0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views28 pages

Chapter 3

Chapter 3 discusses standard controllers used in industrial control systems, including Proportional (P), Integral (I), Derivative (D), and their combinations (PI, PD, PID). It outlines the advantages and disadvantages of each controller type, their effects on system performance, and the importance of tuning parameters for optimal control. The chapter also presents different PID controller structures and their applications in enhancing system stability and accuracy.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views28 pages

Chapter 3

Chapter 3 discusses standard controllers used in industrial control systems, including Proportional (P), Integral (I), Derivative (D), and their combinations (PI, PD, PID). It outlines the advantages and disadvantages of each controller type, their effects on system performance, and the importance of tuning parameters for optimal control. The chapter also presents different PID controller structures and their applications in enhancing system stability and accuracy.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Chapter 3: Standard Controllers: P, PI, PD, PID

Asso. Prof. Dr. H. Benyezza

Eng. 3 Ind. Elec.

Asso. Prof. Dr. H. Benyezza (Eng. 3 Ind. Elec.) Chapter 3 1 / 28


Outline

1 Introduction

2 Elementary Corrective Actions

3 PID Controller Structures

4 Implementations

Asso. Prof. Dr. H. Benyezza (Eng. 3 Ind. Elec.) Chapter 3 2 / 28


Introduction

In industrial control systems, maintaining stability, accuracy, and fast response is essential
for ensuring optimal performance of processes.
Standard controllers—namely Proportional (P), Integral (I), Derivative (D), and their
combinations (PI, PD, PID)—are the most widely used due to their simplicity, robustness,
and effectiveness.

Asso. Prof. Dr. H. Benyezza (Eng. 3 Ind. Elec.) Chapter 3 3 / 28


Elementary Corrective Actions

Three basic corrective actions are used in control systems:


Proportional (P)
Integral (I)
Derivative (D)
Each action addresses specific performance criteria, but may degrade others.
They are suitable for simple systems. For higher performance requirements, these actions are
combined (e.g., PI, PD, PID controllers).

Asso. Prof. Dr. H. Benyezza (Eng. 3 Ind. Elec.) Chapter 3 4 / 28


U ( p)
C ( p) = = Kp.
ε( p)

Proportional Corrector (P) # VX 1z2i


7ϔόЛЁζ eYlY Ģ +Raa3,jCRN TaRURajCRNN3II3

MRnc qRNc qn IRac 03 Iȕājn03 03 I Uaā,CA


Ks · N ( p)
cCRN \n3 Iȕ3aa3na CN0C,C3II3 ε i 0ȕnN cwcjěL3 N3 URccā0Nj Uc 0ȕCNjā<ajCRN T ( p) = Vq3, α = 0W
pα D ( p)
3cj 03 I 8RaL3 -
EO
εi = q3, K = K p · Ks I3 <CN 03 I 7i#QY
1+K

Transfer Function:
0#
X( s) ( s) 10 Y( s) 40
+ Kp
− 1 + s + 0,2 · s2 30

c(t) = Kp ⇒ C (s) = Kp 20

10

y(t) 0 ⊗ ⊗
SY9
−10
Effects: −20 K=
−30
K=
↑ Kp : Reduces response time S
K=5 −40
10−1

100 ω0dB101ω0dB 102
a

K=1 0

↑ Kp : Improves steady-state zY9


−30
−60
−90

accuracy −120
−150 Pm
−180
Pm
t

↑ Kp : Increases overshoot z
z S l −210
10−1 100 101 102
a

↑ Kp : Reduces phase margin 7ϔόЛЁζ eYkY Ģ BNn3N,3 0ȕnN ,Raa3,j3na UaRURajCRNN3I

HRac\n3 I3 <CN n<L3Nj3

Iȕ3aa3na CN0C,C3II3 ε i 0CLCNn3 d


ġ ġ I3 0C<aLL3 0ȕLUICjn03 3cj 0ā,Iā q3ac I3
ġ
I cRajC3 3cj 03 UInc 3N UInc Rc,CIINj3 d @nj VI U@c3 a3cj3 CN,@N<ā3WY
I3 0āUcc3L3Nj d n<L3Nj3.
ġ ġ I $N03 UccNj3 03 I 7i#Q n<L3Nj3. I3
ġ
I3 j3LUc 03 LRNjā3 0CLCNn3 d j3LUc 03 LRNjā3 3cj 0RN, aā0nCj 0ȕnjNj V+8Y
I Uc3n0RĢUāaCR03 Tp 0CLCNn3 Vω p n<A
ġ aUC0Cjā 03c cwcjěL3cWY
Asso. Prof. Dr. H. Benyezza (Eng. 3 Ind. Elec.) Chapter L3Nj3W
3 d 5 / 28
1
Ci ( p) = .
Ti · p
Integral Corrector (I) +3 jwU3 03 ,Raa3,j3na U3nj ćja3 aāICcā3 q3, nN3 $RNN3 UUaRuCLjCRN Ua nN LRNj<3 CNjā<aj3na ©
$c3 0ȕLUIC~,j3nac RUāajCRNN3IcY

 VX 1z2ib /m +Q``2+i2m` AMiû;`H


Transfer Function:
Z t
0#
40
X( s) ( s) 1 10 Y( s) 30

1 1 +
− Ti · s 1 + s + 0,2 · s2 20

dt ⇒
10

c(t) = C (s) = 0 ⊗ ⊗ ⊗
Ti 0 Ti s y(t) Ti = 1,9 s
−10
−20
−30
−40
−50
No correctio
−60 a0gc

Advantages: 10−1

0

100
ω0dB ω0dB ω0dB
101 102
Ti = 1
−30
Ti = 8
Ti =8s
Eliminates steady-state errors S
No correction−90
−60

−120

Enhances system accuracy −150


−180
Pm > 0 Pm

−210 Pm < 0
t

Good for step inputs z


z S
−240
−270
10−1 100 101 102
a0gc

Disadvantages: 7ϔόЛЁζ eY:Y Ģ 2{3jc 0ȕnN ,Raa3,j3na CNjā<aI

Phase lag: −90◦


H3 ,Raa3,j3na UURaj3 nN3 CNjā<ajCRN 0Nc I ,@ţN3 03 ,RLLN03Y +3jj3 CNjā<ajCRN 0Nc I 7i#Q
U3aL3j 0ȕNNnI3a Iȕ3aa3na cjjC\n3 URna nN3 3Njaā3 3N ā,@3IRN. IȕCNjāaćj UaCN,CUI 03 ,3 jwU3 03 ,Raa3,j3na
3cj 0RN, 0ȕLāICRa3a I Uaā,CcCRNY BI CNjaR0nCj LI@3na3nc3L3Nj nN 0āU@c<3 03 −90ï 3j aCc\n3 03 0RN,
a3N0a3 I3 cwcjěL3 CNcj$I3 Ua 0CLCNnjCRN 03 I La<3 03 U@c3Y QN a3jaRnq3 ,3c 3{3jc. cna Iȕ3u3LUI3 03
Reduces phase margin I ~<na3 eY:. I3 cwjěL3 NRN ,RaaC<ā. Nȕ3cj Uc Uaā,Cc. IȕCNjā<ajCRN a3N0 I3 cwcjěL3 Uaā,Cc LCc U3nj nccC I3
a3N0a3 CNcj$I3Y QN ,RNcjj3 nccC cna I aāURNc3 j3LURa3II3 \n3 IȕCNjā<aj3na 0CLCNn3 I3 j3LUc 03 aāURNc3
Slows response time 0n cwcjěL3 V0CLCNnjCRN 03 I $N03 UccNj3 03 I 7i#Q ⇒ 0CLCNnjCRN 03 I $N03 UccNj3 03 I 7i#7
⇒ n<L3NjjCRN 0n j3LUc 03 LRNjā3 ⇒ n<L3NjjCRN 0n j3LUc 03 aāURNc3WY
+3 ,Raa3,j3na 3cj aa3L3Nj njCICcā c3nIY
Rarely used alone
Asso. Prof. Dr. H. Benyezza (Eng. 3 Ind. Elec.) Chapter 3 6 / 28
Derivative Corrector (D)

Transfer Function: Disadvantages:


Reduces accuracy
d Amplifies high-frequency noise
c(t) = Td ε(t) ⇒ C (s) = Td s
dt Rarely used alone
Advantages: Typically combined with P
Phase lead: +90◦
Improves stability
Increases phase margin
Faster response

Asso. Prof. Dr. H. Benyezza (Eng. 3 Ind. Elec.) Chapter 3 7 / 28


Effect of PID Controller Parameters

Parameter Rise Time Overshoot Settling Time Steady-State Error


Kp ↑ Decrease Increase Small Change Decrease
Ki = T1i ↑ Decrease Increase Increase Eliminate
Kd = Td ↑ Small Change Decrease Decrease Small Change

Asso. Prof. Dr. H. Benyezza (Eng. 3 Ind. Elec.) Chapter 3 8 / 28


Proportional-Integral (PI) Controller
Advantages: Disadvantages:
Combines fast response of P May introduce overshoot
Eliminates steady-state error (I) Can cause integral windup
Widely used in industry (accumulation during saturation)
Tuning requires compromise
Slower than P alone

Asso. Prof. Dr. H. Benyezza (Eng. 3 Ind. Elec.) Chapter 3 9 / 28


Proportional-Derivative (PD) Controller
Advantages: Disadvantages:
Phase lead: improves stability Amplifies high-frequency noise
Increases phase margin Does not eliminate steady-state error
Faster transient response Less effective for slow processes
Reduces overshoot

Asso. Prof. Dr. H. Benyezza (Eng. 3 Ind. Elec.) Chapter 3 10 / 28


Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) Controller

The features of each of the PI and PD controllers are utilized.


Improves both steady-state errors as well as transient response specifications.
The PID controller algorithm involves three separate constant parameters that need to be
tuned.

Asso. Prof. Dr. H. Benyezza (Eng. 3 Ind. Elec.) Chapter 3 11 / 28


 
1
C ( p) = K p 1 + (1 + Td · p) ;
PID Controller Structures Ti · p

SA. KBti2 , V~<Y eYSe$W


 
1
C ( p) = K p 1 + + Td · p .
Ti · p
Three Common Structures:
1 Parallel PID: Kp

1 ( s) 1 + U( s) ( s) 1 + U( s)
+ Kp +
C (s) = Kp + + Td s Ti · s + Ti · s +
Ti s
Td · s Td · s
2 Serial PID: VW Parallel TB/ V$W Mixed TB/

 
1 ( s) 1 + U( s)
C (s) = Kp 1+ (1 + Td s) Kp
Ti · s
+ Td · s ++
Ti s V,W Serial TB/

7ϔόЛЁζ eYSeY Ģ bjan,jna3 03c ,Raa3,j3nac TB/


3 Mixed PID: `3La\n3 - RN ,RNcjj3 \n3 I3 03<aā 0n NnLāaj3na 0ȕnN ,Raa3,j3na TB/ 3cj cnUāaC3na n 0
  NRLCNj3na. Ra ,RLL3 URna I3 ,Raa3,j3na UaRURajCRNN3I 0āaCqj3na VT/W C0āI. CI Nȕ3uCcj3 Uc 0
1 TB/ C0āIY mN ,Raa3,j3na TB/ UUaR,@ā aāICc$I3 3cj 03 I 8RaL3 -
C (s) = Kp 1 + + Td s 1 T ·p
Ti s C ( p) = K p + + d q3, Td τ.
Ti · p 1 + τ · p

KI<aā jRnj. URna Iȕājn03 \nC cnCj NRnc N3 ,RNcC0āaRNc \n3 I3c ,Raa3,j3nac C0ānuY
+3c jaRCc 8RaL3c N3 cRNj Uc jRjI3L3Nj ā\nCqI3Nj3c. 3N 3{3j cȕCI 3cj jRnERnac URccC$I3 03
Asso. Prof. Dr. H. Benyezza (Eng. 3 Ind. Elec.) Chapter 3 LCuj3 © nN TB/ UaIIěI3
TB/ 12 / 28
PID Implementations

Electronic Implementation
Analog: op-amps (P, I, D circuits)
Digital (Discrete): microcontrollers, PLCs
High accuracy and fast response

Pneumatic Implementation
Based on air pressure signals (3–15 psi)
Used in industrial environments
Robust but slower response

Asso. Prof. Dr. H. Benyezza (Eng. 3 Ind. Elec.) Chapter 3 13 / 28


Analog: op-amps (P, I, D circuits)

Asso. Prof. Dr. H. Benyezza (Eng. 3 Ind. Elec.) Chapter 3 14 / 28


Pneumatic PID Controllers

Definition:
A pneumatic controller uses air pressure signals (typically 3–15 psi).
It compares:
Process Variable (PV)
Setpoint (SP)
Generates an output pressure to control a final element (valve, actuator).

Key principle: Mechanical force or motion balance.

Asso. Prof. Dr. H. Benyezza (Eng. 3 Ind. Elec.) Chapter 3 15 / 28


Proportional Control Action: Force-Balance Principle

Pneumatic controllers use a force-balance


mechanism
Input pressures (PV and SP) generate forces
via bellows
Output pressure generates an opposing force

Objective:
Maintain equilibrium by balancing forces
Keep the beam in a stable position

Detection:
Beam movement detected by a nozzle–baffle
system

Asso. Prof. Dr. H. Benyezza (Eng. 3 Ind. Elec.) Chapter 3 16 / 28


Direct Action Mechanism

Operation:
PV ↑ pushes the beam upward
Baffle moves closer to the nozzle
Nozzle backpressure ↑
Output pressure ↑

Feedback:
Output bellows expands, pushes beam back
Beam returns to near-initial position

Result
Direct action: PV ↑ → Output ↑

Asso. Prof. Dr. H. Benyezza (Eng. 3 Ind. Elec.) Chapter 3 17 / 28


Reverse Action

Principle:
Controller action can be reversed

Method:
Swap pneumatic connections:
PV applied to upper bellows
SP applied to lower bellows

Result
Reverse action: PV ↑ → Output ↓

Asso. Prof. Dr. H. Benyezza (Eng. 3 Ind. Elec.) Chapter 3 18 / 28


Proportional Control Action: Motion-Balance Principle
Alternative Design:
Some controllers use motion-balance
Lever is free to tilt (not force-restrained)
System maintains constant nozzle gap

Operation:
PV ↑ → lever moves away from nozzle
Nozzle backpressure ↓
Output bellows collapses
Nozzle gap returns to constant

Result
Reverse action: PV ↑ → Output ↓
Asso. Prof. Dr. H. Benyezza (Eng. 3 Ind. Elec.) Chapter 3 19 / 28
Automatic and Manual Modes

Bumpless Transfer:
Balance indicator shows pressure
Allows mode switching without process difference between output bellows
disturbance and manual regulator
Prevents sudden output changes

Auto → Manual:
1 Adjust output regulator until balance indicator
shows zero
2 Switch transfer valve to ”manual”

Manual → Auto:
1 Adjust setpoint regulator until balance
indicator shows zero
2 Switch transfer valve to ”auto”
Asso. Prof. Dr. H. Benyezza (Eng. 3 Ind. Elec.) Chapter 3 20 / 28
PD Control Action

How to Add Derivative:


Place a restrictor valve between nozzle and
output feedback bellows
Causes bellows to fill/empty slowly

Effect on Sudden Change:


PV or SP changes suddenly
Output pressure spikes before bellows equalizes
Creates derivative action

Effect on Ramping Input:


Output shifts more than proportional alone
Adds offset pressure

Asso. Prof. Dr. H. Benyezza (Eng. 3 Ind. Elec.) Chapter 3 21 / 28


PI Control Action

How to Add Integral:


Add a reset bellows opposite the feedback
bellows
Add a restrictor valve (integral adjustment)

How It Works:
Reset bellows creates delayed opposing force
Output bellows must stay ahead of reset
bellows
Creates constant pressure difference

Key Characteristic:
Larger error = faster output change
Error determines velocity of output
Asso. Prof. Dr. H. Benyezza (Eng. 3 Ind. Elec.) Chapter 3 22 / 28
PI Controller: Thought Experiment
Initial Condition:
PV and SP differ by 3 PSI
Output = 3 PSI to feedback bellows
Reset (integral) valve = closed
Reset bellows = 0 PSI (no integral action)

Reset Valve Opens Slightly:


Output (3 PSI) slowly fills reset bellows
Reset bellows pushes down on beam
Baffle moves closer to nozzle
Output pressure rises

Result:
Output must stay ahead of reset bellows
Asso. Prof. Dr. H. Benyezza (Eng. 3 Ind. Elec.) Chapter 3 23 / 28
How Integral Action Works
Key Principle:
Output pressure = 3 PSI + rising
Reset bellows pressure = rising (but slower)
Difference = constant (3 PSI)

Why Constant?
Output must always be 3 PSI ahead of reset
bellows
Creates constant flow through restrictor
Output rises at constant rate

Error Effect:
Larger error = larger pressure drop
Faster flow = faster output change
Asso. Prof. Dr. H. Benyezza (Eng. 3 Ind. Elec.) Chapter 3 24 / 28
Integral Action: Key Takeaways

What It Does:
Output continues to change as long as error
exists
Eliminates steady-state error

How to Adjust:
Change restrictor valve opening
Add capacity tanks to reset bellows

The ”Race”:
Feedback bellows = instantaneous
Reset bellows = delayed
Output must always lead reset bellows

Asso. Prof. Dr. H. Benyezza (Eng. 3 Ind. Elec.) Chapter 3 25 / 28


Foxboro Pneumatic Controllers

Figure: Foxboro Model 43AP Figure: Foxboro Model 130

Asso. Prof. Dr. H. Benyezza (Eng. 3 Ind. Elec.) Chapter 3 26 / 28


Comparison of PID Controller Implementations

Type Technology Advantages Disadvantages


Pneumatic Air pressure (3–15 ✓Robust ×Slow response
psi) ✓Safe (explosive ar- ×Low precision
eas)
Analog Elec- Op-amps, analog ✓Fast response ×Noise sensitive
tronic circuits ✓Continuous signal ×Component drift
Digital Microcontroller, ✓High precision ×Sampling delay
PLC ✓Flexible tuning ×Programming
needed

Asso. Prof. Dr. H. Benyezza (Eng. 3 Ind. Elec.) Chapter 3 27 / 28


Thank You Questions?

Asso. Prof. Dr. H. Benyezza (Eng. 3 Ind. Elec.) Chapter 3 28 / 28

You might also like