[Link]

com/in/document/university-of-lucknow/llb-3yr/scope-and-
extent-of-bnss-2023-a-comprehensive-overview/119596455

Salient Features of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023

1. Philosophical Shift: From Procedure to "Citizen Security"
The BNSS is not merely a name change; it represents a shift from a colonial policing
model to a citizen-centric model. While the CrPC focused on the "administration of
justice" through the lens of the state's power, the BNSS emphasizes Nagarik Suraksha
(Citizen Security), integrating rights of the victim with the duties of the state.

2. Digital Transformation of the Trial Lifecycle

The BNSS legalizes the "Paperless Court" concept through several key sections:
 Section 173 (Registration of FIR): Explicitly allows for e-FIR. It mandates
that if an FIR is given orally or through electronic means, it must be signed by
the informant within three days.
 Section 532: This is an omnibus provision stating that all trials, inquiries, and
proceedings may be held in electronic mode. This includes the examination of
witnesses, the accused, and the evidence.
 Service of Summons (Section 64 & 70): Summons can now be served via
"electronic communication" as may be prescribed by the State Government.
The digital record of the same is deemed as service.

3. Enhanced Investigative Powers & Remand (Section 187)

This is one of the most debated features. Under the old Section 167 of CrPC, police
custody was limited to the first 15 days of the total remand period.
 Extension of Custody: Under Section 187 of BNSS, the 15-day police custody
can be spread out across the first 40 days (for offenses with punishment up to
10 years) or first 60 days (for offenses with punishment over 10 years).
 Rationale: This allows the police to seek custody if new evidence emerges
later in the investigation, which was previously barred once the first 15-day
window closed.

4. Forensic Mandates (Section 176)

To move away from "third-degree" methods to "scientific investigation," the BNSS
mandates:
 Mandatory Forensic Evidence: For offenses punishable by 7 years or more,
the visit of a forensic expert to the crime scene and the collection of forensic
evidence is mandatory.
 Chain of Custody: The entire process of forensic collection at the crime scene
must be videographed to ensure it is not planted or tampered with.

5. Rights of the Accused and "Trial in Absentia"

The BNSS introduces a revolutionary (and controversial) provision regarding
absconding criminals:
 Section 356 (Trial in Absentia): If a person is declared a "Proclaimed
Offender" and has absconded to evade trial, the court can proceed with the trial
in their absence.
 Impact: This ensures that high-profile fugitives or terrorists cannot stall the
Indian legal system indefinitely by simply remaining outside the country.

6. Victimology and Witness Protection

 Victim’s Right to be Heard (Section 398): No government can withdraw a
case (punishable by 7 years or more) without giving the victim an opportunity
to be heard. This prevents political interference in serious criminal matters.
 Witness Protection Scheme (Section 398): Every State Government is now
mandated to prepare and notify a "Witness Protection Scheme" to ensure that
witnesses can testify without fear.
 Zero FIR: While it existed through judicial precedents, BNSS provides a
statutory backbone, ensuring that no police station can refuse to register an FIR
on the grounds of jurisdiction.

7. Strict Judicial Timelines (The "Speedy Trial" Mandate)

The BNSS aims to reduce the "Arrears" in Indian courts by setting expiry dates for
various stages:
1. Investigation of Rape: Must be completed within 2 months.
2. Supply of Documents: Copy of the police report and other documents must be
provided to the accused within 14 days.
 3. Framing of Charges: The court must frame charges within 60 days from the
date of first production of the accused.
4. Judgment Delivery: A judge must deliver a verdict within 30 days of the
conclusion of arguments (extendable to 45 days).

8. Introduction of Community Service (Section 23)

For the first time in Indian substantive and procedural law, "Community Service" is
introduced as a punishment for petty crimes.
 Applicability: It can be awarded for offenses like small-scale theft (if the value
is less than ₹5,000 and it's a first offense), public intoxication, or defamation.
 Objective: To reduce prison overcrowding and adopt a reformative approach
for minor social deviations.

9. Comparative Overview (Table for Exam)

Feature CrPC, 1973 BNSS, 2023

Total Sections 484 531

Police Custody First 15 days only Spread over 40/60 days

Mandatory for 7yr+

Forensics Discretionary
offenses

Technology Ad-hoc usage Integrated into all stages

Victim Mandatory before

Not mandatory for withdrawal
Consultation withdrawal

Metropolitan/Judicial Uniform Judicial

Hierarchy
Magistrates Magistrates
10. Conclusion for Exam
The BNSS 2023 is a comprehensive overhaul aimed at decolonizing Indian criminal
procedure. By mandating forensics, setting strict timelines, and legalizing digital
evidence, it addresses the twin problems of low conviction rates and judicial delays.
However, its success will depend on the infrastructure provided to the police and the
judiciary to meet these new technological and time-bound mandates.

SCOPE AND NATURE AND OBJECT

1. Object of the BNSS (The Purpose)
The primary objective of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) is to replace
the 1898/1973 procedural framework with a system that reflects contemporary Indian
social and technological realities.
 Decolonization: To remove the colonial mindset of "ruling and punishing" and
replace it with "justice and security."
 Technological Integration: To provide a legal framework for digital evidence,
virtual trials, and electronic communication.
 Efficiency and Speed: To address the "Justice Delayed" syndrome by
imposing mandatory timelines for investigations, trials, and judgments.
 Victim-Centric Justice: To transition from a purely accused-centric procedure
to one that recognizes the victim as a primary stakeholder in the criminal
justice process.
 Simplification: To consolidate and streamline various procedural laws into a
more cohesive code (531 sections).

2. Scope of the BNSS (The Extent)

The scope of the BNSS defines its jurisdictional and functional boundaries.
 Territorial Scope: Like its predecessor, the BNSS applies to the whole of
India. However, specific provisions regarding its application to the State of
Nagaland and Tribal Areas remain (similar to the CrPC), where only certain
chapters apply unless the State Government notifies otherwise.
 Functional Scope: * It governs the investigation (search, seizure, arrest),
inquiry, and trial of all offenses under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).
o It also applies to offenses under other special laws (like the POCSO or
UAPA), unless those laws provide a specific different procedure.
  Temporal Scope: The BNSS is prospective. It generally applies to proceedings
initiated after its enforcement date. However, trials already in progress under
the CrPC will usually continue under the old code unless specified otherwise
by the government.
 Uniformity: It abolishes the distinction between "Metropolitan Areas" and
other areas, creating a uniform hierarchy of Judicial Magistrates across the
country.

3. Significance of the BNSS (The Impact)

The significance lies in how the BNSS fundamentally alters the criminal justice
landscape:
A. Legalization of the Digital Lifecycle
The BNSS is significant because it grants legal sanctity to digital footprints. By
mandating the videography of crime scenes (Section 176) and allowing for trials via
video-conferencing (Section 532), it reduces the possibility of evidence tampering and
saves significant state resources spent on transporting undertrials.
B. Deterrence Through Timelines
By setting a "statutory clock" (e.g., framing charges in 60 days, judgments in 30-45
days), the BNSS significantly pressures the judiciary and the police to perform. This is
a landmark shift toward ensuring the Right to a Speedy Trial under Article 21 of the
Constitution.
C. Enhancement of Scientific Investigation
The mandate for forensic teams to visit crime scenes for offenses punishable by 7+
years moves India closer to a "conviction-based" system rather than an "arrest-based"
system. It reduces the reliance on oral testimony, which often turns hostile, and
increases reliance on objective forensic data.
D. Restorative Justice (Community Service)
The introduction of Community Service (Section 23) is significant for the Indian
legal system. It recognizes that for petty offenses, incarceration is counterproductive.
It aims to reform the offender and benefit society simultaneously, reducing the burden
on overcrowded prisons.
E. Empowerment of Victims
Codifying the Zero FIR and the Right to a Progress Report (within 90 days)
empowers the common citizen. It ensures that the police are accountable not just to
their superiors, but to the person who has suffered the crime.
4. Critical Evaluation (For Higher Marks)
While the BNSS is a progressive step, its significance is tempered by challenges:
 Infrastructure Gap: The significance of "mandatory videography" or
"forensic visits" is only as good as the availability of high-speed internet and
forensic labs in rural districts.
 Police Powers: The expansion of police custody (Section 187) across a 40/60-
day window is a significant departure from the 15-day limit in CrPC, raising
concerns about civil liberties.

Summary Table for Exam Reference

Category Key Element

Object Decolonization, Modernization, and Victim Justice.

Scope Whole of India; applies to BNS and special laws.

Digital trials, Forensic mandates, Strict timelines, and Community

Significance
service.

COMPARISON OF BNSS VS CRPC

For a 15-mark law exam, a comparative analysis is most effective when presented
through a "Before vs. After" lens, focusing on the procedural shifts, rights of the
parties, and the infusion of technology.

Comparative Analysis: CrPC (1973) vs. BNSS (2023)

1. Structural Overhaul
The BNSS is not a mere amendment but a complete re-codification.
 CrPC: Contained 484 Sections, 2 Schedules, and 56 Forms.
 BNSS: Contains 531 Sections, 2 Schedules, and 58 Forms.
 Key Change: 160 sections of the old Code have been amended, 9 new sections
have been added, and 9 sections have been repealed.

2. Technology and Electronic Evidence

One of the most significant departures is the transition from a physical-only to a
"Digital-First" procedure.
 CrPC: While judicial precedents (like Shafhi Mohammad v. State of Himachal
Pradesh) allowed digital evidence, the Code lacked a comprehensive
framework for digital trials.
 BNSS:
o Section 173 (e-FIR): Formally allows registration of FIRs
electronically.
o Section 532: Mandates that all trials, inquiries, and proceedings may be
held in electronic mode.
o Search and Seizure: Videography of the entire search and seizure
process is now mandatory (Section 185).

3. Police Custody and Remand (Section 187 vs. Section 167)

The BNSS alters the mechanics of police custody, which is a critical point for exam
discussion.
 CrPC: Police custody of 15 days was allowed only during the first 15 days of
the total remand period.
 BNSS: Police custody of 15 days can now be taken in multiple installments or
"parts" throughout the first 40 or 60 days of the detention period (depending on
the gravity of the offense).
 Impact: This gives investigating agencies more flexibility but has raised
concerns regarding the potential for prolonged custodial pressure.

4. Mandatory Forensics and Scientific Investigation

  CrPC: Forensic examination was discretionary and often delayed due to a lack
of resources.
 BNSS (Section 176): It is now mandatory for a forensic team to visit the
crime scene and collect evidence for any offense punishable by 7 years or
more. If a state lacks a forensic facility, it must utilize one from another state.

5. Hierarchy of Courts and Judicial Officers

 CrPC: Divided areas into "Metropolitan" and "Non-Metropolitan," leading to
different designations (e.g., Metropolitan Magistrate vs. Judicial Magistrate).
 BNSS: The classification of Metropolitan Areas is abolished. There is now a
uniform hierarchy of Judicial Magistrates across India, simplifying the court
structure.

6. Victims' Rights and Zero FIR

 CrPC: Victims were often treated as "witnesses" for the state rather than active
participants. "Zero FIR" was a concept of case law, not the statute.
 BNSS:
o Zero FIR (Section 173): Statutorily mandates that a police station must
register an FIR irrespective of jurisdiction.
o Right to Information: Victims must be informed of the progress of the
investigation within 90 days.
o Withdrawal of Case: The Public Prosecutor cannot withdraw a case
without giving the victim an opportunity to be heard (Section 360).

7. Statutory Timelines for Efficiency

The BNSS introduces "Expiry Dates" for judicial and police actions to prevent
perpetual delays.

Subject Matter CrPC (1973) BNSS (2023)

Medical Exam Report No specific limit Must be sent to IO within 7 days

Framing of Charges Often took years Within 60 days of first hearing

Subject Matter CrPC (1973) BNSS (2023)

"As soon as Within 30 days of closing

Judgment Delivery
practicable" arguments

Adjournments Frequently granted Limited; reasons must be recorded

8. New Concepts: Community Service and Trial in Absentia

 Community Service: Introduced as a new form of punishment for petty
offenses (e.g., small theft, public intoxication) to reduce prison overcrowding.
 Trial in Absentia (Section 356): Allows the court to proceed with a trial
against a "Proclaimed Offender" even if they have absconded, ensuring the
legal process isn't stalled by fugitives.

Conclusion for Exam

While the CrPC was a product of a colonial-administrative mindset, the BNSS 2023
attempts to modernize the process through technology, accountability, and time-
sensitivity. For a law student, the critical takeaway is the balance the Sanhita tries to
strike between increased police powers (remand) and increased citizen safeguards
(mandatory forensics and timelines).

CONSTITUTION AND BNSS

The relationship between the Constitution of India and criminal procedure is
symbiotic; while the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) provides the
"machinery," the Constitution provides the "soul" or the limiting principles. For a 15-
mark answer, you must demonstrate how the BNSS aligns with—or in some cases,
tests—the boundaries of Fundamental Rights.
Constitutional Perspectives on Criminal Procedure
1. The Overarching Principle: Constitutional Supremacy
Criminal procedure must satisfy the "Golden Triangle" of the Constitution: Articles
14, 19, and 21. Any provision of the BNSS that is arbitrary, unfair, or lacks "due
process" can be struck down as ultra vires.

2. Article 14: Right to Equality and the BNSS

Article 14 forbids class legislation but allows reasonable classification.
 Uniformity of Procedure: By abolishing the distinction between
"Metropolitan Areas" and other regions, the BNSS creates a uniform procedural
standard for all citizens, regardless of their place of residence. This aligns with
the principle of "Equality before the law."
 Victim’s Rights: The BNSS introduces provisions that treat the victim as a
stakeholder (e.g., Section 398—right to be heard before withdrawal of a case).
This addresses the historical inequality where the State and the Accused were
the only primary parties, often leaving the victim marginalized.
 Legal Aid: Section 341 of BNSS (corresponding to Section 304 CrPC) ensures
that an accused without means is provided legal aid at state expense, fulfilling
the mandate of equal justice.

3. Article 20: Protection in Respect of Conviction

Article 20 provides three specific protections: Ex Post Facto Law, Double Jeopardy,
and Self-Incrimination.
 Self-Incrimination (Art. 20(3)) and Forensics: * Section 349 of BNSS
allows a Magistrate to order any person to provide finger impressions,
handwriting, or voice samples.
o Constitutional Perspective: The Supreme Court in Selvi v. State of
Karnataka held that while physical samples (fingerprints/hair) are
permissible, "testimonial compulsion" (narco-analysis/polygraph)
violates Art. 20(3). BNSS leans heavily on forensics; however, it must
be implemented within these judicial boundaries.
 Double Jeopardy (Art. 20(2)): Section 337 of BNSS (corresponding to Sec
300 CrPC) upholds the principle of Autrefois Convict and Autrefois Acquit,
ensuring no person is tried twice for the same offense.
4. Article 21: Right to Life and Personal Liberty
This is the most critical intersection. The procedure established by BNSS must be
"just, fair, and reasonable" (Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India).
A. Right to Speedy Trial
The Supreme Court has read the "Right to a Speedy Trial" into Article 21.
 BNSS Alignment: The introduction of strict timelines (e.g., Section 251—
framing charges in 60 days; Section 258—judgment in 30-45 days) is a direct
statutory manifestation of this Constitutional right.
B. Rights of the Arrested Person
 Section 37 of BNSS: Mandates the designation of a police officer in every
district to maintain information about arrested persons and display it
prominently (Digital/Physical). This safeguards the right against arbitrary
detention.
 Section 48 (Arrest of Elderly/Infirm): BNSS provides that for offenses
punishable by less than 3 years, the arrest of persons over 60 or the infirm
requires prior permission of an officer not below the rank of DSP. This adds a
layer of "reasonableness" to the power of arrest.
C. Handcuffing (The Conflict)
 Section 43(3) of BNSS: Permits the use of handcuffs for "heinous crimes" or
habitual offenders.
 Constitutional Perspective: This is a point of contention. In Prem Shankar
Shukla v. Delhi Administration, the SC held that handcuffing is prima facie
inhuman and violates Article 21. The BNSS provision will likely be tested
against this judicial precedent.
D. Police Custody and Remand (Section 187)
The BNSS allows 15 days of police custody to be spread across 60/90 days. Critics
argue this might lead to "custodial torture" or mental harassment over a prolonged
period, potentially clashing with the "fair procedure" requirement of Article 21.

5. Comparative Summary for Exam

Constitutional Constitutional
Relevant BNSS Provision
Article Mandate

Abolition of Metropolitan areas; Right of

Article 14 Equality before Law
Victim to be heard.

No Self- Section 349 (Specimens/Voice samples)

Article 20(3)
Incrimination — subject to judicial limits.

Section 251 & 258 (Mandatory timelines

Article 21 Speedy Trial
for charges/judgment).

Right against Section 37 (Display of arrest data);

Article 21
Arbitrary Arrest Section 48 (Safeguards for elderly).

Right to Legal
Article 22 Section 341 (Legal aid at State expense).
Counsel

Conclusion
The BNSS 2023 attempts to codify many principles that were previously only
available through judicial activism (like the right to a speedy trial and Zero FIR).
While it strengthens the Article 21 right to a speedy trial through technology and
timelines, it also expands state power in areas like remand and handcuffing. In a law
exam, conclude by stating that the BNSS will be interpreted by the higher judiciary to
ensure that the "Procedure Established by Law" remains "Due Process of Law."