.
Consistency is essential for ensuring that the goals of reducing plastic pollution are
achieved, as poorly enforced bans may not have a significant impact on the
environment. According to the Policy Implementation of the Republic Act (RA) 9003 in
the Philippines: A Case Study of Cebu City (2013), the Republic Act No.9003, also
known as the Ecological Solid Waste Management Act (ESWMA), was enacted by the
Philippine Congress and is considered one of the most comprehensive and forward-
thinking solid waste management laws in Asia. As stated by Galarpe and Parilla (2012),
the plastic related issues in the country have led to environmental and health concerns.
These problems have arisen because local and national governments lack the financial,
human, and technical resources required for effective waste management. As a result,
inadequate waste management practices, such as traditional landfills and dumpsites,
pose ecological and health risks. The local administration began promoting the usage of
fewer plastics.
According to the City Government of Baguio (2020), in 2017, the Baguio City Council
passed City Ordinance No. 35 Series of 2017, also known as the Plastic and Styrofoam-
free Baguio Ordinance, which requires all businesses to offer paper bags, reusable
bags, or containers made of paper or biodegradable materials to customers for free or
at an price so they can carry out products or other items from the place of purchase.
The complete text of the ordinance was available to the researchers on the Baguio City
Government's official website. These are a few relevant clauses from the
aforementioned ordinance. In addition, the the aforementioned regulation stipulates that
all establishments must offer paper bags, reusable bags, or containers made of paper
or biodegradable materials to consumers for free or at an expense so they can carry out
goods or additional products from their place of purchase. The sale/purchase receipt or
invoice should include whether or not the store is providing the reusable bag.
Customers may, however, bring their own bags or use any kind of bag—aside from
plastic bags—in the store to help themselves take out their purchases in place of the
bags the store provides.
In order to guarantee the seamless execution, Section 8 of this ordinance
requires the establishment of a technical working group to serve as the monitoring and
oversight committee. This group will be responsible for spearheading the information
and education campaign, which will include issuing penalties and fines for infractions.
The technical working group is also expected to provide an annual report to the City
Council and the Ecological Solid Waste Management Board office detailing how
businesses, operators, government offices, schools, and other interested parties are
adhering to the ordinance. This report should include recommendations for appropriate
modifications to the ordinance to ensure proper implementation (City Government of
Baguio, 2020). In the article of Agoot (2019), it is reported that after two years of
enforcing the plastic and styro-free ordinance in Baguio City, there was a thirty percent
of reduction in plastic waste volume.
In addition the study of Marcial et al. (2016) states that according to the Section 85 of
Batangas City Ordinance No. 16 series of 2010, it is illegal for any commercial
establishment or individual to sell or give plastic bags to customers for the purpose of
packaging wet and dry goods or improperly disposing of solid trash. Such an act
carried a penalty under the same legislation. According to Section 86 of Batangas City's
Environmental Code, a first infraction carries a fine of 500.00 pesos, a second offense
1000.00 pesos, and subsequent crimes 1,500.00 pesos, plus, at the judge's discretion,
six months in jail. The LGU was forced to draft an ordinance to penalize community
members who violate. An example drawn from a rule in the code prohibiting packing
with plastic and Styrofoam. This is applicable not only to the wet market and other
locations, but also to all Batangas City establishments. [Link]
reported that the ordinance applies to both vendor and buyer, that whoever they caught
will be subjected to some penalties and as to those business establishments.
Such ordinance also created the TFK or Task Force Kalikasan, who check the people's
compliance to the ordinance. Members of the TFK walk around town with camera to
take photos of the non-complying constituents. The photos that were will be printed and
evidence the act should they deny such. This will be sent to the offender with a letter of
reminder of what he/she has committed, including its corresponding penalty. Not only
the TFK is tasked with the enforcement of the ordinance, the services of the municipal
police and barangay officials down to barangay tanod is summoned for strict and
consistent implementation (Marcial et al., 2016).
Furthermore, the study of Pacatang (2020), the Ordinance No. 13-245, which
declared Fridays to be "No Plastic Day," was passed by the city administration in 2013
and was strictly enforced. This legislation was compliant with legislation No. 123, the
Garbage Collection and Environmental Health Protection and Sanitation Code of 1998
for the City of Dipolog, another local ordinance on cleanliness and sanitation.
In an attempt to maintain a healthy ecology and increase cleanliness and
sanitation in Dipolog City, the local plastic bag ordinance, No Plastic Day on Friday, and
Ordinance No. 123 on sanitation and cleanliness were created to control the use of
plastic bags. Every Friday and Saturday is tabo, or market day, when it is enforced.
Both buyers and sellers have generally complied with the law. Nowadays, the majority
of sellers utilize paper bags, and fish vendors wrap the fish they sell for customers using
banana leaves or netbags. Customers also bring their own baskets, bags, and
containers these days, and it appears that both parties are cooperating and supporting
one other fully (Pacatang 2020).
However according to Rani (2020), India grapples with plastic pollution,
generating 14 million tons of plastic annually, attributed to the absence of a
structured recycling system. In response, the Indian Government introduced the
Plastic Waste Management Rule 2016, implementing a resolution to prohibit the
manufacturing, trade, and use of single-use plastic.
Based on the study recommendations, it is advised that the Government should
strengthen the authority of the Department of Environment Protection and
related organizations, enabling them to promptly address those violating
regulations. Enforcing such strict measures would effectively reduce the use and
production of polythene bags. Local government representatives and political
leaders can play vital roles in supporting law enforcement at the community
level. Moreover, the government should allocate additional resources to
encourage alternative options such as jute, paper, and cotton bags by providing
necessary incentives for the establishment of these industries. At the same
time, efforts should be made to keep the prices of substitutes reasonable,
ensuring accessibility for consumers. Additionally, immediate actions should be
taken for the reemployment and rehabilitation of individuals previously involved
in the polythene-producing industry.
Policy Implementation of the Republic Act (RA) 9003 in the Philippines: A Case Study of Cebu City.
(2013). [Link]
Galarpe, V. R. K. R., & Parilla, R. (2012). Influence of Seasonal Variation on the Bio- physicochemical
Properties of Leachate and Groundwater in Cebu. . . ResearchGate.
[Link]
_on_the_Bio_physicochemical_Properties_of_Leachate_and_Groundwater_in_Cebu_C
ity_Sanitary_Landfill_Philippines
City government of Baguio. (2020). [Link]
Agoot, L. (2019 January 14). Ban curbs Baguio City plastic waste by 30%. Retrieved from
[Link]
Marcial Pastor, Hernandez, Bobadilla, Escalona, Escabel, M. K., Janet, Ivee Camille, Jonathan, Ederlina.
(2016). Effectiveness in Implementation of Anti-Plastic Ordinance in Batangas City.
[Link]
Shawon, I. H., Haider, M. Z., & Oni, F. A. (2023b). EFFECTIVENESS OF BANNING PLASTIC BAG IN
BANGLADESH FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. Khulna University Studies, 112–118.
[Link]
David Harold Q. Pacatang. (2020). [Link]
[Link]