardy-
Weinberg equilibrium
Forces of evolution: Mutation, Natural Selection (Introduction, Types-Stabilising selection,
Disruptive selection, Directional selection), Genetic drift (Introduction, types-Founder’s
effect, Bottle neck effect).
1 |Dr. Janhavi P
Evolution (also called organic evolution or biological evolution)
Diversification after life began.
Evolution is the slow change in living organisms over time, which can lead to new species.
Theory of Evolution
The theory of evolution explains diversification after life began.
It explains the diversity of life through gradual change over time driven by genetic variation and
natural processes.
Origin of Life
The origin of life means how the first living organisms appeared on Earth.
Origin of life means the process by which the first living organisms arose / formed from non-living
matter on the early Earth through chemical evolution.
The Earth
Our Earth lies at a distance of about 148.7 million km from the Sun. Its diameter is about 12,735 km
and mass is 6 × 10²¹ tonnes.
.
Conditions on Early Earth and reducing atmosphere
Early Earth (~4.6 billion years ago) had:
Very high temperature
No free oxygen (O₂) in the atmosphere
Atmosphere rich in: C (carbon), CH₄ (methane), NH₃ (ammonia), H₂ (hydrogen) and N
(Nitrogen)
o (The temperature was so high that all these compounds existed in gaseous state. Later
all of these gases formed water and water vapour. Such an atmosphere is called a
reducing atmosphere)
Strong energy sources:
UV radiation
lightning
volcanic heat
radioactive decay
These conditions favoured chemical reactions leading to formation of organic molecules.
2 |Dr. Janhavi P
According to parts of mythology, God Brahma created different forms of life from various parts of
his body.
Hence, this theory is purely a religious concept and not a scientific fact, so it is not accepted by
scientists.
Merit: Based on faith / religion
Demerit: Not scientific, no experimental proof
3) Biogenesis Theory
According to biogenesis, life can arise only from pre-existing life and not from nonliving matter.
This theory is supported by the following evidences.
1. Redi’s Experiment
The Italian physician Francesco Redi demonstrated that maggots could not be created from meat.
Redi placed lumps of boiled meat in jars.
Some jars were left uncovered.
Some were covered with fine gauze or muslin cloth.
Others were covered with parchment paper.
Observation:
Maggots appeared only in uncovered jars where flies could lay eggs.
No maggots appeared in covered jars.
Conclusion:
Maggots are formed only from eggs laid by flies, not from meat itself.
2. Spallanzani’s Experiment
Italian scientist Lazzaro Spallanzani poured hay infusion in bottles and corked some bottles while
others were left open.
After a few days, growth of microorganisms was found in the open bottles.
No organisms were found in the airtight corked bottles.
He argued that air contains microorganisms and growth occurs due to contamination, not
spontaneous generation.
3 |Dr. Janhavi P
3. Pasteur’s Experiment
Louis Pasteur prepared hay infusion in swan-necked flasks.
The curved neck allowed air to enter but prevented microorganisms from reaching the
infusion.
No microbes appeared even after 18 months.
When the neck was broken and infusion came in contact with air directly, microbes appeared.
Conclusion:
Life comes only from pre-existing life and not from nonliving matter.
Thus, Pasteur finally proved that the theory of spontaneous generation is false.
4 |Dr. Janhavi P
Life originated through a long sequence of chemical changes in the primitive Earth environment, not
suddenly or supernaturally.
3. Accumulation in Oceans
The organic molecules accumulated in oceans forming a rich mixture called:
Hot dilute soup / Primordial soup (Haldane’s term)
This acted as a “chemical reservoir” for further reactions.
Limitations / Criticism
Exact atmospheric composition of early Earth is debated
Does not fully explain:
origin of genetic code
formation of first self-replicating system (RNA world idea came later)
exact transition from protobiont to true cell
Significance:
Oparin’s work transformed the origin of life from a philosophical question into a testable scientific
hypothesis and laid the foundation for modern origin-of-life research.
Conclusion
The Oparin–Haldane theory states that life originated by chemical evolution, where primitive Earth
conditions allowed the formation of organic molecules that gradually assembled into protocells and
finally into first living cells.
So sequence:
RNA → DNA → Proteins
Merit: Strong scientific support
Demerit: Exact pathway still under research
Miller and Urey designed an experimental set-up to demonstrate that organic compounds can be
synthesised under conditions similar to the primitive earth atmosphere.
6 |Dr. Janhavi P
Experimental Set-up
Result
After a few days, the apparatus contained organic molecules such as:
Aspartic acid, Glutamic acid, Glycine, Alanine, Lactic acid, Acetic acid, Formic acid
This proved that organic molecules could be formed abiotically under primitive earth conditions.
7 |Dr. Janhavi P
Theories of evolution
Various theories regarding evolution have been postulated by different evolutionists. Most important
ones are:
3. Fixity of Species
Many early naturalists believed:
Species are permanent and do not change.
Variation was considered minor and temporary.
Example supporters:
Aristotle
Linnaeus (initially)
8 |Dr. Janhavi P
o gradual changes
Believed all life came from a common origin
Contribution: Early concept of common ancestry and struggle
9 |Dr. Janhavi P
1. Lamarckism (Theory of Inheritance of Acquired Characters)
The theory of inheritance of acquired characters was proposed by French biologist Jean Baptiste de
Lamarck in 1809. It was published in his book “Philosophie Zoologique” in the year 1809. It is
popularly known as Theory of Acquired Characters.
Definition:
According to the theory of inheritance of acquired characters, organic changes in the structure or
function of any organ acquired during the life-time of an individual in response to changes in the
surrounding environment are inherited by offspring and keep on adding over a period of time.
These changes lead to the origin of new species.
Postulates of Lamarckism
Lamarckism is based on four basic factors or postulates:
1. Growth.
Living organisms and their component parts tend to increase in size continuously.
2. New organs as the result of need.
Formation of a new organ or a part in the body is the result of the new need (or new want) which has
arisen and continues to be felt by the organism.
3. Use and disuse.
Development of an organ and its power of action is directly proportional to its use; continuous and
constant use strengthens the organ, while disuse results in degeneration.
4. Inheritance of acquired characters.
All changes, which organisms acquire during their life time, are transmitted to their offsprings by the
process of inheritance.
Lamarck’s theory thus states that organisms change, or evolve through time in ways that adapt them
to their local environment. Such changes occur when the environment alters the organism’s
phenotype. The information about this phenotypic change is passed from the somatic cells to the
reproductive cells of the body, and from there via gametes to the offspring.
2. Evolution of Snakes
According to Lamarck, the ancestors of snakes were limbed and lizard-like. They lived in thick
jungles. Out of fear of many enemies, they started creeping on the ground and living in narrow
10 |Dr. Janhavi P
crevices or burrows. For creeping, burrowing and living in narrow crevices, the legs which were of
no use but proved to be a hindrance in creeping and burrowing, gradually disappeared.
Criticism of Lamarckism
Objections against Lamarck’s Theory of Inheritance of Acquired Characters were:
1. The tendency to increase in size has been noted in many forms, but many times evolution shows
reduction in size.
For example:
In Angiosperms, the primitive plants had woody stems, but herbs evolved later.
Persons constantly busy in reading and writing and using their eyes more than others often
develop impaired sight.
2. The new organs develop where the organism feels their need is also not true.
Example: Birds desired to fly but could not develop wings.
3. Organisms do react to the environment and may undergo temporary changes in their organisation,
but these changes cannot be inherited by the offspring because no change will be produced in the
germplasm.
4. Experiments have disproved the law of inheritance of acquired characteristics.
For example,
if any of the parent becomes blind or deaf or lame before producing the offspring, the
offspring shall not be blind or lame.
mutilations and wounds of parents do not appear in the offspring.
piercing of ear lobes of women and circumcision of penis in Jews and Muslims are age old
customs, yet these effects do not appear in the offspring.
the muscles of a wrestler are not inherited by his children.
5. August Weismann (1904):
He cut off the tails of rats for about 80 generations, but tailless offspring were never born.
6. Pavlov:
A Russian physiologist, trained mice to come to food on hearing the bell. But such acquired
characters were not inherited.
11 |Dr. Janhavi P
2. DARWINISM
Darwinism / the theory of evolution proposed by Darwin is also called ‘Theory of Natural Selection’
as best adapted organisms were selected by nature to pass on their traits to the next generation.
Theory of Natural Selection was explained by Darwin in his book “The Origin of Species by Natural
Selection”.
12 |Dr. Janhavi P
Such selection was called natural selection by Darwin and as survival of the fittest by Herbert
Spencer. Natural selection indicates the automatic weeding out of the less perfect forms.
Darwin illustrated the survival of the fittest by natural selection by taking the example of Lamarck’s
giraffe. In a population of giraffes with somewhat variable neck lengths, those that could not reach
the leaves on tall trees did not get enough food to survive and reproduce. Giraffes with longer necks
got more food and left more offspring and thus the forms of giraffes with longer necks and legs
became abundant and the ones with shorter necks and legs gradually became extinct. The most
successful organisms are those which have several adaptations. Natural selection causes heritable
variations which would produce new species over the long period of geological time.
5. Origin of species.
In the course of long periods of time the best fitted and suitable individuals survived and became
adjusted to the nature. As environment is ever changing, further changes occur and thus new
adaptations appear in organisms. The later descendants after several generations become quite
distinct from their ancestors. In this way new species appear.
Origin of new species by natural selection as envisaged by Darwin can be summed up in the form of
the following Wallace’s chart.
Drawbacks of Darwinism
1. Theory of Pangenesis
Darwin failed to explain the mechanism of inheritance or mode of transmission of variations.
In 1868, Darwin proposed theory of pangenesis to explain this phenomenon.
According to this theory, every cell, organ or part of body produces minute hereditary
particles called pangens, which were carried by blood and deposited in the reproductive
organs. According to Germplasm theory, pangens were not carried by blood. These were
carried by germplasm. However, according to germplasm theory, germplasm gets
differentiated from somatoplasm early in embryonic development, ruling out inheritance of
somatic changes on germ cells.
2. Inheritance of Somatic Variations
Darwin held that small variations from the raw material for evolution. But occurrence of
somatic variations in those organs can be useful to the organism only when they are fully
developed and functional. At initial stage as a small variation, when they cannot be of any
13 |Dr. Janhavi P
advantage. For example, wing of bird in its initial stage as a small structure would have been
of no use to the organism. Such a structure was favoured by selection and inherited to
subsequent generations, with gradual improvement.
3. Existence of Vestigial Organs
According to natural selection, only useful organs are selected and favoured in the struggle
for existence. The existence of vestigial organs cannot be explained because these are of no
use to the possessor.
4. Overspecialisation
Overspecialisation of some organs in certain animals like antlers of deer and tusks of
elephants beyond the stage of usefulness rather causes hindrance in daily life cannot be
explained by natural selection. Also, Darwin had explained the survival of the fittest but did
not explain the arrival of the fittest. Darwin could not explain the mechanism of occurrence
of variations and their inheritance.
14 |Dr. Janhavi P
Neo-Darwinism (Modern Synthetic Theory of Evolution / Genetical theory of natural selection)
Neo-Darwinism, also called the Modern Synthetic Theory of Evolution, is the updated form of
Darwin’s theory of natural selection.
It combines the concept of natural selection proposed by Charles Darwin with the principles of
heredity discovered by Gregor Mendel.
Darwin explained that evolution occurs through natural selection, but he did not know the genetic
basis of variation. After 50-60 years the knowledge of genetics, chromosomes, and mutations
came which helped to explain how variations arise and are inherited.
The integration of Darwin’s theory with Mendelian genetics led to the development of Neo-
Darwinism during the early 20th century.
Several scientists contributed to the development of the Modern Synthetic Theory, including August
Weismann, J. B. S. Haldane, Sewall Wright, and Theodosius Dobzhansky.
DDT-Resistant Insects
When the insecticide DDT was widely used, most insects were killed. However, a few insects had
natural genetic mutations that made them resistant.
These resistant insects survived and reproduced, passing resistance genes to their offspring. Over
time, the population became predominantly DDT-resistant.
Examples include resistance seen in mosquitoes such as Anopheles gambiae.
Significance:
Demonstrates evolution through:
Mutation
Natural selection
15 |Dr. Janhavi P
Increase in resistant allele frequency
16 |Dr. Janhavi P
Adaptive Radiation
One ancestor → Different habitats / foods → Many new species.
It is an evolutionary process.-
Adaptive radiation is a type of evolution in which a single ancestral species rapidly diversifies into
multiple new species, each adapted to different ecological niches.
or
Adaptive radiation is when one ancestral species evolves into many different species, each adapted
to different habitats or food sources.
Occurs when new habitats or resources become available
Often follows migration, mass extinction, or environmental change
Produces many species with different structures and functions
The classic example of adaptive radiation is seen in Darwin’s finches of the Galapagos Islands.
The Galapagos Islands are located about 600 miles west of South America.
A small sparrow-like ancestral bird reached these islands long ago.
Because the islands had:
Different climates
Different vegetation
Different food sources
Very little competition
The birds spread to different islands and evolved into many species.
Today there are about 14–15 species of Darwin’s finches.
They are grouped into 4 genera:
Geospiza
Camarhynchus
Certhidea
Pinaroloxias
All evolved from one common ancestor.
17 |Dr. Janhavi P
Many distinct finch species evolved
Today, there are about 15+ species of Darwin’s finches, all descended from one ancestor.
Reason for formation of New Species
• Different islands → Geographic isolation
• Different foods → Different natural selection
• Over time → New species formed
18 |Dr. Janhavi P
Patterns of evolution
Patterns of evolution describe the recurring, observable ways species change over time, driven by
environmental pressures and genetic variation.
The primary patterns include:
divergent evolution
convergent evolution
parallel evolution and
coevolution
Divergent Evolution
One ancestor → Different environments → Different adaptations → New species.
Divergent evolution is the process in which a single common ancestral species gradually splits into
two or more new species that develop different characteristics. This usually happens when
populations of the same species become separated and adapt to different environmental conditions or
ecological niches. Over time, natural selection favors different traits in each group, leading to the
formation of distinct species.
Produces homologous organs (same origin, different function)
Shows structural similarity but functional difference
Caused by adaptation to different habitats
Example:
The evolution of modern humans and apes from a common ancestor. Both belong to the family
Hominidae but evolved different traits such as bipedalism in humans and arboreal adaptations in
many apes.
Another classic example is Darwin’s finches in the Galápagos Islands, where different species
evolved different beak shapes based on their feeding habits.
Importance: Evidence for common ancestry.
Convergent Evolution
Different ancestors → Same environment → Similar adaptations.
Convergent evolution is the process in which unrelated species independently develop similar
traits because they adapt to similar environments or ecological niches. Even though these species
do not share a recent common ancestor, natural selection leads them to evolve similar features.
Produces analogous organs (different origin, same function)
Similar adaptations due to similar selective pressures
Examples:
Wings of birds and insects
Streamlined body in sharks (fish) and dolphins (mammals)
Succulent stems in desert plants
Importance: Shows adaptation, not common ancestry.
Parallel Evolution
Related ancestors → Similar environments → Similar adaptations evolving separately.
Parallel evolution is the process in which different but closely related species independently
develop similar traits after diverging from a relatively recent common ancestor. These species
evolve in similar environments, so natural selection favors similar adaptations in each lineage.
Occurs in related species
Traits evolve independently but in a similar direction
Common ancestor already had similar basic features
Examples:
19 |Dr. Janhavi P
• Placental mammals and marsupial mammals developing similar body forms (e.g., wolf-like forms
evolving separately in different lineages).
• Similar adaptations in related primate species living in comparable habitats.
• Repeated evolution of similar traits in cichlid fishes in African lakes such as Lake Victoria and
Lake Malawi.
Coevolution
Species A changes → Species B adapts → Species A adapts again → Continuous cycle of evolution.
Coevolution is the process in which two or more species evolve together because they reciprocally
influence each other’s evolution. Changes in one species create selective pressure on the other,
leading to evolutionary adaptations in both.
Involves close ecological interactions
Can occur in mutualism, predation, parasitism, or competition
Leads to specialized adaptations in interacting species
Types
Mutualistic coevolution
Mutualistic coevolution occurs when two animal species (or an animal and another organism) evolve
together in a way that both benefit from the interaction.
Example:
Ants protect aphids in a mutualistic relationship where they act as farmers, guarding the sap-sucking
insects from predators like ladybugs, lacewings, and parasitic wasps. In return, ants consume the
nutrient-rich, sugary "honeydew" that aphids secrete. Ants may also transport aphids to new,
healthier plant sites and shelter them.
Cleaner fish, such as wrasses and gobies, form mutualistic relationships with large marine fish by
removing parasites, dead skin, and infected tissue. These specialists operate "cleaning stations" on
reefs, where large predators, including groupers and moray eels, wait patiently to be cleaned. Cleaner
fish, obtain a reliable food source—specifically ectoparasites, dead skin, and infected tissue—from
the bodies, gills, and mouths of larger fish.
Predator–Prey Coevolution
Predator–prey coevolution is a type of coevolution where predators and their prey exert
reciprocal selective pressures on each other, leading to continuous adaptive changes in both. It is
often described as an evolutionary arms race.
How It Works (Arms Race Model)
Prey evolve better defense mechanisms
Predators evolve improved hunting strategies
Prey evolve further improvements.
Cycle continues.
Examples:
Speed in Cheetahs and Gazelles
• Faster gazelles escape predation.
• Faster cheetahs catch prey.
Camouflage and Detection
• Insects evolve cryptic coloration.
• Birds evolve sharper vision to detect prey.
Host–Parasite Coevolution
Host–parasite coevolution is a type of coevolution in which hosts evolve defenses against parasites,
while parasites evolve strategies to overcome those defenses. This results in a continuous
evolutionary arms race between the two.
Host evolves resistance
20 |Dr. Janhavi P
Parasite evolves better infectivity
Reciprocal adaptation over generations
How It Works
Parasite infects host.
Host evolves immune resistance or behavioral defense.
Parasite evolves new virulence mechanisms.
Cycle continues.
This dynamic is often explained by the Red Queen Hypothesis — species must continuously evolve
just to maintain their fitness.
Example:
Brood Parasitism in Birds
Parasitic birds lay eggs in host nests.
Hosts evolve egg recognition ability.
Parasites evolve egg mimicry.
Rabbits and Myxoma Virus
The myxoma virus was introduced to control rabbit populations in Australia.
Rabbits evolved resistance.
Virus strains evolved different levels of virulence.
21 |Dr. Janhavi P
Microevolution vs Macroevolution
Evolution can be studied at two levels: microevolution (small-scale changes) and macroevolution
(large-scale changes).
Microevolution
Small changes in allele frequencies within a population over a short period of time.
Occurs due to:
Mutation
Natural selection
Genetic drift
Gene flow
Happens within a species.
Examples:
Industrial melanism in the peppered moth (Biston betularia)
DDT resistance in mosquitoes
Antibiotic resistance in bacteria
Key Point:
Microevolution does not create new species immediately but may eventually lead to speciation.
Macroevolution
Large-scale evolutionary changes that occur over long geological time, leading to the formation of
new species and higher taxonomic groups.
Includes:
Speciation
Adaptive radiation
Mass extinction
Evolution of major groups
Examples:
Evolution of birds from reptiles
Adaptive radiation of finches in the Galapagos Islands
Evolution of mammals after dinosaur extinction
Key Point:
Macroevolution is the accumulation of microevolutionary changes over long periods.
Allele Frequency
22 |Dr. Janhavi P
23 |Dr. Janhavi P
24 |Dr. Janhavi P
Genotype Frequency
25 |Dr. Janhavi P
26 |Dr. Janhavi P
Hardy–Weinberg Principle
Definition
The Hardy–Weinberg Principle states that allele frequencies and genotype frequencies remain
constant from generation to generation in a population if no evolutionary forces act on it.
It is also called:
Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium
Genetic Equilibrium
Statement of Principle
no mutation
no migration
no natural selection
no genetic drift
27 |Dr. Janhavi P
28 |Dr. Janhavi P
Conditions Required for Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium
1. Large Population
2. Random Mating
3. No Mutation
No change in genes.
5. No Natural Selection
29 |Dr. Janhavi P
30 |Dr. Janhavi P
Forces of Evolution
Definition
Forces of evolution are factors that cause changes in allele frequencies in a population over
generations. These forces disturb the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium and lead to evolution.
1. Mutation
Mutation is a sudden heritable change in genetic material (DNA).
Effects
Produces new alleles
Introduces genetic variation
Raw material for evolution
Types
1. Gene mutation
2. Chromosomal mutation
1. Gene mutation
Gene mutation is a sudden heritable change in the nucleotide sequence of a gene.
It alters the genetic information present in DNA.
Causes of Gene Mutation
1. Spontaneous Mutations
Occur naturally due to:
errors during DNA replication
natural chemical changes in DNA
2. Induced Mutations
Caused by mutagens such as:
radiation (X-rays, UV rays)
chemicals
viruses
31 |Dr. Janhavi P
Example:
GAA → GAG
Both code for glutamic acid.
b) Missense Mutation
One amino acid is replaced by another.
Protein function may change.
Example:
Sickle Cell Disease is caused by a missense mutation in hemoglobin.
c) Nonsense Mutation
Mutation changes a codon into a stop codon.
Protein synthesis stops prematurely.
2. Frameshift Mutation
Occurs when nucleotides are inserted or deleted in numbers not divisible by three, shifting the
reading frame.
Types
Insertion
Deletion
a. Insertion Mutation
Addition of one or more nucleotides into DNA sequence.
May cause frameshift if not multiple of 3.
b. Deletion Mutation
Removal of nucleotides from DNA sequence.
Can remove one amino acid or shift the reading frame.
Effects:
Alters all codons after mutation
Usually produces nonfunctional proteins
Associated diseases:
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
Tay–Sachs Disease
5. Duplication Mutation
A segment of DNA is repeated one or more times.
6. Inversion Mutation
A DNA segment breaks off, reverses, and reattaches.
Summary Table
Mutation Type Description Effect
Silent No amino acid change Usually harmless
Missense One amino acid changes Protein altered
Nonsense Stop codon formed Short protein
Frameshift Reading frame shifts Severe effect
32 |Dr. Janhavi P
Mutation Type Description Effect
Insertion Bases added May cause frameshift
Deletion Bases removed May cause frameshift
Duplication DNA repeated Abnormal protein
Inversion DNA segment reversed Gene disruption
Repeat Expansion Repeated sequences increase Neurological disorders
Chromosomal Mutation
Chromosomal mutation is a change in the structure or number of chromosomes.
It affects many genes at the same time and may produce major genetic changes.
A. Deletion
Loss of a chromosome segment.
Effect
Missing genes
Abnormal phenotype
Example
Cri-du-chat syndrome
B. Duplication
A chromosome segment is repeated.
33 |Dr. Janhavi P
Effect
Extra copies of genes
Increased gene dosage
C. Inversion
A chromosome segment breaks and reattaches in reverse order.
Types
Paracentric inversion
Pericentric inversion
Effect
Alters gene arrangement
D. Translocation
Transfer of chromosome segment to another chromosome.
Types
Reciprocal translocation
Non-reciprocal translocation
Example
Philadelphia chromosome in leukemia
A. Aneuploidy
Gain or loss of one or few chromosomes.
Types
Monosomy
2n – 1n = n
One chromosome missing.
Example:
Turner syndrome
Trisomy
2n + 1n = 3n
One extra chromosome.
Example:
Down syndrome (Trisomy 21)
B. Polyploidy
Increase in complete sets of chromosomes.
Types
Triploidy (3n)
Tetraploidy (4n)
Common in
Plants
Importance
Produces larger fruits and crops
34 |Dr. Janhavi P
Causes of Chromosomal Mutation
Radiation
Chemicals
Errors during meiosis
Nondisjunction of chromosomes
Nondisjunction
Failure of chromosomes to separate properly during meiosis.
Leads to:
aneuploidy
abnormal chromosome number
Effects
Introduces new alleles
Changes allele frequencies
Increases genetic variation
Example: Pollen transfer between plant populations
Birds migrating and breeding in new regions
Human migration between populations
3. Genetic Drift
Random change in allele frequencies due to chance events, especially in small populations.
Characteristics
More effective in small populations
May lead to loss of alleles
35 |Dr. Janhavi P
Types
a) Founder Effect
The founder effect is a type of Genetic Drift that occurs when a small group of individuals separates
from a large population and forms a new population.
Example: A few birds blown to an island establish a new population. Their genes determine the
genetic makeup of future generations.
Cheetah populations show very low genetic diversity due to past bottleneck events.
Importance
Contributes to evolution
Can lead to formation of new populations or species
Common in island populations
b) Bottleneck Effect
The bottleneck effect is a type of Genetic Drift in which a large population suddenly becomes very
small due to environmental or accidental events.
Population size drastically reduces due to disasters.
Importance
Alters allele frequencies by chance
Demonstrates evolution through random events
Important in conservation biology
Example: If a disease kills most members of a population, the surviving few individuals reproduce
and pass on only their genes to future generations.
Northern Elephant Seal populations experienced a bottleneck due to excessive hunting and now show
low genetic variation.
4. Natural Selection
Natural selection is the process by which organisms with favourable traits survive and reproduce
more successfully than others.
Proposed by: Charles Darwin
Effects
Increases adaptive traits
Eliminates unfavourable traits
Types of Natural Selection
a) Directional Selection
Directional selection is a type of Natural Selection in which one extreme phenotype is favoured over
other phenotypes.
Example: Industrial melanism in moths
b) Stabilizing Selection
Stabilizing selection is a type of Natural Selection in which the intermediate or average phenotype is
favoured, while extreme phenotypes are selected against.
Example: Average-weight babies have higher survival rates than very small or very large babies.
36 |Dr. Janhavi P
c) Disruptive Selection
Disruptive selection is a type of Natural Selection in which both extreme phenotypes (very small or
very large) are favoured, while the intermediate phenotype is selected against.
Examples:
Antibiotic resistance in bacteria
Pesticide resistance in insects
Long neck of Giraffe
5. Non-random Mating
Non-random mating occurs when individuals in a population do not mate by chance but choose
partners based on specific traits or relationships.
Effects
Changes genotype frequencies
Can increase homozygosity
Types of Non-random Mating
a) Assortative Mating
Individuals mate with others that are similar in appearance or traits.
Example: Tall individuals mating with tall individuals
b) Disassortative Mating
Individuals mate with partners that are genetically or physically different.
Example: Preference for genetically different mates
c) Inbreeding
Mating between closely related individuals.
Effects: Increases homozygosity and May expose harmful recessive genes
37 |Dr. Janhavi P