Scribd
Upload
5 views1 page

Reflection

The project involved recording iterations of Chopin’s Op. 10 No. 4, focusing on improving technical stability and musicality through a structured practice plan. Immediate self-listening after each take highlighted areas for improvement, allowing for targeted refinement in subsequent recordings. The use of specific, attainable goals and the PPR cycle facilitated a gradual increase in tempo while enhancing overall performance quality.

Uploaded by

Bowen Chen
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
5 views1 page

Reflection

The project involved recording iterations of Chopin’s Op. 10 No. 4, focusing on improving technical stability and musicality through a structured practice plan. Immediate self-listening after each take highlighted areas for improvement, allowing for targeted refinement in subsequent recordings. The use of specific, attainable goals and the PPR cycle facilitated a gradual increase in tempo while enhancing overall performance quality.

Uploaded by

Bowen Chen
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Week 5 – Project 1: The Dedicated Practice Cycle

Reflection

For this project, I recorded five iterations of the opening measures of Chopin’s Op. 10
No. 4, following the assigned process of baseline recording, planned practice steps, and
real-time listening. Because the Etude is highly technical and exposes even small
weaknesses, my plan focused on stabilizing phrases that tended to slow down and
shaping clearer phrase direction while gradually increasing the tempo toward my target
of 152. This plan directly shaped my progress: each recording gave me concrete
evidence of what improved and what remained inconsistent, which helped me refine
the next step without becoming overwhelmed.

One of the most effective strategies was listening back immediately after each take.
Hearing myself in real time made the problems unavoidably clear; instead of relying on
how the passage felt, I had to confront how it actually sounded. I began noticing small
places where transitions weakened, which later became anchors I monitored
intentionally in the following takes.

By setting a specific, attainable goal for each step (maintain pulse → shape dynamics
→ increase tempo → refine musicality), I kept the work inside my Zone of Proximal
Development. This prevented frustration when raising the tempo; by the fourth and fifth
takes, the technical passages no longer felt forced, which echoes Vygotsky’s discussion
in the readings. The gradual, layered approach helped me avoid the common trap of
jumping too quickly to performance tempo.

Finally, the PPR cycle—Production, Perception, Reflection. Each reflection between


takes sharpened my awareness of both progress and limitations, making the final take
not only faster and more secure but also more musical. I found myself able to add
shaping and expressive nuance without sacrificing clarity, something that would not
have happened without a deliberate, research-informed plan.

Overall, the process showed me how systematic reflection, listening, and stepwise goals
can transform even a short technical passage into a meaningful learning sequence.

You might also like