Scribd
Upload
4 views2 pages

Activity Homework (Chapter2)

The document critiques various leadership approaches, including the Great Man, Trait, Behavioral, Situational/Contingency, and Influence approaches, highlighting their limitations and the evolution of leadership theory from individual-centric models to context-based systems. The Situational/Contingency Approach is favored for its adaptability, while the Great Man Approach is criticized for being outdated and ignoring the learnability of leadership. Overall, the primary shift in leadership theories reflects a transition from focusing on individual traits to understanding the importance of context and relationships in leadership effectiveness.

Uploaded by

dauquang270308
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
4 views2 pages

Activity Homework (Chapter2)

The document critiques various leadership approaches, including the Great Man, Trait, Behavioral, Situational/Contingency, and Influence approaches, highlighting their limitations and the evolution of leadership theory from individual-centric models to context-based systems. The Situational/Contingency Approach is favored for its adaptability, while the Great Man Approach is criticized for being outdated and ignoring the learnability of leadership. Overall, the primary shift in leadership theories reflects a transition from focusing on individual traits to understanding the importance of context and relationships in leadership effectiveness.

Uploaded by

dauquang270308
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

1) Critique of Each Approach & Comparison with the Text

Great Man Approach The approach defines leadership as a quality that exists within
specific individuals who possess natural leadership abilities. The main critique of the
approach states that it fails to recognize how people acquire skills through their life
experiences and with their surrounding environment. The method does not provide access to
all participants.

The Great Man approach which the text describes presents a direct link to these two
elements because it operates through fixed destiny patterns that fail to match present times.
Trait Approach The approach defines leadership through the identification of essential
personality characteristics which successful leaders must possess. The method lacks essential
traits which every leader should possess because there exists no stable collection of
characteristics that guarantees successful leadership through all environments.
The text demonstrates similarity to the approach because it shows how the method lacks
dependable results which cannot demonstrate how leadership works in practice.

Behavioral Approach The approach links leadership development to the examination of


what leaders perform through their various activities. The framework definitely requires
proof because it needs to show which particular actions operate successfully in all situations.
The text critique matches this by highlighting that behavior alone cannot explain leadership
effectiveness without considering context.

Situational/Contingency Approach The approach states that which leadership approach


succeeds depends on the particular situation. Organizations find this method more effective
than its predecessor because it brings realistic value but its high operational demands become
operational challenges which organizations must handle.
The text supports this method yet points out its two main weaknesses which manifest through
its difficult implementation process and its lack of specific operational instructions.

Influence Approach The approach defines leadership as a process which enables leaders to
change others through building interactive relationships with their followers. The system
contains a limitation because it defines leadership through excessive broad terms which make
it impossible to define the precise boundaries of leadership.
The text similarly sees this as a modern perspective but notes that it can be vague and hard to
measure.

2) Preferred and Least Preferred Approach

The Situational/Contingency Approach shows real-world leadership because it


demonstrates how different situations require different leadership approaches. The system
provides both flexible and functional capabilities.
The Great Man Approach is the least appealing because it is outdated and ignores the
possibility that leadership can be learned and developed.

3) Primary Shift in Approaches Over Time


The main shift over time is from focusing on individual leaders to focusing on context,
relationships, and processes.
● Early approaches (Great Man, Trait) focus on who the leader is
● The behavioral approach studies how leaders execute their duties.
● The later approaches (Situational, Influence) examine leadership execution across
various situations and interaction scenarios.
Leadership theory first developed through static leader-based models but later transformed
into flexible context-based systems.

You might also like