0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views2 pages

Table II Editable

The document presents a comparison of few-shot learning classification methods across five datasets, showcasing various metrics such as F1 and NMI scores. The results indicate that the proposed method (Ours) outperforms other methods in most categories, achieving high scores across all datasets. Each method is accompanied by its respective mean and standard deviation, highlighting the variability in performance.

Uploaded by

thanhdat22726
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views2 pages

Table II Editable

The document presents a comparison of few-shot learning classification methods across five datasets, showcasing various metrics such as F1 and NMI scores. The results indicate that the proposed method (Ours) outperforms other methods in most categories, achieving high scores across all datasets. Each method is accompanied by its respective mean and standard deviation, highlighting the variability in performance.

Uploaded by

thanhdat22726
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

TABLE II.

Comparisons of Few-Shot Learning Classification on Five Datasets


Meth CIC- CIC- CIC- CIC- EdgeI EdgeI NF- NF- NF- NF-
ods TON- TON- BoT- BoT- IoT IoT UNS UNS CSE- CSE-
IoT IoT IoT IoT F1 NMI W- W- CIC- CIC-
F1 NMI F1 NMI NB15 NB15 IDS2 IDS2
-v2 -v2 018- 018-
F1 NMI v2 v2
F1 NMI

MBas 41.74 35.81 38.52 27.89 51.13 55.61 41.74 35.81 63.74 68.76
e [22] ±3.22 ±2.84 ±3.58 ±3.84 ±2.31 ±2.05 ±3.22 ±2.84 ±4.14 ±3.16

MTL 30.79 29.81 37.80 25.10 52.64 55.41 44.18 35.85 45.38 47.04
[61] ±3.13 ±3.58 ±5.66 ±2.69 ±5.69 ±4.16 ±4.22 ±2.79 ±5.88 ±4.82

TEG 29.92 22.64 29.62 25.71 26.34 27.58 27.80 21.44 25.20 23.48
[99] ±2.17 ±2.22 ±3.74 ±2.82 ±2.45 ±2.64 ±2.14 ±1.74 ±3.17 ±3.97

CLSA 17.21 45.01 38.54 51.70 18.84 44.25 17.53 45.67 19.19 49.76
[70] ±3.63 ±2.83 ±3.49 ±4.90 ±3.10 ±3.27 ±1.95 ±4.13 ±2.90 ±3.46

ESPT 36.76 38.51 39.41 34.66 61.28 53.77 46.58 49.37 41.37 46.52
[71] ±4.37 ±3.29 ±5.37 ±3.49 ±8.34 ±6.91 ±5.94 ±6.58 ±4.98 ±6.71

ICI 55.67 47.80 71.32 57.51 49.74 51.30 39.17 31.81 76.53 79.00
[69] ±5.14 ±3.77 ±3.35 ±4.50 ±4.65 ±5.27 ±3.66 ±2.21 ±9.43 ±6.20

KSCL 36.19 38.17 33.50 29.40 34.87 30.63 17.03 21.90 25.74 28.26
[72] ±2.66 ±3.90 ±4.23 ±4.80 ±2.14 ±2.56 ±1.97 ±1.98 ±3.01 ±3.15

BSNe 58.41 57.76 42.00 31.41 43.74 49.68 65.73 58.96 56.39 58.56
t [27] ±2.36 ±2.96 ±5.19 ±4.71 ±4.20 ±5.09 ±2.65 ±2.08 ±5.75 ±3.76

CMFS 37.46 47.51 58.62 51.47 39.43 43.67 51.30 47.62 61.37 58.42
L [31] ±5.37 ±4.29 ±3.58 ±6.28 ±3.88 ±5.75 ±4.29 ±6.47 ±4.95 ±6.17

TAD 49.80 42.23 62.75 56.53 50.82 53.40 58.97 58.72 54.88 52.15
[32] ±2.13 ±1.35 ±6.40 ±7.70 ±3.93 ±3.86 ±3.76 ±2.60 ±3.34 ±1.57

PCW 42.92 44.17 56.08 53.01 34.74 34.29 51.97 43.62 52.39 64.56
PK ±3.80 ±3.12 ±2.91 ±5.17 ±2.54 ±3.36 ±1.76 ±2.27 ±8.60 ±5.57
[100]

FeCo 45.78 41.08 43.24 40.12 28.66 26.75 34.51 28.79 64.85 74.83
Grap ±1.96 ±1.56 ±0.88 ±1.54 ±6.66 ±9.01 ±1.02 ±1.42 ±16.0 ±10.5
h 4 1
[101]

FC- 78.55 24.27 76.60 27.04 58.48 1.07± 64.58 2.82± 77.48 22.32
Net ±2.30 ±3.53 ±3.95 ±5.29 ±3.75 0.67 ±3.31 2.09 ±1.32 ±1.82
[64]

BSF- 73.95 66.97 73.21 69.44 51.21 54.68 35.73 45.61 68.56 67.05
NID ±1.15 ±0.59 ±0.05 ±0.32 ±0.16 ±0.64 ±1.50 ±0.76 ±1.02 ±1.53
[102]

Ours 97.47 94.27 86.11 85.36 92.73 88.21 96.00 92.04 93.93 90.98
(DIDS ±1.17 ±2.62 ±0.84 ±4.25 ±2.57 ±3.25 ±1.12 ±1.36 ±3.27 ±3.69
-
MFL)

You might also like