0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views10 pages

Coi FR DPSP

The document outlines the Fundamental Rights, Fundamental Duties, and Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) as enshrined in the Indian Constitution. Fundamental Rights ensure equality, freedom, and justice for all citizens, while Fundamental Duties remind citizens of their responsibilities towards the nation. The DPSP provides guidelines for the State to promote social and economic welfare, although they are non-justiciable and cannot be enforced by courts.

Uploaded by

sarthakgira
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views10 pages

Coi FR DPSP

The document outlines the Fundamental Rights, Fundamental Duties, and Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) as enshrined in the Indian Constitution. Fundamental Rights ensure equality, freedom, and justice for all citizens, while Fundamental Duties remind citizens of their responsibilities towards the nation. The DPSP provides guidelines for the State to promote social and economic welfare, although they are non-justiciable and cannot be enforced by courts.

Uploaded by

sarthakgira
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS, FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES AND

DPSP
Fundamental Rights are a set of rights guaranteed by the Constitution of India to all citizens
to ensure equality, freedom, justice, and dignity. They are enshrined in Part III of the Indian
Constitution (Articles 12 to 35). These rights act as limitations on the power of the state and
protect individuals from arbitrary state actions.

They are inspired by the American Bill of Rights and are often called the "cornerstone of the
Constitution."

Types of Fundamental Rights in India

1. Right to Equality (Articles 14–18)

o Equality before law, prohibition of discrimination, equality of opportunity in


public employment, abolition of untouchability and titles.

o Importance: Prevents social and economic discrimination, ensures equal


treatment.

2. Right to Freedom (Articles 19–22)

o Freedom of speech and expression, assembly, association, movement,


residence, and profession.

o Protection in respect of conviction, life and liberty, rights of arrested persons.

o Importance: Foundation of democracy, allows people to express themselves


freely.

3. Right against Exploitation (Articles 23–24)

o Prohibition of human trafficking, forced labor, and child labor.

o Importance: Protects weaker sections, children, and laborers from exploitation.


4. Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25–28)

o Freedom of conscience and free profession, practice, and propagation of


religion.
o Importance: Promotes secularism and religious harmony.

5. Cultural and Educational Rights (Articles 29–30)

o Protection of interests of minorities, right of minorities to establish educational


institutions.
o Importance: Preserves India’s cultural diversity.
6. Right to Constitutional Remedies (Article 32)

o Citizens can move the Supreme Court if their fundamental rights are violated.

o Importance: Called the "heart and soul of the Constitution" (Dr. B.R.
Ambedkar) because it makes rights enforceable.

Importance of Fundamental Rights

• Safeguard Democracy: Rights like freedom of speech, expression, and equality ensure
active participation in democracy.

• Protect Individual Dignity: Rights against exploitation, rights to life and liberty
protect human dignity.

• Promote Social Justice: Abolition of untouchability and prohibition of discrimination


ensure fairness.

• Check on State Power: The government cannot act arbitrarily; it must respect
constitutional limitations.

• Empower Citizens: They give citizens confidence to challenge injustices through


courts.

• Ensure Unity in Diversity: Minority rights and religious freedoms preserve cultural
harmony.

They are called fundamental because:

1. Basic to Human Existence – They are essential for a dignified life.

2. Constitutionally Guaranteed – They are protected by the Constitution and cannot be


taken away easily.

3. Justiciable in Nature – Citizens can directly approach the Supreme Court (Article 32)
if these rights are violated.

4. Foundation of Democracy – Without these rights, democracy becomes meaningless.

5. Supreme Legal Protection – Any law violating fundamental rights can be struck down
by the courts (judicial review).

Fundamental Rights in details:


The Fundamental Rights of India are contained in Part III of the Constitution (Articles 12 to
35) and are considered the cornerstone of Indian democracy. They guarantee essential
freedoms and protections to citizens, prevent arbitrary actions of the State, and create the
conditions for social justice and human dignity. Although inspired by the American Bill of
Rights, the Indian model adapts these rights to suit the nation’s diversity and socio-economic
context. Unlike ordinary rights, they are justiciable, meaning any violation can be directly
challenged in the courts of law.
1. Right to Equality (Articles 14–18)

The Right to Equality ensures the absence of special privileges and equal subjection of all
citizens to the law. Article 14 guarantees equality before the law and equal protection of the
laws within India. This does not mean identical treatment in all circumstances but mandates
that classifications made by law must be reasonable and not arbitrary.

Article 15 prohibits discrimination by the State on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or
place of birth. However, the Constitution allows the State to make special provisions for
women, children, socially and educationally backward classes, Scheduled Castes, Scheduled
Tribes, and, through the 103rd Constitutional Amendment (2019), for economically weaker
sections.

Article 16 provides equality of opportunity in matters of public employment. Yet, the State is
permitted to reserve jobs for backward classes and minorities, including special quotas for
SCs, STs, OBCs, and EWS.

Article 17 abolishes untouchability in all its forms, declaring its practice a punishable
offence. The Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955, and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled
Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, were enacted to enforce this article.
Article 18 abolishes titles, ensuring that no citizen shall accept any title from the State.
Exceptions exist for academic and military distinctions, such as “Doctor” or “General.”

2. Right to Freedom (Articles 19–22)


The Right to Freedom secures essential civil liberties. Article 19 grants six freedoms:

1. Freedom of speech and expression.

2. Freedom to assemble peacefully and without arms.


3. Freedom to form associations, unions, or cooperative societies.

4. Freedom to move freely throughout India.

5. Freedom to reside and settle in any part of India.

6. Freedom to practice any profession or to carry on any trade or business.


However, these freedoms are not absolute. Reasonable restrictions may be imposed in the
interests of sovereignty and integrity of India, security of the State, friendly relations with
foreign States, public order, decency, morality, contempt of court, defamation, or incitement
to an offence. For example, freedom of speech cannot be used to incite communal hatred, and
freedom of movement can be restricted in tribal areas to protect indigenous populations.

Article 20 provides protection in respect of conviction. It prohibits ex-post facto laws (no
retrospective criminal legislation), double jeopardy (no one can be punished twice for the
same offence), and self-incrimination (no person can be compelled to testify against
themselves).
Article 21 protects life and personal liberty, declaring that no person shall be deprived of life
or liberty except by a procedure established by law. The judiciary has expanded its scope,
interpreting “life” to mean more than mere survival. It includes the right to privacy, legal aid,
shelter, livelihood, education, health, and a clean environment. The celebrated judgment in
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) broadened the scope of this right, insisting that
“procedure” must be just, fair, and reasonable.

Article 21A, inserted by the 86th Constitutional Amendment (2002), guarantees free and
compulsory education to children between 6 and 14 years.

Article 22 provides protection in cases of arrest and detention. Citizens have the right to be
informed of the grounds of arrest, the right to consult a lawyer, and must be presented before
a magistrate within 24 hours. However, preventive detention is allowed, permitting detention
for up to three months without trial, extendable to twelve months in certain cases of national
security.

3. Right against Exploitation (Articles 23–24)


This right safeguards individuals from exploitation in society. Article 23 prohibits human
trafficking, begar (forced labour without payment), and other similar forms of exploitation.
Any contravention is punishable by law, although compulsory service for public purposes,
such as military or social obligations, may be permitted.

Article 24 prohibits the employment of children under the age of fourteen years in factories,
mines, or hazardous occupations. Laws like the Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation)
Act, 1986, and the Right to Education Act further strengthen this protection.

4. Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25–28)

The Constitution of India upholds secularism by ensuring religious freedom. Article 25


grants all persons the freedom of conscience and the right to profess, practice, and propagate
religion, subject to public order, morality, health, and the sovereignty and integrity of India.
This allows individuals to follow their faith freely, though practices like untouchability or
human sacrifice cannot be protected under the guise of religion.

Article 26 allows religious denominations the right to manage their own affairs, establish and
maintain institutions, and own property, again subject to public order and morality.

Article 27 prevents the State from compelling any person to pay taxes for the promotion or
maintenance of a particular religion.

Article 28 restricts religious instruction in educational institutions funded entirely by the


State, though private institutions receiving aid may impart religious teachings, subject to
consent.

5. Cultural and Educational Rights (Articles 29–30)

To protect India’s rich diversity, Article 29 ensures that any section of citizens with a distinct
language, script, or culture has the right to conserve it.
Article 30 gives minorities, based on religion or language, the right to establish and
administer educational institutions of their choice. The State cannot discriminate against such
institutions in providing aid. This is vital for protecting minority identities and ensuring
cultural pluralism.
6. Right to Constitutional Remedies (Article 32)

Article 32 gives every individual the right to directly move the Supreme Court of India for
enforcement of their Fundamental Rights. Unlike other rights that may require long judicial
procedures, this provision empowers citizens with immediate access to the highest court
whenever their rights are violated.

Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, the architect of the Constitution, called Article 32 the “heart and soul of
the Constitution” because without the remedy of enforcement, Fundamental Rights would
remain merely symbolic.

The Supreme Court can issue five types of writs to protect Fundamental Rights:

1. Habeas Corpus (“produce the body”) – issued to release a person who has been
unlawfully detained.

2. Mandamus (“we command”) – directs a public authority to perform a duty that it


has failed or refused to do.

3. Prohibition – issued to a lower court or tribunal, preventing it from acting beyond its
jurisdiction.

4. Certiorari – issued to transfer a case to a higher court or quash an order of a lower


court that has acted beyond its jurisdiction.

5. Quo Warranto (“by what authority”) – issued to prevent an unauthorized person


from holding a public office.

The importance of Article 32 lies in the fact that it provides judicial protection by making
Fundamental Rights justiciable and enforceable. It gives citizens direct access to the
Supreme Court without the need to approach lower courts first, thereby ensuring speedy
remedies. Through this provision, the power of judicial review is strengthened, enabling the
judiciary to strike down unconstitutional laws and executive actions. Most importantly, it acts
as a safeguard against state abuse, empowering citizens to check arbitrary actions by the
government and preserve democratic values.

However, Article 32 also has certain limitations. It is available only for the enforcement of
Fundamental Rights, not for ordinary legal rights. During a National Emergency under
Article 359, the enforcement of certain Fundamental Rights can be suspended. For instance,
during the Emergency of 1975, citizens were denied the right to move the courts for
enforcement of Article 21. Moreover, the remedy under Article 32 is discretionary in
nature, meaning that the Supreme Court may refuse to issue a writ if it finds that another
adequate legal remedy exists.
Over time, several landmark cases have highlighted the significance of Article 32. In
Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras (1950), the Court declared that Article 32 is the very
foundation of the Constitution and cannot be denied. In Keshavananda Bharati v. State of
Kerala (1973), judicial review under Article 32 was held to be part of the “basic structure” of
the Constitution. Conversely, in ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla (1976) during the
Emergency, the Court held that even the right to life under Article 21 could be suspended, a
decision heavily criticized and later overturned in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India
(2017), which reaffirmed the inalienability of life and liberty.

Thus, Article 32 is called fundamental because it guarantees the enforcement of other


Fundamental Rights. Without it, the rights contained in Part III would remain mere
declarations without real force. Its presence ensures that citizens can hold the State
accountable, preserve the spirit of democracy, and uphold the rule of law, making it truly the
“heart and soul” of the Constitution.

Fundamental Duties
Fundamental Duties were not part of the original Constitution of 1950. They were added later
through the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976, following the recommendations of
the Swaran Singh Committee. Initially, ten duties were included under Article 51A in Part IV-
A of the Constitution. Later, the 86th Amendment Act, 2002 added one more duty relating to
education, raising the total to eleven Fundamental Duties.

Unlike Fundamental Rights, which are enforceable by courts, Fundamental Duties are non-
justiciable. This means that if a citizen fails to perform these duties, they cannot be directly
punished by law. However, Parliament can make laws to enforce them indirectly.
According to Article 51A, it is the duty of every citizen of India:

 To abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag, and
the National Anthem.
 To cherish and follow the noble ideals that inspired the freedom struggle.

 To uphold and protect the sovereignty, unity, and integrity of India.

 To defend the country and render national service when called upon.

 To promote harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood among all the people of India
and renounce practices derogatory to the dignity of women.

 To value and preserve the rich heritage of India’s composite culture.

 To protect and improve the natural environment and have compassion for living creatures.

 To develop scientific temper, humanism, and the spirit of inquiry and reform.

 To safeguard public property and to abjure violence.


 To strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity.
 To provide opportunities for education to one’s child or ward between the age of 6 and 14
years.

Importance of Fundamental Duties

• Moral and Civic Obligations: They remind citizens that while they enjoy Fundamental
Rights, they also have responsibilities.

• Promote National Unity: Duties like upholding sovereignty, respecting national


symbols, and promoting harmony help maintain national integrity.

• Strengthen Democracy: Encourage active participation of citizens in governance and


nation-building.

• Protect Culture and Environment: Duties preserve India’s cultural diversity and
natural environment for future generations.

• Balance Rights with Duties: They ensure that rights are not exercised irresponsibly,
creating a balance between individual liberty and social welfare.
Limitations of Fundamental Duties

• They are non-justiciable, meaning there is no direct legal punishment for violating
them (except where Parliament has made specific laws, such as prevention of insult to
national symbols).

• They are often considered too broad and vague, making them difficult to enforce
uniformly.
• Public awareness about Fundamental Duties is relatively low compared to
Fundamental Rights.
Judicial and Legislative Recognition
Though not directly enforceable, courts have often referred to Fundamental Duties in
judgments. For example:
• In AIIMS Students’ Union v. AIIMS (2001), the Supreme Court held that Fundamental
Duties are as important as Fundamental Rights.
• The Environmental Protection Act, 1986 and various pollution control laws are linked
to the duty to protect the environment under Article 51A(g).

• The Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971 enforces respect for the
National Flag and Anthem.

Fundamental Duties act as a constant reminder to citizens that rights and duties go hand
in hand. They instill discipline, patriotism, and commitment to the collective welfare of
society. While they are not legally enforceable in most cases, they hold immense
educational, moral, and symbolic value in guiding citizens’ conduct. In essence, they
represent the obligations every Indian owes to the nation and fellow citizens, making
them an integral part of the constitutional framework.

Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP)


The Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) are contained in Part IV of the Indian
Constitution (Articles 36–51). Inspired by the Irish Constitution (which in turn drew from the
Spanish Constitution), they are guidelines to the central and state governments to frame laws
and policies in accordance with the ideals of justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity set out in
the Preamble. Unlike Fundamental Rights, they are non-justiciable, meaning they cannot be
enforced by courts. However, they are considered fundamental to the governance of the
country and impose a moral and political obligation on the State to apply them in making
laws and policies.
The Directive Principles reflect a broad set of socialist, Gandhian, and liberal ideals:

1. Socialist Principles

These aim to achieve economic and social justice by reducing inequalities and establishing a
welfare state:

• Article 38: State to promote welfare of the people through a social order based on
justice—social, economic, and political.

• Article 39: Principles of policy such as securing right to adequate means of livelihood,
equitable distribution of resources, prevention of concentration of wealth, equal pay
for equal work, and protection of children and youth.

• Article 41: Right to work, education, and public assistance in cases of unemployment,
old age, sickness, and disablement.

• Article 42: Provision for just and humane conditions of work and maternity relief.

• Article 43: Living wage, decent standard of life, and social and cultural opportunities
for all workers.

• Article 43A: Participation of workers in the management of industries.


• Article 47: Duty of the State to raise the level of nutrition and standard of living and
to improve public health.

2. Gandhian Principles
These reflect the ideals of Mahatma Gandhi and aim at building a self-reliant society rooted
in rural development and moral values:
• Article 40: Organization of village panchayats as units of self-government.
• Article 43: Promotion of cottage industries on individual and cooperative basis in
rural areas.

• Article 46: Promotion of educational and economic interests of Scheduled Castes,


Scheduled Tribes, and weaker sections.

• Article 47: Prohibition of intoxicating drinks and drugs injurious to health.

• Article 48: Organization of agriculture and animal husbandry on scientific lines and
prohibition of slaughter of cows, calves, and other milch and draught cattle.

3. Liberal Principles

These are based on liberal democratic ideals of justice, international peace, and
environmental protection:

• Article 44: Uniform Civil Code for all citizens.

• Article 45: Provision for early childhood care and education for children below six
years of age.

• Article 48A: Protection and improvement of environment and safeguarding of forests


and wildlife.

• Article 49: Protection of monuments, places, and objects of artistic or historic interest.

• Article 50: Separation of the judiciary from the executive in the public services of the
State.

• Article 51: Promotion of international peace and security, maintenance of just and
honourable relations between nations, respect for international law, and
encouragement of settlement of international disputes by arbitration.
Relation between DPSP and Fundamental Rights

The Fundamental Rights (Part III) and the Directive Principles (Part IV) are complementary
to each other. Fundamental Rights guarantee civil and political freedoms, while DPSPs aim to
establish socio-economic democracy. Together, they form the Conscience of the Constitution.

• Complementary Role: Fundamental Rights provide the necessary conditions for


individual freedom, whereas DPSPs lay down the goals for social and economic
justice. For instance, the Right to Equality (Article 14) complements Article 39’s
principle of equal pay for equal work.

• Tensions and Conflicts: At times, courts had to decide between Fundamental Rights
and DPSPs. In Champakam Dorairajan v. State of Madras (1951), the Supreme Court
held that Fundamental Rights prevail over DPSPs in case of conflict. However, later
constitutional amendments and judicial pronouncements have emphasized
harmonious construction of both.
• Judicial Evolution: In Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973), the Court
upheld the importance of DPSPs while recognizing Fundamental Rights as part of the
basic structure. In Minerva Mills v. Union of India (1980), the Court declared that a
balance between Fundamental Rights and DPSPs is essential and neither should
override the other.

• Legislative Impact: Many welfare laws, such as the MGNREGA (right to work),
Right to Education Act (2009), and Environmental Protection Act, are outcomes of
DPSPs being transformed into enforceable rights.

The Directive Principles of State Policy embody the vision of the framers to transform
India into a welfare state that ensures social, economic, and political justice. Though non-
justiciable, they are fundamental in guiding governance and law-making. Their
relationship with Fundamental Rights is not of conflict but of complementarity—while
rights protect individual liberty, the directives ensure collective welfare. Together, they
provide the philosophical foundation of the Constitution, balancing freedom with
responsibility and liberty with justice, thereby steering India toward the ideals enshrined
in the Preamble.

You might also like