Chapter 3 Notes
Chapter 3 Notes
Business Research
Module-3 Measurement
Prepared by
Dr. Arya Kumar
Asst. Professor
SCHOOL OF SOCIAL, FINANCIAL & HUMAN SCIENCES, KIIT DU
Bhubaneswar
What is a scale?
A scale suggests a systematic process of allocating the numbers or symbols such process is
called Scale of measurement.
A measurement scale may be represented from a highest point to lowest points. Such may
also have the sub-points in between it. The measuring instruments are scales.
It is used to quantify the variable/ construct/ an object in respect to certain properties. This
may be books, people, tables, plants, chairs and etc. or certain attributes like anger, aptitude,
beauty, personality and etc.
However, a researcher doesn’t consider the objects or its relevant properties for analysis
rather they consider the indicants of object’s properties. There are several characters that are
not easy to quantify like level of hard work, dealing with issue or etc.
A researcher designs certain rule for mapping and then transfer the observation to the
property indicants using such rule. As per the rules, a qualitative and quantitative data can be
presented as per the construct/ variable that are feasible to measure. The allocation of the
numbers or symbols is assigned under certain assumption from the real world observation.
Mapping rules:
Classification of Scale
a) Nominal Scale
This is one of the least powerful, simple and common form of measurement of scale. The
scales are just the numbers and restrictive among all the scales. The scaling is done on all the
facts/ choices or various categories that are exclusive in nature. This scale shows all the
categories of response into numbers of mutually exclusive categories. If there exist no
relationship between the categories then there is no need for ordering or ranking. Generally in
nominal scaling the responses are yes or no, like or dislikes male or female and etc.
For Example:
Gender
1. Male
2. Female
Investment decision
1. Saving Deposit
2. Equity Share
3. Mutual Fund
4. Fixed Deposit
Annual Income
1. 1,50,000-2,50,000
2. 2,50,000-5, 00,000
3. 5,00,000-10,00,000
4. 10,00,000 and above
b) Ordinal Scale
It is a simple measuring scale usually used in social science and humanities based research.
However it is more powerful in comparison to nominal scale. The ordinal scale is useful in
ranking the categories of similar variable. The respondents are expected to rank all the
attributes/benefits of certain products.
This scale has a limitation that the degree of difference between the ranks cannot be
measured. It is useful to implement the positional statistics like mean, and mode for analysis
and interpretation.
Example- Rank the following attributes from 1 to 5, (stating 1 as the highest rank and 5 as the
lowest rank) on the prospective of qualities required for a good team work.
a) Leadership
b) Communication
c) Secrecy
d) Positive attitude
e) Loyalty
In this type of scale numbers are not only assigned certain symbol or letters can be also
been allotted. However, this scale fails in identifying the degree of favourability of each
rank.
A researcher can ask questions from more than one attributes like University, firms or
industry and call for likes and dislikes. For example, the respondents are satisfied with
public transport?
Strongly like it
Like it
Neutral
Dislike it
Strongly dislike it
c) Interval Scale
It was observed that nominal and ordinal scale has several issues which were taken care of in
the interval scale. The interval scale has a regular interval between the points that may also
start from the point zero. It no way affects the statistical operations as the addition,
subtraction or any kind of computation can be done by identifying the mean and mode.
Generally the ordinal and nominal scale consider the measurement of attitude but the interval
scale provides them a range so as to make the data more appropriate for statistical operation.
Example:
A survey is conducted on the preference of buying a two wheeler (Put the tick mark, 1 as
lowest rate and 5 as highest rate).
Company Name 1 2 3 4 5
Design 1 2 3 4 5
Availability of spare 1 2 3 4 5
Mileage 1 2 3 4 5
Engine Capacity 1 2 3 4 5
Here, we can see the distance between two rates are similar from each other i.e. distance from
1 to 2 is similar to that of 4 to 5. But it won’t be interpreted that 4 is twice stronger than 2.
This result can be considered for considered for calculating the mean scores of every variable
for each respondent. From here the standard deviation can also be measured.
d) Ratio Scale-
This is a scale which has some complexity due to which it has less popularity in measurement
of scale. This scale need a base item upon which the comparison can be made. For instance,
in the Interval scale, a score 4 is not the twice of score 2 but in ratio scale it will be
considered as score 4 is two times stronger than score 2. A ratio scale denotes zero as the
natural point and any numbers placed should have equal appearing interval.
The ratio scales are used generally in physical scenarios like height, distance and etc. This
scale gets its popularity for the data that can be easily quantified. This scale is similar to
interval scale but its numbers are more meaningful for interpretations. This kind of data can
be collected mainly through open ended questionnaire where the respondents are allowed to
response without any force of option.
For example:
Which Cricket team is going to win the World Cup?
In which company you would like to invest your savings?
To answer the above question one can use an unambiguous starting point i.e. zero. As there is
no force in choosing the point so a ratio analysis can be made on it. For example, the
dividend announced by Company B in last year was 4% and company A had announced 2%
so one would like to invest in company B as it gives twice the amount of dividend of
company A.
Stapled
Scale
Rati
phic
Scaling Technique
Gra
Non Comparative
ng
Ranking
Differe
Seman
ntial
Comparative
tic
Sum
Con
stan
t
Scale
Stap
Scal
Thurst
Scale
le
one
Seman
Differ
Measurement of Scales
ential
tic
Likert
Scale
Classification of
Guttm
Scale
Ranking Scale
an
Multi
choic
Liker
Forced
ple
Contin
Scaling Technique
Rating
Scale
uous
Comparative
Q-Sort
Scale
t type
Liker
scale
ratin
g
choic
Const
Scale
Mult
Mult
Sum
iple
ant
e
Comparison
Rating
choic
Mult
singl
Paired
iple
Order
Scale
Rank
e
Cate
gory
Sim
ple
compa
rison
Pair-
wise
Rating Scale- This scale is observed when a respondent response on certain object
without any comparison with other objects.
For example: Identifying a person’s knowledge on a particular field can be asked through
rating by himself. Instead of that as per the objective of research a researcher can design
a list of attribute that defines similar kind of objective which varies with certain degree
from the other attributes considering such a respondent will rate as per its convenience.
For example- Strongly like, like, neutral, dislike or strongly dislike.
As it is a rating scale the decision will be made from the list of given rates amongst 5 or
7 scaling points. However, the scale should not be too finely or coarsely. If there lies an
odd scaling then it is advisable to put the middle point as a neutral option for the
respondents.
Ranking Scale- Unlike rating scale, a ranking scale gives an opportunity to a respondent
to make a comparison between the objects that is prepared on the basis of degree of
difference between each other.
A) Rating Scale- This is a scale used for the judging of properties of an object. Generally,
the rating scale is used in social science or management research. Some of the terms used
in this scales are, yes/no, likes/dislikes, approve/disapprove or may be further
classification. A rating scale is used by a person to rate any product or brand.
However, there is no rule of thumb for designing the scaling points a researcher may
design with two set of points or more than it to provide a wide range of opportunity for a
greater accuracy.
Very likely
Likely
Neutral
Not likely
Very unlikely
5. Multiple choice likert type scale- (Ordinal and Interval data)
A series of question with similar answer scale
For example- Your experience on our service centre
Beauty 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Ugly
Liberal 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Rigid
Simple 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Complicated
Stylish 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Out Dated
Significant -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Insignificant
Out of 100 rate each attributes that motivates you to buy a new home
Location
Price
Furnished home
Distance from Hospital
Distance from school
The total sum of all the values allotted must be equal to 100%.
For example: Did you like the taste of the chocolate milk shake?
B) Ranking Scale
It is a scale that allows ratters to make a comparison between two or more objects and
select the best amongst the all. A simple multiple choices tends to select the those that
the respondents feels like appropriate but a ranking scale gives them an opportunity to
select all as per their priority which makes this scale more powerful. A rank order
scale provides direction and relative position but not absolute difference. A rank order
defines the order but does not tell about how much an item is preferred by another.
Mangoes Apples
Cherries Peers
Mangoes Cherries
Peers Apples
Twilight
Lord of rings
Harry Potter
The lion, the witch and the wardrobe
But this scale has a limitation that the respondent may become more careless
in ranking such a huge number of items.
A comparative scale is further divided into two sub-groups that is useful in the
field of social science/ business research
a) Comparative Scale technique
b) Non-Comparative technique
instance if there lies 4 items then this will lead to 6 comparison between the items.
Here in each paired the respondent is asked to select the on amongst the two as per
its preference.
For example: Select which Bollywood film star is a better actor (Shahrukh Khan,
Salman Khan, Amir Khan and Akshaya Kumar)
Here, when respondent select one and rejects the other then such responses are
gathered and represented by adding all the numbers for respective options. After the
addition the researcher will make an average for every option from the total number
of respondents. However there are several ways for comparing the data in paired
comparison analysis.
But this comparison is possible when the number of items is limited as it needs
direct comparison with the objects.
For example: a group of three has respondent on the basis of preference regarding
buying a shaving cream/ foam.
Average Responses
[Link]. Attributes Group-1 Group-2 Group-3
1. Price 20 18 29
2. Fragrance 35 26 22
3. Lather 10 33 15
4. Packing 5 18 9
5. Brand 30 5 25
Total 100 100 100
The advantage of this scale is it helps in fine discrimination of the attributes and helps
in making decision.
iv) Q-Sort Scaling-
It is a scale that helps in discriminating a large number of object’s characteristics
with certain attributes. The objects are sorted with certain piles as per the similar
criteria.
For example a respondent is provided 100 card containing various attribute/object/
characters. They were asked to pile or group them into 10 piles starting from
higher preference to lower preference.
The researcher will fix the number of attributes to be placed in each pile. This
practice helps in normal distribution of data. After the pile is prepared the
respondent is asked to rank the attribute from the most preferred object or
characteristics.
v) Guttman Scaling-
This scaling technique was founded by Louis Guttman during 1944 which is
sometimes called as Cumulative scaling or scalogram analysis. This scaling
technique provides a uni-dimension concept basing upon which respondent will
respond. The scaling technique is designed in such a way that the respondent if
agrees with item 3 it automatically means the person is agreed on item 1 and 2.
Thus the respondents who agree with a particular item have a higher score than
those who disagree with it. In practical sense, this scaling technique has high
popularity as it is helpful in making complex analysis that has a cumulative
pattern. So this technique also help in understanding that how close each items are
towards each other.
Following steps are to be followed in preparing Guttman Scale:
a. Define focus-
The first step is to identify the area that needs to be focused
b. Develop the items-
Identify a large number of items that defines the concept. Several books,
journal or expert advices are required to identify the attributes.
c. Rate the items-
Allow the respondents after preparation to identify which attributes has
highest value and favourable in explaining the concept. They were asked
to respond by yes/no.
d. Develop cumulative
Here, a matrix table is to be prepared that will assign all the responses that
are collected from respondents. The assignment of attributes in matrix will
be prepared as such those attributes gets highest respond will be placed at
top and those that get lower respond will be placed at bottom. If the
response is found to be of similar agreements then they will be placed
from left to right from those that most agreed to fewest agreed to.
Guttman scales have cumulative meaning for the researcher not to the
respondent’s response to a single object. So we need to consider the scale
items and scale scores associated with them.
For example
Scologram
Score 3 2 1 0
Agree 3 √ x √ √
with 2 √ x x √
1 √ √ √ x
Disagree 3 x √ x x
with 2 x √ √ x
1 x x x √
Note: For each agreed respond it gives a score as 1 which will be
cumulated to identify the highest preference amongst all.
It is a scale that sometimes called as graphic rating scale. The respondents in this scale
are asked to put a mark on the proper place on a given line. The extreme ends of the
line contain certain variable that are completely opposite to each other. It gives an
advantage to the respondent of not selecting predefined points rather they are free to
move to any extreme side or in between it to give their response. Here the respondent
will mention a mark which will not be compared to any numbers or point in between
it.
For example:
How much will you rate your present employer?
After the response the researcher can divide the line into several groups and assigns
scores as per the groups in which the rating tends to fall. It is easy to construct but the
scoring may be unreliable.
ii) Likert Scale
A likert scale is a scale of psychometric (attitude based). This scale is mostly
found in researches based on questions that are related to social sciences or
business research. This is a scale that sets several points for any particular objects
Dr. Arya Kumar, [Link]@[Link], 09853422575 Page 12
BRM Module-3 2022
from agree to disagree or like to dislike. This scale asks the respondents to
respond as per their agreement level for every set of questions. The scale is
developed during 1932 by Rensis Likert. It should have the continuous
representative sample of all possible attitude or opinions about an object. The
scale should be formulated in such a way that half of it will show favourable and
remaining half as unfavourable. In case, the scales have odd point then the middle
point will be considered as neutral.
The development of point is made as per the degree of favours or un-favours
result to which the points has five points or seven points or for more accuracy nine
points. Sometime this scale is prepared with force i.e. there will be no middle
point that states about neutrality in preference.
This scale should be presented in bipolar scaling i.e. one side should be positive
while other as negative.
At last the response from the questionnaire will be summed together to prepare the
test score as a result it is otherwise called as summative scales.
For example:
Football can be considered as the most effective outdoor game
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
This scale is different from likert scale. A likert scale ask the respondents to
respond on the basis of the intensity of an agreement or disagreement while
Thurstone scale provides a huge set of concepts or range that vary from highly
favourable to highly unfavourable keeping a neutral respond in between. They
were asked to select those attribute that they feel is very close to their own
attitude.
Some also call it as method of equal appearing intervals as the objective of the
scale was to obtain uni-dimensional scale with interval properties.
3) The values are then collected and mean/median value is calculated for each
statement considering the number of judges who has rated the statements.
4) After such standard deviation (σ) or quartile deviation (QD) is computed if the
judges tends to give high rating then σ or QD will be low and if the response
are poor then σ or QD will be high.
5) After the calculation of σ or QD for each statement the result are positioned in
the favourable and unfavourable point from 1 to 11. Any responses if found as
high variability then such response will be rejected. If the response for tw or
more statements are found to be close or same then the one with minimum σ
or QD will selected for interpretation.
6) Finally, it should be kept in mind of not showing the responses of respondents
as this may bias others while giving the ratings.
For example:
If a respondent agrees on a statements that gives a score like 2.4, 1.9, 3.2 and
2.9 then the attitude score is:
2.4 + 1.9 + 3.2 + 2.9 = 2.6
4
Here, only those responses are taken into consideration that brings a full
responds to the statement.
Sad 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 Happy
After all this steps the total score can be generated by totalling all rating scores
and finding the average of it. This process helps in identifying the meaning behind
the objects and the reaction/ perception to the object.
This scale not only provides an interval scaling but it is a scale that is highly
efficient and very convenient in collecting a large number of response based on
attitude. It is highly versatile rating scale due to which it gains its popularity in
social science and business research.
v) Stapel scale-
It is a scale that called as unipolar rating scale with the scaling point of 10 which
is numbered from -5 to 5 including 0 as a neutral point. This scale is named after
Jan Stapel. The respondents are asked to rate an object from the numerical
response category that may be presented horizontal or vertical. The higher the
score in positive the higher the adjective of the object if one moves towards the
lowest point of scale it relates to less adjective for an object.
For example: rating for the selection of an University for admission
-5 -5 -5
-4 -4 -4
-3 -3 -3
-2 -2 -2
-1 -1 -1
Teaching 0 Price 0 Placement 0
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
The data thus obtained from here can be interpret like that od Semantic
differential scale as the result that is produced from this is similar to semantic
differential scale. The reason that makes it unique from Semantic differential
scale is that it needs no bipolar adjective to define the attitude of an object.
A. Sample Design-
Sampling method- a rules and procedures through which some of the elements of population
are found to be a part of sample. Some of the widely used techniques are convenience
sampling, stratified sampling, random sampling, cluster sampling and etc.
Estimator- it states about the estimation process for calculating the collected sample. If the
sample methods are changed then sample estimation will also tends to change. For example
calculating a mean for simple random sample is different from clustering sample. Result to
this all the variables like standard error or quartile deviation will also tends to change.
To confirm the best sample design it is better to design as per the objective and survey
resources. If the researcher has less time, then it may select a design that takes less time even
if a researcher need accuracy of the sample and result then they may use a design that gives
cent percent result without worrying about time, energy or money.
population then there is a chance that responses from non-target samples will
discourage and change the decision for opening a new showroom.
If the researcher able to identify the exact target population then each sample element
can be considered for sample unit by this way the researcher can be more focus to its
sample for collection data as per the research objective. So in a safe side it is wise to
select the universities as sample unit and every individual commerce faculty as the
sample element. This can be considered as secondary sample unit:
i) Individual unit
ii) Construction unit- house, building, apartment, flat
iii) Geographical unit- rural, urban, town, city, state, district
iv) Special Group unit- team, family, universities
Sampling
Unit
i) An experimental statistical unit is considered as one of the set of the object that is
initially equivalent with each object then subjected to one of several experimental
treatments.
ii) Universal example of a unit can be a single person, an entity, trees, animals or any object
that belongs to a larger group out of which the research is to be conducted.
iii) The sampling unit is characteristically thought of as an entity that has been sampled as of
statistical unit.
iv) This is a term frequently used during poll or survey of sampling
v) A sample may not be from the units observed from any meaningful population but
consider as a convenience sample or may represent the entire population of interest.
vi) In this statistical units descriptively or we may learning their dynamics above time.
vii) In extra or additional complex data sets multiple dimensions are made for each one in the
entire units.
viii) In easy data sets the unit is in on to on connection with the data values
ix) At the same time as units is frequently lowest level at which explanation are made,
further cases, a unit can be some rotten as a statistical gathering.
It discuss about the techniques for selection of sample units. The preference for selection of
the sample units is directly related to the objective of research, financial constraints, time
availability and the nature of problem to be identified. All the groups of sampling method can
be divided in to two groups:
a. Probability Sampling
b. Non-Probability Sampling
It is one of the crucial stages of confirming the size of a sample. There are various ways
of defining the sample that is to be considered for analysis or deciding the size. Few
things that are considered during the decision on sample size:
In non- probability sampling technique some of the rules that are considered are as
follows:
a. Rule of thumbs
b. Nature of analysis
c. Importance of the decision
d. Availability of finance
e. Number of group and sub-group
f. Incidence rates
g. Number of variables
h. Time duration
In probability sampling technique there exist few formulas basing upon which the sample
size are calculated. The selections are done only after the confirmation of level of
acceptable errors and level of confidence. The details that determine the sample size are as
follows:
6. Specifying the sampling Plan-
It is a stage that defines the decision about the execution of the research process. For
instance, the sectors in a town are considered as sample unit and the houses are
considered as sampling element. This stage states about the nature of sampling plan of
selecting the houses on the basis of certain characteristics. This stage deals with
certain questions like:
a) How the interview is to be conducted?
b) Who will conduct the interview?
c) What an interviewer will do if no one is available for interview?
Similarly, various questions are to be framed and answered to make the data
collection process easy. These act as a guideline for the researcher that will help
the researcher at every step of research. Sometimes, the data are collected by a
third party who might face various obstacles in data collection so this plan can
provide various specifications for smooth function in interviewing the sample
element.
7. Selecting Sample
The last step in the process of sampling, here the actual work is carried out i.e.
selection of sample elements. Here, the interviewer and researcher should not be
lenient towards selection of huge number of sample as this may give a spurious result.
So a strict procedure should be followed to avoid such practice and get the true facts
of the research. This is a stage where the sample for survey is considered by following
the sample plan.
An error in survey or sampling is a normal activity which may occur due to random
sampling or due the sources (other than random) i.e. non sampling errors like non
response of the respondents, specification errors, processing errors and etc. These two
sources can affect both estimate and its mean square errors.
Types of Errors
Types of Sampling
A. Probability Sampling-
It is a kind of sampling process where the entire samples considered are calculable
and non-zero probability is considered in the sample then such sample is termed as
probability sampling. The methods for selection of sample from the population may
not be similar for all the cases. A probability sample is highly desirable in the case
when the research is made for a conclusion or prediction that affects the whole
population.
This method is appropriate when the population size is small, frame of sampling is
clear, homogenous and when the details of the population are not known. The main
advantage here is that the population has a minimum knowledge and there is a free of
classification. There are other benefits that there is no human bias or any kind of
dependency on the availability of element. But its application is bit complex so it has
gained less popularity among the researcher as it fails to list every item in the
population prior to sampling.
3. Cluster Sampling-
Here, the whole member of the population will be assigned to one group. This each
group is called as a cluster. A cluster sampling is selected by using probability
method. Then one individual among the cluster is considered for survey. This cluster
may be a town, village, geographical area, qualification or any kind of social units.
The sampling of clusters from the population may be done through stratified or simple
random sampling.
4. Systematic Sampling-
Here all the samples from the sample frame are laid down out of which the every k th
element from the sampling frame is to select. Here the k element states about the skip
interval or a systematic gap between the selected samples. This is selected by
implementing a formula:
For instance: if the k th element is found as 3 and the sample will start from 3 then the
sample would include:
3rd, 6th, 9th, 12th element from the sample frame and so on.
In case, the result of skip interval (k) is not a whole number then the nearest whole
number can be considered as skip interval unit. This type of sampling is mainly
popular in industrial sectors to identify the machines or equipment in the production
line are functioning properly. The manufacturer can check every k th item to verify the
quality is maintained as per the specification. But it has a limitation that the researcher
has to decide the skip interval for every sample frame separately. This method is more
suitable the researcher have less fund and time.
5. Convenience Sampling-
This is a method of selecting the samples as per the easy availability or accessibility
of the researcher. This type of sampling for data collection is easy and cost effective.
For example: a company is planning to manufacture sports shoes for which they
prefer to collect the data from their own employees this activity of data collection is
considered as a perfect example of convenient sampling. But this type of survey has a
limitation that the result of it cannot be made generalized to the whole population as
the sample selection are not the direct representative of target population. Adding to it
there is a chance of personal bias as there is not proper technique for selecting the
sample. As in the example it can be said that the employees may support the
manufacturing of the sports shoes as this will help them to continue their job for a
longer period of time.
It is a process of selecting the units as per certain factors other than random. This
sampling is completely purposive in nature. In general, all the process of selection of
sample that does not come under probability sampling will be under non-probability
sampling.
1. Quota Sampling-
The whole sample is divided into two groups of mutually exclusive. The number
of respondents (quota) that are selected from the several pre-defined categories the
final selection will be carried on by the interviewer who will continue the process
till the quota response is complete.
This type of sampling is widely used in commercial based research where the
purpose was to select the representatives’ who are from different categories of the
population. For instance the survey is carried and the category is gender then the
respondents will be only two i.e. male and female. If the researcher wants a data
of 100 people then it should be made 50 from male and remaining 50 as female.
Quota sampling has a chance of interviewer bias that may affect the result in:
a) Respondents (quota) reflecting as superficial characteristics.
b) Sampling was conducted as per the availability not as per the suitability.
2. Judgemental Sampling-
3. Accidental-
Here the researcher selects a sample without any pre-defined process. It simply
picks up those respondents that fall to hand. By this the researcher continues till it
finds a desired level of sample size and responses.
For instance, a researcher collects information from 100 persons to whom he meet
on the footpath that are willing to respond. It has certain limitations that the
respondent may not be aware not educated about the purpose of research. They
might not be the target population for survey. But it is an easy, time effective and
cost effective process.
4. Multistage Sampling-
5. Snow Ball-
It is a process of selecting additional respondents for research activities. This is
useful for those populations that are rare and have fewer incidences. The process
of sampling always face several problems, as it is difficult to identify the sample
from the huge population so the better option is following a chain system of
referrals. For example an International MBA institute makes an open survey on its
website regarding the interest of selecting an MBA institute for admission.
This is very difficult to collect the response like such so the institute consider the
first 100 visitors of the website and request them to provide some names those
who are looking for taking admission in MBA college. The will be requested
mention at least three names. After the collection of name the institute will try to
interact with them personally and collect the information in details.
This is a method that reduces the costly affairs and saves time but the
disadvantage of this method is biasness. The process of collecting names is the
initial stage the process may continue to follow as much as it is possible for the
process of research. However, this sampling technique may not represent the cross
section of the total population. It may happens that visitor to the site might not
aware of any of the sample like or reluctant to share the names and details.