Keener 2015
Keener 2015
Injuries
Jay D. Keener, MDa,*, Paul M. Sethi, MDb
KEYWORDS
Triceps tendon injury Triceps rupture Elbow Distal triceps Treatment
KEY POINTS
Distal triceps ruptures are uncommon injuries.
Advanced imaging is required for an accurate diagnosis.
Complete tendon injuries are best managed surgically, whereas some partial tears can be treated
conservatively.
Surgery is successful in restoring function.
a
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University, CB# 8233, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St Louis,
MO 63110, USA; b The ONS Sports and Shoulder Service, 6 Greenwich Office Park, Greenwich, CT 06831, USA
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: keenerj@[Link]
Fig. 1. Deep view of triceps muscle and tendon. The Fig. 3. Insertional footprint of the central triceps
deep muscle has been elevated revealing the central tendon. The insertion of the central tendon into the
triceps tendon. Note the well-developed rolled edge olecranon is broad and dome shaped.
on the medial side of the deep tendon (4 asterisks).
Fig. 4. Superficial appearance of the triceps tendon insertion. (A) The lateral triceps expansion is continuous with
the anconeus muscle and lateral antebrachial fascia inserting distally into the dorsolateral ulna. (B) The lateral
triceps expansion is broad and thinner than the central tendon, and is approximately 70% of the width of the
central tendon.
DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING
Fig. 5. Flake sign. Lateral radiograph of an elbow
Plain radiographs should be obtained on presenta- with a triceps tendon tear. Note the displaced avulsion
tion and include anteroposterior, lateral, and obli- of an osteophyte from the olecranon tip indicating a
que views of the elbow. The presence of a small triceps tendon injury.
644 Keener & Sethi
Surgical Treatment
Most complete triceps tendon injuries should be
managed with surgical repair.15,22 The exceptions
include very low demand patients or those not
medically fit for surgery. Partial tendon injuries
that are high grade (involving >50% of the tendon),
associated with tendon retraction and extension
weakness, or that have failed conservative treat-
ment are also recommended for surgical repair
(Fig. 7). These indications are particularly appli-
cable in active individuals and athletes. Ideally,
Fig. 6. Sagittal T2-weighted MRI of a displaced acute surgery should be performed within 2 to 3 weeks
triceps tendon injury; a complete rupture with only a
for acute complete tears with tendon retraction.
few fibers of the deep central triceps tendon intact.
Primary repair can be performed in a delayed
more common at the medial aspect of the
tendon.6,9
TREATMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
Because there exists no classification system for
triceps tendon ruptures, injuries are generally
described by severity and location: partial versus
complete ruptures and tendon versus musculoten-
dinous injuries. Most triceps tendon injuries occur
at the tendon insertion. Advanced imaging is usu-
ally necessary to confirm the severity of injury and
the recommended treatment is dictated by the
injury severity and the age and physical demands
of the patient. In general, partial tears with minimal
strength loss can be managed nonsurgically and
complete ruptures are treated with surgical repair.
Conservative Treatment
Tears of the triceps occurring within the muscle or
musculotendinous junction are thought to have
good healing potential and are generally treated
conservatively. Partial tears of the tendon are more
controversial. In sedentary individuals, all partial
tears can be managed conservatively. When partial
tears are not associated with tendon retraction, Fig. 7. Sagittal MRI of high-grade partial tear of the
strength is usually preserved and conservative treat- distal triceps tendon. The superficial tendon is torn,
ment is preferred. Treatment includes a brief period whereas the deep tendon remains intact. Arrow point
(3–4 weeks) of immobilization at 30 flexion followed to retracted superficial tendon and surrounding fluid.
Distal Triceps Tendon Injuries 645
fashion and may be more feasible with injuries 3 parallel tunnels23 (Fig. 9) have been described.
associated with less tendon retraction. The sutures are then tied over the olecranon as a
bone bridge with the elbow held in near full exten-
sion. Alternatively, the triceps may be reattached
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE with the use of suture anchors placed within the
A variety of techniques have been described for tri- olecranon tip.21,24–26 With these techniques,
ceps tendon repair. There is no clear superior tech- side-to-side sutures are recommended to rein-
nique in terms of clinical outcomes but each has force the edges of the repair.
theoretic advantages. All techniques focus on reat- Modified repair techniques have recently
tachment of the torn central tendon to the olecranon. become more popular in attempts to restore a
In addition, any disruption of the lateral triceps larger, native anatomic footprint and improve the
expansion should be performed and helps to mechanical strength of the repair. The strength of
augment the primary repair. In cases in which there the native triceps tendon has been shown to rival
is a significant amount of olecranon bone attached that of the patellar tendon at roughly 1700 N in ca-
to the displaced triceps tendon, it may be favorable davers.27,28 Yeh and colleagues7 showed signifi-
to reattach the bone fragment with either heavy su- cantly greater repair strength (under cyclical
tures or anchors rather than to excise the bone. loading) with a transosseous-equivalent repair
Perhaps the most historically popular triceps compared with both traditional bone tunnel
repair technique involves the creation of bone tun- and suture anchor repairs. In addition, the
nels in the olecranon. Purchase of the central transosseous-equivalent repair gave a better rec-
tendon is achieved with high-tensile, braided su- reation of the native triceps footprint qualitatively
tures in a running, locked (Krackow) fashion or compared with the other techniques, although
with use of a Bunnell-type suture configuration. this was not quantified. With the transosseous-
The strands of suture are threaded through bone equivalent repair, 2 anchors are positioned in the
tunnels; both crossing tunnels13 (Fig. 8) and proximal olecranon approximately 12 mm from
the olecranon tip. Sutures from these anchors are repair, 2 core high-tensile, braided sutures are
then passed through the tendon creating horizon- woven through the central triceps tendon, creating
tal mattress stitches. These sutures, along with the 4 repair strands (2 medial and lateral suture ends)
tails of a Krackow-type suture weaved through the (Fig. 11). A shuttle suture is passed through the
triceps tendon, are then secured to 2 anchors distal tendon on both the medial and lateral as-
placed more distally on the dorsal aspect of the pects of the tendon as well. Two parallel bone tun-
ulna (Fig. 10).7 This arrangement effectively com- nels are created at the medial and lateral aspects
presses the distal tendon footprint against the of the olecranon, exiting the dorsal aspect of the
bone, creating a larger area of boney apposition ulna. The 3 strands of suture are passed through
and better recreating the large area of the native the olecranon bone tunnel on both the medial
triceps footprint. Alternatively, medial mattress and lateral sides. Next, each shuttle suture is
stitches from anchors can be combined with a used to repass the free ends of the Krackow suture
central tendon Bunnell-type suture secured back through each of the bone tunnels, creating a
through crossing bone tunnels.29 cruciate repair (1 limb from the medial and lateral
Knotless repair constructs have recently been sides are crossed into the opposite tunnel). All
studied and show favorable biomechanical slack is taken out of the 4 Krackow strands and
strength.30,31 In addition, this type of repair can the elbow is extended. All 4 strands are then
be performed with 1 anchor, thereby creating secured to an interference fit–type anchor placed
less expense than transosseous repair tech- after predrilling into the dorsal apex of the olec-
niques. Clark and colleagues31 studied an ranon, angled away from the articular surface.
anatomic knotless repair compared with a tradi-
tional cruciate bone tunnel repair in cadaveric el- POSTOPERATIVE CARE
bows. The knotless repair showed significantly
less displacement under cyclic loading and better Most protocols recommend immobilization of the
peak load to failure and yield strength than the elbow at 30 to 45 for a short period (1–2 weeks)
traditional repair. With the anatomic knotless to allow skin healing and protect the repair.15,22
Gentle active elbow flexion and passive or
gravity-assisted extension starts at 2 weeks and
continues until full range of motion has returned.
Active elbow extension is initiated at 4 weeks.
Light strengthening begins at 6 weeks with slow
progression until 3 months. Heavy lifting and
weight training should be delayed until 4 to
6 months following surgery.13 With the advent of
stronger repair constructs, some investigators
have recommended a more accelerated rehabilita-
tion protocol. We prefer to place the arm in a sling
rather than a splint and begin immediate active
and passive range of motion of the elbow and fore-
arm unrestricted. Patients should avoid lifting
more than 2.3 kg (5 pounds) during this phase.
Light triceps strengthening is initiated 6 weeks af-
ter surgery and advanced as tolerated. Direct
comparisons between rehabilitation timelines
have not been performed, therefore the advan-
tages and safety of accelerated rehabilitation pro-
tocols have not been established.
Fig. 11. Knotless repair construct. (A) The central tendon is secured with 2 separate sutures passed through the
tendon in a Krackow configuration creating 4 separate strands (2 medial and 2 lateral sutures). In addition, a
shuttle suture is passed through the medial and lateral aspects of the distal tendon. Three strands of suture
are passed through a medial and lateral longitudinal bone tunnel in the olecranon. (B) Each shuttle suture is
used to repass the free ends of both the medial and lateral Krackow sutures back through each of the bone tun-
nels, creating a cruciate repair. (C) A bone tunnel is created distal to the olecranon tip on the dorsal surface of the
bone, away from the articular surface. (D) The 4 limbs of suture are passed through an interference fit–type an-
chor to be secured into the bone tunnel. Note the extended position of the elbow to facilitate reduction of the
tendon. (E) Secured knotless cruciate repair of the triceps tendon.
suspected to be difficult, potential tendon primary repair. Petre and colleagues27 compared
augmentation should be discussed with the pa- the biomechanical strength of the intact triceps
tient before surgery. A variety of tendon augmen- tendon with direct tendon repair and repairs
tation procedures have been described and augmented with flexor carpi radialis tendon.
include allograft or autograft hamstring tendon Although neither repair construct was a strong as
augmentation, rotational anconeus flap, Achilles the native tendon, the augmented repairs were
tendon augmentation, and ligament augmentation nearly twice as strong as the repairs without
devices.15,32–34 The method of reconstruction in augmentation. In scenarios with deficient or
these cases depends on several factors, including poor-quality tissue, hamstring augmentation can
surgeon preference, tendon mobility and tissue be used to reinforce the repair or gain tendon
quality, and a variety of host factors. length. The tendon is woven in a Bunnell fashion
Repair augmentation with tendon can substan- through the residual tendon (Fig. 12). A transverse
tially improve the repair strength compared with bicortical tunnel is drilled 1 cm from the olecranon
648 Keener & Sethi
Fig. 12. Triceps tendon repair with graft augmentation. The triceps tendon is reinforced with a hamstring graft
woven through the tendon in a Bunnell-type manner (A). The tendon is fixated through the olecranon through a
transverse bone tunnel (B). (From Yeh PC, Dodds SD, Smart LR, et al. Distal triceps rupture. J Am Acad Orthop Surg
2010;18(1):31–40; with permission.)
tip. The free ends of the graft are passed through in 5 acute tears repaired with suture anchors at a
the tunnel from opposite directions. An interfer- mean 32 months following surgery. Function was
ence screw is placed, securing the graft within nearly normal in these patients with a mean
the tunnel with the elbow in extension. DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and
Hand) score of 1.4, American Shoulder and Elbow
CLINICAL OUTCOMES AND COMPLICATIONS Surgeons elbow score of 99.2, and a mean Mayo
Elbow Performance Index of 95.8. The results of
The clinical results of acute distal triceps tendon more anatomic repair constructs are largely un-
repairs are generally good; however, reruptures known. Kokkalis and colleagues29 reported the re-
have been described to occur in up to 20% of sults of 11 acute triceps tendon tears repaired with
cases.13 Successful repair is more predictable a double-row technique at a mean of 21 months
when performed within 2 to 3 weeks of injury. following surgery. All repairs were performed
One series noted that a primary repair was within 3 weeks of injury. The mean visual analog
feasible in only 6 of 15 cases when surgery scale pain score decreased from 8.5 preopera-
was performed more than 25 days after the tively to 2.4 at follow-up. The mean loss of elbow
injury.13 Most studies reporting the outcomes of extension was 7 and the mean arc of elbow mo-
triceps tendon repair are retrospective and tion was 136 . Elbow extension strength was
consist of small case series without control significantly improved but not quantified. Nine of
groups or direct comparisons of various repair the 11 patients were completely satisfied with the
constructs. In addition, outcomes are not re- surgery and had returned to full activity.
ported in a consistent fashion and often lack vali- Results of repairs of chronic ruptures often lack
dated scales of upper extremity function. quantitative data and objective outcome mea-
Van Riet and colleagues13 showed peak sures. However, Van Riet and colleagues13
strength of 92% (range of 75%–106%) and loss measured the outcomes of 9 chronic ruptures
of extension of 8 compared with the uninjured (average of 163 days before surgery) that under-
side at 1 year postoperatively in 14 acute tears went reconstructions. These patients showed, on
(average of 63 days before surgery) that were pri- average, 66% peak elbow extension strength
marily repaired using the transosseous cruciate (range of 35%–100%) and loss of elbow extension
technique. Mair and colleagues9 treated 11 acute of 13 . Despite the wide range of peak strength,
complete triceps tears in professional football this report shows that reconstructions of chronic
players with immediate repair. All but 1 missed tears are inferior to primary repairs of acute tears.
an entire season. There was 1 tendon rerupture. The results of repairs and reconstructions from 3
The remaining patients were doing well at 3 years recurrent rupture cases by van Riet and col-
postoperatively with no pain or subjective weak- leagues13 were functionally equivalent to results
ness. Bava and colleagues24 noted good results of first-time primary repairs.
Distal Triceps Tendon Injuries 649
Common complications of triceps tendon re- 8. Capo JT, Collins C, Beutel BG, et al. Three-dimen-
pairs include olecranon bursitis, localized soft tis- sional analysis of elbow soft tissue footprints and
sue irritation from sutures or wires, residual mild anatomy. J Shld Elbow Surg 2014;23(11):1618–23.
elbow flexion contracture, and elbow extension 9. Mair SD, Isbell WM, Gill TJ, et al. Triceps tendon rup-
weakness. In addition, rerupture remains a tures in professional football players. Am J Sports
concern, especially with poor-quality tissue or de- Med 2004;32(2):431–4.
layed repairs performed under tension. 10. Stucken C, Ciccotti MG. Distal biceps and triceps in-
juries in athletes. Sports Med Arthrosc 2014;22(3):
153–63.
SUMMARY
11. Sollender JL, Rayan GM, Barden GA. Triceps
Acute triceps ruptures are an uncommon entity, tendon rupture in weight lifters. J Shld Elbow Surg
occurring mainly in athletes, weight lifters (espe- 1998;7(2):151–3.
cially those taking anabolic steroids), and following 12. Stannard JP, Bucknell AL. Rupture of the triceps
elbow trauma. Accurate diagnosis is made clini- tendon associated with steroid injections. Am J
cally, although MRI may aid in confirmation and Sports Med 1993;21(3):482–5.
surgical planning. Acute ruptures are classified 13. van Riet RP, Morrey BF, Ho E, et al. Surgical treat-
on an anatomic basis based on tear location and ment of distal triceps ruptures. J Bone Joint Surg
the degree of tendon involvement. Most complete Am 2003;85-A(10):1961–7.
tears are treated surgically in medically fit patients. 14. Viegas SF. Avulsion of the triceps tendon. Orthop
Partial-thickness tears are managed according to Rev 1990;19(6):533–6.
the tear severity, functional demands, and 15. Yeh PC, Dodds SD, Smart LR, et al. Distal triceps
response to conservative treatment. Surgical rupture. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2010;18(1):31–40.
repair offers predictable return of function with a 16. Downey R, Jacobson JA, Fessell DP, et al. Sonogra-
small risk of loss of elbow motion. Even surgical phy of partial-thickness tears of the distal triceps
treatment of chronic tears has shown improved brachii tendon. J Ultrasound Med 2011;30(10):
elbow extension strength and patient satisfaction. 1351–6.
We favor an anatomic footprint repair of the triceps 17. Wenzke DR. MR imaging of the elbow in the injured
to provide optimal tendon-to-bone healing and, ul- athlete. Radiol Clin North Am 2013;51(2):195–213.
timately, functional outcome. 18. Thornton R, Riley GM, Steinbach LS. Magnetic reso-
nance imaging of sports injuries of the elbow. Top
Magn Reson Imaging 2003;14(1):69–86.
REFERENCES
19. Kaempffe FA, Lerner RM. Ultrasound diagnosis of
1. Anzel SH, Covey KW, Weiner AD, et al. Disruption of triceps tendon rupture. A report of 2 cases. Clin Or-
muscles and tendons; an analysis of 1, 014 cases. thop Relat Res 1996;(332):138–42.
Surgery 1959;45(3):406–14. 20. Bos CF, Nelissen RG, Bloem JL. Incomplete rupture
2. Handling MA, Curtis AS, Miller SL. The origin of the of the tendon of triceps brachii. A case report. Int Or-
long head of the triceps: a cadaveric study. thop 1994;18(5):273–5.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010;19(1):69–72. 21. Farrar EL 3rd, Lippert FG 3rd. Avulsion of the triceps
3. Keener JD, Chafik D, Kim HM, et al. Insertional anat- tendon. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1981;(161):242–6.
omy of the triceps brachii tendon. J Shld Elbow Surg 22. Tom JA, Kumar NS, Cerynik DL, et al. Diagnosis and
2010;19(3):399–405. treatment of triceps tendon injuries: a review of the
4. Madsen M, Marx RG, Millett PJ, et al. Surgical anat- literature. Clin J Sport Med 2014;24(3):197–204.
omy of the triceps brachii tendon: anatomical study 23. Sierra RJ, Weiss NG, Shrader MW, et al. Acute tri-
and clinical correlation. Am J Sports Med 2006; ceps ruptures: case report and retrospective chart
34(11):1839–43. review. J Shld Elbow Surg 2006;15(1):130–4.
5. Belentani C, Pastore D, Wangwinyuvirat M, et al. Tri- 24. Bava ED, Barber FA, Lund ER. Clinical outcome af-
ceps brachii tendon: anatomic-MR imaging study in ter suture anchor repair for complete traumatic
cadavers with histologic correlation. Skeletal Radiol rupture of the distal triceps tendon. Arthroscopy
2009;38(2):171–5. 2012;28(8):1058–63.
6. Athwal GS, McGill RJ, Rispoli DM. Isolated avulsion 25. Bach BR Jr, Warren RF, Wickiewicz TL. Triceps
of the medial head of the triceps tendon: an rupture. A case report and literature review. Am J
anatomic study and arthroscopic repair in 2 cases. Sports Med 1987;15(3):285–9.
Arthroscopy 2009;25(9):983–8. 26. Pina A, Garcia I, Sabater M. Traumatic avulsion of
7. Yeh PC, Stephens KT, Solovyova O, et al. The distal the triceps brachii. J Orthop Trauma 2002;16(4):
triceps tendon footprint and a biomechanical anal- 273–6.
ysis of 3 repair techniques. Am J Sports Med 27. Petre BM, Grutter PW, Rose DM, et al. Triceps ten-
2010;38(5):1025–33. dons: a biomechanical comparison of intact and
650 Keener & Sethi
repaired strength. J Shld Elbow Surg 2011;20(2): transosseous cruciate repair: a biomechanical com-
213–8. parison. Arthroscopy 2014;30(10):1254–60.
28. Adams DJ, Mazzocca AD, Fulkerson JP. Residual 32. Wagner JR, Cooney WP. Rupture of the triceps mus-
strength of the quadriceps versus patellar tendon af- cle at the musculotendinous junction: a case report.
ter harvesting a central free tendon graft. Arthros- J Hand Surg Am 1997;22(2):341–3.
copy 2006;22(1):76–9.
29. Kokkalis ZT, Mavrogenis AF, Spyridonos S, et al. Triceps 33. Sanchez-Sotelo J, Morrey BF. Surgical techniques for
brachii distal tendon reattachment with a double-row reconstruction of chronic insufficiency of the triceps.
technique. Orthopedics 2013;36(2):110–6. Rotation flap using anconeus and tendo achillis allo-
30. Paci JM, Clark J, Rizzi A. Distal triceps knotless graft. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002;84(8):1116–20.
anatomic footprint repair: a new technique. Arthrosc 34. Weistroffer JK, Mills WJ, Shin AY. Recurrent rupture
Tech 2014;3(5):e621–6. of the triceps tendon repaired with hamstring tendon
31. Clark J, Obopilwe E, Rizzi A, et al. Distal triceps autograft augmentation: a case report and repair
knotless anatomic footprint repair is superior to technique. J Shld Elbow Surg 2003;12(2):193–6.