Synthesis
Note:
This
document
should
only
be
used
as
a
reference
and
should
not
replace
assignment
guidelines.
A
synthesis
puts
two
or
more
arguments
into
conversation
with
each
other,
showing
where
they
overlap
and
where
they
diverge.
Some
syntheses
include
your
own
ideas
as
a
conclusion.
Preparation
Synthesis
Question
Most
syntheses
are
driven
by
a
synthesis
question,
similar
to
a
research
question.
The
question
should
be
open-‐ended
and
complex
enough
to
allow
for
a
variety
of
responses.
An
example
is,
“To
what
extent
should
the
U.S.
pursue
nuclear
power
as
an
energy
solution?”.
Your
research
question
may
change
slightly
as
you
gain
a
better
sense
of
the
academic
conversation
through
your
research.
Pre-‐writing
To
get
a
sense
of
your
topic,
identify
key
terms
in
your
synthesis
question
and
conduct
a
database
search,
skimming
a
variety
of
article
titles
and
abstracts,
before
you
select
your
final
sources.
You
may
need
to
adjust
or
narrow
your
focus
at
this
point.
An
example
of
an
adjusted
research
question
is,
“To
what
extent
should
the
U.S.
develop
nuclear
reprocessing
facilities
to
address
our
energy
needs?”.
Select
arguments
that
address
your
research
question
but
take
different
stances.
Read
and
annotate
them
thoroughly.
Think
about
how
the
authors
answer
the
synthesis
question
differently
and
what
evidence
they
provide
to
support
their
arguments.
Also
consider
what
one
author
would
say
in
response
to
the
other.
You
may
find
it
helpful
to
make
a
chart
like
the
following
to
organize
your
thoughts:
Source
Main
Key
Terms
Evidence
Possible
My
Connections
Argument
Counterarguments
Reaction
to
Other
Arguments
Organizing
the
Essay
Your
essay
will
probably
have
three
or
four
sections,
including
the
introduction,
analysis
section,
and
synthesis
section.
Some
syntheses
will
also
include
your
own
thoughts
as
a
conclusion.
Introduction
Your
introduction
introduces
the
topic,
question,
and
arguments
to
the
reader.
It
generally
includes
three
points:
• a
statement
of
the
research
question
or
problem,
stated
as
a
question
or
a
description
• short
introductions
to
the
articles
(titles,
authors,
brief
arguments)
• a
thesis
that
answers
the
research
question
as
the
authors
answer
it
UVU
Writing
Center
•
Library
208
•
ph:
801-‐863-‐8936
•
Updated
Feb.
2016
Web:
[Link]/writingcenter
•
Facebook:
UVUWritingCenter
•
Twitter:
@uvuwritingctr
Synthesis
Note:
This
document
should
only
be
used
as
a
reference
and
should
not
replace
assignment
guidelines.
Analysis
section
Your
analysis
section
breaks
down
the
arguments
to
show
the
reader
their
different
pieces.
It
lays
the
foundation
for
the
synthesis
section,
so
you
will
want
to
focus
on
the
main
ideas
that
you
plan
to
return
to
later.
This
section
shows
“difference
within
similarity”—the
authors
address
the
same
topic
but
present
different
stances.
• Write
in-‐depth
summaries
of
each
of
the
articles,
showing
how
their
arguments
and
attitudes
toward
the
question
differ.
• Analyze
the
arguments
by
using
rhetorical
analysis
and/or
ideas
critique,
depending
on
your
focus.
• Focus
on
points
you
want
to
later
contrast
in
the
synthesis
section.
Synthesis
section
Your
synthesis
section
puts
the
arguments
back
together
in
a
new
way.
To
write
your
synthesis
section,
you
will
need
to
find
a
point
of
commonality
between
the
arguments.
This
is
their
“similarity
within
difference”—their
arguments
differ,
but
they
overlap
in
some
areas.
The
connections
may
not
be
obvious
at
first;
they
may
fall
under
minor
points
or
implied
ideas.
• One
way
to
do
this
is
to
find
a
question
that
both
parties
agree
on.
For
instance,
one
article
might
argue
for
nuclear
reprocessing
while
the
other
argues
against
it,
but
they
might
agree
that
nuclear
energy
is
one
viable
solution
to
our
energy
needs
or
that
the
U.S.
needs
to
develop
more
domestic
energy
resources.
• Put
the
authors
in
conversation
with
each
other.
What
would
they
say
to
each
other?
• Ask
yourself:
what
does
reading
one
article
demonstrate
about
the
shortcomings
of
the
second,
and
vice
versa?
What
does
one
author
fail
to
consider?
How
do
you
account
for
the
authors’
differences
in
attitude
or
focus?
• What
new
understanding
does
reading
both
arguments
together
achieve?
Conclusion
(sometimes
optional,
depending
on
assignment)
Your
conclusion
reflects
on
how
your
thinking
on
this
subject
has
changed
after
writing
the
synthesis.
Sometimes
the
synthesis
section
serves
as
a
conclusion,
and
sometimes
you
will
include
a
conclusion
that
shows
your
own
addition
to
the
academic
conversation.
• What
do
you
agree
and
disagree
with
and
why?
• What
points
have
both
authors
failed
to
take
into
account?
• How
has
your
perception
of
the
issue
changed?
• What
new
questions
have
these
arguments
raised
in
your
mind?
• How
would
you
position
yourself
in
regards
to
the
authors
and
the
topic?
UVU
Writing
Center
•
Library
208
•
ph:
801-‐863-‐8936
•
Updated
Feb.
2016
Web:
[Link]/writingcenter
•
Facebook:
UVUWritingCenter
•
Twitter:
@uvuwritingctr