Scribd
Upload
5 views5 pages

OUTPUT

The document presents the results of a crosstab analysis examining the relationship between contraceptive methods (Kontrasepsi), menstrual status (Menstruasi), and age (Usia) using a dataset of 42 valid cases. It includes chi-square tests to assess the significance of the relationships, with some results indicating statistically significant associations. The analysis also notes the handling of missing values and provides details on the processing time and dimensions of the dataset.

Uploaded by

sundari sitompul
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
5 views5 pages

OUTPUT

The document presents the results of a crosstab analysis examining the relationship between contraceptive methods (Kontrasepsi), menstrual status (Menstruasi), and age (Usia) using a dataset of 42 valid cases. It includes chi-square tests to assess the significance of the relationships, with some results indicating statistically significant associations. The analysis also notes the handling of missing values and provides details on the processing time and dimensions of the dataset.

Uploaded by

sundari sitompul
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

CROSSTABS

/TABLES=Kontrasepsi BY Menstruasi BY Usia


/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ
/CELLS=COUNT

/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Crosstabs

Notes

Output Created 04-May-2025 11:08:53

Comments

Input Active Dataset DataSet0

Filter <none>

Weight <none>

Split File <none>

N of Rows in Working Data


42
File

Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are treated
as missing.

Cases Used Statistics for each table are based on all


the cases with valid data in the
specified range(s) for all variables in
each table.

Syntax CROSSTABS
/TABLES=Kontrasepsi BY Menstruasi
BY Usia
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ
/CELLS=COUNT
/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.047

Elapsed Time 00:00:00.023

Dimensions Requested 3

Cells Available 142987

[DataSet0]

Case Processing Summary


Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Kontrasepsi * Menstruasi *
42 100.0% 0 .0% 42 100.0%
Usia

Kontrasepsi * Menstruasi * Usia Crosstabulation

Count

Menstruasi

Usia Tidak Normal Normal Total

23 Kontrasepsi KB Suntik 1 1

Total 1 1

24 Kontrasepsi KB Suntik 1 1

Total 1 1

26 Kontrasepsi KB Suntik 1 1

Total 1 1

28 Kontrasepsi KB Suntik 2 2

Total 2 2

29 Kontrasepsi IUD 1 1

Total 1 1

30 Kontrasepsi KB Suntik 2 0 2

IUD 0 2 2

Total 2 2 4

32 Kontrasepsi KB Suntik 1 0 1

IUD 0 6 6

Total 1 6 7

33 Kontrasepsi KB Suntik 1 0 1

IUD 0 1 1

Total 1 1 2

34 Kontrasepsi KB Suntik 1 0 1

IUD 0 2 2

Total 1 2 3

36 Kontrasepsi KB Suntik 1 0 1

IUD 0 1 1
Total 1 1 2

37 Kontrasepsi IUD 1 1

Total 1 1

38 Kontrasepsi KB Suntik 2 0 2

IUD 0 2 2

Total 2 2 4

39 Kontrasepsi KB Suntik 1 0 1

IUD 0 3 3

Total 1 3 4

40 Kontrasepsi KB Suntik 1 0 1

IUD 0 5 5

Total 1 5 6

42 Kontrasepsi IUD 3 3

Total 3 3

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Usia Value df sided) sided) sided)

23 Pearson Chi-Square .a

N of Valid Cases 1

24 Pearson Chi-Square .a

N of Valid Cases 1

26 Pearson Chi-Square .a

N of Valid Cases 1

28 Pearson Chi-Square .a

N of Valid Cases 2

29 Pearson Chi-Square .a

N of Valid Cases 1

30 Pearson Chi-Square 4.000b 1 .046

Continuity Correctionc 1.000 1 .317

Likelihood Ratio 5.545 1 .019

Fisher's Exact Test .333 .167

Linear-by-Linear Association 3.000 1 .083

N of Valid Cases 4
32 Pearson Chi-Square 7.000d 1 .008

Continuity Correctionc 1.215 1 .270

Likelihood Ratio 5.742 1 .017

Fisher's Exact Test .143 .143

Linear-by-Linear Association 6.000 1 .014

N of Valid Cases 7

33 Pearson Chi-Square 2.000e 1 .157

Continuity Correctionc .000 1 1.000

Likelihood Ratio 2.773 1 .096

Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .500

Linear-by-Linear Association 1.000 1 .317

N of Valid Cases 2

34 Pearson Chi-Square 3.000f 1 .083

Continuity Correctionc .188 1 .665

Likelihood Ratio 3.819 1 .051

Fisher's Exact Test .333 .333

Linear-by-Linear Association 2.000 1 .157

N of Valid Cases 3

36 Pearson Chi-Square 2.000e 1 .157

Continuity Correctionc .000 1 1.000

Likelihood Ratio 2.773 1 .096

Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .500

Linear-by-Linear Association 1.000 1 .317

N of Valid Cases 2

37 Pearson Chi-Square .a

N of Valid Cases 1

38 Pearson Chi-Square 4.000b 1 .046

Continuity Correctionc 1.000 1 .317

Likelihood Ratio 5.545 1 .019

Fisher's Exact Test .333 .167

Linear-by-Linear Association 3.000 1 .083

N of Valid Cases 4

39 Pearson Chi-Square 4.000g 1 .046

Continuity Correctionc .444 1 .505

Likelihood Ratio 4.499 1 .034


Fisher's Exact Test .250 .250

Linear-by-Linear Association 3.000 1 .083

N of Valid Cases 4

40 Pearson Chi-Square 6.000h 1 .014

Continuity Correctionc .960 1 .327

Likelihood Ratio 5.407 1 .020

Fisher's Exact Test .167 .167

Linear-by-Linear Association 5.000 1 .025

N of Valid Cases 6

42 Pearson Chi-Square .a

N of Valid Cases 3

a. No statistics are computed because Kontrasepsi and Menstruasi are constants.

b. 4 cells (100,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,00.

c. Computed only for a 2x2 table

d. 3 cells (75,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,14.

e. 4 cells (100,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,50.

f. 4 cells (100,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,33.

g. 4 cells (100,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,25.

h. 4 cells (100,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,17.

You might also like