0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views90 pages

Chapter 10

Chapter 10 discusses catalysis and catalytic reactors, defining key concepts such as positive and negative catalysis, and differentiating between homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis. It covers catalyst properties, adsorption isotherms, surface reactions, and the rate-limiting steps in catalytic reactions. The chapter also illustrates various mechanisms and examples, including the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis and NH3 synthesis over Fe catalyst.

Uploaded by

irembasar2000
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views90 pages

Chapter 10

Chapter 10 discusses catalysis and catalytic reactors, defining key concepts such as positive and negative catalysis, and differentiating between homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis. It covers catalyst properties, adsorption isotherms, surface reactions, and the rate-limiting steps in catalytic reactions. The chapter also illustrates various mechanisms and examples, including the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis and NH3 synthesis over Fe catalyst.

Uploaded by

irembasar2000
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Chapter 10

Catalysis and Catalytic Reactors


Definitions

• Catalyst
•positive catalysis
– rate (not equilibrium)
•negative catalysis
– yield
– selectivity
• Pathway (mechanism)
Homogeneous catalysis
catalyst is in solution with at least one of the reactants

CHO
CH3 CH i-butyl aldehyde
Co CH3
CH3 CH CH2 + CO + H2
CH3 CH2 CH2 CHO n-butyl aldehyde

Heterogeneous catalysis
involves more than one phase, usually the catalyst is a solid and the
reactants and the products are in liquid or gaseous state

Pt
Al2O3 + 3H2
Catalyst Properties

catalytic reactions occur at the fluid-solid interface


large interfacial area will be useful or even necessary
porous catalysts

e.g. typical silica-alumina cracking catalyst


pore volume : 0.6 cm3/g
average pore radius : 4 nm (40 Å)
surface area :300 m2/g

sometimes the pores are so small that they prevent large molecules
from entering

molecular sieves

e.g. clays, zeolites, microporous carbons


uniform pores of molecular sizes
e.g. 4 Å for zeolite 4A
surface areas of up to 900-1000 m2 or more
+ 6H
2

nonmetal
CH4 +1/2O2 CO + H2 CH3OH zeolite
CH3CH3
when the catalyst is
sufficiently active
monolithic catalysts
(press. drop, heat removal)
e.g. Pt gauze for NH3 ox.
and honeycomb converters
Supported catalyst (e.g. V2O5 / silica, Pt / Al2O3)

Unsupported catalyst (Pt gauze, promoted Fe)

Active site (acid, base, metal)

Deactivation (aging, coking, poisoning)

Turnover frequency

Dispersion, D

Adsorption (physical / chemical)


(chemisorption)
Example CO + 3H2 → CH4 + H2O

The Fisher-Tropsch synthesis was studied using a commercial 0.5 wt


% Ru on γ-Al2O3. The catalyst dispersion percentage of atoms
exposed, determined from hydrogen chemisorption was found to be
49 %. At pressure of 988 kPa and a temperature of 475 K, a turnover
frequency of 0.044 s-1 was reported for methane. What is the rate of
formation of methane in mol/s.g-cat (metal plus support) ?

# 1 & % Ru
− rA" = N CH D % (
4
$ MWRu ' 100
0.044 molecules 1 mol CH 4
− rA" = ×
(surface atom Ru).s 6.02 × 10 23 molecules
0.49 surface atoms 6.02 × 10 23 atoms Ru
× ×
total atoms Ru g atom( mol )Ru
g atoms Ru 0.005 g Ru
× × = 1.07 × 10 −6 mol / s. g − cat
101.1 g Ru g total
Steps in a Heterogeneous Catalytic Reaction
Adsorption Isotherms

A + S 
 A.S

Ct is the total molar concentration of active sites per
unit mass of catalysts, mol/g-cat
Pi partial pressure of species i in the gas phase, atm
Ci-S surface concentration of sites occupied by species
i, mol/g-cat

A B

vacant and occupied sites

For the system shown,


C t = C v + C A.S + C B.S
CO adsorbed as molecules

CO + S  
 CO • S


rate of attachment = kAPCOCv

rate of detachment = k-ACCO.S

net rate of adsorption; rAD = kAPCOCv -k-ACCO.S

K A = k A / k −A

⎛ CCO.S ⎞
rAD = k A ⎜⎜ PCOC v - ⎟⎟
⎝ K A ⎠
⎛ CCO.S ⎞
rAD = k A ⎜⎜ PCOC v - ⎟⎟
⎝ K A ⎠

CO is the only adsorbed molecule

C t = C v + CCO .S or C v = C t − CCO .S

at equilibrium net rate = 0

CCO.S = K A PCO C v = K A PCO (C t − CCO.S )

K A PCO C t
rearranging C CO.S = Langmuir Isotherm
1 + K A PCO
PCO 1 PCO
= +
CCO.S K ACt Ct
C CO.S
mol/g - cat

PCO , kPa

PCO 1
slope =
CCO.S Ct

1
K ACt

PCO
CO adsorbed as atoms

CO + 2S  
C•S+ O•S


rate of attachment = kAPCOC2v

rate of detachment = [Link].S

net rate of adsorption; rAD = kAPCOC2v -[Link].S

K A = k A / k −A

⎛ 2 C [Link] O.S ⎞
rAD = k A ⎜⎜ PCOC v - ⎟⎟
⎝ K A ⎠
at equilibrium net rate = 0
K A PCOC 2v = [Link].S

for CC.S = CO.S


1/2
( K APCO ) Cv = CO.S

C v = C t − CC.S − CO.S = C t − 2CO.S

rearranging the equations

1/2 1/2

CCO.S =
( K A PCO ) C t P 1/2
CO
=
1 2 ( PCO )
1/2 1/2 +
1 + 2 ( K A PCO ) CCO.S C t ( K A ) Ct
Adsorption of H2 on Cu powder at 25°C
PH 2 C H 2S × 10 2 PH 2 C H 2S × 10 2
torr g mol/g Cu torr g mol/g Cu
3.25 0.559 45.1 1.160
8.90 0.761 21.5 0.995
17.65 0.941 10.65 0.800
36.2 1.212 5.40 0.659
74.5 1.281 2.95 0.564
204.8 1.471 1.70 0.464

80 12

70
10
60
PH 2 50
PH 2
8

C H 2 ⋅S 40

30 C H 2 ⋅S
6

4
20
2
10

0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 0 5 10 15 20

PH 2 PH2
1/2

CH2 .S =
K A PH2 C t P 1/2
H2
=
1
+
( )
2 PH2
1 + K A PH2 CH2 .S Ct ( K A )
1/2
Ct
when more than one substance is present

adsorption isotherm of A in the presence of adsorbate B

K A PA C t
C A⋅S =
1 + K A PA + K B PB

adsorption isotherm of B in the presence of adsorbate A

K B PBC t
C B⋅S =
1 + K A PA + K B PB
Surface Reactions
A+S A •S
⎛ C A.S ⎞
rAD = k A ⎜⎜ PA C v - ⎟⎟
⎝ K A ⎠

Single-site mechanism
A •S B•S
A B
⎛ CB⋅S ⎞
rS = k S ⎜⎜ CA⋅S - ⎟⎟
⎝ K S ⎠

Dual-site mechanism
A ⋅S + S B⋅S + S
A B ⎛ C B⋅SC v ⎞
rS = k S ⎜⎜ C A⋅SC v - ⎟⎟
⎝ K S ⎠
Dual-site mechanism
A ⋅S + B⋅S C ⋅S + D ⋅S
A B C D ⎛ CC⋅SC D⋅S ⎞
rS = k S ⎜⎜ C A⋅SC B⋅S - ⎟⎟
⎝ K S ⎠

Species adsorbed on different types of sites S and S´

B A C D
A ⋅ S + B ⋅ Sʹ′ C ⋅ Sʹ′ + D ⋅ S
⎛ CC⋅Sʹ′C D⋅S ⎞
rS = k S ⎜⎜ CA⋅SCB⋅Sʹ′ - ⎟⎟
⎝ K S ⎠

Single or dual-site mechanisms are sometimes referred to as


following Langmuir-Hinshelwood Kinetics
Reaction between an adsorbed molecule and a molecule in the
gas phase

B A C

A ⋅ S + B(g ) C⋅S

" CC ⋅S %
rS = kS $ C A⋅S PB - '
# K S &

Eley-Rideal Mechanism
Desorption
C ⋅S C+S

the desorption rate law


⎛ Cv PC ⎞
rDC = k D ⎜⎜ CC⋅S - ⎟⎟
⎝ K DC ⎠

rDC = - rAC

1
K DC =
KC

rDC = k D (CC⋅S - K C PC Cv )
The Rate-limiting Step

− rAʹ′ = rAD = rS = rD

One particular step is rate-limiting or rate-controlling

Current I in the case of resistance in series

E E
I= =
R tot R AD + R S + R D

The approach in determining catalytic and heterogeneous


mechanism is called Langmuir-Hinshelwood approach
NH3 Synthesis from H2 and N2 over Fe catalyst

3 H2 + N2 2 NH3

H 2 + 2S 2H ⋅ S Rapid

N2 + S N2 ⋅ S
Rate-Limiting
N 2S + S 2N ⋅ S

N ⋅S + H ⋅S HN ⋅ S + S
NH ⋅ S + H ⋅ S H2 N ⋅ S + S
Rapid
H2N ⋅ S + H ⋅ S NH 3 ⋅ S + S
NH 3 ⋅ S NH 3 + S
Reaction of CO and NO over Cu catalyst
1
CO + NO CO 2 + N 2
2
CO + S CO ⋅ S
Rapid
NO + S NO ⋅ S

NO ⋅ S + CO ⋅ S CO 2 + N ⋅ S + S Rate-Limiting

N ⋅S + N ⋅S N2 ⋅ S
Rapid
N2 ⋅ S N2 + S
Synthesizing a Rate Law, Mechanism and Rate-Limiting Step
Cumene decomposition to yield benzene and propylene

C6 H 5CH(CH 3 ) 2 → C6 H 6 + C3H 6
Reaction sequence

kA
C+S k −A
C ⋅S adsorption of cumene on the
surface
kS surface reaction to form adsorbed
C ⋅S k −S
B⋅S + P benzene and propylene in the gas
phase
kD
B⋅ S k −D
B+S desorption of benzene from the
surface

CC → PC
kA
C+S k −A
C ⋅S rAD = k A PCCv − k −A CC⋅S

C C ⎛ CC⋅S ⎞
Adsorption : rAD = k A ⎜ PCC v −
⎜ ⎟⎟
⎝ K C ⎠

C ⋅S
kS
k −S
B⋅S + P rS = k SCC⋅S − k −SPP CB⋅S

C B +P ⎛ PP CB⋅S ⎞
Surface reaction : rS = k S ⎜ CC⋅S −
⎜ ⎟⎟
⎝ K S ⎠

kD
B⋅S k −D
B+S rD = k DCB⋅S − k −D PBCv

B B ⎛ PBC v ⎞
Desorption : rD = k D ⎜⎜ CB⋅S − ⎟⎟
⎝ K DB ⎠
⎛ PBC v ⎞
Desorption : rD = k D ⎜ CB⋅S −
⎜ ⎟⎟
⎝ K DB ⎠

1
KB =
K DB

Desorption : rD = k D (CB⋅S − K BPBCv )

There is no accumulation of reacting species on the surface

− rCʹ′ = rAD = rS = rD
Is the adsorption of cumene rate-limiting?
assume that adsorption step is rate-limiting

⎛ CC⋅S ⎞
− rCʹ′ = rAD = k A ⎜⎜ PCC v − ⎟⎟
⎝ K C ⎠

Steady-state − rCʹ′ = rAD = rS = rD

For adsorption limited reactions, kA is small, kS and kD are large

⇒ rS / k S and rD / k D are very small


rAD / k A is relatively large
⎛ PP CB⋅S ⎞
Surface reaction : rS = k S ⎜⎜ CC⋅S − ⎟⎟
⎝ K S ⎠
Desorption rD = k D (CB⋅S − K BPBCv )
For adsorption limited reaction kS is large
⎛ PP CB⋅S ⎞
Surface reaction : rS = k S ⎜⎜ CC⋅S − ⎟⎟
⎝ K S ⎠

rS C B⋅S PP
≈0 C C⋅S =
kS KS

For adsorption limited reaction kD is large


rD = k D (CB⋅S − K BPBCv )

rD
≈0 CB⋅S = K BCv PB
kD

PB PP
C C⋅S = KB Cv
KS
⎛ CC⋅S ⎞
rAD = k A ⎜⎜ PC C v − ⎟⎟
⎝ K C ⎠

⎛ K B PB PP ⎞ ⎛ PB PP ⎞
rAD = k A ⎜⎜ PC − ⎟⎟C v = k A ⎜⎜ PC − ⎟⎟C v
⎝ K SK C ⎠ ⎝ K P ⎠

For the reaction

C B+P
K SK C
rAD = 0 KP =
KB
Equilibrium constant is related with the change in the Gibbs free energy

RT ln K = −ΔG o
The concentration of vacant sites, Cv

Ct = Cv + CC.S + CB.S

PB PP
Ct = Cv + K B C v + K BC v PB
KS
Ct
Cv =
PB PP
1+ KB + K B PB
KS

C t k A (PC − PP PB / K p )
− rCʹ′ = rAD =
1 + K B PB PP / K S + K B PB
C t k A (PC − PP PB / K p )
− rCʹ′ = rAD =
1 + K B PB PP / K S + K B PB

initially initial rate, -rʹ′C0


PP = PB = 0 − rCʹ′ 0 = Ct k A PC 0 = kPC 0

initial partial pressure of cumene, PC0


Is the surface reaction rate-limiting?
⎛ PP CB⋅S ⎞
Surface reaction : rS = k S ⎜⎜ CC⋅S − ⎟⎟
⎝ K S ⎠
rAD
≈0 CC⋅S = K C PCCv
k AD
rD CB⋅S = K BCv PB
≈0
kD
⎛ PP K B PB ⎞ ⎛ PP PB ⎞
rS = k S ⎜⎜ K C PC − ⎟⎟C v = k SK C ⎜⎜ PC − ⎟⎟C v
⎝ K S ⎠ ⎝ K P ⎠

Ct
Ct = Cv + CC.S + CB.S Cv =
1 + K B PB + K C PC
k s C t K C (PC − PP PB / K P )
− rCʹ′ = rS =
1 + K B PB + K C PC
initial rate is
kPC 0
− rCʹ′ 0 =
1 + K C PC 0
where k = k sCt K C

at low PC0 1 〉〉 K C PC0

− rCʹ′ 0 ≈ kPC0

initial rate, -rʹ′C0


at high PC0 K C PC0 〉〉 1

kPC 0 k
− rCʹ′ 0 = = initial partial pressure of cumene, PC0
K C PC 0 K C
Is the desorption of benzene rate-limiting?
Desorption : rD = k D (CB⋅S − K BPBCv )
rS
≈0 CB⋅S = KSCC⋅S / PP
kS

rAD
≈0 CC⋅S = K CCv PC
k AD

⎛ PC PB ⎞
CB⋅S = KSK CCv PC / PP rD = k D K C K S ⎜⎜ − ⎟⎟C v
⎝ PP K P ⎠
Ct
Ct = Cv + CC.S + CB.S Cv =
1 + K C K S PC / PP + K C PC
k D C t K S K C (PC − PP PB / K P )
− rCʹ′ = rS =
PP + K C PC K S + K C PC PP
initially PP = PB = 0

− rCʹ′ 0 = k D C t

initial rate, -rʹ′C0

initial partial pressure of cumene, PC0


Summary of the cumene decomposition

Rate-law derived by assuming surface reaction is rate-limiting


agrees with the experimental data
Initial rate, -rʹ′C0

Initial partial pressure of cumene,


PC0

k (PC − PB PP / K P )
− rCʹ′ =
1 + K B PB + K C PC
Inerts in the feed

I+S I ⋅S

Ct = Cv + CC⋅S + CB⋅S + CI⋅S

CI⋅S = K I PI CV

k (PC − PB PP / K P )
− rCʹ′ =
1 + K B PB + K C PC + K I PI
Octane Number

Fuels with low octane numbers can produce spontaneous combustion


in the cylinder before the air/fuel mixture is compressed to its desired
value and ignited by the spark plug.

K.I.

100% heptane 100% i-octane


Octane Number


n − pentane 
0.75wt %Pt
 
 i − pentane
Al O 2 3

−H +H

n − pentane 
2

 n − pentene 

2 3

 i
Al O
− pentene 

2

 i − pentane
Pt Pt
Octane number and the dual site mechanism
Al2O3
N I
1. Select a mechanism (Mechanism I)

Adsorption N +S N ⋅S

Surface reaction N ⋅S + S I ⋅S + S

Desorption I ⋅S I+S
2. Assume a rate limiting step: The rate law for the surface reaction step

⎛ C I⋅SC v ⎞
− rNʹ′ = rS = k S ⎜⎜ C N⋅SC v − ⎟⎟
⎝ K S ⎠
3. Find the expression for concentration of the adsorbed species Ci. S

C N⋅S = PN K N C v
PI C v
C I⋅S = = K I PI C v
KD
4. Write a site balance
C t = CI⋅S + C N⋅S + C v

5. Derive the rate law

kS Ct2 K N ( PN − PI / K P )
− rN" = rS = 2
(1 + K N PN + K I PI )
6. Compare with data
If the derived rate law does not agree with the data
a)Assume a different rate limiting step and repeat steps 2-6.
b)If, after assuming that each step is rate limiting, none of the derived rate
laws agree with the experimental data, select a different mechanism (e.g., a
single site mechanism):


N + S
 NiS

NiS 
 IiS

IiS 
I +S
and then proceed through steps 2-6.

The single site mechanism, with the following rate law, turns out to be the
correct one.
k ( PN − PI / K P )
− rN′ =
1 + K N PN + K I PI
c) If two or more models agree, statistical tests should be used to
discriminate between them.
Single site

kPA
A ⋅S → B ⋅S - rAʹ′ =
1 + K A PA + K B PB
Dual site
kPA
A ⋅S + S → B⋅S + S - rAʹ′ =
(1 + K A PA + K B PB )2
kPA PB
A ⋅S + B ⋅S → C ⋅S + S - rAʹ′ =
(1 + K A PA + K B PB + K C PC )2
Eley-Rideal
kPA PB
A ⋅ S + B(g) → C ⋅ S - rAʹ′ =
1 + K A PA + K C PC
Rate laws derived from the pseudo-steady state
*
An alternative way to derive rate law −r =0
i⋅S

Ex: isomerization of n-pentene to i-pentene

N +S ⎯⎯
← ⎯kN

k− N

⎯ N ⋅S
N ⋅S ⎯k⎯
S
→ I ⋅S

I ⋅S 

kI
k− I

 I+S

The rate law for the surface reaction

− rNʹ′ = rS = k SC N⋅S
The net rates of generation of N•S and S•I sites are

rN* ⋅S = k N PN C v − k − N C N⋅S − k SC N⋅S = 0


*
r = k SC N⋅S − k I C I⋅S + k − I PI C v = 0
I⋅S

Solving for CN•S and CS•I

k N PN C v
C N⋅S =
k −N + kS

k SC N⋅S + k −I PI C v ⎛ k Sk N PN k −I PI ⎞
CI⋅S = = ⎜⎜ + ⎟⎟C v
kI ⎝ k I (k − N + k S ) k I ⎠
The rate law
k N PN Cv
− rN′ = kS
k− N + kS

A site balance

C t = CI⋅S + C N⋅S + C v

k N k SC t PN
− rNʹ′ =
k −N + kS k N ⎛ k S ⎞ k −I
1+ ⎜⎜1 + ⎟⎟PN + PI
k − N + k S ⎝ k I ⎠ kI
k −I kN
KI = and KN =
kI k −N

k
⎛ K N k S Ct ⎞ PN
− rN′ = ⎜
⎝ 1 + kS / k− N ⎟⎠ 1 + 1
K N PN + K I PI
1 + kS / k− N

Surface reaction limiting k S is much smaller compared to k - N


kS
1〉〉
k -N

kPN
− rNʹ′ =
1 + K N PN + K I PI
Temperature dependence of the rate law

For a surface reaction limited irreversible isomerization

A B
in which both A and B are adsorbed on the surface, the rate law is

kPA
− rAʹ′ =
1 + K A PA + K B PB
at high temperatures (low coverages)

1 〉〉 KA PA + KBPB
− rAʹ′ ≈ kPA
for a reversible izomerization

− rAʹ′ ≈ k(PA − PB / K P )
Design of Reactors for Gas-Solid Reactions

Design Equations
dX
Batch reactor N A0 = −rAʹ′ W
dt
dX
Packed-bed reactor FA 0 = −rAʹ′
dW
FA 0 X
CSTR V=
− rAʹ′

FA 0 X
W=
− rAʹ′
Heterogeneous Data Analysis for Reactor Design C6 H5CH 3 + H 2 → C6 H 6 + CH 4
rTʹ′ × 1010 Partial Pressure (atm)
Run g mol toluene Toluene Hydrogen Methane Benzene
g cat.s -1 PT PH2 PM PB
Set A
1 71.0 1 1 1 0
2 71.3 1 1 4 0
Set B
3 41.6 1 1 0 1
4 19.7 1 1 0 4
5 42.0 1 1 1 1
6 17.1 1 1 0 5
Set C
7 71.8 1 1 0 0
8 142.0 1 2 0 0
9 284.0 1 4 0 0
Set D
10 47.0 0.5 1 0 0
11 71.3 1 1 0 0
12 117.0 5 1 0 0
13 127.0 10 1 0 0
14 131.0 15 1 0 0
15 133.0 20 1 0 0
16 41.8 1 1 1 1
Deducing a rate law from the experimental data
1. Dependence on the product methane
If methane adsorbed → partial pressure of methane in the denominator
and the rate inversely proportional with methane conc.

− rTʹ′ ≈
[]⋅
1 + K M PM + ⋅ ⋅

However from Run1 and Run2, fourfold increase in the PM has little effect
on the rate. Methane is weakly adsorbed or goes directly to gas phase
(KMPM<<1)
2. Dependence on the product benzene
From Run3 and Run4 for fixed conc. H and T , the rate is decreased with
increasing conc. B. Partial pressure of B appears in the denominator.

1
− rTʹ′ ≈
1 + K B PB + ⋅ ⋅
3. Dependence on toluene
At low conc. T (Run10 and Run11), the rate increases with increasing PT,
the rate is independent of PT
PT
− rTʹ′ ≈
1 + K T PT + ⋅ ⋅

4. Dependence on hydrogen
From Run7, 8 and 9, rate increases linearly with increasing PH2.. H2 is not
adsorbed or its coverage is extremely low (KH2PH2<<1)

− rTʹ′ ≈ PH 2
Combining

kPH 2 PT
− rTʹ′ =
1 + K T PT + K B PB
Finding a mechanism consistent with experimental observations

T (g ) + S T ⋅S
⎛ CT⋅S ⎞
Adsorption : rAD = k A ⎜⎜ PT C v − ⎟⎟
⎝ K T ⎠

H2 (g) + T ⋅ S B ⋅ S + M (g )
⎛ PM CB⋅S ⎞
Surface reaction : rS = k S ⎜⎜ PH 2 CT⋅S − ⎟⎟
⎝ K S ⎠

B⋅ S B (g) + S

Desorption : rD = k D (CB⋅S − K BPBCv )


surface reaction rate-limiting
⎛ PM CB⋅S ⎞
rS = k S ⎜⎜ PH 2 CT⋅S − ⎟⎟
⎝ K S ⎠
rAD
From adsorption rate ≈0 CT⋅S = K T PT Cv
k AD

rD
From desorption rate ≈0 CB⋅S = K BCv PB
kD

Ct
Ct = Cv + CT.S + CB.S Cv =
1 + K B PB + K T PT

− rTʹ′ =
(
k s C t K T PH 2 PT − PM PB / K P )
1 + K B PB + K T PT

kPH 2 PT
Neglecting the reverse reaction − rTʹ′ =
1 + K B PB + K T PT
Evaluation of the rate law parameters
kPH 2 PT
− rTʹ′ =
1 + K B PB + K T PT

PH 2 PT 1 K B PB K T PT
= + + Yj = a 0 + a1X1 j + a 2 X 2 j
− rTʹ′ k k k

8.7 × 10 −4 PH 2 PT g mol T
− rTʹ′ =
1 + 1.39 PB + 1.038PT kg [Link]

With known KT and KB, ratio of sites occupied by the various adsorbed species can be
calculated

CT⋅S K T PT C v K T PT K T PA 0 (1 − X) K T (1 − X) 1.038(1 − 0.4)


= = = = = = 1.12
C B⋅S K BC v PB K B PB K B PA 0 X K BX 1.39(0.4)

At 40% conversion ~12 % more sites occupied by toluene than by benzene


dX − rAʹ′
Reactor Design =
dW FA 0
The hydrodemethylation of toluene is to be carried out in a packed bed
reactor. Plot the conversion, pressure ratio (y), and the partial pressures of
toluene, hydrogen and benzene as a function of W. The molar feed rate of
toluene to the reactor is 50 mol/min and the reactor is operated at 40 atm
and 640oC. The feed consists of 30% toluene, 45% H2 and 25% inerts. H2
is used in excess to help prevent coking. The pressure drop parameter α is
9.8x10-5 kg-1. Also determine the catalyst weight in a CSTR with a bulk
density of 400 kg/m3.
C6 H5CH 3 + H 2 → C6 H 6 + CH 4
Design equation: dFT
= rT!
dW
dX − rTʹ′
=
dW FT 0
Rate law:
kPH 2 PT k = 0.00087 mol / atm 2 / kg cat / min
− rTʹ′ =
1 + K B PB + K T PT K B = 1.39 atm −1 , K T = 1.038 atm −1
Stoichiometry:
# 1− X & # 1− X &
PT = CT RT = CT 0 RT0 % y = P y
$ 1 + ε X (' T0 %
$ 1 + ε X ('

ε = yT 0δ = 0.3(0) = 0
PT = PT 0 (1 − X ) y
(
PH 2 = PT 0 θ H 2 − X y)
PB = PT 0 Xy
0.45
θ H2 = = 1.5
0.30
because ε = 0
P 1/2
y= = (1 − αW ) → α = 9.8 × 10 −5 kg −1
P0

PT 0 = 0.3(40) = 12 atm

1 1/2

40
(
= 1 − 9.8 × 10 −5 W ) → W = 10197 kg
Example 10.3 Example 10.3
1 18

0.9 16

0.8 y H2
14
0.7
12
0.6

PT,PH2,PB
10
T
X,y

0.5
x 8
0.4
6
0.3

0.2 4

0.1 2
B
0 0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
w w

FA 0 X g mol T
W= At X = 0.65 − rAʹ′ = 2.39 ×10 −3
− rAʹ′ kg cat. min

50(0.65) 4 1.36 ×10 4 kg 3


W= −3
= 1.36 × 10 kg V= = 34 m
2.39 ×10 400 kg / m3
Chemical Vapor Deposition

Gas-phase dissociation GeCl 4(g) GeCl 2(g) + Cl 2 (g)

Adsorption GeCl 2(g) + S GeCl 2⋅ S

Adsorption H 2+ 2S 2H ⋅ S

Surface-reaction GeCl 2⋅ S + 2H ⋅ S Ge (s) + 2HCl (g) + 2S

Ge
Cl2 HCl (g)
H H

Ge
Ge Ge Ge Ge Ge Ge Ge Ge Ge Ge
Surface-reaction is the rate limiting step

ʹ′ʹ′ = k Sf GeCl2 f H2
− rDep
− rDep
ʹ′ʹ′ = deposition rate, nm/s
k S = surface specific reaction rate, nm/s
f GeCl2 = fraction on the surface occupied by germanium chloride
f H2 = fraction on the surface covered by molecular H 2

Fractional area balance 1 = f v + f GeCl2 + f H

⎛ f GeCl2 ⎞
rAD = k A ⎜⎜ PGeCl2 f v − ⎟⎟
⎝ KA ⎠
rAD
Surface-reaction is rate limiting step ≈0
k AD

f GeCl2 = f v K A PGeCl2

⎛ f 2

= kH ⎜ PH 2 fv −
2 H2
Dissociative adsorption of H2 on surface rH2
⎝ K H ⎟⎠

rH 2
Surface-reaction is rate limiting step ≈0
k H2

fH = fv K H PH 2

ʹ′ʹ′ = k Sf GeCl2 f H2
− rDep ʹ′ʹ′ = f v3k SK A PGeCl2 K H PH2
− rDep
1 = f v + f v K A PGeCl2 + f v K H PH 2

1
fv =
1 + K A PGeCl2 + K H PH 2

kS K A PGeCl K H PH
rDep
!! = 2 2

( 1 + K A PGeCl + K H PH
2 2
) 3

k ! PGeCl PH
rDep
!! = 2 2

( 1 + K A PGeCl + K H PH
2 2
) 3
If we assume that the gas phase reaction

GeCl 4(g) GeCl 2(g) + Cl 2 (g)


is in equilibrium, we have
PGeCl PCl
KP = 2 2

PGeCl
4

PGeCl
PGeCl = 4
Kp
2
PCl
2

if hydrogen weakly adsorbed K H PH < 1


2

kPGeCl PH PCl2
rDep
!! = 4 2 2
3
(P Cl2
+ K PGeCl
4
)
Catalyst Deactivation
The reactions are considered in two categories: separable
kinetics and nonseparable kinetics

Separable kinetics; rate law and catalyst’s activity are


separated

Separable kinetics : −rAʹ′ = a(past history) × −rAʹ′ (fresh catalyst)

Nonseparable kinetics : −rAʹ′ = −rAʹ′ (past history, fresh catalyst)


1

− rAʹ′ ( t ) a(t)
a (t) =
− rAʹ′ ( t = 0)
0
t
− rAʹ′ = a(t)k(T)fn(CA , CB ,...., CP )
a(t) = catalytic activity, t dependent
k(T) = specific reaction rate, T dependent
Ci = gas-phase concentration of reactants, products or contaminant

the rate of catalyst decay

da
rd = − = p[a ( t )] k d (T) h(CA , C B ,...., C P )
dt
kd is the specific decay constant
h(Ci) is the functionality of rd on the reacting species concentration
p[a(t)] is the functionality of rd on the activity
p[a(t)] can take a variety of forms

For a first order decay

p (a ) = a
For a second order decay

p (a ) = a 2
Types of Catalyst Deactivation

Deactivation by sintering (aging)

decay by sintering: pore


closure

decay by sintering: agglomeration of deposited metal


sites (T >40 % of the melting temp. of the metal)
One of the most commonly used decay laws is second order with
respect to the present activity
2 da
rd = k d a = −
dt

a =1 @ t = 0
1 Sa 0
a(t) = Sa =
1+ kdt 1+ kdt
Sintering decay constant
⎛ E d ⎛ 1 1 ⎞ ⎞
k d = k d (T0 ) exp⎜⎜ ⎜⎜ − ⎟⎟ ⎟⎟
⎝ R ⎝ T0 T ⎠ ⎠

Algorithm for the reactor design for a fluid-solid system with decaying
catalyst
mole balance → reaction rate law → decay rate law
stoichiometry → combine and solve → numerical techniques
Example: The first order isomerization AèB is being carried out isothermally
in a batch reactor on a catalyst that is decaying as a result of aging. Derive
an equation for conversion as a function of time.
Solution
Design equation: dX
N A0 = −rAʹ′ W
dt

Reaction rate law − rAʹ′ = kʹ′a(t )CA

Decay law
1
a(t) =
1+ kdt

N A0
Stoichiometry C A = C A 0 (1 − X) = (1 − X)
V

Combining dX W
= kʹ′a ( t )(1 − X)
dt V
dX W
= kʹ′a ( t )(1 − X)
dt V

W dX
k= kʹ′ = k a ( t )(1 − X)
V dt

1 dX dt
a(t) = =k
1+ kdt (1 − X) 1+ kdt

Solving

1
X = 1−
(1 + k d t )k / kd
Deactivation by coking or fouling

Decay by coking
the amount of coke on the surface at a time t C C = At n
Representative values of A and n for East Texas % coke = 0.47 t(min)
light gas oil yield

Relation between the activity and amount of coke on the surface is


represented with variety of forms.
1
One commonly used form is a=
1 + kCk CCp

1 1
in terms of time a= =
1 + kCk A pt np 1 + k !t m
Decay law for East Texas light gas oil being cracked at 750oF over a
catalyst is 1
a=
1 + 7.6t 1/ 2
Other forms are
− α1C C
1
a=e a=
1 + α 2 CC
Deactivation by poisoning

Poison in the feed

A +S A ⋅S
main kC A
A ⋅S B ⋅ S + C (g ) − rAʹ′ = a ( t )
reaction 1 + K A C A + K BC B
B⋅ S B+S

poisoning da
P+S P ⋅S rD = − = kʹ′d Cmp a q
reaction dt
If it is assumed that the rate is proportional to the number of the
unpoisoned sites (Ct0-CP.S) and the conc. of poison in the gas phase Cp

rP⋅S = kd (Ct 0 − CP⋅S )CP

dCt dCP⋅S
− = = rP⋅S = kd (Ct 0 − CP⋅S )CP
dt dt

Dividing by Ct0 and letting f be the fraction of the total number of sites
that have been poisoned

df
= k d (1 − f )C P
dt

da
− = a ( t )k d C P
dt
Packed bed reactors

1.0
t1 < t2 < t3 < t4
a(t)
t1 t2 t3 t4

Wexit
W

Movement of activity front in a packed bed

1.0

0.8

0 t4 t

Exit conversion as a function of time


Poisoning by either reactants or products

Main reaction : A +S → B+S - rAʹ′ = k A CnA


Poisoning reaction : A + S → A ⋅S rd = kʹ′d CmA a q
An example where one of the reactants acts as a poison
Ru
CO + 2H 2 ⎯⎯→ CH 4 + 1 / 2O2

da
− rCO = ka ( t )CCO − = rd = kʹ′d a ( t )CCO
dt
For separable deactivation kinetics resulting from contacting a poison
at a constant conc. Cpo and no spatial variation
da
− = rd = kʹ′d a q ( t )C nP0 = k d a q
dt
For the case of first order decay
da
− = k da → a = e -k d t
dt
Decay rate laws

Functional Decay Reaction Differential Integral Examples


Form of Activity Order Form Form
Linear 0 da a = 1 − β0 t Conversion of para-H on tungsten when poisoned
− = β0 with O2
dt
Exponential 1 da a = e −β1t Ethylene hydrogenation on Cu poisoned with CO
− = β1 a
dt Cracking of gas oil
Vinyl chloride monomer formation
Paraffin dehydrogenation on Cr.Al2O3
Hyperbolic 2 da 1 Vinyl chloride monomer formation
− = β2a 2 = 1 + β2 t
dt a Cyclohexane dehydrogenation on Pt/Al2O3
Isobutylene hydrogenation on Ni
Reciprocal power β3 + 1 da a = A 0 t − β3 Cracking of gas oil and gasoline on clay
=γ − = β 3 a n A 10/ 5
β3 dt
β4 + 1 da a = A 0 t −β4 Cyclohexane aromatization on Pt/Al2O3
=η − = β 4 a n A 10/ 5
β4 dt
Example: Catalyst Decay in Fluidized Bed modeled as a CSTR

Gas-phase cracking reaction

gas oil (g) → products (g)


A→ B+C
Fluidized CSTR
feed stream 80% gas oil (A, contains sulfur compounds) and 20% inert (I)
Assumptions;
- the cracking reaction is first order
- the rate of catalyst decay is first-order in the present activity and first-
order in the reactant concentration
- the bed can be modeled as a well-mixed CSTR
Determine the reactant concentration, activity, and conversion as a function of
time.
Additional information
v0=5000 m3/h W=50000 kg ρb=500 kg/m3
CA0=0.8 mol/dm3 k= ρbk’=45 h-1
CT0=1.0 mol/dm3 kd= 9 dm3/mol.h

1. Mole balance on reactant


' dN A
v 0C A 0 − vC A + r W =
A
dt
N A = CA V and rA V = rA' W
dC A
v 0C A 0 − vC A + rA V = V
dt

2. Rate law − rA = kaCA


3. Decay law
da
− = k d aC A
dt

4. Stoichiometry (gas-phase, P=P0, T=T0)


FT v 0 (FA + FB + FC + FI 0 )
v = v0 =
FT0 FA 0 + FI 0

FB = FC = FA0 - FA
v FI 0 + 2FA 0 − FA
=
v0 FT0
v FA 0 FA CA v
= 1+ − = 1 + y A0 −
v0 FT0 FT0 CT0 v 0

Solving for v
1 + y A0 CA 0
v = v0 y A0 =
1 + CA / CT0 CT0
5. Combining
v 0 (1 + y A0 ) dC A
v0CA 0 − CA -kaCA V = V
1 + CA / CT0 dt
Dividing both sides by V and using τ = V / v0

dC A CA 0 (1 + y A0 ) /(1 + CA / CT0 ) + aτk


= − CA
dt τ τ

FA0 − FA vCA ⎛ 1 + yA0 ⎞ ⎛ CA ⎞


X= = 1− = 1− ⎜ ⎟⎜C ⎟
FA0 v0CA0 ⎝ 1 + C A / CT0 ⎠ ⎝ 0⎠
A
W 50000 3
V= = = 100 m
ρ b 500 kg/m 3

V 100 m3
τ= = 3
= 0.02 h
v 0 5000 m /h
Variation of CA, a, and X with time in a CSTR
Matching the reactor type with speed of catalyst decay

Slow decay Temperature-Time trajectories


Moderate decay Moving-Bed Reactors
Rapid decay Straight-Through Transport reactors

You might also like