0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views3 pages

Ene Test Notes Final Notes

The document compares spoken and written language, highlighting differences in acquisition, persistence, standardization, and prestige. It also discusses Speech Act Theory, detailing performatives and constatives, the three-part structure of speech acts, and the distinction between direct and indirect speech acts. Additionally, it covers coherence and cohesion in writing, explaining how logical organization and linguistic devices contribute to effective communication.

Uploaded by

vhonanikevin9
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views3 pages

Ene Test Notes Final Notes

The document compares spoken and written language, highlighting differences in acquisition, persistence, standardization, and prestige. It also discusses Speech Act Theory, detailing performatives and constatives, the three-part structure of speech acts, and the distinction between direct and indirect speech acts. Additionally, it covers coherence and cohesion in writing, explaining how logical organization and linguistic devices contribute to effective communication.

Uploaded by

vhonanikevin9
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

1. Spoken vs.

Written Language
While both serve communication, they differ significantly in acquisition, prestige, and
structure.

Aspect Spoken Language Written Language

Acquisition Natural; acquired in early childhood Requires systematic instruction


without formal instruction. and practice; builds on speech.
Transient; historically preserved only Permanent; can be preserved for
Persistence
by memory until recording tech. millennia (e.g., libraries).
High variety in regional dialects and High pressure toward a single
Standardization
pronunciation. written norm/standard.
Often viewed as "informal" or Associated with political,
Prestige
inferior in literate societies. economic, and educational power.

New Example: The "Job Interview"

 Spoken: You use verbal cues, tone, and slang like "Yeah, for sure." This is
dynamic but disappears once said.
 Written: Your CV uses formal, standardized English. It is a permanent record
the recruiter can study later.

2. Speech Act Theory: Austin and Searle


A Speech Act is an utterance that serves a functional purpose—doing something with words.

A. Performatives vs. Constatives

 Constative: Describes a state of affairs. It is evaluated based on Truth Value (is it


true or false?).
o New Example: "The coffee is cold." (This describes the temperature and can
be proven true or false).
 Performative: Performs an action through the act of speaking. It is evaluated by
Felicity (was it successful?).
o New Example: "I bet you ten dollars it will rain." (By saying this, you have
officially entered into a wager).

B. Felicity Conditions

For a performative to "work" (be felicitous), certain conditions must be met:

1. Preparatory: The speaker must have the authority and the context must be right.
2. Sincerity: The participants must mean what they say.
3. Essential: The utterance must count as the performance of the act.

3. The Three-Part Structure of Speech Acts

1. Locutionary Act: The literal meaning; the actual words and grammar used.
2. Illocutionary Act: The intention or "force" behind the words (request, command,
promise).
3. Perlocutionary Act: The effect on the listener (compliance, offense, persuasion).

New Example: "Watch out for the wet floor!"

 Locutionary: A warning about a slippery surface.


 Illocutionary: Warning/Directing the person to walk carefully.
 Perlocutionary: The listener slows down and avoids falling.

4. Direct vs. Indirect Speech Acts

 Direct: The literal meaning matches the intention (e.g., "Pass the sugar" as a
command).
 Indirect: The intention is implied through context or politeness.
o New Example: "Are you still using that stapler?"
o Direct Meaning: A question about the current status of the object.
o Indirect Meaning: A request to borrow the stapler.

5. Coherence: The Logic of Text

Coherence is achieved when a text is organized logically and makes sense. It involves
Causality Relations in the "Textual World".

Causality Relations & Time

Category Definition New Example Time Relation

Cause "The storm knocked down the


Event A creates the Forward: Cause
power lines; the city was in the
condition for Event B. → Result
dark."
Event A makes Event B "She found her keys, so she Forward: Enable
Enablement
possible but not certain. could finally leave for work." → Action
A rational response to an "I was hungry, so I made a Forward: Reason
Reason
earlier event. sandwich." → Action
Category Definition New Example Time Relation

An earlier event is done "He practiced daily to win the Backward: Goal
Purpose
to achieve a later goal. marathon." ← Action

6. Cohesion: The "Glue" of Writing

Cohesion refers to the linguistic devices (the "surface features") that link sentences together.

Reference Sub-categories

 Exophoric: Refers to something outside the text.


o Example: "Look at that!" (Pointing to a bird).
 Anaphoric: Refers back to something mentioned earlier.
o Example: "Sarah arrived late. She missed the intro." (She refers back to
Sarah).
 Cataphoric: Refers forward to something coming later.
o Example: "When he arrived, John saw the mess." (He refers forward to John).

Other Cohesive Tools

 Substitution: Replacing a word with another (e.g., "I have a red pen. Do you want
one?").
 Ellipsis: Omitting words because the meaning is understood (e.g., "Where are you
going?" "To the mall.").
 Lexical Cohesion: Using synonyms or repetition (e.g., "The dog barked. The hound
was hungry.").

You might also like