0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views6 pages

Unit 4 Written Assignment

This document presents a case study on procurement, emphasizing the importance of supply chain management and the selection of suppliers based on various criteria such as quality, delivery, and financial stability. The analysis concludes that Supplier A is the best choice due to its high-quality products and favorable pricing, despite potential challenges related to overseas sourcing. The document outlines a structured supplier selection process and highlights the need for a backup strategy in case supplier conditions change.

Uploaded by

ztokaryk
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views6 pages

Unit 4 Written Assignment

This document presents a case study on procurement, emphasizing the importance of supply chain management and the selection of suppliers based on various criteria such as quality, delivery, and financial stability. The analysis concludes that Supplier A is the best choice due to its high-quality products and favorable pricing, despite potential challenges related to overseas sourcing. The document outlines a structured supplier selection process and highlights the need for a backup strategy in case supplier conditions change.

Uploaded by

ztokaryk
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Course: Bus 5116

Assignment: Written Assignment Unit 4

Case Study Procurement

Term 02

Academic Year: 2022-2023

Lecturer: Dr. Juancho Lim

December 2022
1
Abstract

The operations needed to organize, direct, and carry out a product's movement from

materials through production and distribution in the most cost-effective manner, makeup supply

chain management (Daniel D. , 2020 ). It helps businesses manage demand, carry the proper

amount of inventory, cope with disruptions, keep costs down, and satisfy consumer demand as

efficiently as possible. It also offers a number of benefits, including new efficiencies, higher

profitability, lower expenses, and increased collaboration.

The task of procuring an item or service for a client is known as procurement. Ordering,

delivery, distribution, warehousing, and final payments are all part of the procurement process.

Depending on the sort of business, this process may be highly expensive logistically. Anyone

running a procurement agency must have a thorough understanding of the logistical and

distributive processes. The cost of goods sold, often known as COGS, and procurement are

directly related in every firm.( James, 2011)

Any supply chain that relies on logistics expects the quickest, on-time delivery of

materials because anything less could impede their manufacturing line and future anticipated

advancements. Delays in logistics could result in significant downtime for industry, which puts

pressure on their taskforce to finish production on schedule and could interfere with their

production strategy for efficient output. High rejection rates and low output quality may also

result from the task force's heavy workload.

Case Study

In this case study, a proposal is required for the chief procurement officer to answer a multitude

of questions. There are 3 suppliers that have been listed with different statistical data given to the
2
researcher to grasp which agency would be more lucrative. A variety of considerations need to

be taken into account because the company's decision to outsource the value change is so

important. The selection of the ideal supplier for the three-year period is essential to the project's

success. Within the industry, customers anticipate high-quality service, competitive pricing, and

prompt delivery. All three of the mentioned vendors receive scores that fall within certain ranges.

It is essential to conduct a thorough analysis of each subsection before picking the best choice for

the firm.

The selection based on personal processes and research will be chosen by the following criteria;

(Murphy, K. 2022)

1.​ What the supplier is providing and how it meets the needs of the organization.

2.​ Who has the best quality rates for delivery, price, and quantity.

3.​ Service Levels

4.​ Financial Management

What supplier would you select?

I would select Supplier A. Supplier A, has the product and quality at a range of 90% and

delivery at a range of 95%.

Rationale Behind Supplier A

The supplier A establishes the overseas sourcing where they have access to the best tools,

resources, and networking opportunities. The statistics show high-quality goods at reasonable

prices, which could support the maintenance of business quality control while still generating
3
profit margins for the company. Even the delivery statistics are quite suitable for the needs of the

organization. The main disadvantage, though, might be that there wouldn't be as many business

relationships established because of the overseas source, and it might be difficult to create a

defect return for discovered defective raw materials.

1.​ Supplier A , compared to supplier B although the rating is at 100% is in a financial crisis.

This means in the near future there is a possibility of implosion.

2.​ Despite being close by, supplier C delivers goods of poor quality, which is not a benefit.

When seen in a broader context, the high rejection rate of incoming material would

increase workload strain on employees and result in severe damages to machinery,

shortening the lifespan of that equipment.

What supplier would you select if price and quality were the underlying factors? Would

your POV( Point of View) change depending on the supplier?

Based on the figures of Suppliers A-C, my choice would not change in regard to the supply

chain management and procurement.

Supplier A- Price and Quality are at 90% and the price is favorable compared to the other

Suppliers where their figures are 100 % ( for one who is in a financial crisis) and 85% (whose

benefit is only proximity.) However, compared to Supplier C the price and quality remain

inferior.

The main reason my election would not change is due to the fact that Supplier A has room for

improvement. In the shipping sector of the distribution channels, even though the lead time is

outlined as 3 weeks that can possibly change relying on many factors. Furthermore, when

making a sound decision business wise it is never a good idea to invest and go with a business
4
who is already having financial issues. Lastly, quality is what makes a good service. Product

satisfaction, brand reputation, and brand recognition lead sales within the 21st century.

Conclusion

The supplier selection procedure must be managed in the context of the business's growth

objectives. Whether the firm is huge or little, selecting a reputable supplier can make or break the

supply chain and distribution channels. Marketers and business plans must include a backup

strategy in case the factors affecting the supplier of choice change. According to (Stevens, C.

2020), there are five phases to take into account:

1. Establish Criteria

2. Browse Options

3. Create the possibility of bidding

4. Review your offers

5. Keep track of vendor performance

I believe that this company can make a sound decision once they consider the criteria above.
5

References

●​ Daniel, D. (2020, November 10). What is Supply Chain Management (SCM)? ERP.

Retrieved December 4, 2022, from

[Link]

●​ James, T. (2011). Operations Strategy. [Link] retrieved from

[Link]

●​ Murphy, K. (2022, September 28). The supplier selection process. PLANERGY

Software. Retrieved December 4, 2022, from

[Link]

●​ Stevens, C. (2020, November 20). How to choose the right supplier for your business.

[Link]. Retrieved December 4, 2022, from

[Link]

er-for-your-business/

You might also like