Argumentative Essays

1) Should homework be given every day?

Homework is a common part of school life. Some students feel it helps them learn, while others
feel it takes away their free time. In my opinion, homework should not be given every day.
Instead, teachers should give homework only when it is truly useful.
Firstly, students need time to rest and recharge. After school, many students are tired from
classes, travel, and activities. If they get homework daily, they may not sleep well or feel fresh
the next day. Good rest is important for memory and concentration.
Secondly, students should have time to develop other skills. Children learn not only from books
but also from sports, music, reading stories, helping at home, and spending time with family.
When homework comes every day, students may stop doing these healthy activities. For
example, a student who wants to practice football or drawing may not get enough time because
of long assignments.
Thirdly, daily homework can cause stress, especially when many teachers give work on the same
day. Some students rush through homework just to finish it, and they do not understand the topic
properly. In addition, students may start copying from friends or the internet, which defeats the
purpose of learning.
Some people argue that homework every day builds discipline and improves practice. However, I
still disagree because practice can be done in class, and homework can be given a few times a
week in a planned way. Short, meaningful homework is better than daily heavy work.
In conclusion, homework should not be given every day. Schools should focus on quality, not
quantity. If homework is limited and well-designed, students will learn better and still have time
for rest and hobbies.

2) Are mobile phones good or bad for students?

Mobile phones are everywhere today. Many students use them for calls, messages, games, and
videos. People often debate if phones are helpful or harmful for students. In my opinion, mobile
phones are mostly bad for students if used without rules, but they can be useful in a controlled
way.
Firstly, phones can distract students from studying. Social media, games, and short videos are
designed to keep us watching for a long time. A student may plan to study for one hour but ends
up scrolling for two hours. This can reduce marks and also waste valuable time.
Secondly, too much phone use can affect health. Staring at screens for long hours can cause eye
strain and headaches. It can also reduce sleep if students use phones late at night. For example, if
a student watches videos before sleeping, they may wake up tired and feel sleepy in class.
Thirdly, phones can create problems like cheating and cyberbullying. Some students may use
phones during exams or share answers in groups. Others may face rude messages or online
pressure, which can harm their confidence.
Some people argue that phones are good because students can learn online, use educational apps,
and search information quickly. However, I still disagree with giving full freedom because many
students find it hard to control their screen time. Learning can happen, but distractions are
stronger.
In conclusion, mobile phones are not completely bad, but they can become harmful without
limits. Students should use them only for important calls and learning, with time restrictions.
Schools and parents should guide students so that phones help education instead of ruining it.

3) Should school uniforms be compulsory?

Many schools require students to wear uniforms, while some allow free dress. Students and
parents often argue about this topic. In my opinion, school uniforms should be compulsory
because they create equality, discipline, and a better learning environment.
Firstly, uniforms reduce differences between rich and poor students. When everyone wears the
same dress, students are less likely to judge each other by clothes. This helps students feel
included. For example, if one student wears expensive branded clothes, others may feel
uncomfortable. Uniforms remove this pressure.
Secondly, uniforms save time and reduce stress in the morning. Students do not have to think
daily about what to wear. Parents also spend less money because they do not need to buy many
fashionable clothes for school.
Thirdly, uniforms create discipline and a sense of belonging. When students wear the same
uniform, they feel like part of one team. It also helps teachers and security staff identify students
easily during trips or in crowded places.
Some people argue that uniforms stop students from expressing their personality. However, I still
disagree because students can express themselves in other ways, such as through their behaviour,
talents, hairstyles (if allowed), art, and communication. School is mainly for learning, not fashion
competitions.
In conclusion, school uniforms should be compulsory. They promote equality, reduce
unnecessary competition, and support a focused study environment. A simple uniform rule can
make school life easier and fairer for everyone.

4) Is online learning better than classroom learning?

Learning online has become popular in recent years. Some students enjoy learning from home,
while others miss classrooms. In my opinion, classroom learning is better than online learning
for most Class 8 students, although online learning can be helpful sometimes.
Firstly, classrooms provide direct interaction with teachers. When students do not understand
something, they can ask questions immediately. Teachers can also notice if a student is confused
and explain again. In online classes, students may feel shy to speak, or the teacher may not notice
their problems.
Secondly, classroom learning improves discipline and routine. Going to school on time, sitting
properly, and following a timetable builds good habits. At home, students may get distracted by
TV, mobile phones, noise, or even comfort and laziness. For example, some students attend
online classes but do not listen carefully.
Thirdly, schools help students develop social skills. In classrooms, students learn teamwork,
communication, and friendship. Activities like group projects, sports, and assemblies are
important for overall growth. Online learning cannot fully replace these experiences.
Some people argue that online learning is better because it saves travel time and allows learning
at one’s own speed. However, I still disagree because many students face internet problems, lack
of devices, and less motivation at home. Also, learning alone can feel boring and lonely.
In conclusion, classroom learning is better for regular education because it supports
understanding, discipline, and social development. Online learning can be used as extra support,
but it should not fully replace classrooms.

5) Should junk food be banned in schools?

Junk food like chips, sugary drinks, and fast food is popular among students. Many schools sell
these items in canteens. People argue whether it should be allowed. In my opinion, junk food
should be banned in schools because schools should protect students’ health.
Firstly, junk food is unhealthy when eaten regularly. It often has too much oil, sugar, and salt.
This can lead to weight gain, weak immunity, and low energy. A student who eats junk food daily
may feel lazy and tired in class.
Secondly, junk food can harm concentration and learning. Healthy food like fruits, nuts, milk,
and home-cooked meals provide better nutrition for the brain. For example, after eating sugary
food, students may feel active for a short time but later feel sleepy or restless.
Thirdly, banning junk food teaches good habits. Schools are places where students learn values
and discipline. If schools promote healthy eating, students may continue these habits at home
too. Canteens can sell healthier options like sandwiches, sprouts, idli, poha, fruits, and fresh
juice.
Some people argue that students should have freedom of choice and junk food is fine “once in a
while.” However, I still disagree because many students do not control their choices, especially
when junk food is easily available. Schools can guide students by offering better options.
In conclusion, junk food should be banned in schools. This will improve student health, energy,
and focus. Schools should encourage nutritious food so students can learn well and stay strong.

6) Is social media helpful for teenagers?

Social media is used by many teenagers for chatting, entertainment, and sharing photos. Some
say it is useful, while others say it is dangerous. In my opinion, social media is helpful only if
used carefully, but it can be harmful if used too much or without guidance.
Firstly, social media can help teenagers learn and connect. Students can watch educational
videos, follow science pages, and join study groups. They can also stay in touch with friends and
family, especially if they live far away. For example, students can share notes and reminders
about homework.
Secondly, it can build confidence and creativity. Some teenagers share art, writing, or music
online and get encouragement. They may learn new skills through tutorials and positive
communities.
However, social media also has serious disadvantages. It can waste time and reduce focus. Many
teenagers keep checking notifications, which affects studies. It can also create pressure to look
perfect, leading to insecurity. In addition, there are risks like cyberbullying, fake news, and
strangers who may not be safe.
Some people argue that social media is completely bad and should be avoided. However, I still
disagree with a total ban because it can be useful for learning and communication. The real
problem is uncontrolled use.
In conclusion, social media can be helpful for teenagers, but only with limits. Teenagers should
use it for a fixed time, avoid harmful content, and never share personal information with
strangers. With proper guidance, social media can support learning instead of causing problems.

7) Should exams be removed from schools?-yes

Exams are an important part of school, but many students feel stressed because of them. Some
people suggest removing exams completely. In my opinion, exams should not be removed, but
they should be improved so that students learn without extreme pressure.
Firstly, exams help measure learning. They show what students understand and where they need
improvement. Without exams, teachers may find it harder to check progress. For example, if a
student is weak in maths, exam results can help identify the problem early.
Secondly, exams teach responsibility and time management. Preparing for tests encourages
students to revise, practice, and stay regular in studies. These habits are useful later in life too.
Thirdly, exams create a common standard. If students move to another school or apply for higher
classes, exams help compare performance in a fair way.
Some people argue that exams cause stress and do not test real skills. This is partly true.
However, I still disagree with removing exams completely because assessment is necessary.
Instead, schools can reduce stress by having shorter tests, more project work, open-book
activities sometimes, and marks for class participation. Teachers can also focus on
understanding, not just memorizing.
In conclusion, exams should not be removed from schools. They are useful for checking learning
and building discipline. But exams should be balanced with projects, activities, and regular
feedback so students can learn happily and confidently.