MODULE – 7
Net-Zero
Net Zero: Concept and Targets
• Define "Net Zero"
• Net zero refers to achieving a balance between the amount of greenhouse gases
emitted and the amount removed from the atmosphere.
• Importance of Net Zero
• Addressing climate change
• Preserving ecosystems
• Ensuring a sustainable future for generations to come
Net Zero: Impact
• Impact of Climate Change
• Rising global temperatures
• Extreme weather events
• Sea level rise
• Role of Greenhouse Gas Emissions
• Carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O)
• Contribution to global warming and climate disruption
Benefits of Achieving Net Zero
• Mitigating Climate Change
• Limiting global temperature rise
• Protecting biodiversity and ecosystems
• Economic Opportunities
• Investment in renewable energy
• Job creation in green industries
• Health and Well-being
• Reduction in air pollution
• Improved public health outcomes
1
Page
Strategies for Achieving Net Zero
• Renewable Energy Transition
• Solar, wind, hydroelectric, geothermal
• Phasing out fossil fuels
• Energy Efficiency
• Improving building insulation
• Implementing energy-efficient technologies
• Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS)
• Capturing CO2 emissions from industrial processes
• Storing CO2 underground or utilizing it for other purposes
• Afforestation and Reforestation
• Planting trees to absorb CO2 from the atmosphere
• Restoring degraded ecosystems
Challenges and Considerations
• Technological Limitations
• Scaling up renewable energy infrastructure
• Developing cost-effective carbon capture technologies
• Economic Barriers
• Initial investment costs
• Transitioning from fossil fuel-dependent industries
• Policy and Regulatory Frameworks
• Establishing clear emissions reduction targets
• Implementing carbon pricing mechanisms
• International Cooperation
• Collaborating on climate action across borders
• Addressing disparities in global emissions
Addition Question
1. Vision for a Sustainable Future
2. Successful net zero initiatives
2
Page
MODULE – 6
Environmental And Social Governance (ESG)
Environmental and Social Governance (ESG) and Environmental, Social and
Governance (ESG)
"Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)" and "Environmental and Social Governance
(ESG represent slightly different focuses within the broader concept of sustainable and
responsible investing.
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG):
• This term typically refers to a framework used by investors to evaluate the sustainability and
ethical impact of an investment in a company or business.
• Governance: Aspects related to the structure and effectiveness of a company's leadership,
management practices, board composition, and transparency.
Environmental and Social Governance (ESG):
▪ This term focuses specifically on the environmental and social aspects of corporate
governance.
▪ it still includes the environmental and social dimensions; it may not explicitly highlight the
governance aspect as a separate component.
Concept of ESG
ESG represents the company’s efforts to systematically assess, manage, and monitor risks
of material potential impact to the strategic and financial decisions of the company.
The term ESG is often used as a synonym for sustainability, CSR, public relations, social
investment, or environmental compliance. While some of these elements may factor into an
ESG program, at the center of ESG is the management of risk and the preservation of
shareholder value.
Climate
Change
Shareho Environ
lder mental
Rights Impacts
ESG Risks
Board Health
Quality and
Safety
Comm
3
Page
unities
Environmental and Social Governance (ESG)
ESG is a set of criteria for evaluating an institution’s performance in environmental, social,
and governance areas.
ESG becomes more important in investing and business decision-making, as stakeholders are
becoming more interested in companies’ environmental impact.
ESG reporting frameworks include a range of ESG performance measurements, including
board diversity, greenhouse gas emissions, and DE&I.
ESG Framework to guide
• What ESG metrics you should track and report
• How to structure your ESG report
• How to think about your ESG strategy — processes, tools, people, etc.
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI)
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion are mutually reinforcing principles /values within an
organization
Diversity
• Presence of differences that may include race, gender, religion, sexual orientation, ethnicity,
nationality, socioeconomic status, language, (dis)ability, age, religious commitment, or
political perspective.
Equity
• Promoting justice, impartiality and fairness
• Ensures everyone has access to the same treatment, opportunities, and advancement
Inclusion
• Outcome to ensure those that are diverse actually feel and/or are welcomed
• Refers to how people with different identities feel as part of the larger group
Companies that are diverse, equitable, and inclusive are better able to respond to challenges,
win top talent, and meet the needs of different customer bases
Correlations between diversity and business performance: The greater the representation of
gender diversity, the higher the likelihood of outperformance.
Organizations have taken strides to build diversity, equity, and inclusion into their policies
and hiring practices.
Environmental and social governance (ESG) framework
• Environmental, social and governance (ESG) is a framework used to assess an organization's
business practices and performance on various sustainability and ethical issues.
• The three pillars of ESG are:
• Environmental – this has to do with an organization's impact on the planet.
• Social – this has to do with the impact an organization has on people, including staff and
customers and the community.
• Governance – this has to do with how an organization is governed. Is it governed
transparently?
•
•
4
Page
Key Components of ESG
• Corporate governance issues apply universally across all industries.
• Good governance of corporate, environmental, and social issues creates sustainable
companies
• Material environmental and social issues vary significantly by industry and may even be
company-specific, depending on the level of materiality of each factor.
Corporate Governance
• Board Quality
• Independence
• Skills and Qualifications
• Diversity
• Refreshment
• Board Leadership
• Management Incentives
• Pay-for-Performance Alignment
• Ownership Requirements
• Metrics and Goals
• Severance / CIC Payouts
• Claw-back Provisions
• Shareholder Rights
• Board Accountability to Shareholders
• Shareholders’ ability to act
• Voting Rights
• Environmental
• Climate Change
• Carbon Emissions
• 2-Degree Alignment
• Fossil Fuel Reserves
• Energy Efficiency
• Renewable Energy
• Resource Management
• Water Management
• Raw Materials
• Energy Sources
• Environmental Impact
• Air Quality
• Ecological impacts
• Critical Incidents (accidents)
• Waste Management
• Plastics
5
Page
• Social
• Workforce & Human Capital
• Inclusion and Diversity
• Supply Chain Labor
• Workplace Health and Safety
• Gender Pay Gap
• Value Chain (Suppliers and Customers)
• Product Health and Safety
• Data Privacy
• Data Security
• Predatory Sales / Pricing
• Society and Communities
• Community Relations
• Economic Impacts
• Human Rights
• Corruption
• Political Activities
Common ESG Matters
Environmental
• Climate change
• Ecological impacts, such as pollution, deforestation,
and loss of biodiversity
• Energy management, such as energy-efficient
buildings and production processes
• Greenhouse gas emissions
• Litigation risk, for example, related to environmental contamination
• Policies and regulations
• Raw material sourcing
• Renewable energy
• Sustainable products and packaging
• Water and waste management
Social
• Community relations
• Diversity, equity, and inclusion
• Employee health and safety
• Human capital development
• Labor management
• Privacy and data security
• Product quality and safety
• Supply-chain standards
6
Page
Governance
• Antibribery and anticorruption
• Business ethics
• Corporate resiliency
• Diversity of leadership
• Executive compensation
• Lobbying and political contributions
• Ownership structure
• Tax transparency
You can’t control what you don’t measure.
• ESG concerns are generally two-fold:
1. What are companies doing to ensure their own practices have a positive impact on
society and the environment?
2. What are they doing to manage business and financial risks related to those matters?
• Reporting these activities to developing strategies to tackling ESG issues
ESG Issues & Risk assessments
ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) issues have become increasingly important in
risk assessment for companies and investors
ESG risk assessments are a powerful tool to identify and manage the environmental, social
and governance impacts of your business activities.
To avoid potential reputational, regulatory and financial losses, but also create value for the
business and stakeholders
ESG Risk assessments
1. Environmental Risks: Companies face risks related to environmental factors such as climate
change, resource depletion, pollution, and waste management. Impact operations, supply
chains, regulatory compliance, and reputation.
2. Social Risks: Social factors include labor practices, human rights, diversity and inclusion,
community relations, and product safety. Social risks can arise from issues such as labor
disputes, human rights violations, discrimination, and negative community impacts.
3. Governance Risks: Governance encompasses factors such as corporate governance structure,
board diversity, executive compensation, transparency, and ethics. Governance risks can
include conflicts of interest, board mismanagement, regulatory compliance failures, and
corruption. It fosters ethical business practices.
Assessing ESG risks
1. Data Collection and Analysis: Companies and investors gather data on ESG performance
from various sources, including company reports, third-party ratings agencies, and specialized
ESG research firms. This data is analyzed to identify risks and opportunities associated with
ESG factors.
2. Integration into Risk Models: ESG factors are integrated into traditional risk assessment
models or may involve developing new risk metrics to incorporate ESG considerations.
7
Page
3. Scenario Analysis: Scenario analysis is used to assess how different ESG scenarios could
impact a company's financial performance and reputation. This helps to understand the
potential magnitude and likelihood of ESG-related risks.
4. Stakeholder Engagement: Engaging with stakeholders such as customers, employees,
investors, regulators, and communities helps companies identify and address ESG risks more
effectively. Stakeholder feedback can provide valuable insights into emerging issues and help
build trust and credibility.
5. Risk Mitigation Strategies: Once ESG risks are identified, companies can develop strategies
to mitigate these risks. This may involve implementing sustainable practices, improving
governance structures, enhancing transparency and disclosure, and addressing stakeholder
concerns.
ESG- Stakeholder expectations
Stakeholders have increasingly high expectations regarding a company's approach to ESG
Expectations Stem from societal trends, regulatory pressures, investor demands, and ethical
considerations.
Stakeholder wise Expectations: -
Investors: expect companies to disclose relevant ESG information transparently, demonstrate
robust ESG risk management practices
Customers: expect companies to adopt sustainable practices throughout their value chain,
minimize environmental footprint, ensure product safety and quality.
Employees: Seek purpose-driven workplaces that prioritize ESG considerations
Communities: Expect responsible behavior and positive contributions to local development
as they are affected by it’s operation.
Regulators and Governments: Expect companies to comply with relevant regulations,
disclose material ESG information accurately and in a timely manner, and demonstrate
commitment to ethical business practices.
Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and activists pressure companies to address
specific environmental or social concerns, adopt sustainable practices, and improve
transparency and accountability.
ESG and sustainability reporting
ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) reporting is a means for companies to
communicate their performance and impact in these areas to stakeholders, including investors,
customers, employees, and communities.
Sustainability reporting, often overlaps with ESG reporting, focuses on disclosing a
company's economic, environmental, and social impacts, as well as its governance structure,
in a transparent and standardized manner.
8
Page
Standard Frameworks: Various frameworks exist to guide ESG and sustainability reporting:
✓ The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI): an international independent standards organization
that helps businesses, governments, and other organizations understand and communicate
their impacts on issues such as climate change, human rights, and corruption.
✓ The Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB): is a non-profit organization, founded
in 2011 by Jean Rogers to develop sustainability accounting standards. Investors, lenders,
insurance underwriters, and other providers of financial capital are increasingly attuned to the
impact of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors on the financial performance
of companies.
✓ The Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD): provides information to
investors about what companies are doing to mitigate the risks of climate change, as well as
be transparent about the way in which they are governed.
These frameworks provide guidelines and indicators for reporting on specific ESG issues,
allowing for comparability across companies and industries.
Data Collection and Verification: Companies collect data on ESG performance through
various sources,
a. Internal systems,
b. Third-party audits,
c. Stakeholder engagement.
Data is often verified by independent auditors to ensure accuracy and reliability.
Materiality Assessment: Companies typically conduct a materiality assessment to identify
the most significant ESG issues for their business and stakeholders. This helps prioritize
which ESG metrics to report on and ensures that reporting is relevant and meaningful to
stakeholders.
Integration into Annual Reports: ESG and sustainability reporting are often integrated into
a company's annual report or published as standalone sustainability reports. These reports
provide detailed information on the company's ESG performance, initiatives, goals, and
progress over time.
Stakeholder Engagement: Companies engage with stakeholders throughout the reporting
process to gather feedback, address concerns, and ensure that reporting meets stakeholders'
information needs. This helps enhance transparency, credibility, and accountability.
Impact Measurement and Disclosure: In addition to reporting on activities and initiatives,
companies increasingly focus on measuring and disclosing the impact of their ESG efforts.
This includes quantifying environmental outcomes (e.g., carbon emissions reductions), social
benefits (e.g., community investments), and governance improvements (e.g., board diversity).
Continuous Improvement: ESG and sustainability reporting is an iterative process, with
companies continually refining their reporting practices based on evolving standards,
stakeholder expectations, and business priorities. This includes setting ambitious goals,
9
tracking performance against targets, and disclosing challenges and lessons learned.
Page
ESG Ratings and Scores
Provided by specialized ESG rating agencies, research firms, and data providers
How ESG ratings and scores work:
✓ Data Collection: ESG rating agencies collect data on companies' ESG performance from
various sources, including company disclosures, regulatory filings, news articles, NGOs,
industry reports, and proprietary research
✓ Criteria and Indicators: A set of criteria and indicators tailored to specific ESG issues and
industries.
These criteria may include environmental management, carbon emissions, labor
practices, human rights, board diversity, executive compensation, corporate governance,
product safety, and community relations.
✓ Scoring Methodology: ESG rating agencies use a scoring methodology to evaluate
companies' performance against each criterion and indicator.
Scores are often assigned on a numerical scale or in the form of letter grades, percentile
rankings, or scores relative to peers. Some agencies also provide sector-specific benchmarks
to account for industry differences.
✓ Weighting: ESG ratings agencies may assign weights to different criteria and indicators based
on their materiality and relevance to a company's business and stakeholders.
✓ Normalization and Comparability: ESG ratings agencies may normalize data to account for
differences in company size, geography, and industry.
✓ Transparency and Disclosure: ESG rating agencies typically provide transparency around
their methodologies, data sources, scoring criteria, and rating processes.
✓ Updates and Revisions: ESG ratings are often updated periodically to reflect changes in
companies' ESG performance, new data availability, and evolving rating methodologies.
✓ Limitations and Criticisms: ESG ratings are not without limitations and criticisms.
Challenges include data accuracy and reliability, lack of standardization and consistency
across rating agencies, subjectivity in scoring methodologies, and potential conflicts of
interest
10
Page