Coi FR DPSP
Coi FR DPSP
DPSP
Fundamental Rights are a set of rights guaranteed by the Constitution of India to all citizens
to ensure equality, freedom, justice, and dignity. They are enshrined in Part III of the Indian
Constitution (Articles 12 to 35). These rights act as limitations on the power of the state and
protect individuals from arbitrary state actions.
They are inspired by the American Bill of Rights and are often called the "cornerstone of the
Constitution."
o Citizens can move the Supreme Court if their fundamental rights are violated.
o Importance: Called the "heart and soul of the Constitution" (Dr. B.R.
Ambedkar) because it makes rights enforceable.
• Safeguard Democracy: Rights like freedom of speech, expression, and equality ensure
active participation in democracy.
• Protect Individual Dignity: Rights against exploitation, rights to life and liberty
protect human dignity.
• Check on State Power: The government cannot act arbitrarily; it must respect
constitutional limitations.
• Ensure Unity in Diversity: Minority rights and religious freedoms preserve cultural
harmony.
3. Justiciable in Nature – Citizens can directly approach the Supreme Court (Article 32)
if these rights are violated.
5. Supreme Legal Protection – Any law violating fundamental rights can be struck down
by the courts (judicial review).
The Right to Equality ensures the absence of special privileges and equal subjection of all
citizens to the law. Article 14 guarantees equality before the law and equal protection of the
laws within India. This does not mean identical treatment in all circumstances but mandates
that classifications made by law must be reasonable and not arbitrary.
Article 15 prohibits discrimination by the State on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or
place of birth. However, the Constitution allows the State to make special provisions for
women, children, socially and educationally backward classes, Scheduled Castes, Scheduled
Tribes, and, through the 103rd Constitutional Amendment (2019), for economically weaker
sections.
Article 16 provides equality of opportunity in matters of public employment. Yet, the State is
permitted to reserve jobs for backward classes and minorities, including special quotas for
SCs, STs, OBCs, and EWS.
Article 17 abolishes untouchability in all its forms, declaring its practice a punishable
offence. The Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955, and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled
Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, were enacted to enforce this article.
Article 18 abolishes titles, ensuring that no citizen shall accept any title from the State.
Exceptions exist for academic and military distinctions, such as “Doctor” or “General.”
Article 20 provides protection in respect of conviction. It prohibits ex-post facto laws (no
retrospective criminal legislation), double jeopardy (no one can be punished twice for the
same offence), and self-incrimination (no person can be compelled to testify against
themselves).
Article 21 protects life and personal liberty, declaring that no person shall be deprived of life
or liberty except by a procedure established by law. The judiciary has expanded its scope,
interpreting “life” to mean more than mere survival. It includes the right to privacy, legal aid,
shelter, livelihood, education, health, and a clean environment. The celebrated judgment in
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) broadened the scope of this right, insisting that
“procedure” must be just, fair, and reasonable.
Article 21A, inserted by the 86th Constitutional Amendment (2002), guarantees free and
compulsory education to children between 6 and 14 years.
Article 22 provides protection in cases of arrest and detention. Citizens have the right to be
informed of the grounds of arrest, the right to consult a lawyer, and must be presented before
a magistrate within 24 hours. However, preventive detention is allowed, permitting detention
for up to three months without trial, extendable to twelve months in certain cases of national
security.
Article 24 prohibits the employment of children under the age of fourteen years in factories,
mines, or hazardous occupations. Laws like the Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation)
Act, 1986, and the Right to Education Act further strengthen this protection.
Article 26 allows religious denominations the right to manage their own affairs, establish and
maintain institutions, and own property, again subject to public order and morality.
Article 27 prevents the State from compelling any person to pay taxes for the promotion or
maintenance of a particular religion.
To protect India’s rich diversity, Article 29 ensures that any section of citizens with a distinct
language, script, or culture has the right to conserve it.
Article 30 gives minorities, based on religion or language, the right to establish and
administer educational institutions of their choice. The State cannot discriminate against such
institutions in providing aid. This is vital for protecting minority identities and ensuring
cultural pluralism.
6. Right to Constitutional Remedies (Article 32)
Article 32 gives every individual the right to directly move the Supreme Court of India for
enforcement of their Fundamental Rights. Unlike other rights that may require long judicial
procedures, this provision empowers citizens with immediate access to the highest court
whenever their rights are violated.
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, the architect of the Constitution, called Article 32 the “heart and soul of
the Constitution” because without the remedy of enforcement, Fundamental Rights would
remain merely symbolic.
The Supreme Court can issue five types of writs to protect Fundamental Rights:
1. Habeas Corpus (“produce the body”) – issued to release a person who has been
unlawfully detained.
3. Prohibition – issued to a lower court or tribunal, preventing it from acting beyond its
jurisdiction.
The importance of Article 32 lies in the fact that it provides judicial protection by making
Fundamental Rights justiciable and enforceable. It gives citizens direct access to the
Supreme Court without the need to approach lower courts first, thereby ensuring speedy
remedies. Through this provision, the power of judicial review is strengthened, enabling the
judiciary to strike down unconstitutional laws and executive actions. Most importantly, it acts
as a safeguard against state abuse, empowering citizens to check arbitrary actions by the
government and preserve democratic values.
However, Article 32 also has certain limitations. It is available only for the enforcement of
Fundamental Rights, not for ordinary legal rights. During a National Emergency under
Article 359, the enforcement of certain Fundamental Rights can be suspended. For instance,
during the Emergency of 1975, citizens were denied the right to move the courts for
enforcement of Article 21. Moreover, the remedy under Article 32 is discretionary in
nature, meaning that the Supreme Court may refuse to issue a writ if it finds that another
adequate legal remedy exists.
Over time, several landmark cases have highlighted the significance of Article 32. In
Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras (1950), the Court declared that Article 32 is the very
foundation of the Constitution and cannot be denied. In Keshavananda Bharati v. State of
Kerala (1973), judicial review under Article 32 was held to be part of the “basic structure” of
the Constitution. Conversely, in ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla (1976) during the
Emergency, the Court held that even the right to life under Article 21 could be suspended, a
decision heavily criticized and later overturned in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India
(2017), which reaffirmed the inalienability of life and liberty.
Fundamental Duties
Fundamental Duties were not part of the original Constitution of 1950. They were added later
through the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976, following the recommendations of
the Swaran Singh Committee. Initially, ten duties were included under Article 51A in Part IV-
A of the Constitution. Later, the 86th Amendment Act, 2002 added one more duty relating to
education, raising the total to eleven Fundamental Duties.
Unlike Fundamental Rights, which are enforceable by courts, Fundamental Duties are non-
justiciable. This means that if a citizen fails to perform these duties, they cannot be directly
punished by law. However, Parliament can make laws to enforce them indirectly.
According to Article 51A, it is the duty of every citizen of India:
To abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag, and
the National Anthem.
To cherish and follow the noble ideals that inspired the freedom struggle.
To defend the country and render national service when called upon.
To promote harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood among all the people of India
and renounce practices derogatory to the dignity of women.
To protect and improve the natural environment and have compassion for living creatures.
To develop scientific temper, humanism, and the spirit of inquiry and reform.
• Moral and Civic Obligations: They remind citizens that while they enjoy Fundamental
Rights, they also have responsibilities.
• Protect Culture and Environment: Duties preserve India’s cultural diversity and
natural environment for future generations.
• Balance Rights with Duties: They ensure that rights are not exercised irresponsibly,
creating a balance between individual liberty and social welfare.
Limitations of Fundamental Duties
• They are non-justiciable, meaning there is no direct legal punishment for violating
them (except where Parliament has made specific laws, such as prevention of insult to
national symbols).
• They are often considered too broad and vague, making them difficult to enforce
uniformly.
• Public awareness about Fundamental Duties is relatively low compared to
Fundamental Rights.
Judicial and Legislative Recognition
Though not directly enforceable, courts have often referred to Fundamental Duties in
judgments. For example:
• In AIIMS Students’ Union v. AIIMS (2001), the Supreme Court held that Fundamental
Duties are as important as Fundamental Rights.
• The Environmental Protection Act, 1986 and various pollution control laws are linked
to the duty to protect the environment under Article 51A(g).
• The Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971 enforces respect for the
National Flag and Anthem.
Fundamental Duties act as a constant reminder to citizens that rights and duties go hand
in hand. They instill discipline, patriotism, and commitment to the collective welfare of
society. While they are not legally enforceable in most cases, they hold immense
educational, moral, and symbolic value in guiding citizens’ conduct. In essence, they
represent the obligations every Indian owes to the nation and fellow citizens, making
them an integral part of the constitutional framework.
1. Socialist Principles
These aim to achieve economic and social justice by reducing inequalities and establishing a
welfare state:
• Article 38: State to promote welfare of the people through a social order based on
justice—social, economic, and political.
• Article 39: Principles of policy such as securing right to adequate means of livelihood,
equitable distribution of resources, prevention of concentration of wealth, equal pay
for equal work, and protection of children and youth.
• Article 41: Right to work, education, and public assistance in cases of unemployment,
old age, sickness, and disablement.
• Article 42: Provision for just and humane conditions of work and maternity relief.
• Article 43: Living wage, decent standard of life, and social and cultural opportunities
for all workers.
2. Gandhian Principles
These reflect the ideals of Mahatma Gandhi and aim at building a self-reliant society rooted
in rural development and moral values:
• Article 40: Organization of village panchayats as units of self-government.
• Article 43: Promotion of cottage industries on individual and cooperative basis in
rural areas.
• Article 48: Organization of agriculture and animal husbandry on scientific lines and
prohibition of slaughter of cows, calves, and other milch and draught cattle.
3. Liberal Principles
These are based on liberal democratic ideals of justice, international peace, and
environmental protection:
• Article 45: Provision for early childhood care and education for children below six
years of age.
• Article 49: Protection of monuments, places, and objects of artistic or historic interest.
• Article 50: Separation of the judiciary from the executive in the public services of the
State.
• Article 51: Promotion of international peace and security, maintenance of just and
honourable relations between nations, respect for international law, and
encouragement of settlement of international disputes by arbitration.
Relation between DPSP and Fundamental Rights
The Fundamental Rights (Part III) and the Directive Principles (Part IV) are complementary
to each other. Fundamental Rights guarantee civil and political freedoms, while DPSPs aim to
establish socio-economic democracy. Together, they form the Conscience of the Constitution.
• Tensions and Conflicts: At times, courts had to decide between Fundamental Rights
and DPSPs. In Champakam Dorairajan v. State of Madras (1951), the Supreme Court
held that Fundamental Rights prevail over DPSPs in case of conflict. However, later
constitutional amendments and judicial pronouncements have emphasized
harmonious construction of both.
• Judicial Evolution: In Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973), the Court
upheld the importance of DPSPs while recognizing Fundamental Rights as part of the
basic structure. In Minerva Mills v. Union of India (1980), the Court declared that a
balance between Fundamental Rights and DPSPs is essential and neither should
override the other.
• Legislative Impact: Many welfare laws, such as the MGNREGA (right to work),
Right to Education Act (2009), and Environmental Protection Act, are outcomes of
DPSPs being transformed into enforceable rights.
The Directive Principles of State Policy embody the vision of the framers to transform
India into a welfare state that ensures social, economic, and political justice. Though non-
justiciable, they are fundamental in guiding governance and law-making. Their
relationship with Fundamental Rights is not of conflict but of complementarity—while
rights protect individual liberty, the directives ensure collective welfare. Together, they
provide the philosophical foundation of the Constitution, balancing freedom with
responsibility and liberty with justice, thereby steering India toward the ideals enshrined
in the Preamble.