ASTM Core-Test Strength and ACI 562 Equivalent Concrete
Strength
1. ASTM-Based Core Testing Workflow
For existing reinforced concrete buildings, the determination of in-place
concrete compressive strength generally begins with an ASTM-based
investigation. Concrete cores are selected, extracted, prepared, and tested in
accordance with ASTM C42/C42M, while sampling guidance may be taken
from ASTM C823. The corrected core-test results are then statistically
evaluated to establish a representative in-place concrete strength for the
structure.
2. Use of Statistically Evaluated Core Strength
Where the testing program is representative, the number of cores is
adequate, variability is reasonably low, and the concrete condition is
relatively uniform, the statistically evaluated core strength may be directly
adopted in the structural numerical model. Under these conditions, the
ASTM-based strength is generally reliable for structural evaluation.
3. Limitations of Direct ASTM-Based Strength
The reliability of direct use of statistically evaluated core strength reduces
where the existing structure has significant uncertainty, including limited
core data, high variation in test results, deteriorated or aged concrete,
inaccessible structural regions, uncertain construction quality, localized
defects, or incomplete information about the existing structure.
Under such conditions, direct use of the ASTM-based strength may not
adequately represent the dependable in-place concrete strength.
4. ACI 562 Equivalent Concrete Strength
To address such uncertainty, ACI 562 introduces a reliability-adjusted
equivalent specified concrete strength, f ceq, for evaluation and rehabilitation
of existing concrete structures:
[ √ ]
2
( kc V )
f ceq =0.9 f́ c 1 −1.28 +0.0015
n
where:
f́ c =average corrected concrete core strength
V =coefficient of variation of corrected core strengthsn=number of core tests
k c =statistical factor related to number of tests
5. Role of NDT Data
The strength values used in the ACI 562 equation are based on corrected
concrete core-test results obtained from ASTM C42 testing, not directly from
NDT results. Rebound hammer, UPV, and other NDT methods may be used
for preliminary screening, identifying weak zones, assessing uniformity, and
improving investigation coverage.
However, NDT data should not be directly substituted into the f ceqequation
unless it has been properly calibrated and correlated with core-test results.
Even then, calibrated NDT remains supplementary, while core-test results
remain the primary strength basis.