Picture this.
A new establishment was just built across a public park where families and
children play every day. Though the families never expected one to be built so close to home,
they celebrate its existence, for its industry is known to support the personal development of
young men and women, espouse essential lessons about interpersonal communication, and
promote body positivity.
Within this establishment, female entertainers demonstrate their physical prowess
through dance. Customers come in to marvel at the alluring acrobatics that show off the limits of
the human form, in strength, flexibility, and sensuality. After performing, beautiful women that
men typically never speak to, generously offer their time and companionship to customers.
Through the guidance of these entertainers, men learn how to ask for permission, treat women
well, and respect their boundaries. In between beverages and dances, the men learn about how
the history of gendered oppression still affects women today, and once they’ve been enlightened,
they thank the entertainers by paying them handsomely.
There are rules, however. Mainly — no touching. And also, always ask for consent.
Anyone who has trouble internalizing these rules is thrown out. Should something wrongful
happen within this building — and there are cameras and members of security who work to
ensure that nothing happens — there is an understanding that it’s usually the man who has
erred. Clients face harsh criminal penalties for any crimes they commit, and the entertainers are
viewed with the tender and forgiving kindness they well deserve. For the onus is on the man to
be responsible for his body and his actions, and the establishment prioritizes the safety of its
employees, and nothing is worth risking their welfare.
The men exit this building humbled by their place in this world, with a renewed respect
for women. But in truth, the establishment does not service the men who visit. Rather, it serves
the women.
Is it possible to perform sex work as a choice, not as a result of oppression? Yes.
Is it necessarily objectifying? No, but some people can rightfully feel disempowered
doing sex work. But that’s their call, not ours.
More stuff. Good, positive stuff.
I tell Lingling my vision of sex work, and she laughs. Her stage name doesn’t actually
mean anything. It’s just meant to sound oriental. We’re on video call, talking through our
respective phones, laying on our respective beds. It’s a Friday night.
L: “That’s not possible. You will be violated for sure, repeatedly.”
D: “If the rules were enforced more strictly, is there a chance that sex work could be
wholesome? That it just becomes any other work and people don't get violated?”
L: “The violation is where the money comes from.”
D: “So it sounds like the lack of enforcement comes intrinsically with sex work.”
L: “Yeah, I mean, it's like if you were a drug dealer. Can you enforce the rules so your
clients won’t OD? Your financial interests mean you’re not invested in the wellness of your
clients.”
Learn About Sex Work
Sex Workers Outreach Project USA
The overwhelming majority of sex worker clients do not perpetrate violence against sex workers. And the
central cause of violence is institutional alienation of sex workers from law enforcement protection and a
justice system that leads most sex workers to distrust and fear law enforcement officials. Violent
individuals do not fear repercussions and prey on sex workers in particular. Most interactions between sex
workers and law enforcement involve arrest, and law enforcement and judicial system officials frequently
ignore or doubt reports by sex workers. So sex workers either do not report sexual and physical assault to
law enforcement or law enforcement officials do not sufficiently respond to complaints, and individuals
remain free and continue to perpetrate crimes against sex workers.
—
Yes, of course. That was a mere fantasy. So imagine this more realistic world instead.
This is a world where most people support transgender rights, but would never date a
transgender person. Where people love drag queens, but would hate for their significant other to
be one. Where people recognize the importance of nonbinary identities, but still mess up
nonbinary pronouns.
In this world, women who were never offered the same opportunities as men know of a
way to financially support themselves. Other women have also discovered a way to bamboozle
the patriarchy, a loophole in the gender norms rulebook that offers an additional stream of
revenue for women — a side hustle if you will.
All of these women start working in an establishment where they dance for hours into
the night. Some work once a week, others work more frequently. The job is physically
demanding, and many employees get injured on the job. They’re thankful that they receive
health insurance and are protected by the law.
A few years ago, the country realized that these women are a minority, and allowing
them to live their lives doesn’t change how the rest of conventional society goes about its day. So
instead of forbidding their livelihoods, which would put them in harm’s way, the country decides
to offer them the same rights as any other worker.
What if sex work is a patriarchal bargain?
And so what if it is? The existence of women is a patriarchal bargain.
“I say this not bc I’m angry or anything, ur allowed to do anything u want, but I think u have an unhealthy
need for male attention and validation. And I think u were being manipulative w telling me that u valued
me for not judging at all right before asking me that question. Ik there are guys out there that would be
fine w it, I guess I’m just not one of them.”
I tried to tell him that I wasn’t actually serious about working at a strip club. That I was
simply toying with the idea, and it was actually unlikely to happen in reality.
“It’s not really about how ‘unlikely’ it’s going to happen but rather the morality of it all. Like u’d literally be a
sex worker, selling ur body to turn on random crusty men. Esp considering ur stance on gender equality, u
can see how I might find it confusing and hypocritical that u’d be happy as a stripper. U so desperately
want to believe that men and women are exactly the same, but u crave male attention and validation and
sexual objectification so much, that ur willing to be a stripper.”
Interview with Lisa about her experience dating.
Interview with Lucy. What does it mean to be a sex worker?
I was having dinner with my friend Suyash, and I brought up the fact that I just had a
conversation with a stripper about the definition of sex work, and I prepared myself to present
an idea I know he would disagree with. “She pointed out that housewives can also be viewed as
sex workers.”
We argued for about two hours.
He posited that it’s unfair to simplify all the work a housewife does as sex work. I posited
that it’s not derogatory to call a housewife a sex worker — it’s actually a means of liberating
women.
What of other kinds of physical labor, like cooking or cleaning? What of taking care of
children? What of managing household finances?
It sounds like we need to have a clearer definition of sex work, and I see sex work as not
simply providing literal sex. It’s also everything surrounding the act of sex. Emotional labor too.
Despite his adamant denial, I believed he thought the term “sex worker” was derogatory, which
was the real reason he was against my proposal.
And then he finally said, “Look, housewives work extremely hard, and they’re the
foundations of essential labor for the household. They already face so much trouble and stigma
on so many levels in society, and they are constantly being attacked for their — it’s unfair to call
them sex workers.”
And that was when I understood. Like the conventional sex worker, housewives are also
stigmatized in their own way. Many women with defined roles in the service of society are.
As I walked home that night, I remember thinking that all relationships are
performative. In the performance of a housewife, you can’t be viewed as a sex worker. The
relationship relies on your moral integrity.
But here’s another crazy thought. What if sex work could be feminist work?
If housewives are sex workers, then female mobility was founded in sex work.
There’s a story that I’m reminded of.
“They all know it is there, all the people of Omelas. Some of them have come to see it,
others are content merely to know it is there. They all know that it has to be there. Some of them
understand why, and some do not, but they all understand that their happiness, the beauty of
their city, the tenderness of their friendships, the health of their children, the wisdom of their
scholars, the skill of their makers, even the abundance of their harvest and the kindly weathers
of their skies, depend wholly on this child’s abominable misery.”
— Ursula Le Guin, “The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas”
Being against sex work is a thing of morality — the desire to differentiate yourself from a
sex worker, to mark yourself as more moral.
Revolt against sex work is a means of self-opposition that further retains the sacredness
of one’s own sexual relationships that are deeply transactional in nature. It allows us to believe
there’s something sacred about a woman freely offering her body to a man. Without the
oppression of sex workers, we cannot have pure relationships and marriages in conventional
society.