0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views2 pages

SOC Reflection

This paper critiques the concept of heterosexual hegemony, referencing earlier theories by Oswald, Blume, and Marks while highlighting its diminishing relevance in today's diverse society. It introduces a new hegemonic heteromorphic model that accounts for evolving gender identities and family structures, emphasizing the need for a theoretical framework that reflects the complexities of pluralistic societies. The paper illustrates how societal acceptance of diverse gender expressions and family forms is challenging traditional notions of heterosexuality.

Uploaded by

nancywang23333
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views2 pages

SOC Reflection

This paper critiques the concept of heterosexual hegemony, referencing earlier theories by Oswald, Blume, and Marks while highlighting its diminishing relevance in today's diverse society. It introduces a new hegemonic heteromorphic model that accounts for evolving gender identities and family structures, emphasizing the need for a theoretical framework that reflects the complexities of pluralistic societies. The paper illustrates how societal acceptance of diverse gender expressions and family forms is challenging traditional notions of heterosexuality.

Uploaded by

nancywang23333
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

This paper combines the theoretical analysis of heterosexual hegemony.

Initially, it recalls

the work of Oswald, Blume, and Marks in 2005, theorizing heterosexuality as an inseparable

combination of analysis of gender, sexual orientation, and family attitudes (Allen and Shawn,

2018). However, social and political changes over the past decade have weakened the theory's

applicability in today's diverse society. On this basis, the paper proposes a new hegemonic

heteromorphic model, focusing on the changes of different gender identities and family forms in

various contexts, while focusing on their adjustment over the life cycle (Allen and Shawn, 2018).

By integrating the analysis of heteronormality and heteronormativity, the paper proposes a new

theoretical framework aimed at better understanding the evolution of heteronormativity in

pluralistic societies and its impact on family life.

Heterosexual hegemony is like a societal rule that heterosexual relationships are more

advantageous in every way. For example, society's expectations of traditional gender roles for

men and women were a manifestation of heterosexual hegemony, such as that men should be

strong and women should be gentle. However, modern society is gradually breaking through

these stereotypes, and more and more people are beginning to accept and support different gender

expressions and sexual orientations. Given the shifting heterosexual hegemony, taking the family

as an example, it might have been considered in the past that only heterosexual families were

"normal" while other forms of family structure were marginalized. But today, pluralistic forms

such as same-sex couples and transgender families have become more visible, demonstrating a

challenge to heterosexual hegemony. These examples show how heterosexual hegemony is

gradually being challenged in different ways and society's acceptance of diversity is increasing.
Reference

Samuel H. Allen, & Shawn N. Mendez. (2018). Hegemonic Heteronormativity: Toward a New

Era of Queer Family Theory: Hegemonic Heteronormativity. Journal of Family Theory &

Review, 10, 70–86. [Link]

You might also like