0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views6 pages

Analysis 1-Chapter0 1

The document is a chapter from a mathematics course at the University of Batna 2, focusing on real numbers and their properties. It covers various sets of numbers, axiomatic definitions, intervals, absolute values, bounded parts, and the Archimedean property of real numbers. Additionally, it introduces the completed number line and reasoning by recurrence as a mathematical proof technique.

Uploaded by

BELDJERD DJAMILA
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views6 pages

Analysis 1-Chapter0 1

The document is a chapter from a mathematics course at the University of Batna 2, focusing on real numbers and their properties. It covers various sets of numbers, axiomatic definitions, intervals, absolute values, bounded parts, and the Archimedean property of real numbers. Additionally, it introduces the completed number line and reasoning by recurrence as a mathematical proof technique.

Uploaded by

BELDJERD DJAMILA
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

University of Batna 2

Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science


Departement of Mathematics

Chapter 01: Real Numbers R

By: Brahimi Mahmoud

inf A sup A

Academic year 2024/2025


Chapitre 1 Usual sets of numbers
Usual sets of numbers
Among the different types of numbers:
 ℕ = {0, 1, 2, . . . } the set of natural numbers
 ℤ = (ℕ) ∪ (−ℕ) = {. . . , −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, . . . } set of relative integers
𝑝
 ℚ = {𝑞 where 𝑝 ∈ ℤ, 𝑞 ∈ ℕ∗ and 𝑝, 𝑞 are coprime 𝑝 ∧ 𝑞 = 1} set of rational
numbers.
 The set of real numbers, denoted ℝ was introduced to complete the set ℚ of rational
numbers we say that 𝑥 is a real number if and only if either 𝑥 ∈ ℚ or 𝑥 ∉ ℚ, 𝑥 is said
to be irrational number 𝑥 ∈ (ℝ − ℚ).
 ℕ⊂ℤ⊂ℚ⊂ℝ
 These private sets of 0 are respectively noted by ℕ∗ , ℤ∗ , ℚ∗ , ℝ∗ .

Axiomatic definition of real numbers


The set ℝ equipped with two internal laws, addition (+), multiplication (×) or (. ) and a
relation of comparison of the elements of ℝ noted (<) (less than or equal) satisfies the
following axioms:
(ℝ, +) is a commutative group, that's to say
 For all 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ ℝ, (𝑥 + 𝑦) + 𝑧 = 𝑥 + (𝑦 + 𝑧) (associativity of addition)
 For all 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ, 𝑥 + 𝑦 = 𝑦 + 𝑥 (commutativity of addition)
 For all 𝑥 ∈ ℝ, 𝑥 + 0 = 𝑥 (0 neutral element)
 For all 𝑥 ∈ ℝ, there exists an element −𝑥 ∈ ℝ such that 𝑥 + (−𝑥) = 0.
(ℝ∗ , . ) is a commutative group, that's to say
 For all 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ ℝ, (𝑥. 𝑦). 𝑧 = 𝑥. (𝑦. 𝑧) (associativity of multiplication)
 For all 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ, 𝑥. 𝑦 = 𝑦. 𝑥 (commutativity of multiplication)
 For all 𝑥 ∈ ℝ, 𝑥. 1 = 𝑥 (1 neutral element)
1
 For all 𝑥 ∈ ℝ∗ , there exists an element 𝑥⁻¹ = 𝑥 ∈ ℝ such that 𝑥. 𝑥⁻¹ = 1.

Multiplication is distributive with respect to addition, i.e:


 For all 𝑥, 𝑦 and 𝑧 ∈ ℝ; 𝑥. (𝑦 + 𝑧) = 𝑥. 𝑦 + 𝑥. 𝑧
(ℝ, ≤) is totally ordered, i.e:
 For all 𝑥 ∈ ℝ, we have: 𝑥 ≤ 𝑥 (Reflexivity)
 For all 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ we have: if 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 and 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 then 𝑥 = 𝑦 (Antisymmetry)
 For all 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ ℝ we have: if 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 and 𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 then 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧 (Transitivity)
 For all 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ we have: 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 or 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 (Total order)
Relation (≤) is compatible with addition and multiplication, i.e:
 For all 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑥′, 𝑦′ ∈ ℝ checking (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 and 𝑥′ ≤ 𝑦′) then 𝑥 + 𝑥′ ≤ 𝑦 + 𝑦′
(compatibility of the addition)
 For all 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑥′, 𝑦′ ∈ ℝ₊ checking (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 and 𝑥′ ≤ 𝑦′) then 𝑥. 𝑥′ ≤ 𝑦 . 𝑦′
(compatibility of multiplication)
 The relation (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 and 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦) for all 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ means that 𝑥 < 𝑦
 A real number 𝑥 is said to be strictly positive if 0 < 𝑥, the set of strictly positive real
numbers is denoted by ℝ∗+ =]0, +∞[
 A real number 𝑥 is said to be strictly negative if 𝑥 < 0, the set of strictly negative
real numbers is denoted by ℝ∗− =] − ∞, 0[
 For all 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ, we write 𝑥 − 𝑦 instead of 𝑥 + (−𝑦) and 𝑥𝑦 instead 𝑥. 𝑦

Notion of interval in ℝ
 A non-empty part 𝐸 of ℝ is an interval if and only if, for all 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ verifies 𝑥 < 𝑦
there exists 𝑧 ∈ 𝐸 such that 𝑥 < 𝑧 < 𝑦.
 If 𝑎, 𝑏 and 𝑥₀ denote real numbers such that 𝑎 < 𝑥₀ < 𝑦 the open intervals of ℝ are
]𝑎, 𝑏[, ]𝑎, +∞[, ] − ∞, 𝑎[ and ℝ =] − ∞, +∞[, the intervals which are neither closed
nor open are [𝑎, 𝑏[ and ]𝑎, 𝑏].
 If 𝑎 = 𝑏; [𝑎, 𝑎] = {𝑎} and ]𝑎, 𝑎[= ∅.
 𝑎 and 𝑏 are called the limits of the interval and (𝑏 − 𝑎) its length.
 The total order relation (≤) allows to define the absolute value function in ℝ.

Absolute value in ℝ
Definition
The absolute value in ℝ is a function denoted |. | defined from ℝ to ℝ by: for all
𝑥, if 𝑥 ≥ 0;
𝑥 ∈ ℝ, |𝑥| = max(𝑥, −𝑥), i.e: |𝑥| = {
−𝑥, if 𝑥 < 0.

Proposition
For all 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ, we have:
 |𝑥| = 0 ⇔ 𝑥 = 0
 |𝑥𝑦| = |𝑥||𝑦| in particular |𝑥|² = |𝑥²| = 𝑥²
 |𝑥| ≤ 𝛼 ⇔ −𝛼 ≤ 𝑥 ≤ 𝛼
 |𝑥 + 𝑦| ≤ |𝑥| + |𝑦|
 ||𝑥| − |𝑦|| ≤ |𝑥 − 𝑦|
 |𝑥| ≥ 𝛼 ⇔ 𝑥 ∈] − ∞, 𝛼] ∪ [𝛼, +∞[
Bounded part in ℝ
Definition
Let 𝐸 be a non-empty subset of ℝ, we say that:
 𝑀 ∈ ℝ is an upper bound of 𝐸 if, for all 𝒙 ∈ 𝑬, 𝒙 ≤ 𝑴.
The smallest of the majorants when it exists is called the upper bound of 𝐸. It is a
maximum if it belongs to 𝐸. it is noted sup𝐸 or max𝐸.
 𝑚 ∈ ℝ is a lower bound of 𝐸 if, for all 𝒙 ∈ 𝑬, 𝒎 ≤ 𝒙.
The largest of the lower bounds when it exists is called the lower bound of 𝐸, it is noted
inf𝐸. It is a minimum if it belongs to 𝐸 and it is noted min𝐸.

Remark
sup𝐸 and inf𝐸 when they exist are unique and [inf𝐸, sup𝐸] is the smallest closed interval
containing 𝐸.

Upper Bound Axiom


Every non-empty part of ℝ and bounded above admits an upper bound.

Remark
Every non-empty part of ℝ and bounded below has a lower bound.

Proposition
Let 𝐸 be a bounded subset of ℝ, M and 𝑚 ∈ ℝ, then:

For all 𝑥 ∈ 𝐸, 𝑥 ≤ 𝑀
 𝑀 = supE ⇔ {
For all 𝜀 > 0, there exists 𝑥0 such as 𝑀 − 𝜀 < 𝑥0

For all 𝑥 ∈ 𝐸, 𝑚 ≤ 𝑥
 𝑚 = inf𝐸 ⇔ {
For all 𝜀 > 0, there exists 𝑥0 𝑠uch as 𝑥0 < 𝑚 + 𝜀

Examples:
 𝐸 = {−1, 0, 1}, minE = −1, maxE = 1
 𝐸 = [0, 1], minE = 0, maxE = 1
 𝐸 = [0, 1[, minE = 0, supE = 1
 𝐸 =]0, 1], infE = 0, maxE = 1
 𝐸 =]0, 1[, infE = 0, supE = 1
Archimedes' Axiom
Proposition
For all 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ∗ , there exists 𝑛 ∈ ℕ∗ such that 𝑛𝑥 > 𝑦 (ℝ is Archimedean).

Remark
ℕ is unbounded above, therefore ℤ is unbounded (it suffices to take 𝑥 = 1 in the
Archimedes axiom).

̅
Completed number line ℝ
Definition
We call the completed number line ℝ the set obtained by adding to ℝ the two distinct
elements −∞ and +∞ verifying, for all 𝑥 ∈ ℝ̅ , −∞ ≤ 𝑥 ≤ +∞ (ℝ ̅ = ℝ ∪] − ∞, +∞[)

̅ by setting
Operations on ℝ extend partly to ℝ

̅ , {𝑥 + (+∞) = (+∞) + 𝑥
 For all 𝑥 ∈ ℝ
𝑥 + (−∞) = (−∞) + 𝑥

̅ , 𝑥(+∞) = (+∞)𝑥 = {+∞, if 𝑥 > 0


 For all 𝑥 ∈ ℝ
−∞, if 𝑥 < 0

̅ , 𝑥(−∞) = (−∞)𝑥 = {−∞, if 𝑥 > 0


 For all 𝑥 ∈ ℝ
+∞, if 𝑥 < 0

 (+∞) + (+∞) = +∞, (−∞) + (−∞) = −∞, (+∞)(+∞) = +∞,

(−∞)(−∞) = +∞, (−∞)(+∞) = −∞.

Remark
The sum (+∞) + (−∞) and the product 0(+∞) are not defined.
Reasoning by recurrence
The recurrence principle allows us to show that an assertion 𝑃(𝑛), depending on naturel
number 𝑛, is true for all 𝑛 ∈ ℕ, the demonstration by recurrence takes place in two steps:

- We prove 𝑃(𝑛) is true for 𝑛 = 𝑛0 (initial condition)

- We assume 𝑃(𝑛) is true and we show that 𝑃(𝑛 + 1) is true (final condition).

Once this is established, we conclude that 𝑃(𝑛) is true for all 𝑛 ≥ 𝑛0 .

Example:
𝑛(𝑛+1)
Show that ∀𝑛 ≥ 1; 1 + 2+. . . 𝑛 = .
2

You might also like