Bci Unit 2 Notesfinal Notes
Bci Unit 2 Notesfinal Notes
Sensorimotor activity – Mu rhythm, Movement Related Potentials – Slow Cortical Potentials-P300 - Visual
Evoked Potential - Activity of Neural Cells - Multiple Neuromechanisms.
1. Introduction
A challenge of BCI research is to be able to control complex devices using noninvasive recordings of
brain signals at high spatial and temporal resolution.
The cerebral cortex is the area of greatest interest in BCI as
1. it is most accessible to electrode probes and scalp recording
2. it is highly involved in the executive function of motor and communication behaviours.
The non-invasive recording of brain signals captures the changes in blood flow or fluctuations in
electric/magnetic fields caused by the activity of large populations of neurons
Since EEG signals reflect the combined input to large populations of neurons, methods for building BCIs
from EEG signals rely on modulating the response of large neural populations either through subject
training over a period of time or through external stimuli that can activate large populations of
neurons.
1.1 Two methods for building BCIs from EEG signals
1. Self-paced (or asynchronous) BCI
BCIs based on the subject can voluntarily initiate control at any time without being tied to a
stimulus.
Self-paced BCIs typically utilize some form of imagery (motor or cognitive) that can generate a
robust and reliable EEG response after a period of training.
2. Stimulus-based BCIs (also called synchronous BCIs)
Stimulus-based BCIs (also called synchronous BCIs) rely on detecting a stereotypical brain
response generated after the subject is presented with a stimulus (such as a flash) that is linked
to a BCI command or choice.
Thus the Control is not initiated by the subject but is tied to the presentation of stimuli by the
BCI.
Stimulus-based BCIs however are easier to use because they do not require training on the part
of the subject, and relatively high accuracies can be obtained for naïve subjects, compared to
imagery-based BCIs.
Figure 1 Basic principle of a typical EEG BCI. (a) and (b) show the setup of a BCI.(c–f) Examples of EEG
signals used for BCI
potentials reflect changes in the excitability of the cortical neurons and are thought to be involved in
various cognitive processes.
c. Movement-Related Potentials Movement-related potentials (MRPs) are a type of event-related
potential (ERP) that occurs in the brain before, during, or after the execution of voluntary movements.
These potentials reflect the neural activity associated with motor planning, execution, and feedback
processes.
2. Stimulus-based BCIs (also called synchronous BCIs) A major class of EEG signals used in non-
invasive BCIs are evoked potentials (EPs), which are stereotypical EEG responses generated by the
brain when the sub ject is presented with a particular type of stimulus.
a. The P300 Potential: when a rare but task- relevant auditory, visual or somatosensory stimulus is
interspersed with fre quent and routine stimuli, the rare stimulus evokes a potential with a positive peak
at about 300 ms after the stimulus is presented. This potential is called the P300 (or P3) potential.
b. Visually Evoked Potentials (VEPs): VEPs are generated by visual stimuli such as flashing lights.
c. Auditory Evoked Potentials (AEPs): AEPs are generated by auditory stimuli such as clicks and tones.
d. Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential (SSVEP): SSVEP BCIs use visual stimuli flickering at different
frequencies. The user focuses on a specific flickering stimulus, eliciting a frequency-specific brain
response that can be detected and used for control.
e. Somatosensory Evoked Potentials (SSEPs): These BCIs use tactile or proprioceptive stimuli to evoke
brain responses. For example, vibrotactile stimuli applied to the skin can elicit event-related
desynchronization (ERD) or event-related synchronization (ERS) patterns that can be used for control.
3. Hybrid BCIs: These BCIs combine multiple types of stimuli or brain signals to improve performance
and usability. For example, a hybrid BCI may combine SSVEP and motor imagery signals for more
robust control.
In relaxed awake people, the EEG recorded over primary sensorimotor cortical areas often displays 8–
12 Hz (mu-rhythm) and 18–26 Hz (beta-rhythm) activity. These sensorimotor rhythms (SMRs) are
thought to be produced by thalamocortical circuits.
The execution or imagination of limb movement induces changes in rhythmic activity recorded over
sensorimotor cortex.
These changes in SMRs can be detected on the scalp by electroencephalography (EEG) or
magnetoencephalography (MEG) or on the surface of the brain by electrocorticography (ECoG)
SMRs are oscillations in the electric or magnetic fields recorded over sensorimotor cortices. (ie)
Sensorimotor rhythms (SMR) refer to oscillations in brain activity recorded from somatosensory and
motor areas.
SMR activity comprises a variety of different rhythms that are distinguished from each other by location,
frequency, and/or relationship to concurrent sensory input or motor output. Some beta rhythms are
harmonics of mu rhythms, while others are separable from mu rhythms by topography and/or timing.
Figure 5 SMR topographies and spectra from a BCI user controlling three-dimensional cursor movement
• Users initially employ motor imagery to control the cursor, but, as training proceeds, imagery usually
becomes less important, and users learn to move the cursor automatically.
• SMR-based BCI has been used to answer simple yes/no questions with accuracies >95%, to perform
basic word processing.
• The frequency bands that are most important for motor imagery are mu and beta in EEG signals.
• Activity invoked by right hand movement imagery is most prominent over electrode location C3. Left
hand movement imagery produces activity most prominent over [Link] is, activity invoked by hand
movement imagery is located on the contralateral (opposite) side.
• A distinction between left and right foot movement is not possible in EEG because the corresponding
cortical areas are too close. Similarly, ERD/ERS patterns of individual fingers cannot be discriminated
in EEG.
• To produce patterns that can be detected, the cortical areas involved have to be large enough so that the
resulting activity is sufficiently prominent compared to the remaining EEG (background EEG).
• Hand areas, foot areas, and the tongue area are comparatively large and topographically different.
Therefore, BCIs have been controlled by imagining moving the left hand, right hand, feet, and tongue.
• When there is no movement, the spectrum at C4, which corresponds to the left hand, is displayed in the
following image.
An imagined movement in left hand causes the SMR rhythm to decrease which is depicted below.
Figure 7 Imagining movement of left limb causes local blocking of corresponding SMR
3.1 Mu rhythm
The mu rhythm and the beta rhythm are originated from the sensorimotor cortex, i.e., the area which is
primarily responsible for the control of hand and foot movements.
9
Alpha waves (or the alpha rhythm) are electrical fluctuations in the range 8–13 Hz and can be measured in
EEG from the occipital region in awake persons when they are relaxed or their eyes are closed.
A particular kind of alpha wave popular in BCI applications is known as the mu rhythm (8–12 Hz).
Mu rhythm is found over sensorimotor areas in the absence of movement and is decreased or abolished
when the subject performs a movement or imagines performing a movement.
Mu rhythms display two distinct ERD patterns. Lower frequency (8–10 Hz) mu-rhythm ERD occurs
during almost any kind of motor behaviour, is widespread over the entire sensorimotor cortex, and
probably reflects general motor preparation and attentional processes.
In contrast, higher-frequency (10–13 Hz) mu-rhythm ERD is topographically restricted and is related
to task-specific aspects of performance. In sum, lower-frequency mu ERD appears to be nonspecific,
whereas higher-frequency mu ERD is topographically and functionally specific.
4. Slow Cortical Potentials(SCPs)
The slowest features of the scalp-recorded EEG yet used in BCI systems are slow voltage changes
generated in cortex. These potential shifts occur over 0.5–10.0 s and are called slow cortical potentials
(SCPs).
SMRs are EEG features that are analysed in the frequency domain (e.g., frequency on the x-axis) and
thus are often referred to as frequency-domain activity. Additional EEG features associated with motor
function are measured in the time domain and thus are referred to as time-domain activity.
Movement or movement imagery is typically associated with relatively slow changes in the voltages
recorded over sensorimotor cortex in time domain. These are called slow cortical potentials (SCPs).
SCPs are event-related potentials that are time-locked and phase-locked to specific sensorimotor events
(i.e., they occur at predictable times before, during, or after specific events).
SCPs typically consist of negative potential shifts that precede actual or imagined movement or
cognitive tasks. They are thought to represent cortical activation in preparation for action. An SCP is
typically followed by a biphasic wave referred to as the movement-related potential.
10
In normal brain function, negative SCPs accompany mental preparation, while positive SCPs probably
accompany mental inhibition.
Negative and positive SCPs probably reflect an increase and decrease, respectively, in excitation of
cortical neurons.
The contingent negative variation is a slowly developing negative SCP that occurs between a warning
stimulus and a stimulus requiring a response [22]. It reflects increased activation and decreased firing
thresholds in cortical networks associated with the preparatory process preceding the response.
Like SMRs, SCPs and related potentials over sensorimotor areas are associated with motor imagery as
well as with actual movements.
They are thought to reflect a mechanism for local mobilization of excitation or inhibition in cortical
populations, caused by inputs from the thalamus.
In one of the studies with 13 healthy subjects and 3 patients with total motor paralysis, EEG was
recorded from electrode locations Cz, C3, and C4 , and two channels were extracted: a Cz-linked
mastoid channel (i.e., 1/2 [(Cz-A1) + (Cz-A2)]) and a bipolar C3 minus C4 channel.
The training task involved controlling a cursor to hit the top or bottom edge of the screen. The position
of the cursor was proportional to the difference between average baseline EEG amplitude and the
average EEG amplitude over the last 500 ms from the Cz channel.
The baseline amplitude was calculated from an immediately preceding baseline period.
Some subjects participated in a two-dimensional cursor task where the target could also be the left or
right edge of the screen. In this case, the horizontal position of the cursor was proportional to the
difference between average baseline EEG amplitude from the (C3−C4) channel and the average EEG
amplitude from this channel over the last 500 ms.
11
Figure 10 Slow cortical potentials (SCPs) in healthy subjects. (Top 2 panels) Average SCP at Cz
and vertical electro-oculogram (vEOG), averaged during a single training session over 13
subjects. (Lower 2 panels) SCP difference between the left (C3) and right (C4) motor cortex and
horizontal EOG (hEOG), averaged across last 3 training sessions for 5 subjects.
Figure 11 SCP- based BCI in an ALS patient. (A) SCP and EOG for an ALS patient MP at the beginning of
training (left) and after training over several months (right). (B) Improvement in performance for the same
12
patient over time, as revealed by an increasing percentage of hits (black dots) and decreasing percentage of
false positive (asterisks) over sessions spanning several months
Figure 10 shows the average SCP waveforms generated by healthy subjects on cue after training. For
both channels, a clear deviation from baseline activity in the positive or negative direction can be seen:
this difference from baseline was used to proportionally move the cursor up/down or left/right. Out of
the 13 subjects, 4 were able to produce significant positive-going responses, 3 generated significant
negative-going responses, and 3 were able to generate both.
Slow cortical potentials (SCPs) are slow, mainly negative, voltage shifts recorded over sensorimotor or
frontal cortical areas.
They precede and coincide with imagined or actual motor actions or cognitive tasks.
With extensive training, people can learn to control SCPs and use them to operate spelling programs and
other applications. Although SCP-based BCIs were used successfully in the past by people with severe
disabilities (e.g., Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patent), this BCI modality receives little attention
at present because it is inherently slow, allows only one dimension of control, requires extensive training,
and is prone to error.
In the future, SCP-based BCI paradigms may prove useful as therapeutic neuro-feedback tools or as
adjuncts to other BCI or conventional control modalities (e.g., by allowing recognition of anticipation in
the user)
5. Movement-Related Potentials
EEG signals show a small and slow potential drift prior to voluntary movements.
These movement-related potentials (MRPs), sometimes also called readiness potentials (RPs) or
Bereitschaftspotentials (BPs), show variation in distribution over the scalp with respect to the body part
being moved.
The Bereitschaftspotential (or readiness potential) is a negative SCP that usually begins 500–1000 ms
before a self-initiated movement.
For example, the BP related to movement of left versus right arm shows a strong lateral asymmetry.
This potentially allows one to not only estimate the intent to move, but also distinguish between left and
right movement intention.
This makes them attractive targets for BCI applications but since they are typically much smaller than
other EEG phenomena such as alpha or beta rhythms, their detection is much harder.
13
It has been suggested that while ERD may reflect changes in the background oscillatory activity in wide
cortical sensorimotor areas, MRPs may represent increased, task-specific responses of supplementary
and primary motor cortical areas.
Its amplitude and topography are affected by movement type and the muscles involved.
6 Stimulus-Evoked Potentials
A major class of EEG signals used in noninvasive BCIs are evoked potentials (EPs), which are
stereotypical EEG responses generated by the brain when the subject is presented with a particular type
of stimulus.
For example, when a rare but task- relevant auditory, visual or somatosensory stimulus is interspersed
with frequent and routine stimuli, the rare stimulus evokes a potential with a positive peak at about 300
ms after the stimulus is presented.
This potential is called the P300 (or P3) potential Other types of responses include:
visually evoked potentials (VEPs) generated by visual stimuli such as flashing lights,
steady state visually evoked potentials (SSVEP) produced by a visual stimulus repeated at a rate greater
than 5 Hz,
auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) generated by auditory stimuli such as clicks and tones, and
Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) caused by somatosensory stimulation.
14
The voltages that constitute the ERP are embedded within the general EEG activity recordable from the
scalp and are usually quite small relative to the ongoing EEG.
However, because the ERPs are time-locked to events, and follow a constant time course, they can be
extracted by averaging multiple trials of eliciting events.
The result is a series of positive and negative voltage deflections that are referred to as components.
Longer-latency components ( > 150 msec) tend to reflect information-processing activity that is cognitive
in nature and is thus less dependent on stimulus modality and more dependent on the significance of the
eliciting event in the subject’s concurrent tasks. They are usually referred to as endogenous components.
Current P300-based BCIs allow users to select items displayed on a computer screen.
The specific set of circumstances for eliciting the P300 ERP is known as the Oddball Paradigm.
A subject is presented with a series of events (i.e.,stimuli), each of which falls into one of two
classes.
The events that fall into one of the classes frequent than those that fall into the other class.
The subject performs a task that requires classifying each event into one of the two classes.
The events that fall into the less-frequent class elicit a P300.
As long as an experimental design adopts the three attributes of the oddball paradigm, any stimulus and
any classification task can elicit a P300.
A P300 can be elicited by an event that consists of the absence of a stimulus, if that absence satisfies the
conditions of the oddball paradigm.
Figure 12 illustrates a typical P300 experiment. The letters ‘O’ and ‘X’ flash on a video screen in a
random order at a rate of one per second.
The X occurs infrequently (e.g., 20 % of the flashes) and is thus the oddball stimulus, while the O occurs
frequently. The subject is asked to count the number of times one of the stimuli (e.g., X ) occurs.
Each time a stimulus occurs, a marker is placed in the data file to indicate the identity of the stimulus, X
or O
Each stimulus is presented on the screen for 100 msec, and then the screen is blank for 900 msec until
the presentation of the next stimulus.
The ERPs elicited by the oddball stimulus at midline electrode locations Fz, Cz, and Pz of the 10–20
system for 800 msec after the stimulus.
15
Figure 12. Time course of rare (i.e., oddball) (X) and common (O) stimuli in a standard oddball protocol. (B)
Average oddball ERPs from a subject for electrode locations Fz, Cz, and Pz.
The three responses show a typical P300 scalp topography: the most prominent potential is a positive
component occurring about 350 msec after the X stimulus; and it is largest at the Pz electrode and
attenuates at more anterior and posterior locations.
It should be noted that the results would be essentially the same even if the subject had been asked to
count the frequent O stimuli rather than the rare X stimuli.
- P300 is always elicited by the rare events.
- P300 latency may vary from 250 to 750 msec
A famous example of an early BCI based on EEG is the P300 now-classic BCI “speller” based on the
oddball paradigm, the 26 letters of the English alphabet are displayed in the form of a 6 × 6 matrix on a
computer screen.
In order to spell a word, the subject must select each letter comprising the word by focusing attention on
that letter in the matrix.
While the subject is focusing on the letter or command, the rows and columns of the matrix are repeatedly
flashed in random order.
Each flash of a row or column lasts 100 ms, and the interval between flashes is fixed at either 500 ms or
125 ms.
16
Only when the row or column containing a subject’s chosen letter or command is flashed is a large P300
generated by the subject’s brain.
The subject’s choice of letter or command can thus be inferred by keeping track of which flashed row
and column elicited the largest P300s.
17
This signal can be detected using a classifier such as linear discriminant analysis (LDA). The subject’s
choice of letter or command can thus be inferred by keeping track of which f lashed row and column
elicited the largest P300s
18
To reduce false positives due to alpha rhythms, a screening experiment with eyes closed was first
performed, and frequencies with power more than twice the mean power between 4 Hz and 35 Hz were
excluded from the stimulation frequencies.
Additionally, all stimulation frequencies were odd multiples of the frequency resolution to prevent one
stimulation frequency being twice another stimulation frequency.
The user views three red boxes each of which flickers at a different frequency. By choosing to focus on
the 8-Hz box, it elicits EEG activity at 8 Hz and its harmonic frequencies (as shown in the frequency
spectrum of EEG activity at occipital location O2; blue trace in bottom panel). Also shown for
comparison is the spectrum produced when the user is not looking at one of the boxes (red trace).
19
20
21
thought to be conveyed instead by the firing rate (number of spikes per second) and/or the timing of
spikes.
Neurons are therefore often modeled as emitting a 0 or 1 digital output. Similarly, in extracellular
recordings typically done in awake animals a spike is often represented as a short vertical bar at the time
the spike occurred. Neural cells, or neurons, are the primary functional units of the nervous system,
responsible for transmitting information through electrical and chemical signals. The activity of neural
cells can be broadly categorized into two main types:
Resting State: Neurons are typically in a resting state when they are not actively sending signals. During
this state, the neuron maintains a negative resting membrane potential, meaning that the inside of the cell
is more negatively charged compared to the outside. This resting potential is maintained by the selective
permeability of the cell membrane to ions such as potassium (K+) and sodium (Na+), as well as the
action of ion pumps like the sodium-potassium pump.
Action Potential: When a neuron receives a strong enough stimulus, it can depolarize and generate an
action potential. This is a rapid change in membrane potential where the inside of the cell becomes more
positively charged. This depolarization is caused by the opening of voltage-gated ion channels, allowing
sodium ions to flow into the cell. The action potential then propagates down the length of the neuron's
axon, ultimately leading to the release of neurotransmitters at the synapse.
24
Synapses can be excitatory or inhibitory. As the name suggests, excitatory synapses cause a momentary
increase in the local membrane potential of the postsynaptic cell. This increase is called an excitatory
postsynaptic potential (EPSP).
EPSPs contribute to a higher probability of firing a spike by the postsynaptic cell. Inhibitory synapses
do the opposite – they cause inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs), which temporarily decrease the
local membrane potential of the postsynaptic cell.
A neuron is called excitatory or inhibitory based on the kind of synapse it forms with postsynaptic
neurons. Each neuron forms only one kind of synapse, and therefore if an excitatory neuron is to inhibit
a second neuron, it must excite an inhibitory “interneuron,” which then inhibits the desired neuron.
Spike Generation
When the neuron receives sufficiently strong inputs from its synapses for its membrane potential to cross
a neuron-specific threshold, a spike is emitted (Figure 20).
This makes the neuron a hybrid analog-digital computing device: digital 0/1 inputs are converted to
analog changes in the local membrane potential, followed by summation of these changes at the soma,
and a spike if the summation of changes exceeds threshold.
This simplified model of course ignores the complex and potentially important forms of signal processing
associated with dendrites, but the threshold model of a neuron has proven to be a useful abstraction in
neural modeling and artificial neural networks.
Adapting the Connections: Synaptic Plasticity
A critical component of the brain’s adaptive capabilities is the ability of neurons to change the strength
of the connections between themselves through synaptic plasticity.
Numerous forms of synaptic plasticity have been experimentally observed, the most studied being long-
term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD).
Both involve changes to a synapse that last for hours or even days. More recently, other types of plasticity
have been characterized, including spike timing dependent plasticity (STDP), where the relative timing
of input and output spikes determines the polarity of synaptic change, and short-term
facilitation/depression, where the plasticity is rapid but not long-lasting.
25
LTD
Long-term depression or LTD involves a decrease in the strength of a synaptic connection caused, for
example, by uncorrelated firing between the two neurons involved. LTD has been observed most
prominently in the cerebellum, although it also coexists with LTP in the hippocampus, neocortex, and
other brain areas.
STDP
Traditional experimental protocols demonstrating LTP/LTD involved stimulating a presynaptic neuron
and a postsynaptic neuron simultaneously.
These protocols manipulate the firing rate of pre-and postsynaptic neurons but not the timing between
presynaptic and postsynaptic spikes.
The precise timing of pre-and postsynaptic spikes can determine whether the change in synaptic strength
is positive or negative. This form of synaptic plasticity has been termed spike timing dependent plasticity
(STDP).
26
The types of synaptic plasticity discussed above are called long-term plasticity because the changes they
cause can last for hours, days, or even longer periods of time.
27