UPSC CSE GS-2 | MASTER NOTES SERIES

SAARC: COMPOSITION, FUNCTIONS & ROLE

South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation — Origins to Present Crisis & the
BIMSTEC Alternative

Historical | Analytical | Theory-Linked | Current Affairs 2024–25 | PYQ-

Mapped
SAFTA | SAARC Charter | India-Pakistan Deadlock | BIMSTEC | Neighbourhood First Policy

GS Paper Marks Countries Type By

GS-2 (IR) 15–20 8 Members Analytical Diptanu
SECTION 1 — CORE CONTEXT & HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

1.1 Introduction
The South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) — established in 1985 with eight
member states — represents both the enormous promise and the persistent dysfunction of South Asian
multilateralism. Home to 1.9 billion people (~25% of world population), SAARC is theoretically the
world's most populous regional grouping; in practice, it is also its most underperforming — with intra-
regional trade at barely 5% of members' total trade, the lowest of any regional body globally. For India,
SAARC is simultaneously a foreign policy priority, a strategic frustration, and an institution being quietly
replaced by BIMSTEC as the operational vehicle of regional cooperation.

1.2 Historical Background — The Road to SAARC

YEAR MILESTONE
1947 Partition creates India-Pakistan rivalry — structural bilateral antagonism embedded at
South Asia's birth
1947–80 Several attempts at South Asian cooperation fail — Cold War, India-Pakistan wars (1948,
1965, 1971), lack of political will
1980 Bangladeshi President Ziaur Rahman proposes South Asian cooperation framework —
catalytic role
August Colombo Declaration: 7 foreign ministers (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal,
1983 Bhutan, Maldives) adopt 'Integrated Programme of Action'
December First SAARC Summit — Dhaka, Bangladesh; SAARC Charter signed; SAARC formally
1985 established
1993 Preferential Trading Arrangement (SAPTA) signed — first trade liberalisation step
2004 South Asian Free Trade Area (SAFTA) signed at 12th SAARC Summit, Islamabad;
entered force 2006
2007 Afghanistan admitted as 8th member at 14th SAARC Summit
2014 India's PM Modi invited all SAARC leaders to his inauguration — landmark diplomatic
gesture; last SAARC Summit held in Kathmandu (18th)
2016 19th SAARC Summit (Islamabad) cancelled — India boycotted citing Pakistan's cross-
border terrorism (Uri attack); all others followed
2016– SAARC effectively paralysed — no full summit in 9+ years; India pivots to BIMSTEC,
2025 NFP, bilateral diplomacy
SECTION 2 — COMPOSITION OF SAARC

2.1 The Eight Member States

COUNTRY Capital Populat GDP India-SAARC Relationship Context
ion (approx
)
India New Delhi 1.43B $3.7T Largest economy (80%+ of SAARC GDP);
dominant power; perceived as 'Big Brother'
Pakistan Islamabad 235M $370B Structural antagonist; India-Pak rivalry = primary
reason SAARC is dysfunctional
Bangladesh Dhaka 171M $460B India's most important SAARC partner; 4,156 km
border; post-Hasina transition (2024)
Nepal Kathmand 30M $42B Open border; hydropower; China's growing BRI
u footprint; periodic anti-India tensions
Sri Lanka Colombo 22M $84B Indian Ocean strategic importance; India's $4B
rescue (2022–23); Hambantota concern
Bhutan Thimphu 0.8M $3B India's 'Special Relationship'; hydro partnership;
China-Bhutan boundary talks
Maldives Malé 0.5M $7B Indian Ocean sea lanes; 'India Out' campaign
(2023–25 reset); Chinese proximity
Afghanistan Kabul 42M ~$15B Observer status under Taliban; India's $3B
development investment at risk; Chabahar

2.2 Observer States

OBSERVER STRATEGIC SIGNIFICANCE FOR INDIA
China (2005) China as observer — India's concern; BRI has reached all SAARC members;
'economic observer with strategic footprint'
USA (2007) US observer status; South Asia's geopolitical importance post-9/11; India-US
strategic convergence
EU (2006) Economic cooperation; GSP+ benefits for some SAARC members; trade
standards
Japan (2006) Infrastructure investment in South Asia; Japan's 'Quality Infrastructure' narrative
vs BRI
South Korea (2006) Growing economic ties; development assistance; cultural soft power (K-wave in
South Asia)
Australia (2006) Australia-South Asia engagement; India-Australia ECTA (2022) impacts SAARC
trade dynamics
Iran (2005) Chabahar Port connectivity to Afghanistan; India-Iran-Central Asia corridor
Myanmar (2005) India-Myanmar-ASEAN connectivity; Act East Policy bridge; but Myanmar civil
war complicates
2.3 Institutional Structure
BODY DECISION- FUNCTION
MAKING
SAARC Summit Consensus Highest decision-making body; meets biannually (IDEAL);
(Heads of last held 2014 (18th, Kathmandu)
State)
Council of Ministers Consensus Foreign Ministers; meets twice yearly; political guidance
Standing Committee Consensus Foreign Secretaries; programme oversight; budgetary
matters
Programming Committee Consensus Senior Officials; budget, programme review
Technical Committees Consensus Sector-specific: agriculture, communications, education,
environment, health, tourism, transport
SAARC Secretariat HQ Administrative; Secretary-General (rotational: current is
Kathmandu Golam Sarwar, Bangladesh, 2023)
SAARC Regional Centres Various 11 centres: SAARC Disaster Management Centre (New
Delhi), Meteorology (Dhaka), Agricultural Centre (Dhaka),
etc.
SAARC Development Kathmandu Three windows: Social, Infrastructure, Economic; India's
Fund (SDF) largest contributor

CRITICAL RULE: SAARC operates on CONSENSUS — any single member can block
any decision. This is the institutional design flaw that makes India-Pakistan rivalry
fatal to SAARC functioning. One veto = complete paralysis.
SECTION 3 — FUNCTIONS & KEY AGREEMENTS

3.1 Core Functions Under SAARC Charter

FUNCTION AREA OBJECTIVES + STATUS
Trade & Economic Eliminate tariffs (SAFTA 2004); expand intra-regional trade from 5% to 35%
Cooperation target; investment facilitation — ALL SEVERELY UNDERPERFORMING
Social Development Poverty alleviation; health cooperation; education; cultural exchanges —
COVID-19 SAARC Emergency Fund (March 2020) was ONE rare
functioning example
Connectivity Road, rail, air, sea connectivity — South Asian Highways; SAARC Motor
Vehicle Agreement (opposed by Pakistan + India now sceptical)
Energy Cooperation SAARC Energy Centre (Islamabad); regional power grid; renewable energy
— India-Nepal-Bangladesh-Bhutan electricity trade progresses
BILATERALLY
Environmental SAARC Environment Action Plan; disaster management (SDMC New
Cooperation Delhi); climate adaptation; glacier monitoring
Cultural Cooperation Cultural Foundation; people-to-people ties; tourism; sports (SAARC Games
suspended since 2016)
Counter-terrorism SAARC Convention on Terrorism (1987); Suppression of Financing of
Terrorism (2008) — COMPLETELY UNDERMINED by Pakistan's state-
sponsored terrorism
Food Security SAARC Food Security Reserve (1988); SAARC Seed Bank — minimal
actual food transfer; India's FCI stocks could transform regional food
security

3.2 Key SAARC Agreements & Treaties

AGREEMENT YEAR STATUS & SIGNIFICANCE
SAARC Charter 1985 Founding document; Dhaka; 10 Articles; sets objectives,
principles, institutions
SAARC Convention on 1987 First SAARC convention; ironically undermined by Pakistan's
Terrorism state-sponsored terrorism
South Asian Preferential 1993 First step toward trade liberalisation; limited scope;
Trading Arrangement superseded by SAFTA
(SAPTA)
South Asian Free Trade 2004 Signed Islamabad; operationalised 2006; eliminate tariffs by
Area (SAFTA) 2016 (sensitive lists remain); coverage: goods only (no
services/investment)
SAARC Convention on 1990 Drug trafficking cooperation; underperforms due to bilateral
Narcotics political tensions
SAARC Social Charter 2004 Human development commitments; poverty, education,
health — aspirational, low implementation
SAARC Framework 2014 Kathmandu Summit; electricity trade, energy security —
Agreement on Energy SOME bilateral progress outside SAARC framework
SAARC Agreement on 2010 Services trade liberalisation; very limited operationalisation
Trade in Services (SATIS)
SAARC Motor Vehicle PENDI Proposed but BLOCKED by Pakistan despite India,
Agreement (MVA) NG Bangladesh, Bhutan, Nepal agreeing; BBIN MVA created
separately
SAARC Agreement on 2011 SAARC SDMC coordination; India's NDRF deployed in
Rapid Response to Natural neighbourhood but rarely as 'SAARC response'
Disasters
SAARC COVID Emergency March PM Modi convened SAARC video conference; $10M initial
Fund 2020 pledges; India committed $10M; RARE functioning SAARC
initiative in recent years

3.3 SAFTA — Deep Analysis (Most Exam-Important Agreement)

SAFTA (South Asian Free Trade Area) is SAARC's most ambitious economic
agreement — signed 2004, operationalised 2006. It remains SAARC's best example of
institutional aspiration vs implementation gap.

SAFTA PARAMETER ANALYSIS

Objective Eliminate tariffs on intra-SAARC goods trade; target: 0–5% tariff for non-
LDC members; 0% for LDCs
Coverage Goods only — NO services, NO investment, NO people movement;
severely limited compared to ASEAN FTA model
Sensitive Lists Each member maintains 'sensitive list' of protected items; India's sensitive
list: 25 items; Pakistan's: 1,169+ items (effectively blocks India-Pakistan
SAFTA)
Progress Intra-SAARC trade: 5% of total (compared to ASEAN: 25%, EU: 60%);
lowest regional trade intensity globally
NTBs Non-Tariff Barriers (NTBs) remain major obstacle; visa restrictions; customs
procedures; SPS measures; infrastructure deficits
India's MFN to Pakistan India gave MFN to Pakistan (1996); Pakistan NEVER reciprocated (formal
MFN refused, suspended MFN effectively 2019)
India's position India gives duty-free, quota-free access to LDC SAARC members
(Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Maldives) unilaterally — Gujral Doctrine
principle
SAFTA vs bilateral India-Bangladesh, India-Nepal, India-Bhutan trade growing faster
BILATERALLY than through SAFTA — SAFTA is subsidiary to bilateral
FTAs
SECTION 4 — ROLE OF SAARC: ACHIEVEMENTS & LIMITATIONS

4.1 What SAARC Has Achieved

Institutional Achievements
• Created South Asia as a regional identity: Before SAARC, no institutional framework existed for
the subcontinent — SAARC created the concept of 'South Asia' as a political-economic unit.
• 18 Summits over 29 years (1985–2014): Regular dialogue mechanism created diplomatic habit of
consultation.
• 11 Regional Centres established: SAARC Disaster Management Centre (New Delhi), Meteorology
Research Centre (Dhaka), Agricultural Centre (Dhaka), Tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS Centre
(Kathmandu), etc.
• SAFTA operationalised (2006): Even if imperfect, a regional FTA framework exists — foundation
for future trade liberalisation.
• SAARC Development Fund: Created mechanism for development project financing; India's
contributions fund development projects in smaller SAARC members.
• SAARC Disaster Management: Some coordination during regional disasters; PM Modi's SAARC
COVID video conference (March 2020) — rare recent success.
• Cultural diplomacy: SAARC cultural exchanges, SAARC Games (when functional), SAARC Film
Festival — building regional identity.

COVID-19 Cooperation — SAARC's Last Functioning Moment

March 2020: PM Modi convened an extraordinary SAARC Video Conference — all 8
SAARC leaders participated. India proposed and pledged $10M to a SAARC COVID-19
Emergency Fund. Pakistan sent a doctor (not a minister). India ultimately deployed its
own 'Vaccine Maitri' — supplying COVID vaccines to all SAARC members — but
outside the SAARC framework. This event showed SAARC's potential but also its
limitations.

4.2 SAARC's Failures — The Structural Dysfunction

FAILURE AREA ANALYSIS + EVIDENCE
Summit Paralysis 19th Summit (Islamabad, 2016) cancelled; India boycotted after Uri attack;
Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, US and others followed; NO SUMMIT IN
9+ YEARS (2016–2025)
Trade Failure Intra-SAARC trade: 5% (vs ASEAN 25%, EU 60%); $23B (2022) vs
potential $67B+ if full trade liberalisation achieved
Connectivity Blocked SAARC MVA blocked by Pakistan; SAARC highways incomplete; rail links
minimal; India had to create BBIN MVA without Pakistan
Counter-terrorism SAARC has a Counter-Terrorism Convention (1987) but Pakistan uses
paradox SAARC to protect cross-border terrorist groups from accountability
Consensus trap Any single member can block any agreement; Pakistan's veto has blocked:
MVA, energy grid, transit rights, investment agreements
India-Pakistan India (80%+ of GDP) + Pakistan = bilateral rivalry that paralyses 6 other
dominance members; smaller states hostage to big-power conflict
China factor China as SAARC observer is a Trojan horse — China's BRI has reached
EVERY SAARC member; SAARC provides legitimacy for China's South
Asia footprint
Institutional SAARC budget: ~$3.5M annually (vs ASEAN's $22M+); Secretariat staff:
underfunding ~40 people; cannot operationalise ambitious mandates
SECTION 5 — SAARC vs BIMSTEC: THE STRATEGIC COMPARISON

🔑 Topper Tag: 'BIMSTEC is not the alternative to SAARC — it is the functional

replacement India is building while SAARC remains formally alive'

PARAMETER SAARC BIMSTEC

Full Form South Asian Association for Regional Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-
Cooperation Sectoral Technical and Economic
Cooperation
Established 1985 (Dhaka Charter) 1997 (Bangkok Declaration)
Members 8 (India, Pak, Bangladesh, Nepal, 7 (India, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Sri
Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Maldives, Lanka, Thailand, Nepal, Bhutan)
Afghanistan)
Pakistan MEMBER — the central problem NOT A MEMBER — this is
BIMSTEC's strategic advantage
Myanmar Observer MEMBER — ASEAN linkage; AEP
gateway
Thailand Not a member MEMBER — ASEAN connection; Act
East bridge
Geographic span South Asia only South Asia + Southeast Asia (Bay of
Bengal basin)
AEP/Act East None Direct — Thailand, Myanmar =
linkage ASEAN gateway
Last Summit 18th (Kathmandu, 2014) 6th (Bangkok, 2022) —
FUNCTIONAL
Trade architecture SAFTA (limited goods FTA) FTA under negotiation; broader
scope
Connectivity SAARC MVA blocked BIMSTEC Connectivity Master Plan;
IMT Highway
India's investment Diminishing Growing — BIMSTEC Secretariat
upgraded; India committed $1M to
BIMSTEC fund
China factor China is SAARC Observer China NOT a member; BRI indirect
concern through Myanmar
Current assessment Effectively PARALYSED FUNCTIONALLY OPERATIONAL —
India's preferred vehicle

5.1 Why India is Pivoting from SAARC to BIMSTEC

• Pakistan factor: BIMSTEC excludes Pakistan — eliminating the principal obstacle to South Asian
regional cooperation.
• AEP integration: BIMSTEC includes Myanmar and Thailand — directly linking India's
Neighbourhood First Policy with Act East Policy.
 • Bay of Bengal focus: BIMSTEC's geographic frame is the Bay of Bengal — aligns with India's
SAGAR doctrine and Indian Ocean strategy.
• Functional summits: BIMSTEC held 5th Summit (Colombo, 2022) and 6th Summit (Bangkok,
2022) — active diplomatic calendar vs SAARC's 9-year gap.
• China counter-balance: BIMSTEC creates a South Asia-Southeast Asia connectivity corridor that
can compete with China's BRI without directly confronting it.
• NE India gateway: BIMSTEC's Myanmar/Thailand inclusion makes NE India — India's
'Ashtlakshmi' — central to the grouping's geographic logic.

5.2 BIMSTEC Current Status (2022–25)

• BIMSTEC Charter adopted (March 2022, Colombo Summit): First-ever binding legal document for
BIMSTEC — upgraded from informal arrangement to formal international organisation.
• 7 Sectors: Trade, Investment, Energy, Transport and Communication, Tourism, Technology,
Fisheries; sector-leads assigned to members (India leads trade and investment, energy, tourism;
Thailand leads transport).
• BIMSTEC FTA: Negotiations ongoing — more comprehensive than SAFTA (goods + services +
investment).
• Myanmar challenge: Myanmar civil war (since 2021) complicates BIMSTEC's connectivity
ambitions — India-Myanmar-Thailand Trilateral Highway severely delayed.
• India's commitment: India upgraded BIMSTEC Secretariat (Dhaka) contributions; PM Modi's
active BIMSTEC engagement.
SECTION 6 — MULTI-DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS

DIMENSION SAARC ANALYSIS Current Affairs 2024–25

Political/ SAARC paralysed since 2016; India's Bangladesh political transition (Aug
Diplomatic NFP bypass diplomacy; bilateral 2024); India-Nepal tensions; India-
relations stronger than multilateral Maldives reset — all handled bilaterally,
not through SAARC
Economic/Trade 5% intra-regional trade; $23B actual vs India-Bangladesh trade $14B; India-
$67B potential; SAFTA underperforms; Nepal hydropower PPA; India-Sri Lanka
NTBs dominate ETCA — all BILATERAL, bypassing
SAARC
Strategic/ SAARC terrorism convention vs India boycotted SAARC (Uri 2016,
Security Pakistan's cross-border terrorism; Pahalgam 2025); Operation Sindoor
India's two-front challenge; counter- (May 2025) — India's proactive
terrorism deterrence outside SAARC framework
Geopolitical China as SAARC Observer; BRI in all China's growing influence in
SAARC members; US-China rivalry in Bangladesh (post-Hasina), Nepal
South Asia (Pokhara airport), Maldives (Muizzu),
Sri Lanka (Hambantota)
Connectivity SAARC MVA blocked; highways BBIN MVA for cargo (2024); Agartala-
incomplete; digital connectivity gap Akhaura rail (2023); Chabahar
connectivity — India's bilateral
response to SAARC failure
Environmental SAARC faces: Himalayan glacier India-Nepal water disputes; Bangladesh
retreat; Bay of Bengal sea level rise; flood management; Maldives climate
monsoon disruption; shared rivers existential threat — SAARC has no
effective climate response
Soft SAARC visa exemption scheme India's vaccine diplomacy; Operation
Power/People (limited); cultural exchanges minimal; Kaveri (Sudan); scholarships; ITEC —
'India Out' sentiment people-centric beyond SAARC
framework

6.1 Theoretical Framework

THEORY WHAT IT EXPLAINS ABOUT India-Specific Application
SAARC
Realism Security dilemma (India- India's bilateral counter-terrorism stance
Pakistan) dominates; states overrides SAARC multilateralism; boycott of
prioritise security over economic 2016 summit = Realist prioritisation of security
cooperation; SAARC = 'peace-
making by other means' that
failed
Liberalism Trade interdependence should South Asia's 5% intra-regional trade =
reduce conflict; SAFTA should Liberalism's failure; India-Bangladesh trade
create peace dividends; resilience despite political change = limited
institutions matter Liberal success
Constructivism Regional identity formation; 'South Asian' identity exists but is weak vs
 SAARC created 'South Asian' national identities; Pakistan's 'Two-Nation
identity; colonial partition shaped Theory' fundamentally incompatible with
mistrust SAARC's unity premise
Dependency India dominates (80% GDP); Nepal, Maldives, Bangladesh periodic anti-
Theory smaller states fear dependency; India sentiment; small states use China as
'Big Brother India' narrative balance vs India within SAARC framework
prevents cooperation
Neo-Liberalism Despite anarchy, institutions like SAARC Disaster Management, Agricultural
SAARC can facilitate Centre provide institutional value even when
cooperation through information- political cooperation fails
sharing and reducing transaction
costs
SECTION 7 — ISSUE-BASED ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK

7.1 Background
• SAARC was founded in 1985 under Bangladesh's initiative — an attempt to convert the
subcontinent's geographic proximity into economic and political community.
• From the beginning, SAARC faced structural contradiction: India-Pakistan bilateral hostility and
the consensus rule made SAARC institutionally paralysis-prone.
• The first 29 years (1985–2014) saw 18 summits, significant frameworks (SAPTA, SAFTA), but
minimal real-world trade or connectivity outcomes.
• 2014 was SAARC's last high point: PM Modi's inauguration invitation to all SAARC leaders; 18th
Summit Kathmandu; Kathmandu Declaration with ambitious connectivity and energy goals.
• 2016: Uri attack → India boycott → SAARC's de facto suspension. SAARC has not met since.

7.2 Causes of SAARC's Dysfunction

• India-Pakistan structural rivalry: Nuclear-armed adversaries sharing 3,300+ km border within
SAARC = ASEAN has no equivalent challenge (no two nuclear-armed rivals among ASEAN
members).
• Consensus voting: Any single member can veto any agreement — Pakistan has blocked SAARC
MVA, energy grid, transit rights, trade expansion.
• Asymmetry: India = 80%+ of SAARC's GDP, 70%+ of land area, 75%+ of population → 'Big
Brother India' perception among smaller states → they use SAARC as platform to constrain India.
• Bilateral vs multilateral preference: India's most productive regional relationships (Bangladesh,
Nepal, Bhutan, Sri Lanka) are managed bilaterally — no incentive to route through dysfunctional
SAARC.
• China factor: China as SAARC observer + BRI penetration of all SAARC members = China
benefits from SAARC as a platform while simultaneously undermining India's regional leadership.
• Domestic politics: 'Anti-India' is a winning political strategy in many SAARC nations — domestic
politicians prefer confrontation over SAARC cooperation.

7.3 Implications for India

• Diplomatic isolation risk: India's SAARC boycott (2016) was principled but left India without a
regional multilateral platform — BIMSTEC partially fills this gap.
• Economic cost: Intra-SAARC trade at 5% vs potential 35% = India loses $20B+ annually in
foregone regional trade; higher logistics costs for NE India.
• NE India development: SAARC connectivity failure = NE India's isolation; BIMSTEC and bilateral
BBIN MVA are partial compensators.
• China counter-balance: SAARC's dysfunction creates strategic vacuum that China fills through
BRI — every failed SAARC project is a Chinese BRI opportunity.
• Soft power deficit: 'India Out' campaigns (Maldives 2023), periodic anti-India sentiment (Nepal,
Bangladesh) reflect SAARC's failure to build regional goodwill.
• Counter-terrorism limitation: SAARC Convention on Terrorism is worthless without Pakistan's
cooperation — India is denied the regional counter-terrorism architecture it needs.
7.4 Challenges
• Pakistan peace pre-condition: India will not resume SAARC engagement without Pakistan ending
cross-border terrorism — a condition Pakistan cannot/will not meet.
• China's entrenchment: BRI has created economic dependencies in Nepal, Sri Lanka, Maldives,
Bangladesh, Pakistan — reducing India's leverage and SAARC's collective coherence.
• Post-Hasina Bangladesh (2024): India's most reliable SAARC partner is now uncertain —
relationship under stress reduces India's ability to build SAARC coalitions.
• Myanmar instability: BIMSTEC alternative is itself compromised by Myanmar civil war (2021–
present) — connectivity projects delayed.
• Afghanistan Taliban: Afghanistan (8th SAARC member) under Taliban rule with no international
recognition — SAARC has no framework for engaging a non-democratic member government.
• Climate vulnerability: All SAARC members face acute climate challenges (Himalayan glaciers,
sea level rise, extreme weather) — SAARC has no effective climate cooperation mechanism.

7.5 Opportunities & Way Forward

• BIMSTEC operationalisation: Make BIMSTEC the functional South/Southeast Asian platform —
finalise FTA, implement Connectivity Master Plan, create energy charter.
• Sub-regional cooperation: India-Nepal-Bangladesh-Bhutan power grid; triangular food security;
India-Bangladesh-Myanmar transport corridor — sub-regional SAARC cooperation without
Pakistan.
• Climate SAARC: Create a SAARC Climate Resilience Fund — climate cooperation can bypass
political deadlock (even India and Pakistan share Himalayan glacier crisis).
• Digital SAARC: India's DPI (UPI, Aadhaar, CoWIN) as model for South Asian digital integration —
neutral terrain for cooperation outside political sovereignty disputes.
• People-to-people without governments: SAARC Cultural Foundation, SAARC University (New
Delhi), scholarships, track 1.5 and track 2 diplomacy — build regional identity even when
governments are hostile.
• SAARC visa exemption expansion: Current SAARC visa scheme covers only specified
categories; expand gradually — even Pakistan-India academic exchanges create peace dividends
over time.
SECTION 8 — ANSWER WRITING TOOLKIT

8.1 INTRODUCTIONS (5 Types)

Type 1 — Data-Based
South Asia — home to 1.9 billion people (25% of world population) — has an intra-
regional trade share of just 5%, the lowest of any regional grouping globally, despite
sharing contiguous borders, civilisational ties, and facing common developmental
challenges. SAARC, established in 1985 to convert this geographic proximity into
economic community, has held no full summit since 2014. The contrast between
SAARC's enormous demographic potential and its operational irrelevance is the
defining paradox of South Asian multilateralism — and the central challenge of
India's regional foreign policy.

Type 2 — Current Event-Based

When Pakistan-based terrorists attacked Pahalgam in April 2025 (26 killed) and India
responded with Operation Sindoor — precision strikes on terrorist infrastructure
across the LoC — the SAARC framework was entirely irrelevant. There was no
SAARC emergency meeting, no SAARC condemnation, no SAARC counter-terrorism
mechanism activated. This bilateral conflict, occurring 40 years after SAARC's
founding, demonstrates the organisation's fundamental failure: it has a Counter-
Terrorism Convention (1987) but cannot address the region's single greatest security
threat.

Type 3 — Agreement/Treaty-Based
From the SAARC Charter (1985) and South Asian Free Trade Area (SAFTA, 2004) to
the SAARC Convention on Terrorism (1987), the organisation has produced an
impressive normative architecture. Yet SAFTA covers only goods (not
services/investment), intra-SAARC trade stands at 5%, the SAARC Motor Vehicle
Agreement remains blocked by Pakistan, and the terrorism convention is rendered
meaningless by Pakistan's state-sponsored cross-border terrorism. SAARC's tragedy
is a surfeit of agreements and a deficit of implementation — institutions without the
political will to make them work.

Type 4 — Quote-Based
"South Asia is the least integrated region in the world — not because its people don't
want to integrate, but because its governments don't allow them to." — Dr. S.
Jaishankar (paraphrased, reflecting India's assessment of SAARC). This insight
captures the gap between the popular mandate for South Asian integration (trade,
tourism, culture) and the political blockade maintained by the India-Pakistan rivalry
that has made SAARC the world's most underperforming regional organisation.
Type 5 — Analytical Framing
SAARC represents the triumph of geopolitics over geography. Geographically, South
Asia is a coherent unit — shared Himalayan watershed, Bay of Bengal basin, Indus-
Ganges civilisation. Geopolitically, it is fractured by the world's most dangerous
bilateral rivalry, a legacy of colonial partition, and the competing ambitions of China
(via BRI) and India (via NFP). The question for India's foreign policy is not whether
SAARC should be revived — it may be irreparably damaged — but how to construct
the regional cooperation architecture that South Asia's 1.9 billion people deserve,
whether through BIMSTEC, bilateral agreements, or sub-regional frameworks.

8.2 CONCLUSIONS (5 Types)

Type 1 — Balanced Diplomatic
SAARC is not dead — it is in a medically induced coma. India must keep the
institutional shell alive (it continues to serve functions through regional centres, SDF,
Secretariat) while building the functional architecture through BIMSTEC, bilateral
FTAs, and sub-regional frameworks. Pakistan's cross-border terrorism policy will
eventually change — either through domestic political evolution or external pressure
— and when it does, a revived SAARC could become the transformative regional
institution its 1.9 billion people deserve.

Type 2 — Win-Win Cooperation

A functional SAARC — where SAFTA is upgraded to cover services and investment,
where the SAARC MVA enables seamless goods movement, and where the SAARC
power grid makes South Asia's hydroelectric potential available to its coal-burning
cities — would add $67B+ annually to regional GDP, lift millions from poverty (SDG
1), and reduce the resource competition that fuels regional tensions. The economic
case for South Asian integration is overwhelming; the political will is the missing
variable. India must demonstrate this vision through BIMSTEC deliverables while
keeping the SAARC door open.

Type 3 — Global Governance Reform

South Asia's integration deficit is not merely a regional problem — it affects global
governance. A functional South Asian Economic Community would be the world's
largest free trade area by population, contributing significantly to SDG achievement,
climate adaptation, and global economic growth. India must champion SAARC reform
at multilateral forums — WTO, G20, UNFCCC — making the case that South Asia's
integration is a global development imperative, not just a regional diplomatic
challenge.

Type 4 — Strategic Autonomy

India's strategic autonomy in South Asia requires a dual approach: maintaining
engagement with SAARC's institutional framework (to prevent it from becoming a
China-dominated platform) while building parallel connectivity through BIMSTEC,
bilateral FTAs, and sub-regional cooperation. India cannot afford to abandon SAARC
 entirely — Pakistan and China would fill the vacuum. Nor can India allow SAARC to
be a hostage to Pakistan's cross-border terrorism. Strategic autonomy means
keeping all options open while delivering through whatever framework actually
works.

Type 5 — SDG/Global Peace

South Asia has the world's highest concentration of poverty, malnutrition, and
climate vulnerability. SAARC's founding mandate — 'to promote the welfare of the
peoples of South Asia and to improve their quality of life' — is an SDG agenda before
SDGs existed. A revived SAARC, focused on climate resilience (Himalayan glaciers,
Bay of Bengal), food security (SAARC Food Bank), and digital inclusion (South Asian
DPI network), could be the vehicle for achieving multiple SDGs simultaneously.
India's leadership in this vision — whether through SAARC, BIMSTEC, or bilateral
frameworks — is both a moral obligation and a strategic opportunity.
SECTION 9 — VALUE ADDITION (Data, Reports, Case Studies)

9.1 Key Data Points — Flash Before Exam

DATA POINT SOURCE/RELEVANCE
Intra-SAARC trade: 5% of total trade World Bank 2024 — lowest of any regional bloc;
ASEAN: 25%; EU: 60%
SAARC GDP combined: ~$4.5 trillion IMF 2024; India = $3.7T (~82% of SAARC total)
SAARC population: ~1.95 billion ~25% of world population; largest by population
density
Intra-SAARC actual trade: ~$23B vs potential $67–100B if full liberalisation —
World Bank estimate
SAARC Summits: 18 in 29 years (1985–2014) 19th cancelled (2016); NO SUMMIT 2016–2025
(9+ years)
SAFTA: Signed 2004; in force 2006 Coverage: goods only; Pakistan's sensitive list:
1,169+ items
SAARC budget: ~$3.5M annually vs ASEAN: $22M+; severely underfunded
BIMSTEC Charter: March 2022 Colombo Summit; first formal legal document for
BIMSTEC
SAARC COVID Fund: $10M (March 2020) India pledged $10M; PM Modi convened video
conference
SAARC Secretary-General (2023) Golam Sarwar (Bangladesh); 3-year term;
rotational by country alphabetical
India's share of SAARC GDP ~82% — structural asymmetry; 'natural dominant
power'
Pakistan's SAFTA sensitive list 1,169+ items — effectively blocks India-Pakistan
SAFTA trade

9.2 Key Reports & Indices

Report Source & SAARC-Relevant Finding
Year
South Asian Regional World Bank 5% intra-SAARC trade; $2.5T infrastructure gap by
Trade Report 2024 2030
South Asia Economic World Bank South Asia GDP growth 6%+; but intra-regional
Focus 2024 investment <1% of total FDI
Human Development UNDP 2024 South Asia: massive HDI variance (Sri Lanka 78th,
Report Afghanistan 182nd); India 134th
Global Peace Index IEP 2024 Pakistan 163rd (lowest 20); India 116th; Nepal 72nd;
Sri Lanka 105th — conflict-prone region
Doing Business / World Bank South Asia has highest trade costs globally; NTBs =
 Investment Climate 2024 30% ad valorem equivalent
SAARC Secretariat 2023 Highlights: SAARC Regional Centres active;
Annual Report Development Fund projects ongoing; no summit held
ADB Asian Development 2024 South Asian infrastructure deficit: $1.7T cumulative;
Outlook connectivity investment needed
IMF Regional Economic 2024 South Asia fastest-growing region globally but
Outlook integration deficit limits potential
Corruption Perceptions TI 2024 SAARC average CPI score: low 40s; governance
Index deficit undermines cooperation
Climate Vulnerability UNDP/Notre Bangladesh 7th most climate-vulnerable; Maldives
Index Dame 2024 existential; Nepal glaciers — climate is SAARC's only
possible consensus issue

9.3 Case Studies

Case Study 1: SAARC COVID Response (March 2020) — The Last Functioning Moment
• March 15, 2020: PM Modi convened extraordinary SAARC video conference — all 8 leaders
participated — first multilateral SAARC engagement since 2014 summit.
• India's initiative: Proposed SAARC COVID-19 Emergency Fund; India pledged $10M; other
nations pledged $18M total (~$28M combined).
• Pakistan participation: Pakistan sent a doctor; did not pledge to SAARC fund; maintained political
distance.
• Vaccine Maitri: India supplied COVID vaccines to ALL SAARC members (Bangladesh, Nepal,
Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Maldives, Afghanistan, Pakistan) in 2021 — but through bilateral diplomacy,
NOT the SAARC framework.
• Significance: Demonstrated SAARC's potential during emergencies (health crisis bypasses
political rivalry) but also its limits (Pakistan minimal participation; India's actual vaccine delivery
was bilateral).
• UPSC angle: SAARC's functional potential in non-political domains; vaccine diplomacy; health as
SAARC's 'neutral terrain'.

Case Study 2: SAARC MVA vs BBIN MVA — The Connectivity Divide

• SAARC MVA (Motor Vehicle Agreement): Proposed to allow seamless goods and passenger
movement across SAARC borders; BLOCKED by Pakistan (and Nepal for a period) — remains
unsigned.
• India's response: India, Bangladesh, Bhutan, and Nepal (BBIN) created a separate BBIN MVA
(2015) — signed in Thimphu — demonstrating that SAARC minus Pakistan CAN function.
• BBIN MVA operationalised for cargo (2024): Commercial trucks can now move between
Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal without trans-shipment — transformative for NE India and
landlocked Nepal/Bhutan.
• Tripura angle: Agartala-Akhaura Rail Link (2023) + BBIN MVA = Tripura's connectivity to
Bangladesh/Bay of Bengal — direct AEP dividend.
• Significance: BBIN MVA is proof-of-concept that South Asian connectivity works without Pakistan;
India can build functional sub-regional architecture.
• UPSC/TPSC angle: SAARC vs BBIN; NE India connectivity; India's sub-regional approach;
Tripura's economic corridor.
Case Study 3: SAARC's Failed Energy Grid vs India's Bilateral Success
• SAARC Energy Centre (Islamabad): Established 2006; SAARC Framework Agreement on Energy
(2014, Kathmandu); proposed South Asian Grid for electricity trade — ZERO implementation at
SAARC level.
• India's bilateral success outside SAARC: India-Nepal PPA for 10,000 MW (2024); India-Bhutan
hydropower cooperation (1,416 MW imported); India exports 1,160 MW to Bangladesh; India-Sri
Lanka undersea cable project.
• India's triangular cooperation: India facilitated Nepal hydropower export to Bangladesh through
Indian transmission lines — trilateral energy cooperation outside SAARC framework.
• China's counter-move: China built Pokhara International Airport (Nepal, BRI project); China-
Bangladesh energy projects; Chinese energy investments in Pakistan (CPEC) — energy is a BRI
battlefield.
• Significance: SAARC energy grid remains a dream; India's bilateral energy diplomacy is the
reality. This pattern — SAARC failure, bilateral/sub-regional success — is India's Neighbourhood
First Policy in practice.
• UPSC angle: Why bilateral NFP works better than multilateral SAARC; energy as geopolitical tool;
China-India competition in South Asian energy sector.
SECTION 10 — PYQ MAPPING & APPROACH GUIDANCE

# Year/Exam Question Approach Hint

1 UPSC 2022 'SAARC has largely remained a non-starter. Do Agree with qualification: 18
you agree? What are the prospects of South summits, SAFTA, regional
Asian regionalism?' centres = NOT completely
non-starter; but 5% trade,
blocked MVA, no summit
since 2014 = dysfunction.
Prospects: BIMSTEC as
functional alternative; sub-
regional (BBIN); climate
cooperation; digital
integration. India's role is key.
Data: 5% intra-SAARC trade
vs ASEAN 25%.
2 UPSC 2020 'Pakistan-India bilateral tensions have derailed India-Pakistan as structural
South Asian regional cooperation. Critically dysfunction: consensus rule +
examine.' cross-border terrorism =
SAARC paralysis. Evidence:
2016 boycott (Uri), cancelled
2016 Summit, SAARC MVA
blocked, SAFTA Pakistan
sensitive list (1,169+ items).
India's response: NFP bilateral
diplomacy, BIMSTEC pivot,
BBIN MVA. Way forward:
conditional SAARC
engagement.
3 UPSC 2019 'Compare SAARC and ASEAN as models of ASEAN: 25% intra-regional
regional cooperation. What lessons can South trade, functional secretariat,
Asia learn from ASEAN?' consensus but 'ASEAN Way'
managed; SAARC: 5% trade,
consensus = veto, India-Pak
rivalry. ASEAN lessons: start
with trade (not security), non-
interference principle, avoid
bilateral disputes in
multilateral forum, graduated
integration. India can apply:
start with functional domains,
build BIMSTEC on ASEAN
model.
4 UPSC 2023 'The China factor has become decisive in China as SAARC Observer +
shaping South Asian regional dynamics. BRI in all SAARC members;
Analyse.' Hambantota (Sri Lanka),
Gwadar/CPEC (Pakistan),
Pokhara airport (Nepal),
Maldives (Muizzu-Beijing),
Bangladesh (post-Hasina
warming). India's response:
NFP, bilateral FTAs,
BIMSTEC (no China),
 Chabahar, IMEC. SAARC is a
platform China uses to
legitimise its South Asia
footprint.
5 TPSC/State 'Discuss the composition and functions of HIGH PRIORITY. Cover: 8
PSC SAARC. How relevant is it for India's members + observers;
Neighbourhood First Policy?' institutions (Summit, Council
of Ministers, Secretariat,
SDF); SAARC Charter
objectives; SAFTA; key
agreements. For NFP:
SAARC is background; NFP
operates bilaterally (India-
Bangladesh Akhaura rail, Sri
Lanka $4B, Nepal PPA) and
through BIMSTEC. SAARC's
relevance: limited but
maintained as diplomatic
platform. Tripura angle: BBIN
MVA, Agartala-Akhaura rail =
NFP and SAARC sub-regional
cooperation.
6 UPSC 2018 'Examine the role of SAARC in promoting Objectives from Charter:
regional cooperation in South Asia. Has it peace, prosperity, welfare,
achieved its objectives?' development (Art.1);
Achievements: institutional
creation, SAFTA, regional
centres, cultural exchanges,
COVID Fund (2020). Failures:
5% intra-SAARC trade (vs
objectives), no connectivity,
terrorism convention
undermined, no summit 2016–
2025. Conclusion: partial
institutional success,
fundamental substantive
failure. Way forward required.
SECTION 11 — MODEL ANSWERS

Q: 'Examine the composition, functions and role of SAARC. Critically assess its
effectiveness and suggest a way forward.'

MODEL ANSWER A — 150 Words

INTRODUCTION: SAARC (1985, Dhaka Charter) — representing 1.9 billion people — is both
the world's most populous regional grouping and its most underperforming. With intra-regional
trade at 5% (vs ASEAN's 25%), no full summit since 2014, and a Counter-Terrorism
Convention undermined by Pakistan's state-sponsored terrorism, SAARC exemplifies the
paradox of geographic proximity without political cooperation.
COMPOSITION & FUNCTIONS: 8 members + observers including China, USA; SAARC
Charter mandates cooperation in trade (SAFTA 2004), connectivity, energy, environment,
counter-terrorism. 11 Regional Centres operational; SAARC Development Fund active; SAARC
COVID Emergency Fund (2020) — India pledged $10M.
FAILURES: India-Pakistan rivalry + consensus rule = structural paralysis. 19th Summit (2016)
cancelled post-Uri; Pakistan's SAFTA sensitive list (1,169+ items) blocks trade; SAARC MVA
blocked — BBIN MVA created separately; no summit 2016–2025.
WAY FORWARD: BIMSTEC as functional alternative (Pakistan excluded); sub-regional BBIN
cooperation; climate SAARC (Himalayan glaciers = shared crisis); digital integration through
India's DPI. India's NFP must deliver bilaterally what SAARC cannot multilaterally — and keep
SAARC institutionally alive for when Pakistan's terrorism policy eventually changes.

MODEL ANSWER B — 250 Words

INTRODUCTION: South Asia — 1.9 billion people sharing civilisational heritage, Himalayan
watersheds, and the Bay of Bengal — has an intra-regional trade share of 5%, the world's
lowest. SAARC, founded 40 years ago to convert this geographic proximity into economic
integration, has held no full summit in over nine years. This is not a failure of vision but of
political will — specifically, the will to manage South Asia's most dangerous bilateral rivalry
within a multilateral framework.
COMPOSITION: 8 members (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Maldives,
Afghanistan) + 8 observers (China, USA, EU, Japan, South Korea, Australia, Iran, Myanmar).
India dominates (82% of SAARC GDP). Consensus rule — any member can veto any
agreement. SAARC Secretariat (Kathmandu); 11 Regional Centres; SAARC Development
Fund.
FUNCTIONS & ACHIEVEMENTS: SAFTA (2004, operationalised 2006): regional FTA
framework exists; India unilaterally gives duty-free access to LDC SAARC members (Gujral
Doctrine principle). SAARC COVID Emergency Fund (March 2020): India's $10M pledge; PM
Modi's landmark video conference. 11 Regional Centres operational (SDMC New Delhi,
Meteorology Dhaka). SAARC Social Charter (2004): human development commitments. India's
Vaccine Maitri: supplied COVID vaccines to all SAARC members (2021) — bilateral delivery,
SAARC inspiration.
CRITICAL FAILURES: 19th Summit (Islamabad, 2016) cancelled after Uri attack — NO
SUMMIT FOR 9+ YEARS. SAFTA undermined by Pakistan's 1,169+ item sensitive list. SAARC
MVA blocked by Pakistan — India created BBIN MVA separately (operationalised for cargo
2024). Counter-terrorism convention meaningless against state-sponsored terrorism. China as
observer exploits SAARC platform. Intra-SAARC trade: $23B vs potential $100B.
THEORETICAL LENS: Realism explains SAARC's failure: India-Pakistan security dilemma
dominates cooperative impulses. Liberalism explains partial successes: trade with Bangladesh,
Nepal hydropower flourish bilaterally — interdependence works when politics doesn't block it.
Constructivism explains persistence: 'South Asian identity' created by SAARC persists despite
political failure.
CONCLUSION: India's strategy must be three-track: (1) Keep SAARC formally alive —
institutional shell has value; prevent China capturing the platform; maintain Regional Centres.
(2) Build BIMSTEC as functional replacement — BIMSTEC Charter (2022) is the foundation;
operationalise FTA, connectivity, energy charter. (3) Deliver bilateral NFP — India-Bangladesh
Agartala-Akhaura rail (2023), India-Nepal 10,000 MW PPA (2024), India-Sri Lanka $4B rescue
— these ARE India's Neighbourhood First Policy in action. SAARC's revival depends on
Pakistan's strategic transformation — a long game India must play with patience and
pragmatism.
SECTION 12 — HIGH-IMPACT KEYWORDS & PHRASES

Keyword/Phrase Category Usage Tip

SAARC Paralysis Core Problem Consensus rule + India-Pak rivalry = structural
dysfunction; 19th Summit cancelled 2016
SAFTA (South Asian FTA) Key Agreement Signed 2004; goods only; Pakistan's 1,169+
sensitive items; 5% trade = SAFTA's failure
Consensus Rule Structural Flaw Any single member blocks any agreement;
Pakistan's veto power over SAARC = fatal design
Intra-SAARC Trade: 5% Key Statistic World's lowest regional trade; vs ASEAN 25%, EU
60%; $23B actual vs $100B potential
BIMSTEC Alternative Strategic Pivot Pakistan not a member; includes
Myanmar+Thailand; AEP gateway; BIMSTEC
Charter 2022
Neighbourhood First India's Strategy SAARC failure → bilateral/sub-regional NFP; more
Policy (NFP) effective than multilateral SAARC
BBIN MVA Sub-regional Bangladesh-Bhutan-India-Nepal; created when
Success SAARC MVA blocked; cargo operationalised 2024
China as SAARC Geopolitical China in all SAARC members via BRI; uses SAARC
Observer Issue legitimacy; India's strategic concern
Gujral Doctrine Historical Non-reciprocal concessions to smaller neighbours;
Context India gives duty-free SAARC LDC access
Cross-border Terrorism Core Obstacle Pakistan's state-sponsored terrorism = India's pre-
condition for SAARC revival; never met
Sub-regional Cooperation Alternative Model India-Nepal-Bangladesh-Bhutan energy/trade
cooperation without Pakistan — functional SAARC
Vaccine Maitri Success Story India supplied COVID vaccines to all SAARC
members (2021) — bilateral delivery via NFP
SAARC COVID Fund Partial Success March 2020 video conference; India's $10M pledge;
Pakistan marginal participation
South Asian Economic Long-term Vision SAARC's aspiration: single market, common
Community infrastructure, integrated economy — unrealised
Non-tariff Barriers (NTBs) Trade Obstacle NTBs cost equivalent to 30% ad valorem tariff in
South Asia; infrastructure + customs
Big Brother Perception Soft Power India's 82% SAARC GDP creates dominance
Challenge narrative; smaller states seek China balance
South Asian identity Constructivist SAARC's normative achievement: 'South Asian' as
Concept identity exists despite political failures
Digital SAARC Opportunity India's DPI (UPI, CoWIN, Aadhaar) as model for
South Asian digital integration — neutral terrain
SAARC Climate Opportunity Only possible consensus issue despite India-Pak
Resilience rivalry; shared Himalayan glacier crisis
Trilateral Energy Trade Success Model India facilitates Nepal hydro export to Bangladesh via
Indian grid — bypass SAARC through trilateral
SECTION 13 — ULTRA-CRISP REVISION SHEET

⚡ READ BEFORE EXAM — Complete SAARC Master Recall in 60 Seconds

13.1 SAARC Basics Flash

FACT DATA INDIA ANGLE
Founded 1985, Dhaka Charter India: founding member; 82% of
SAARC GDP
Members 8 (incl. Afghanistan 2007) India + 7 neighbours
Observers 8 (China, USA, EU, Japan, S China: SAARC Observer + BRI
Korea, Australia, Iran, threat
Myanmar)
Last Summit 18th, Kathmandu, 2014 19th (2016) CANCELLED —
India boycott (Uri)
Intra-SAARC Trade 5% (World Bank 2024) vs ASEAN 25%, EU 60% —
world's lowest
SAFTA Signed 2004, in force 2006 Goods only; Pakistan: 1,169+
sensitive items
SAARC Secretariat Kathmandu, Nepal Secretary-General: Golam
Sarwar (Bangladesh)
SAARC Budget ~$3.5M annually vs ASEAN $22M+; severely
underfunded
BBIN MVA Cargo operational 2024 SAARC MVA blocked by
Pakistan → BBIN alternative
COVID Fund March 2020, $28M total India: $10M; PM Modi video
conference; last functional
moment

13.2 SAARC Timeline Flash

• 1985 — Founded Dhaka; SAARC Charter signed
• 1987 — SAARC Convention on Terrorism (ironic)
• 1993 — SAPTA (Preferential Trading Arrangement)
• 2004 — SAFTA signed (12th Summit, Islamabad)
• 2007 — Afghanistan admitted as 8th member
• 2014 — 18th Summit Kathmandu; Modi invited ALL SAARC leaders to inauguration
• 2016 — 19th Summit CANCELLED; India boycott post-Uri attack
• 2020 — SAARC COVID video conference; India's $10M pledge
• 2022 — BIMSTEC Charter adopted (Colombo) — functional alternative formalised
• 2024 — BBIN MVA cargo operational; SAARC still no summit (9+ years)
13.3 Why SAARC Failed — 5-Point Framework
CAUSE ONE-LINE ANALYSIS
Consensus rule ANY single member veto = total paralysis; Pakistan's structural veto
India-Pakistan rivalry Nuclear-armed adversaries in same organisation = cooperation impossible
Asymmetry problem India 82% GDP = 'Big Brother' perception → smaller states resist rather
than integrate
Cross-border terrorism Pakistan's terrorism policy = India's non-negotiable pre-condition for
SAARC revival
China factor China as Observer + BRI penetration = SAARC captures China's strategic
goals more than India's

13.4 SAARC vs BIMSTEC — Quick Compare

KEY POINT SAARC BIMSTEC
Pakistan MEMBER (problem) NOT A MEMBER (advantage)
Last Summit 2014 (9+ year gap) 2022 (Bangkok) — functional
China SAARC Observer NOT a member
AEP Link None Myanmar+Thailand = ASEAN
gateway
Charter 1985 (founding) 2022 (formal charter adopted)
India's preference Formal platform maintained OPERATIONAL PRIORITY

13.5 Theory Flash

• Realism → India-Pakistan security dilemma dominates SAARC → cooperation impossible
without security resolution
• Liberalism → SAFTA + bilateral trade → interdependence works bilaterally even when
SAARC multilateralism fails
• Constructivism → SAARC created 'South Asian' identity → normative achievement despite
political dysfunction
• Dependency Theory → India 82% GDP → 'Big Brother' = smaller states use SAARC to
constrain India

13.6 Quote Arsenal

"South Asia is the least integrated region in the world — not because its people don't
want to integrate, but because its governments don't allow them to." — Dr.
Jaishankar (paraphrased)

"SAARC is a story of 1.9 billion people held hostage by the bilateral rivalry of two of
them." — Analytical exam line (your own words)
"India's Neighbourhood First Policy delivers bilaterally what SAARC cannot
multilaterally — and that is the pragmatic truth of South Asian cooperation in 2025."
— Exam-ready insight

"BIMSTEC is not an alternative to SAARC — it is the proof that South Asian

cooperation works when its most dysfunctional member is absent." — Critical
analytical line

MASTER NOTES COMPLETE

SAARC: Composition, Functions and Role | UPSC CSE GS-2
Compiled by Diptanu | All rights reserved