B.S.A.

COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
& TECHNOLOGY, MATHURA

RESEARCH PROJECT REPORT

On

A STUDY ON USE OF AI IN THE FINANCIAL

DECISIONS OF A COMPANY

Submitted for the fulfillment towards the award

of the degree in MASTER OF BUSINESS
ADMINISTRATION
of
Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University,
Lucknow

Submitted By Under the Guidance of

Pratham Kannojia Mr. Chakresh Pathak
Roll Number: 2400650700032 [Link]
Session – 2025-26
 CONTENT

Certificate…..........................................................................................................ii
Declaration…........................................................................................................iii
Acknowledgement…............................................................................................iv
Abstract…............................................................................................................v

CHAPTER-1 Introduction…................................................................1-11

1.1 Background
1.2 Problem Statement: Use of AI in Company Decision-Making.
1.3 Need of AI in Financial Decision-Making Objective of the study.
1.4 Significance of AI in Financial Decision-Making.
1.5 Objectives of the Study.
1.6 Scope of the Study.
1.7 Limitations of the Study.

CHAPTER-2 Literature Review

...............................................................................................................
12-24

2.1 Global Perspective on AI in Finance.

2.2 AI Adoption in Indian Business Environment.
2.3 Gaps Identified in Existing Literature.
2.4 Growth of AI in Financial Decision-Making.
2.5 Applications of AI in Financial Decision-Making.
2.6 Role of Machine Learning and Advanced Techniques.
2.7 Explainable AI (XAI) in Financial Decisions.
2.8 Benefits of AI in Financial Decision-Making.
2.9 Future Research Directions.
2.10 Theoretical Framework.
2.11 Role of AI in Financial Functions.
CHAPTER-3 Research Methodology.....................................................25-57

3.1 Research design.

3.2 AI Implementation in Indian Startups.
3.3 Impact of AI on Financial Performance Metrics.
3.4 Comparative Analysis Across Industries.
3.5 Challenges and Ethical Considerations.
3.6 Population and Sample.
3.7 Data Collection Tools and Techniques.
3.8 Statistical Tools Used for Analysis.
3.9 Research Questions and Hypotheses.
3.10 Identification of the major research streams.
3.11 Issues that deserve further investigation.

CHAPTER-4 Data Analysis and Findings...............................................58-65

CHAPTER-5 Recommendations…..........................................................66-67

5.1 Recommendations for Future AI Integration.

5.2 Implications for Business and Policy Makers.
5.3 Suggestions for Further Research.

CHAPTER-6 Conclusion.......................................................................... 68-69

CHAPTER-7 References…........................................................................ 70-80

 CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that Mr. Pratham Kannojia (Roll No. 2400650700032), a bonafide

student of MBA IV Semester, B.S.A. College of Engineering & Technology,

Mathura, has successfully completed the Research Project Report (BMB 406)

titled:

“A STUDY ON USE OF AI IN THE FINANCIAL DECISIONS OF A COMPANY”

for the partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Master

of Business Administration from Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University,

Lucknow, under my guidance.

Mr. Chakresh Pathak

(Project Guide)

Director

B.S.A. College of Engineering & Technology

iv
 DECLARATION

I, Pratham Kannojia, student of MBA IV Semester, B.S.A. College of

Engineering & Technology, Mathura, hereby declare that the Research Project

Report (BMB 406) titled:

“A STUDY ON USE OF AI IN THE FINANCIAL DECISIONS OF A COMPANY”

is my original work and has been completed by me under the guidance of Mr.

Chakresh Pathak. This report has not been submitted earlier to any university or

institution for the award of any degree or diploma.

Signature: _____________

Name: Pratham Kannojia

Roll No.: 2400650700032

Place: Mathura

Date:

v
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I would like to express my sincere gratitude to B.S.A. College of Engineering &

Technology, Mathura for providing me the opportunity to work on this research

project.

I am highly thankful to my project guide, Mr. Chakresh Pathak, for his valuable

guidance, continuous support, and encouragement throughout the completion of

this project.

I also extend my thanks to all faculty members of the MBA Department for their

support and cooperation. I am grateful to my friends and family for their constant

motivation and help during the preparation of this report.

Finally, I would like to thank everyone who directly or indirectly contributed to the

successful completion of this project.

Pratham Kannojia

vi
 ABSTRACT

Over the past two decades, artificial intelligence (AI) has experienced rapid
development and is being used in a wide range of sectors and activities,
including finance. In the meantime, a growing and heterogeneous strand of
literature has explored the use of AI in finance. The aim of this study is to
provide a comprehensive overview of the existing research on this topic and
to identify which research directions need further investigation. Accordingly,
using the tools of bibliometric analysis and content analysis, we examined a
large number of articles published between 1992 and March 2021.

We find that the literature on this topic has expanded considerably since the
beginning of the XXI century, covering a variety of countries and different AI
applications in finance, amongst which Predictive/forecasting systems,
Classification/detection/early warning systems and Big data Analytics/Data
mining /Text mining stand out. Furthermore, we show that the selected articles
fall into ten main research streams, in which AI is applied to the stock market,
trading models, volatility forecasting, portfolio management, performance, risk
and default evaluation, cryptocurrencies, derivatives, credit risk in banks,
investor sentiment analysis and foreign exchange management, respectively.
Future research should seek to address the partially unanswered research
questions and improve our understanding of the impact of recent disruptive
technological developments on finance.

vii
 CHAPTER-1

INTRODUCTION

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into the financial ecosystem of

Indian businesses is revolutionizing traditional decision-making processes
and redefining the competitive landscape. With the advent of digital
transformation, Indian enterprises, ranging from startups to large
conglomerates, are increasingly adopting AI technologies such as machine
learning, natural language processing, and predictive analytics to enhance
financial forecasting, risk management, credit scoring, and investment
strategies.

The traditional methods of financial analysis, which often relied heavily on

human expertise and historical data, are now being supplemented—and in
some cases, supplanted—by AI systems that can analyze vast datasets in
real time to derive actionable insights (Marr, 2019). The growing volume
and complexity of financial data, coupled with the pressure for accurate,
timely, and data- driven decisions, have necessitated this shift.

Indian financial institutions, particularly in the banking and fintech sectors,

have emerged as frontrunners in deploying AI to automate credit
underwriting, detect fraud, and optimize asset management (Kumar &
Malhotra, 2020). This paradigm shift is not only improving operational
efficiency but also mitigating cognitive biases traditionally associated with
human-led decision- making.

Artificial Intelligence has substantially enhanced financial decision-making

accuracy and speed by introducing algorithmic models capable of predictive
analysis and real-time monitoring. In Indian business environments, AI
applications are enabling CFOs and financial analysts to process multi-
dimensional data from market trends, customer behavior, and economic 1
indicators more efficiently than ever before (Sharma & Jain, 2021).
This real-time processing capacity is particularly important in volatile
markets, where delayed or inaccurate decisions can lead to significant
financial losses. For instance, AI enabled decision- support systems help in
portfolio management by continuously scanning global financial markets,
predicting asset performance, and recommending strategic moves based on
risk tolerance and investment objectives (Dwivedi et al., 2021).

Furthermore, the advent of AI-powered chatbots and virtual financial

advisors has made financial services more accessible to small and medium-
sized enterprises (SMEs), thus democratizing financial intelligence and
bridging gaps in expert access. As Indian businesses navigate complex
regulatory frameworks and global competition, AI emerges not just as a tool
but as a strategic partner in sound financial governance.

In addition to enhancing efficiency, AI is playing a critical role in improving

the quality of financial decisions by identifying patterns, anomalies, and
correlations that human analysts might overlook. In sectors like e-
commerce, manufacturing, and logistics, Indian businesses are employing
AI to optimize pricing strategies, manage working capital, and automate
budgeting processes.

These innovations are reducing human errors and introducing greater

objectivity into financial judgments, thereby minimizing risks and improving
profitability (Saxena & Raj, 2022). AI also contributes significantly to
compliance and auditing by tracking transactions in real-time, flagging
unusual activities, and ensuring adherence to financial regulations

2
1.1 Background

The rise of AI in India’s financial decision-making landscape is also being

driven by government initiatives like Digital India and Startup India, which

have created a conducive ecosystem for AI experimentation and innovation

(Mehta & Singh, 2020). With the convergence of AI technologies and

financial analytics, Indian businesses are better equipped to navigate

economic uncertainties and make strategic decisions that align with long-

term goals.

Nevertheless, the adoption of AI in financial decision-making does

not come without challenges. Despite the promising benefits, Indian

businesses face several hurdles including high implementation costs, lack

of technical expertise, and concerns regarding data privacy and algorithmic

transparency. Many traditional enterprises still operate within legacy

systems that are

3
not AI-compatible, limiting the extent of technological integration

(Narayanan & Ghosh, 2023). Moreover, AI-driven financial decisions, while

largely accurate, may lack the contextual understanding and ethical

considerations that human judgment provides. This raises questions about

accountability, especially when decisions go awry.

The absence of robust regulatory frameworks to govern AI applications in

finance adds another layer of complexity. However, ongoing research and

industry collaborations are addressing these gaps by developing ethical AI

models and promoting digital literacy among financial professionals.

The need of the hour is a hybrid model wherein AI augments human

intelligence rather than replacing it entirely, ensuring that financial decisions

are not only data-driven but also socially responsible and contextually

nuanced (Bhardwaj & Kumar, 2021).

4
1.2 Problem Statement: Use of AI in Company Decision-Making

1. Information Overload.

Problem:

Companies collect huge amounts of data (sales, customers, operations),

which humans cannot process efficiently.

Solution by AI:

AI systems analyze large datasets quickly and extract meaningful insights.

Example:

Retail companies use AI to analyze customer purchase patterns.

2. Slow Decision-Making.

Problem:

Traditional decision-making takes time due to manual analysis.

Solution by AI:

AI provides real-time insights and automated recommendations.

Example:
5
AI helps in instant fraud detection in banking.
3. Human Bias and Errors.

Problem:

Managers may take biased or emotional decisions.

Solution by AI:

AI makes data-driven and objective decisions, reducing human bias.

Example:

AI in hiring processes reduces favoritism.

6
4. Inaccurate Forecasting.

Problem:

Companies struggle to predict demand, sales, or risks.

Solution by AI:

AI uses predictive analytics to forecast future trends.

Example:

E-commerce companies predict product demand using AI.

5. Complex Decision Environments.

Problem:

Business decisions involve multiple variables (cost, demand, competition).

Solution by AI:

AI models evaluate multiple scenarios and suggest optimal decisions.

Example:

Supply chain optimization using AI.

6. Lack of Personalization. 7
Problem:

Companies cannot customize decisions for individual customers manually.

Solution by AI:

AI enables personalized recommendations.

Example:

Platforms like Amazon recommend products based on user behavior.

8
7. Risk Management Issues.

Problem:

Difficult to identify risks like fraud, market changes, or failures.

Solution by AI:

AI detects patterns and anomalies to reduce risks.

Example:

Banks use AI for credit risk analysis.

8. Inefficient Resource Allocation.

Problem:

Companies may waste resources due to poor planning.

Solution by AI:

AI optimizes resource usage (labor, inventory, finances).

Example:

AI helps factories reduce production costs.

9. Lack of Real-Time Insights. 9

Problem:

Decisions are based on outdated data.

Solution by AI:

AI processes live data for real-time decision-making.

10
1.3 Need of AI in Financial Decision-Making

The need for Artificial Intelligence (AI) in financial decision-making in Indian

businesses is becoming increasingly urgent due to the rapidly changing

economic environment, technological disruptions, and growing data

complexity. In a landscape where financial decisions must be made swiftly

and with high accuracy, AI serves as a powerful tool to process vast

quantities of structured and unstructured data in real time, offering

businesses the ability to respond quickly to market changes and customer

behavior.

Traditional financial methods, while historically reliable, often suffer from

latency, limited scalability, and vulnerability to human bias. AI helps

overcome these limitations by using machine learning algorithms and

predictive analytics to deliver more accurate forecasts, identify hidden

trends, and enhance overall financial planning (Dwivedi et al., 2021). For

Indian enterprises, especially in sectors such as fintech, retail, healthcare,

and logistics, where the volume and velocity of transactions are massive, AI

provides the necessary technological leverage to maintain competitiveness.

Additionally, the global shift toward digital banking, the rise of UPI and

mobile payments in India, and increasing customer expectations for

personalization have intensified the demand for AI- driven financial solutions

(Mehta & Singh, 2020).

AI also plays a crucial role in managing financial risks by identifying

11
potential defaults, detecting frauds, and simulating future economic
scenarios through advanced modelling, which is increasingly necessary in

India’s volatile and complex financial ecosystem (Sharma & Jain, 2021).

12
1.4 Significance of AI in Financial Decision-Making

The significance of AI in financial decision-making lies in its transformative

ability to enhance efficiency, accuracy, transparency, and strategic agility in

Indian businesses. By automating routine financial tasks such as invoicing,

budgeting, and expense tracking, AI allows finance professionals to focus

on high value activities like strategy formulation and stakeholder

engagement.

AI applications such as robot-advisors, intelligent dashboards, and natural

language generation tools have made real-time financial insights more

accessible to decision-makers at all organizational levels (Kumar &

Malhotra, 2020). This not only improves decision quality but also aligns

financial strategies with broader business objectives. Moreover, in the post

COVID-19 recovery phase, businesses are under increasing pressure to

optimize resources, cut costs, and make data-driven decisions swiftly.

AI, with its capacity to generate insights from historical and real-time data,

supports predictive and prescriptive financial decision-making, which is

critical for long-term sustainability (Bhardwaj & Kumar, 2021).

For Indian SMEs, which often lack dedicated financial departments, AI tools

offer an affordable and scalable way to manage cash flow, conduct market

analysis, and improve financial literacy. Additionally, AI enhances regulatory

compliance by continuously monitoring transactions, identifying anomalies,

and ensuring adherence to financial standards.

13
This is particularly significant in India, where businesses face evolving tax
policies, digital finance regulations, and increased scrutiny from financial

institutions (Narayanan & Ghosh, 2023).

Thus, the integration of AI into financial decision-making is not just a trend

but a strategic imperative for Indian businesses aiming to thrive in a

dynamic and digitized economic landscape.

14
1.5 Objectives of the Study

1. To examine the extent to which Artificial Intelligence (AI) is adopted in

the financial decision- making processes of Indian businesses.

2. To analyze the impact of AI tools and technologies on the accuracy,

speed, and quality of financial decisions.

3. To evaluate the perceptions of financial professionals regarding the

usefulness, challenges, and ethical concerns of using AI in financial

decision-making.

4. To identify sectoral differences in AI adoption and analyze how factors

such as firm size, industry type, and technological readiness influence AI-

driven financial decisions.

15
 1.6 Scope of the Study

This study primarily focuses on Indian businesses across various sectors

including banking, fintech, manufacturing, IT, and retail. It aims to explore

the role and impact of AI in financial decision-making functions such as

budgeting, investment planning, risk analysis, and compliance.

The research includes both qualitative and quantitative approaches—

gathering data from financial professionals, company executives, and

industry experts through surveys, interviews, and document analysis.

Furthermore, it aims to provide sector-specific insights, thus offering

valuable information for policymakers, tech developers, and business

leaders looking to implement or scale AI in finance.

1.7 Limitations of the Study

With the rapid adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI), companies are increasingly

relying on automated systems to support or replace human decision-making

processes. While AI offers benefits such as speed, efficiency, and data-

driven insights, it also introduces several critical challenges that can

negatively impact organizational performance and ethical standards.

The primary problem lies in the over-reliance on AI systems without fully

understanding their limitations. AI models depend heavily on historical data,

16
which may be biased, incomplete, or outdated. As a result, decisions
 generated by AI can reinforce existing inequalities, lead to unfair outcomes,

or produce inaccurate predictions.

Another major issue is the lack of transparency and explainability in AI

algorithms (often referred to as the "black box" problem). Managers and

stakeholders may find it difficult to interpret how AI systems arrive at certain

decisions, reducing trust and accountability in organizational processes.

Additionally, the use of AI raises ethical and legal concerns, including data

privacy, security risks, and the potential misuse of sensitive information.

Companies may face regulatory challenges if AI-driven decisions violate

compliance standards or discriminate against certain groups.

17
There is also the challenge of reduced human judgment and critical

thinking. Excessive dependence on AI can limit managerial intuition,

creativity, and contextual understanding, which are essential for complex

and strategic decisions.

Furthermore, implementing AI systems involves high costs, technical

complexity, and skill gaps, making it difficult for organizations to effectively

integrate AI into their decision-making frameworks.

18
 CHAPTER-

2 REVIEW OF

LITERATURE

2.1 Global Perspective on AI in Finance

Globally, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformational force

in financial decision-making, significantly altering how businesses manage

data, assess risk, and optimize performance. Research indicates that AI

technologies, such as machine learning (ML), natural language processing

(NLP), and robotic process automation (RPA), have enabled financial

institutions to improve the speed, precision, and predictive capacity of their

decision-making models (Bhat & Sharma, 2020).

According to Brynjolfsson and McAfee (2017), AI enables a shift from

intuition-driven to data- driven decision-making, offering real time insights

and enhanced risk prediction models in global banking and investment

sectors.

In the United States and Europe, AI-powered tools such as robot-advisors

and fraud detection algorithms are increasingly replacing manual

processes, thus reducing operational costs and human errors (Deloitte,

2020).

19
Moreover, large global corporations are using AI to develop dynamic
pricing, algorithmic trading strategies, and predictive analytics for strategic

financial planning (Krauss, Do & Huck, 2017). Despite these advantages,

challenges such as ethical concerns, data privacy regulations (e.g., GDPR),

and bias in algorithmic decision making remain pertinent in global literature

(Binns, 2018).

20
2.2 AI Adoption in Indian Business Environment

In India, the application of AI in financial decision-making is gaining

momentum, especially in sectors such as banking, fintech, e-commerce,

and insurance. Indian companies are leveraging AI for a variety of financial

tasks including fraud detection, credit scoring, customer segmentation, and

investment forecasting (Mehta & Gupta, 2021).

The National Association of Software and Service Companies (NASSCOM,

2021) reported a 30% increase in AI adoption in Indian financial services

post-2020, particularly due to the acceleration of digital transformation

during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Additionally, the emergence of AI-enabled fintech startups such as Razor

pay, Paytm, and Cred has reshaped the traditional financial landscape by

introducing real-time, personalized financial solutions (Kumar & Malhotra,

2020).

However, the pace of AI adoption varies significantly across company sizes

and industries. Large corporations tend to integrate AI more efficiently due

to better infrastructure and skilled workforce, whereas small and medium

enterprises (SMEs) often face technological, financial, and skill-related

barriers (Rao & Singh, 2022).

Moreover, concerns related to data quality, lack of regulatory clarity, and

cybersecurity are frequently highlighted as key challenges in the Indian

context. Despite these issues, government initiatives such as “Digital India”

21
and “AI for All” are expected to foster broader acceptance and integration of
AI tools in Indian financial decision-making.

22
2.3 Gaps Identified in Existing Literature

Although a considerable amount of literature has examined the use of AI in

financial sectors globally and in India, certain gaps remain.

First, much of the existing research focuses on technological

implementation or consumer-facing applications, with limited emphasis on

how AI specifically influences internal financial decision- making processes

such as capital budgeting, financial forecasting, and strategic investment

planning (Narayanan & Ghosh, 2023).

Second, there is a dearth of empirical studies exploring the perceptions and

readiness of financial professionals in Indian businesses toward AI

integration. While global studies have examined behavioral aspects, Indian

literature largely overlooks the human, ethical, and cognitive dimensions of

AI adoption in finance.

Third, sector-specific analysis is limited—existing studies often generalize

findings without distinguishing between industries like IT, manufacturing,

and retail, which may have unique challenges and opportunities related to

AI-driven decision-making (Sharma & Jain, 2021). Additionally, the impact

of organizational culture, leadership attitude, and digital maturity on AI

adoption in finance remains an underexplored area in Indian academia.

 Need for hybrid AI models combining interpretability and accuracy.

 Limited research on AI adoption in SMEs.

 Lack of standardized frameworks for AI-based financial decision-making.

23
 Insufficient focus on ethical AI and governance.
These gaps highlight the need for more comprehensive, mixed-method

research that combines technological analysis with managerial insights to

better understand the influence of AI on financial decision-making within the

Indian business ecosystem.

24
2.4 Growth of AI in Financial Decision-Making

Recent literature highlights a rapid increase in AI adoption across financial

functions. Studies show that more than 90% of financial institutions are

either using or planning to adopt AI, reflecting its growing importance in

decision-making.

Research by Bahoo et al. (2024) indicates that AI applications in finance

have expanded significantly since the early 2000s, particularly in:

 Forecasting and predictive analytics.

 Risk assessment.

 Portfolio management.

 Fraud detection.

This growth demonstrates that AI is becoming a core tool for improving

financial efficiency and strategic planning in companies.

2.5 Applications of AI in Financial Decision-Making

 Risk Management and Credit Analysis.

AI models such as Random Forest, Neural Networks, and XGBoost are

widely used to assess creditworthiness and financial risk. Studies report

that AI-driven systems can improve risk model accuracy by up to 25% and

reduce loan defaults by 20%.

25
 Investment and Portfolio Decisions.
  AI is extensively used in.

 Stock price prediction.

 Algorithmic trading.

 Portfolio optimization.

Machine learning models can identify complex patterns in financial data,

outperforming traditional statistical methods in many cases.

 Fraud Detection.

AI enhances fraud detection by analyzing transaction patterns and

anomalies. Literature shows a 40% reduction in false positives using AI-

based systems.

 Financial Statement Analysis.

AI improves the analysis of financial statements by automating data

processing and enhancing prediction accuracy, helping companies make

informed strategic decisions.

26
2.6 Role of Machine Learning and Advanced Techniques

Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) are the backbone of AI-based

decision systems. Common techniques include:

 Support Vector Machines (SVM).

 Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM).

 Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN).

These models help in capturing nonlinear relationships in financial data,

leading to improved forecasting and decision-making.

Reinforcement Learning (RL) is also gaining attention for dynamic financial

decision-making, especially in:

 Market trading.

 Portfolio optimization.

 Real-time decision systems.

2.7 Explainable AI (XAI) in Financial Decisions

One major concern in AI adoption is the “black-box” nature of models.

Explainable AI (XAI)

addresses this issue by providing transparency in decision-making.

A systematic review of 138 studies found that:

 XAI is widely used in credit scoring, fraud detection, and stock 27

prediction.
  Techniques like SHAP and feature importance improve trust and

accountability.

 Explainability is crucial in finance because decisions often involve

regulatory compliance and high risk.

2.8 Benefits of AI in Financial Decision-Making

Literature consistently highlights several advantages:

 Improved accuracy and efficiency.

 Faster decision-making.

 Better risk management.

 Cost reduction through automation.

 Enhanced predictive capabilities.

 AI enables companies to make proactive rather than reactive financial

decisions.

28
 2.9 Future Research Directions

 Future studies should focus on:

 Developing explainable and transparent AI systems.

 Integrating AI with human decision-making (Human-AI collaboration).

 Enhancing data governance and security.

 Expanding AI applications in emerging financial areas like fintech and

digital currencies.

2.10 Theoretical Framework

2.10.1Decision Theory and AI Integration.

Decision theory, a multidisciplinary field rooted in economics, statistics,

psychology, and management science, seeks to explain and improve

decision-making under conditions of uncertainty and complexity. In the

context of financial decision-making, it traditionally provides frameworks like

Expected Utility Theory, Prospect Theory, and Bayesian Decision Theory

that guide how choices are made regarding investments, risk management,

and resource allocation (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979). With the advent of

Artificial Intelligence, decision theory has found a powerful ally, enabling

computational models to handle large-scale data analysis and derive

29
predictive insights that were previously unattainable.
AI enhances decision theory by embedding machine learning algorithms

capable of recognizing patterns, minimizing biases, and dynamically

adapting to real-time market changes, thereby supporting optimal financial

choices (Russell & Norvig, 2020). For example, AI-infused decision support

systems now use reinforcement learning to simulate different financial

outcomes, providing more robust risk-adjusted strategies (Sutton & Barto,

2018).

Indian businesses, especially in finance and banking, are beginning to shift

from static decision matrices to AI-based systems that employ decision

trees and neural networks to make time- sensitive financial judgments

(Mehta & Gupta, 2021). This integration not only accelerates decision

cycles but also enables the customization of financial solutions based on

individual client profiles, thereby promoting precision finance.

30
 The use of AI within decision theory frameworks also addresses

several cognitive limitations inherent in human decision-making. Behavioral

decision theory, which highlights how cognitive biases influence financial

decisions, finds a practical corrective in AI systems that are designed to

mitigate such biases by relying on factual, data-driven patterns (Thaler,

2016).

For instance, algorithms can now quantify the influence of confirmation bias

or overconfidence by tracking decision patterns and providing alternative,

data-backed choices. In emerging Indian markets, where financial

ecosystems are often driven by informal practices and instinctual

judgments, the application of AI under decision theory principles offers a

pathway to formalized, transparent, and auditable decision-making models

(Rao & Singh, 2022).

By integrating AI with decision theory, businesses gain not just

computational speed but also analytical depth—bridging the gap between

theoretical financial logic and real-world application. Ultimately, AI provides

the technological mechanism to automate, scale, and refine decision theory,

thereby transforming it from an academic framework into a strategic tool for

financial leadership.

2.10.2AI Models Used in Financial Decision-Making.

Artificial Intelligence encompasses a wide variety of models that are

increasingly being deployed in financial decision-making across global and

Indian business landscapes. Among the most prominent are machine 31

learning (ML) models, including supervised learning (e.g., regression,

decision trees, support vector machines), unsupervised learning (e.g.,

clustering, PCA), and reinforcement learning models (Krauss, Do, & Huck,

2017).

These models are used for tasks such as credit risk evaluation, asset

management, portfolio optimization, fraud detection, and algorithmic trading.

Supervised models, especially regression analysis and classification

algorithms, are highly effective in predicting loan defaults and investment

outcomes based on historical data. Reinforcement learning, on the other

hand, is widely applied in high-frequency trading platforms where AI agents

learn optimal trading strategies through trial and error (Zhang et al., 2020).

32
These models are not only accurate but also adaptive, enabling systems to

learn and evolve from new data inputs. Indian fintech companies like

Zerodha, Groww, and PolicyBazaar extensively use ML for client profiling,

personalized product recommendations, and automated compliance checks

(Kumar & Malhotra, 2020).

Additionally, deep learning models, particularly neural networks like

Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Long Short-Term Memory

(LSTM) networks, are gaining traction for their ability to handle complex and

non-linear relationships in large financial datasets. LSTM networks are

particularly useful in time-series forecasting—an essential component of

financial modeling that helps predict stock prices, market trends, and cash

flows (Goodfellow et al., 2016).

Moreover, Natural Language Processing (NLP) models are increasingly

employed to extract sentiment and trends from unstructured data such as

financial news, tweets, and earnings reports. For instance, sentiment

analysis using BERT or GPT-based models can alert businesses to market

shifts even before they reflect in financial indicators (Devlin et al., 2019).

In the Indian context, companies like Infosys and TCS are integrating these

advanced models into their enterprise financial systems to enhance

strategic planning and reduce decision latency (NASSCOM, 2021). As the

availability of financial data grows, the capacity of AI models to process and

transform such data into actionable intelligence becomes indispensable,

establishing AI not just as a support tool but as a core component of the

financial decision-making architecture.

33

2.10.3Conceptual Framework of the Study.

The conceptual framework of this study is anchored in the integration of AI

technologies within traditional financial decision-making processes and aims

to explore the degree, methods, and outcomes of such integration in Indian

businesses.

The framework begins with the independent variables, which include

various AI technologies such as machine learning models, deep learning

algorithms, and natural language processing tools. These technologies are

operationalized through their applications in financial tasks like budgeting,

forecasting, credit scoring, and investment evaluation (Narayanan & Ghosh,

2023).

The mediating variables include organizational readiness, employee

competence, digital infrastructure, and regulatory compliance. These factors

influence how effectively AI tools are implemented and whether they

enhance or hinder decision-making quality.

34
The dependent variables are improvements in financial decision accuracy,

speed, cost-efficiency, and strategic alignment. By mapping these

relationships, the framework provides a structural basis to analyze the

impact of AI across various levels of decision-making, from operational

finance to strategic planning. This conceptual model is further enriched by

incorporating theories such as the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)

and the Resource-Based View (RBV).

TAM helps in understanding the behavioral intent of Indian financial

professionals towards AI adoption, emphasizing perceived ease of use and

perceived usefulness (Davis, 1989).

Meanwhile, the RBV suggests that AI constitutes a strategic asset when

coupled with human capital and organizational routines, thereby generating

sustainable competitive advantage (Barney, 1991).

The model also considers feedback loops, where AI-driven decisions

influence business performance, which in turn informs future AI adoption

and refinement strategies. This dynamic nature of the framework reflects

the real-time adaptability that AI introduces into financial systems.

Empirical validation of this framework will involve quantitative techniques

such as structural equation modeling (SEM) and qualitative interviews to

assess perceived benefits and challenges. In sum, the conceptual

framework not only captures the multifaceted relationship between AI and

financial decision making but also serves as a practical guide for

businesses and policymakers to strategize AI integration in Indian financial

35
contexts.
2.11 Role of AI in Financial Functions

2.11.1 AI in Budgeting and Forecasting.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has revolutionized traditional budgeting and

forecasting processes by offering real-time analysis, enhanced accuracy,

and dynamic adaptability. Traditional budgeting often relies on static data,

historical performance, and human estimations, which can be prone to bias

and inefficiency.

In contrast, AI tools leverage machine learning (ML) algorithms, neural

networks, and predictive analytics to process vast datasets and detect

patterns that human analysts may overlook (Deloitte, 2020). These

technologies allow finance teams to build rolling forecasts and what-if

analyses with higher precision. For instance, AI can factor in variables like

inflation, customer behavior, market volatility, and geopolitical changes, thus

generating more nuanced financial predictions (Ghosh & Saha, 2021).

Moreover, AI-driven tools such as IBM Planning Analytics and Oracle Cloud

EPM automate repetitive forecasting tasks and provide visual dashboards

that enhance managerial decision- making. This significantly reduces

manual errors and enables faster response to changing market dynamics

(Accenture, 2022).

Businesses using AI for budgeting benefit from reduced forecast variances,

improved cost planning, and better capital allocation. Furthermore, AI

systems continuously learn and improve, making future forecasts more 36

accurate over time (Kraus et al., 2021). In India, large corporations like
Reliance and Infosys are already integrating AI into enterprise resource

planning (ERP) systems for more agile financial planning and forecasting

processes, demonstrating its growing significance in corporate finance.

37
2.11.2 AI in Risk Management and Fraud Detection.

Risk management and fraud detection have become critical areas where AI

is making profound impacts, especially in an increasingly digitalized and

complex financial environment. Traditional risk models often use static

parameters and predefined rules, which may not account for the evolving

nature of financial threats.

AI, with its ability to process massive datasets in real-time, can identify

anomalies, predict emerging risks, and mitigate threats more effectively

(Jain & Aggarwal, 2021). Machine learning algorithms can learn from past

risk patterns and adapt to new risk indicators without requiring manual

programming. In fraud detection, AI systems analyze transaction patterns,

user behavior, and historical fraud data to flag suspicious activities (Kumar

& Srinivas, 2020).

AI-enabled tools like SAS Fraud Management and FICO Falcon Platform

are used by banks and financial institutions to detect unusual patterns and

reduce false positives. For instance, these tools analyze geolocation, IP

addresses, time of transaction, and purchase behavior to authenticate

users. Furthermore, Natural Language Processing (NLP) is increasingly

used to analyze emails, messages, and audit reports for early detection of

financial misconduct (PwC, 2021).

Indian banks like HDFC and SBI have implemented AI-driven fraud

analytics to secure online banking operations, showing substantial declines

38
in fraud incidents. Importantly, AI's predictive capabilities also support risk
assessment in lending, investment, and compliance, helping firms stay

ahead of potential threats in a dynamic financial landscape (Gupta et al.,

2022).

2.11.3 AI in Investment and Portfolio Analysis.

AI is fundamentally transforming investment strategies and portfolio

management by offering data-driven insights, personalized

recommendations, and predictive analytics. Unlike human analysts, who

may rely on intuition or limited data, AI systems can scan financial news,

economic reports, market sentiments, and historical data to deliver informed

investment decisions. Robo- advisors like Zerodha’s "Rainmatter" and

global platforms such as Betterment and Wealthfront use AI to create and

manage personalized investment portfolios based on an individual’s risk

tolerance, goals, and market trends (Kaplan, 2020).

39
These systems are particularly valuable for retail investors, as they

democratize access to sophisticated portfolio management strategies.

Additionally, AI-driven hedge funds and asset management firms employ

deep learning to forecast stock movements and adjust portfolio allocations

dynamically (Lo, 2019). Sentiment analysis, using AI techniques, is

increasingly used to predict market reactions by evaluating news headlines,

tweets, and financial statements, giving investors an edge over traditional

methods (Choudhury & Roy, 2021).

In India, fintech firms such as Upstox and Groww are using AI tools to offer

predictive analytics and investment suggestions to customers, increasing

portfolio returns and customer engagement. AI also assists in portfolio risk

optimization through tools that continuously assess volatility, correlation,

and asset performance. These tools enable investors to rebalance portfolios

automatically and in real-time, thereby minimizing risks and maximizing

returns under volatile conditions.

2.11.4 AI in Credit Scoring and Lending Decisions.

AI plays a transformative role in credit scoring and lending decisions by

replacing conventional, rule-based models with more dynamic and inclusive

evaluation methods. Traditional credit scoring models such as those based

on CIBIL or FICO scores often exclude individuals with limited credit

histories, leading to credit access challenges, particularly in emerging

economies like India. AI- based systems, however, utilize alternative data

such as utility payments, mobile phone usage, e- commerce behavior, and 40

social media activity to assess creditworthiness (Mitra & Sinha, 2020).

These models are especially useful for extending financial services to the

unbanked and underbanked segments of society. Fintech companies like

KreditBee, PaySense, and CASHe are using AI algorithms to offer instant

loans to customers by assessing their repayment capacity in real-time.

Moreover, AI models provide enhanced risk profiling by continuously

learning from borrower behavior, thus improving default prediction rates and

reducing non-performing assets (Bose & Roy, 2022). AI-driven credit

engines also automate loan approval processes, significantly reducing

turnaround time and improving operational efficiency.

41
Machine learning models like gradient boosting and support vector

machines (SVM) have demonstrated superior performance in detecting

potential loan defaulters compared to traditional logistic regression models

(Muthukrishnan & Pandey, 2021). Indian banks such as ICICI Bank and

Axis Bank have adopted AI in their credit decision-making to expedite loan

processing and personalize loan products.

2.11.5 A taxonomy of AI applications in Finance.

After scrutinising some relevant features of the papers, we make a step

forward and outline a taxonomy of AI applications used in Finance and

tackled by previous literature.

Many research papers (39 out of 110) employ AI as a predictive instrument

for forecasting stock prices, performance and volatility. In 23 papers, AI is

employed in classification problems and warning systems to detect credit

risk and frauds, as well as to monitor firm or bank performance. The former

use of AI permits to classify firms into two categories based on qualitative

and quantitative data; for example, we may have distressed or non-

distressed, viable–nonviable, bankrupt–non-bankrupt, or financially healthy–

not healthy, good–bad, and fraud–not fraud. Warning systems follow a

similar principle: after analysing customers’ financial behaviour and

classifying potential fraud issues in bank accounts, alert models signal to

the bank unusual transactions. Additionally, we see that 14 articles employ

text mining and data mining language recognition, i.e. natural language

processing, as well as sentiment analysis. This may be the starting point of 42

AI-driven behavioural analysis in Finance. Amongst others, trading models

and algorithmic trading are further popular aspects of AI widely analysed in

the literature. Moreover, interest in Robo-advisory is growing in the asset

investment field. Finally, less studied AI applications concern the modelling

capability of algorithms and traditional machine learning and neural

networks.

43
 CHAPTER-3

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3.1 Research Design

The research design for this study is descriptive and analytical in nature,

aimed at systematically investigating the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in

enhancing financial decision-making processes within Indian businesses.

Descriptive design helps in gathering data that describes the existing

conditions of AI applications in financial systems, while analytical methods

are employed to interpret relationships between variables, such as AI

adoption level and decision accuracy or efficiency.

This mixed-methods approach enables a holistic understanding by

integrating both qualitative and quantitative insights (Creswell, 2014). The

study explores patterns, experiences, and performance indicators

associated with AI-driven financial decisions in sectors like banking, fintech,

insurance, and investment firms. The design also allows cross sectional

data collection, capturing a snapshot of the current practices and

perceptions of financial professionals regarding AI adoption. Furthermore,

the study incorporates correlational analysis to examine the extent to which

AI tools affect the speed, reliability, and accuracy of financial decisions.

44
3.2 AI Implementation in Indian Startups

Indian startups have emerged as dynamic platforms for experimenting with

and implementing AI- driven solutions, especially in the financial domain.

Startups such as Razorpay, ZestMoney, Cred, Groww, and ClearTax have

effectively integrated AI into their financial systems to automate decision-

making, personalize services, and enhance customer experience. For

example, ZestMoney utilizes AI to assess customer creditworthiness using

alternative data like smartphone usage, geolocation, and online behavior,

enabling even low-income and thin-file customers to access credit

(Sundararajan & Kumar, 2022).

This innovative credit-scoring model has significantly expanded financial

inclusion in tier-2 and tier-3 cities. Similarly, Razorpay employs machine

learning algorithms to detect fraudulent transactions in real-time by

analyzing spending patterns and behavioral cues (Verma & Bansal, 2023).

Startups benefit from AI by reducing operational costs and increasing the

scalability of financial services without corresponding increases in workforce

size. According to a study by Nasscom (2021), over 68% of Indian fintech

startups report that AI has improved their ability to serve underbanked

populations and streamline back-office processes. Moreover, the

adaptability and agile nature of startups make them more capable of

iteratively testing and refining AI models compared to traditional

corporations.

45
The case of Cred, which uses AI to gamify credit card bill payments and
detect anomalies in credit behavior, exemplifies the strategic use of AI for

customer acquisition and retention. The ecosystem of Indian startups is not

only adopting AI for internal efficiency but is also creating AI-powered

products as services (like Finbox or Signzy) that are being offered to larger

financial institutions. Hence, the implementation of AI in Indian startups

demonstrates both a grassroots and platform- based impact on the broader

financial services sector (Raghavan, 2021).

46
3.3 Impact of AI on Financial Performance Metrics

Empirical evidence suggests a strong correlation between AI integration

and improved financial performance metrics such as return on investment

(ROI), cost-to-income ratio, fraud loss ratios, and earnings before interest

and taxes (EBIT). Companies that have implemented AI in financial

operations have reported measurable improvements in efficiency and

profitability.

For example, a study conducted by KPMG India (2022) showed that

businesses leveraging AI in areas such as credit assessment, cash flow

forecasting, and compliance management saw an average increase of 18%

in operational efficiency and a reduction of 22% in fraud-related losses.

Specifically, AI-driven expense management tools like SAP Concur and

Zoho Expense have allowed firms to reduce unauthorized spending and

enhance budget compliance. In terms of ROI, organizations deploying AI in

their treasury and investment functions witnessed faster turnaround in asset

reallocation and improved risk-adjusted returns, particularly in volatile

market conditions (Patel & Menon, 2021).

Financial performance has also improved in predictive sales and revenue

forecasting, where AI algorithms have outperformed human estimates by

accurately modeling variables across geographies and consumer segments.

For instance, Infosys reported that after deploying AI tools in their

enterprise finance function, the forecast accuracy for revenue and

47
expenditure improved by over 30%, enhancing quarterly planning and
investor communication.

Furthermore, AI systems have helped lower the cost of compliance by

automating regulatory reporting and anomaly detection in financial

statements, thus minimizing penalties and audit risks (Aggarwal & Sharma,

2023). Overall, AI is not only a tool for innovation but also a measurable

asset contributing directly to core financial KPIs across multiple sectors in

India.

48
3.4 Comparative Analysis Across Industries

The extent and impact of AI adoption in financial decision-making vary

significantly across industries in India, influenced by regulatory

environments, digital maturity, and investment capacity. The banking and

financial services sector is at the forefront of AI integration, leveraging tools

for credit scoring, fraud detection, chatbots for customer service, and robo-

advisors for wealth management (Mishra & Rajan, 2021). For example,

ICICI Bank utilizes an AI-based robotic process automation (RPA) system

that has executed over 1 million banking transactions, thereby reducing

turnaround times and operational costs.

In contrast, the manufacturing sector has been relatively slow to adopt AI in

financial processes, primarily due to legacy systems and low digital literacy

among finance professionals. However, AI is gradually being used in supply

chain finance, predictive maintenance budgeting, and inventory cost

optimization.

The retail industry is leveraging AI for dynamic pricing, demand forecasting,

and financial planning aligned with seasonal sales and consumer behavior,

as evidenced by the implementation of AI tools by Reliance Retail and

Flipkart (Saxena, 2022).

In the healthcare industry, AI is being used in financial management for

insurance claim automation, pricing models, and revenue cycle

management. Hospitals like Apollo and Fortis are adopting AI for predicting
49
cash flows from insurance reimbursements and optimizing budgeting for
medical equipment procurement (Singh & Dubey, 2022).

While AI adoption is robust in sectors with high regulatory oversight and

customer touchpoints like BFSI and retail, it is still evolving in traditional

sectors such as agriculture and textiles. However, the Indian government's

push for digital transformation through initiatives like Digital India and

Startup India is creating a more favorable environment for cross-sectoral AI

implementation.

As industries gain access to better AI infrastructure and talent, a more

uniform adoption is expected, thereby amplifying the role of AI in strategic

and operational financial decisions across the Indian business landscape.

50
3.5 Challenges and Ethical Considerations

3.5.1 Data Privacy and Security.

As artificial intelligence systems become increasingly integrated into the

financial frameworks of Indian businesses, concerns regarding data privacy

and cybersecurity have escalated substantially. AI powered financial

decision-making tools require vast amounts of sensitive personal and

organizational data—ranging from consumer credit histories and income

statements to behavioral data gleaned from digital footprints.

This data dependency increases the vulnerability of financial systems to

breaches and misuse. In India, high-profile data leaks from financial

institutions like MobiKwik and BharatPe in recent years have underscored

the gravity of such risks (Sharma & Gupta, 2023).

Moreover, most AI systems, particularly those built on machine learning and

deep learning architectures, lack clear traceability in how data is collected,

processed, and stored, which complicates data governance frameworks.

While the Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP) of 2023 was a step

in the right direction, its implementation is still in nascent stages, and many

businesses have not yet realigned their AI protocols with the law's

stipulations (Mehta, 2024).

Additionally, third-party AI service providers pose added risks, as data-

sharing agreements often lack robust end-to-end encryption and legal

safeguards. Without strong cybersecurity infrastructure and real-time 51

monitoring, AI becomes a potential liability rather than an asset. As reported

by the Data Security Council of India (2022), nearly 59% of companies

using AI in financial decision-making admitted to facing at least one

significant data security threat within a fiscal year. Therefore, a failure to

address data privacy and protection in AI deployment could lead not only to

legal penalties but also to reputational damage and customer attrition.

52
3.5.2 Bias and Transparency in AI Algorithms.

A significant ethical challenge confronting the application of AI in financial

decision-making in Indian businesses is algorithmic bias and the opacity of

AI decision-making systems. AI models, especially those developed using

historical data, can inadvertently perpetuate and amplify existing biases

related to gender, caste, location, or socio-economic status. For instance,

biased lending algorithms may systematically offer lower credit limits or

deny loans to applicants from marginalized communities due to correlations

drawn from skewed datasets (Nair & Roy, 2022).

In the Indian context, where socio-economic diversity is vast and digital

literacy is unevenly distributed, such biases can significantly deepen

financial exclusion. Compounding this problem is the "black box" nature of

many AI algorithms, which makes it difficult for stakeholders— including

regulators, customers, and even developers—to understand or question

how a particular financial decision was made (Sen & Iyer, 2023). Financial

institutions that rely heavily on opaque AI systems may find it challenging to

explain adverse actions to customers, such as credit denials or loan

rejections, potentially violating principles of natural justice and consumer

rights. The lack of transparency also weakens public trust in AI-enabled

finance, limiting its broader acceptance.

A report by McKinsey (2022) emphasizes that only 38% of Indian

consumers fully trust AI- generated financial advice, largely due to the lack

of transparency. To mitigate this, experts recommend implementing 53

Explainable AI (XAI) systems that provide comprehensible justifications for

their decisions, and mandating regular audits to identify and rectify biased

outputs. Without conscious interventions, the AI revolution in Indian finance

could exacerbate social inequities rather than bridge them.

54
3.5.3 Regulatory and Legal Challenges in India.

The regulatory landscape governing the application of AI in financial

services in India is still evolving and presents a mix of gaps, ambiguities,

and emerging frameworks. Unlike more mature markets such as the

European Union—which has enacted the AI Act—or the United States with

sector-specific AI guidance, India lacks a comprehensive, unified legal

framework for AI governance in finance.

As of now, financial institutions using AI tools operate under a patchwork of

existing regulations, including those set by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI),

the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), and the Ministry of

Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), each with varying levels of

specificity regarding AI (Bansal & Trivedi, 2023).

The RBI, for instance, has highlighted concerns over automated lending

and urged caution regarding AI-based credit scoring, but has not issued

formal guidelines on how AI should be audited, validated, or ethically

deployed.

Furthermore, cross-border data flow laws, intellectual property issues

concerning AI models, and the legal accountability of algorithmic errors

remain largely unaddressed in current Indian statutes (Jain & Sinha, 2024).

Legal scholars have also raised concerns about liability—who is to be held

accountable if an AI system makes a financially detrimental decision: the

developer, the financial institution, or the AI model itself? This lack of legal
55
clarity may dissuade responsible innovation and lead to over-reliance on
foreign-made AI models that are not tailored to India’s socio-legal realities.

There is also a pressing need for an independent AI regulatory authority or

body to standardize ethical practices and certify AI systems used in critical

financial functions. Until these issues are comprehensively addressed, the

widespread deployment of AI in Indian finance will remain ethically and

legally precarious.

56
3.6 Population and Sample

The target population of the study comprises financial professionals,

managers, data analysts, and decision-makers working in Indian

businesses that have either adopted or are planning to adopt AI in their

financial operations.

The study focuses on sectors such as banking, insurance, fintech, corporate

finance departments, and investment firms. A stratified random sampling

technique has been adopted to ensure representation across different

business sizes (large corporations, mid-sized companies, and startups),

ownership types (private, public, and government sectors), and

geographical regions (North, South, East, and West India).

The estimated population size considered is approximately 10,000

professionals working in AI supported financial environments across India.

From this population, a sample of 400 respondents has been drawn based

on Krejcie and Morgan’s (1970) sample size determination table for a

known population size, ensuring a 95% confidence level and a margin of

error of ±5%.

The sample includes 200 professionals from large enterprises, 100 from

mid-sized firms, and 100 from startups.

3.7 Data Collection Tools and Techniques

To collect relevant data for the study, both primary and secondary data 57

sources are utilized. Primary data is collected using a structured

questionnaire consisting of both closed-ended and Likert-scale questions

designed to capture perceptions, frequency of AI tool usage, and perceived

impact on financial decision quality.

The questionnaire includes five sections: demographic profile,

organizational background, AI tools used, decision-making efficiency, and

challenges faced. The tool has been validated by experts in financial

technology and business research, and a pilot study was conducted on 30

respondents to ensure reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.84). In addition to

surveys, semi-structured interviews are conducted with 15 financial

executives to gain deeper qualitative insights into the AI integration journey

and real-world challenges faced.

Secondary data is collected through industry reports, journal publications,

company whitepapers, and financial performance reviews from platforms

like NASSCOM, RBI Bulletins, McKinsey AI

58
reports, and Statista. Ethical approval and informed consent procedures

have been strictly followed to maintain confidentiality and authenticity.

Here’s a well-structured questionnaire format + analysis

framework. Questionnaire Format:

Topic: A Study on Use of AI in Financial Decision-Making of a Company

o Section 1: Demographic Profile.

1. Name:

Ms. / Mrs. …………………………………………

2. Age Group:

☐ Below 25

☐ 25–35

☐ 36–45

☐ 46+

59
3. Gender:
☐ Male

☐ Female

☐ Other

60
4. Educational Qualification:

☐ Graduate

☐ Postgraduate

☐ Professional

☐ Other

5. Designation:

☐ Junior Level

☐ Middle Level

☐ Senior Management

6. Years of Experience:

☐ <2 years

☐ 2–5 years

☐ 5–10 years

61

☐ 10+ years
o Section 2: Organizational Background.

7. Type of Industry:

☐ Manufacturing

☐ Service

☐ IT

☐ Finance

☐ Other

62
8. Size of Organization:

☐ Small

☐ Medium

☐ Large

9. Does your organization use AI in financial decision-making?

☐ Yes

☐ No

10. Duration of AI usage:

☐ <1 year

☐ 1–3 years

☐ 3–5 years

☐ 5+ years

63
o Section 3: AI Tools Used.

11. Which AI tools are used?

☐ Machine Learning

☐ Predictive Analytics

☐ Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

☐ Chatbots

☐ Data Analytics Software

64
 12. Purpose of AI usage:

☐ Forecasting

☐ Risk Management

☐ Investment Decisions

☐ Fraud Detection

☐ Budgeting

13. Frequency of AI usage:

☐ Rarely

☐ Occasionally

☐ Frequently

☐ Always

65
o Section 4: Decision-Making Efficiency.
(Use Likert Scale: Strongly Agree → Strongly Disagree)

☐ AI improves accuracy in financial decisions

☐ AI reduces time required for decision-making

☐ AI helps in better risk assessment

☐ AI enhances forecasting ability

☐ AI reduces human errors

☐ AI supports strategic financial planning

66
o Section 5: Challenges Faced.

20. What challenges are faced while using AI?

☐ High Cost

☐ Lack of Skilled Personnel

☐ Data Privacy Issues

☐ Technical Complexity

☐ Resistance to Change

21. Rate the severity of challenges:

☐ Low

☐ Moderate

☐ High

22. Is training provided for AI tools?

☐ Yes

☐ No

67
23. Suggestions for improving AI usage (Open-ended).

68
Questionnaire Analysis Format.

o 1. Data Coding.

 Assign numerical values:

o Yes = 1, No = 0

o Likert Scale:

Strongly Agree = 5 → Strongly Disagree = 1

o 2. Descriptive Analysis.

 Use:

o Frequency Tables.

o Percentage Analysis.

Example: 69
 AI UsageRespondentsPercentage

Yes 40 80%

No 10 20%

o 3. Graphical Representation.

 Bar Charts → AI tools used.

 Pie Charts → Industry distribution.

 Line Graph → Efficiency trends.

70
 o 4. Mean Score Analysis (For Likert Scale).

Formula:

Mean = Σ(f × x) / N

Example:

Statement Mean ScoreInterpretation

AI improves accuracy4.3 Strong Agreement

o 5. Comparative Analysis.

 Compare:

o AI usage vs Experience.

o AI efficiency vs Organization size.

71
o 6. Correlation Analysis (Optional).
  Relationship between:

o AI usage & decision efficiency.

o AI adoption & challenges.

o 7. Interpretation & Findings.

 Identify key insights:

o Majority companies use AI for forecasting.

o AI improves speed but faces cost challenges.

72
 3.8 Statistical Tools Used for Analysis

For quantitative analysis, the study employs various descriptive and

inferential statistical techniques. Descriptive statistics such as mean,

median, mode, and standard deviation are used to summarize the general

trends in AI adoption and financial performance metrics.

To examine relationships between variables like AI usage frequency and

financial decision quality, Pearson’s correlation coefficient and regression

analysis are applied. For hypothesis testing, t-tests and ANOVA are used to

explore significant differences across sectors and organizational types.

The effectiveness of AI-based decision-making tools is also evaluated using

factor analysis to identify core influencing components. For analyzing Likert

scale responses, Chi-square tests and ordinal logistic regression are

employed to interpret perceptions and satisfaction levels. All statistical

analyses are conducted using SPSS 26.0 and R programming language,

ensuring reliability and replicability. Additionally, thematic analysis is used

for qualitative interview data to identify recurring themes and contextual

understanding of AI-driven decision-making practices.

3.9 Research Questions and Hypotheses

3.9.1 Research Questions:

73
1. To what extent are Indian businesses integrating AI in their financial

decision-making processes?

2. What is the impact of AI on the efficiency, speed, and accuracy of

financial decisions in Indian firms?

3. How do financial professionals perceive the role of AI in enhancing or

complicating their decision-making tasks?

4. What are the key challenges and ethical considerations in

implementing AI in financial operations across different business sectors?

74
3.9.2 Hypotheses:

 H₁: There is a significant positive impact of AI adoption on the accuracy of

financial decision- making in Indian businesses.

 H₂: The use of AI tools significantly reduces the time taken for

financial decision-making processes.

 H₃: Financial professionals perceive AI as a useful aid in decision-making,

despite concerns over ethical and employment-related implications.

 H₄: The adoption of AI in financial decision-making significantly varies

with business size, industry type, and level of digital maturity.

3.10 Identification of the major research streams

Drawing upon the co-citation analysis mentioned in Sect. "Methodology", we

detected ten main research streams:

(1) AI and the stock market;

(2) AI and Trading Models;

(3) AI and Volatility Forecasting;

75
(4) AI and Portfolio Management;
(5) AI and Performance, Risk, and Default Valuation;

(6) AI and Bitcoin, Cryptocurrencies;

(7) AI and Derivatives;

(8) AI and Credit Risk in Banks;

(9) AI and Investor Sentiments Analysis;

(10) AI and Foreign Exchange Management.

76
 Stream 01: AI and the stock market.

The stream “AI and the Stock Market” comprises two sub-streams, namely

algorithmic trading and stock market, and AI and stock price prediction. The

first sub-stream deals with the impact of algorithmic trading (AT) on financial

markets. In this regard, Herdershott et al. (2011) argue that AT increases

market liquidity by reducing spreads, adverse selection, and trade-related

price discovery. This results in a lowered cost of equity for listed firms in the

medium–long term, especially in emerging markets (Litzenberger et al.

2012). As opposed to human traders, algorithmic trading adjusts faster to

information and generates higher profits around news announcements

thanks to better market timing ability and rapid executions (Frino et al.

2017). Even though high-frequency trading (a subset of algorithmic trading)

has sometimes increased volatility related to news or fundamentals, and

transmitted it within and across industries, AT has overall reduced return

volatility variance and improved market efficiency (Kelejian and Mukerji

2016; Litzenberger et al. 2012).

The second sub-stream investigates the use of neural networks and traditional

methods to forecast stock prices and asset performance. ANNs are

preferred to linear models because they capture the non-linear relationships

between stock returns and fundamentals and are more sensitive to changes

in variables relationships (Kanas 2001; Qi 1999). Dixon et al. (2017) argue

that deep neural networks have strong predictive power, with an accuracy

rate equal to 68%. Also, Zhang et al. (2021) propose a model, the Long
77
Short-Term Memory Networks (LSTM), that outperforms all classical ANNs

in terms of prediction accuracy and rational time cost, especially when

various proxies of online investor attention (such as the internet search

volume) are considered.

78
Stream 02: AI and trading models.

From the review of the literature represented by this stream, it emerges that

neural networks and machine learning algorithms are used to build

intelligent automated trading systems. To give some examples, Creamer

and Freund (2010) create a machine learning-based model that analyses

stock price series and then selects the best-performing assets by

suggesting a short or long position. The model is also equipped with a risk

management overlayer preventing the transaction when the trading strategy

is not profitable. Similarly, Creamer (2012) uses the above-mentioned logic

in high-frequency trading futures: the model selects the most profitable and

less risky futures by sending a long or short recommendation. To construct

an efficient trading model, Trippi and DeSieno (1992) combine several

neural networks into a single decision rule system that outperforms the

single neural networks; Kercheval and Zhang (2015) use a supervised

learning method (i.e. multi-class SVM) that automatically predicts mid-price

movements in high-frequency limit order books by classifying them in low-

stationary-up; these predictions are embedded in trading strategies and

yield positive payoffs with controlled risk.

Stream 03: AI and volatility forecasting.

The third stream deals with AI and the forecasting of volatility. The volatility

index (VIX) from Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) is a measure of

market sentiment and expectations. Forecasting volatility is not a simple

task because of its very persistent nature (Fernandes et al. 2014). 79

According to Fernandes and co-authors, the VIX is negatively related to the

SandP500 index return and positively related to its volume. The

heterogeneous autoregressive (HAR) model yields the best predictive

results as opposed to classical neural networks (Fernandes et al. 2014;

Vortelinos 2017). Modern neural networks, such as LSTM and NARX

(nonlinear autoregressive exogenous network), also qualify as valid

alternatives (Bucci 2020). Another promising class of neural networks is the

higher-order neural network (HONN) used to forecast the 21-day-ahead

realised volatility of FTSE100 futures. Thanks to its ability to capture higher-

order correlations within the dataset, HONN shows remarkable performance

in terms of statistical accuracy and trading efficiency over multi-layer

perceptron (MLP) and the recurrent neural network (RNN) (Sermpinis et al.

2013).

80
Stream 04: AI and portfolio management.

This research stream analyses the use of AI in portfolio selection. As an

illustration, Soleymani and Vasighi (2020) consider a clustering approach

paired with VaR analysis to improve asset allocation: they group the least

risky and more profitable stocks and allocate them in the portfolio. More

elaborate asset allocation designs incorporate a bankruptcy detection model

and an advanced utility performance system: before adding the stock to the

portfolio, the sophisticated neural network estimates the default probability

of the company and asset’s contribution to the optimal portfolio (Loukeris

and Eleftheriadis 2015). Index-tracking powered by deep learning

technology minimises tracking error and generates positive performance

(Kim and Kim 2020). The asymmetric copula method for returns

dependence estimates further promotes the portfolio optimization process

(Zhao et al. 2018). To sum up, all papers show that AI-based prediction

models improve the portfolio selection process by accurately forecasting

stock returns (Zhao et al. 2018).

Stream 05: AI and performance, risk, default valuation.

This research stream comprises three sub-streams, namely AI and

Corporate Performance, Risk and Default Valuation; AI and Real Estate

Investment Performance, Risk, and Default Valuation; AI and Banks

Performance, Risk and Default Valuation.

The first sub-stream examines corporate financial conditions to predict

81
financially distressed companies (Altman et al. 1994). As an illustration,

Jones et al. (2017) and Gepp et al. (2010) determine the probability of
corporate default. Sabău Popa et al. (2021) predict business performance

based on a composite financial index. The findings of the aforementioned

papers confirm that AI-powered classifiers are extremely accurate and easy

to interpret, hence, superior to classic linear models. A quite interesting

paper surveys the relationship between face masculinity traits in CEOs and

firm riskiness through image processing (Kamiya et al. 2018). The results

reveal that firms lead by masculine-faced CEO have higher risk and

leverage ratios and are more frequent acquirers in MandA operations.

82
The second sub-stream focuses on mortgage and loan default prediction

(Feldman and Gross 2005; Episcopos, Pericli, and Hu, 1998). For instance,

Chen et al. (2013) evaluate real estate investment returns by forecasting the

REIT index; they show that the industrial production index, the lending rate,

the dividend yield and the stock index influence real estate investments. All

the forecasting techniques adopted (i.e. supervised machine learning and

ANNs) outperform linear models in terms of efficiency and precision.

The third sub-stream deals with banks’ performance. In contradiction with

past research, a text mining study argues that the most important risk

factors in banking are non-financial, i.e. regulation, strategy and

management operation. However, the findings from text analysis are limited

to what is disclosed in the papers (Wei et al. 2019). A highly performing NN-

based study on the Malaysian and Islamic banking sector asserts that

negative cost structure, cultural aspects and regulatory barriers (i.e. low

competition) lead to inefficient banks compared to the U.S., which, on the

contrary, are more resilient, healthier and well regulated (Wanke et al.

2016a, b, c, d; Papadimitriou et al. 2020).

Stream 06: AI and cryptocurrencies.

Although algorithms and AI advisors are gaining ground, human traders still

dominate the cryptocurrency market (Petukhina et al. 2021). For this

reason, substantial arbitrage opportunities are available in the Bitcoin

market, especially for USD–CNY and EUR–CNY currency pairs (Pichl and

Kaizoji 2017). Concerning daily realised volatility, the HAR model delivers
83
good results. Likewise, the feed-forward neural network effectively
approximates the daily logarithmic returns of BTCUSD and the shape of

their distribution (Pichl and Kaizoji 2017).

Additionally, the Hierarchical Risk Parity (HRP) approach, an asset

allocation method based on machine learning, represents a powerful risk

management tool able to manage the high volatility characterising Bitcoin

prices, thereby helping cryptocurrency investors (Burggraf 2021).

84
Stream 07: AI and derivatives.

ANNs and machine learning models are accurate predictors in pricing

financial derivatives. Jang and Lee (2019) propose a machine learning

model that outperforms traditional American option pricing models: the

generative Bayesian NN; Culkin and Das (2017) use a feed-forward deep

NN to reproduce Black and Scholes’ option pricing formula with a high

accuracy rate. Similarly, Chen and Wan (2021) suggest a deep NN for

American option and deltas pricing in high dimensions. Funahashi (2020),

on the contrary, rejects deep learning for option pricing due to the instability

of the prices, and introduces a new hybrid method that combines ANNs and

asymptotic expansion (AE). This model does not directly predict the option

price but measures instead, the difference between the target (i.e. derivative

price) and its approximation. As a result, the ANN becomes faster, more

accurate and “lighter” in terms of layers and training data volume. This

innovative method mimics a human learning process when one learns about

a new object by recognising its differences from a similar and familiar item

(Funahashi 2020).

85
Stream 08: AI and credit risk in banks.

The research stream labelled “AI and Credit Risk in Banks”Footnote2

includes the following sub- streams: AI and Bank Credit Risk; AI and

Consumer Credit Risk and Default; AI and Financial Fraud detection/ Early

Warning System; AI and Credit Scoring Models.

The first sub-stream addresses bank failure prediction. Machine learning

and ANNs significantly outperform statistical approaches, although they lack

transparency (Le and Viviani 2018). To overcome this limitation, Durango‐

Gutiérrez et al. (2021) combine traditional methods (i.e. logistic regression)

with AI (i.e. Multiple layer perceptron -MLP), thus gaining valuable insights

on explanatory variables. With the scope of preventing further global

financial crises, the banking industry relies on financial decision support

systems (FDSSs), which are strongly improved by AI- based models

(Abedin et al. 2019).

The second sub-stream compares classic and advanced consumer credit

risk models. Supervised learning tools, such as SVM, random forest, and

advanced decision trees architectures, are powerful predictors of credit

card delinquency: some of them can predict credit events up to 12

months in advance (Lahmiri 2016; Khandani et al. 2010; Butaru et al. 2016).

Jagric et al. (2011) propose a learning vector quantization (LVQ) NN that

better deals with categorical variables, achieving an excellent classification

rate (i.e. default, non-default). Such methods overcome logit- based

approaches and result in cost savings ranging from 6% up to 25% of total

86
losses (Khadani et al. 2010).
The third group discusses the role of AI in early warning systems. On a

retail level, advanced random forests accurately detect credit card fraud

based on customer financial behaviour and spending pattern, and then flag

it for investigation (Kumar et al. 2019). Similarly, Coats and Fant (1993)

build a NN alert model for distressed firms that outperforms linear

techniques. On a macroeconomic level, systemic risk monitoring models

enhanced by AI technologies, i.e. k-nearest neighbours and sophisticated

NNs, support macroprudential strategies and send alerts in case of global

unusual financial activities (Holopainen, and Sarlin 2017; Huang and Guo

2021). However, these methods are still work-in-progress.

87
Stream 09: AI and investor sentiment analysis.

Investor sentiment has become increasingly important in stock prediction.

For this purpose, sentiment analysis extracts investor sentiment from social

media platforms (e.g. StockTwits, Yahoo-finance, [Link]) through

natural language processing and data mining techniques, and classifies it

into negative or positive (Yin et al. 2020). The resulting sentiment is

regarded either as a risk factor in asset pricing models, an input to forecast

asset price direction, or an intraday stock index return (Houlihan and

Creamer 2021; Renault 2017). In this respect, Yin et al. (2020) find that

investor sentiment has a positive correlation with stock liquidity, especially

in slowing markets; additionally, sensitivity to liquidity conditions tends to be

higher for firms with larger size and a higher book-to-market ratio, and

especially those operating in weakly regulated markets. As for predictions,

daily news usually predicts stock returns for few days, whereas weekly

news predicts returns for longer period, from one month to one quarter. This

generates a return effect on stock prices, as much of the delayed response

to news occurs around major events in company life, specifically earnings

announcement, thus making investor sentiment a very important variable in

assessing the impact of AI in financial markets. (Heston and Sinha 2017).

Stream 10: AI and foreign exchange management.

The last stream addresses AI and the management of foreign exchange.

Cost-effective trading or hedging activities in this market require accurate

exchange rate forecasts (Galeshchuk and Mukherjee 2017). In this regard, 88

the HONN model significantly outperforms traditional neural networks (i.e.

multi-layer perceptron, recurrent NNs, Psi sigma-models) in forecasting and

trading the EUR/USD currency pair using ECB daily fixing series as input

data (Dunis et al. 2010). On the contrary, Galeshchuk and Mukherjee

(2017) consider these methods as unable to predict the direction of change

in the forex rates and, therefore, ineffective at supporting profitable trading.

For this reason, they apply a deep NN (Convolution NNs) to forecast three

main exchange rates (i.e. EUR/USD, GBP/USD, and JPY/USD). The model

performs remarkably better than time series models (e.g. ARIMA:

Autoregressive integrated moving average) and machine learning

classifiers. To sum up, from this research stream it emerges that AI-based

models, such as NARX and the above-mentioned techniques, achieve

better prediction performance than statistical or time series models, as

remarked by Amelot et al. (2021).

89
3.11 Issues that deserve further investigation.

As shown in Sect. "A detailed account of the literature on AI in Finance", the

literature on Artificial Intelligence in Finance is vast and rapidly growing as

technological progress advances. There are, however, some aspects of this

subject that are unexplored yet or that require further investigation. In this

section, we further scrutinise, through content analysis, the papers

published between 2015 and 2021 (as we want to focus on the most recent

research directions) in order to define a potential research agenda. Hence,

for each of the ten research streams presented in Sect. "Identification of the

major research streams", we report a number of research questions that

were put forward over time and are still at least partly unaddressed.

Research questions for future research.

From: Artificial intelligence in Finance: a comprehensive review through

bibliometric and content analysis.

Research Research questions Authors (s)

streams / Year

AI and Which AI-based technique (e.g. ML, Law, 90

Stock clustering algorithms) is the best for Stock

Market market prediction? and Shawe-

Taylor (2017)

Which kind of order book information best Tashiro, et

improves the accuracy of AI-based models al. (2019)

for stock market prediction?

How does policy and regulation Litzenberger

impact Algorithmic trading? et al. (2012)

Research Research questions Authors (s)

streams / Year

What effect have market cycles on the Booth et

accuracy of intelligent stock price al.

prediction models? Can it be leveraged to (2015)

improve the model’s performance?

AI and How do Robo advisors perform during Tao et

Trading major unexpected financial crisis such as al.

Models COVID-19? (2021)

Can limit order books data embedded in Sirignano

AI- based techniques boost trading models (2018)

accuracy?

AI and Volatility Do more elaborated neural network Bucci (2020)

Forecasting architectures enhance realised volatility

prediction? What are the benefits and

results of using NNs multivariate time

series in forecasting realised volatility? 91

 Which AI optimising algorithms most Kim and Kim

improve index-tracking portfolio strategy? (2020)

AI and Which machine learning approach (e.g. Soleymani

Portfolio fuzzy clustering) best improves portfolio and Vasighi

Management construction? (2020)

How can deep learning techniques Chen and

contribute to volatility forecasting for Ge (2021)

portfolio selection?

Research Research questions Authors (s)

streams / Year

AI and How would multiple classifiers based on AI Jones et

technology perform compared to binary al.

Performance,
classifiers in predicting corporate (2017)
Risk, and
bankruptcy, bond default, corporate

mergers, reconstructions, and takeovers?

Default Valuation

What are the benefits of combining

sophisticated data mining techniques with

experts’ opinion in corporate default

forecasts?

What are possible solutions for

transforming and manipulating missing

data in AI predictive models?

92
 What impact have corporate credit ratings Uddin et

and social media data on the accuracy of al.

AI- powered risk predictors? (2020)

Which AI tools help overcome Sariev

ANNs limitations (e.g. overfitting,

black box)? and Germano

(2020)

AI and Which AI techniques are best for Burggra

Bitcoin, the optimization of a f (2021)

Cryptocurrency cryptocurrency portfolio?

What are future developments in the Petukhina et

crypto market in terms of AI-based trading al. (2020)

methods and blockchain?

Research Research questions Authors (s)

streams / Year

What impact has regulation and blockchain

on crypto markets and AI models

performance?

AI and Derivatives What are potential deployments and Jang and

results of text-based input data and Lee (2019)

sentiment analysis in option pricing?

What are the best designs of AI models Chen and

93
that minimise computational cost? Wan (2021)
 Are there further human learning paths to Funahas

be implemented in AI technology? hi (2020)

AI and Credit Risk What type of data (e.g. bank market data) Le and

in Banks best improves the result of bank default Viviani (2018)

forecasting models?

What methods reduce AI training speed Kumar et

and enhance classification accuracy? al.

(2019)

How can early warning models be further Holopainen

simplified to be widely implemented? and

Which AI technique is best for combining

Sarlin (2017)
visual data or visual interfaces with

systemic risk measurement to “visualise”

and interact with future risk scenarios?

Research Research questions Authors (s)

streams / Year

AI and Can the combination of both textual data Houlihan

Investor and market data improve AI predictive

Sentiments models in specific sectors and industries? and Creamer

Analysis (2021)

How do diverse types of news and “social” Heston

data impact financial markets? How does

94
the market process that information? and Sinha
 (2017)

Which AI model best captures the impact Xu and

of social networks sites’ sentiment (SNS) Zhao (2020)

on individual stock for portfolio

management?

Does the increasing role of “influencers” in

Finance (e.g. investor advisors, expert

analysts) affect market returns and how

can AI technology use it for financial

forecasts?

What are the strategies to simplify and Galeshchuk

make machine learning leaner and faster? and

Mukherjee
Which AI-based trading strategy best
(2017)
performs in the forex market during a

financial crisis?

AI and Which AI model based on advanced time Amelot et

Foreign series (e.g. genetic algorithm (GA), hybrid al. (2021)

Exchange genetic algorithm optimised long short-

Management term memory, ETS models or APGARCH

or hybrid ANN Gravitational models) is

most performing in

Research Research questions Authors (s)

95
streams / Year
 foreign exchange rates or stock

market forecasting?

AI and the stock market.

This research stream focuses on algorithmic trading (AT) and stock price

prediction. Future research in the field could analyse more deeply

alternative AI-based market predictors (e.g. clustering algorithms and

similar learning methods) and draw up a regime clustering algorithm in

order to get a clearer view of the potential applications and benefits of

clustering methodologies (Law, and Shawe-Taylor 2017). In this regard,

Litzenberger et al. (2012) and Booth et al. (2015) recommend broadening

the study to market cycles and regulation policies that may affect AI models’

performance in stock prediction and algorithmic trading,

respectively.Footnote3 Furthermore, forecasting models should be

evaluated with deeper order book information, which may lead to a higher

prediction accuracy of stock prices (Tashiro et al. 2019).

AI and trading models.

This research stream builds on the application of AI in trading models. Robo

advisors are the evolution of basic trading models: they are easily

accessible, cost-effective, profitable for investors and, unlike human traders,

immune to behavioural biases. Robo advisory, however, is a recent

96
phenomenon and needs further performance evaluations, especially in
periods of financial distress, such as the post-COVID-19 one (Tao et al.

2021), or in the case of the so-called “Black swan” events. Conversely,

trading models based on spatial neural networks (an advanced ANN)

outperform all statistical techniques in modelling limit order books and

suggest an extensive interpretation of the joint distribution of the best bid

and best ask. Given the versatility of such a method, forthcoming research

should resort to it with the aim of understanding whether neural

97
networks with more order book information (i.e. order flow history) lead to

better trading performance (Sirignano 2018).

AI and volatility forecasting.

As previously mentioned, volatility forecasting is a challenging task.

Although recent studies report solid results in the field (see Sermpinis et al.

2013; Vortelinos 2017), future work could deploy more elaborated recurrent

NNs by modifying the activation function of the processing units composing

the ANNs, or by adding hidden layers and then evaluate their

performance (Bucci 2020). Since univariate time series are commonly used

for realised volatility prediction, it would be interesting to also inquire about

the performance of multivariate time series.

AI and portfolio management.

This research stream examines the use of AI in portfolio selection

strategies. Past studies have developed AI models that are capable of

replicating the performance of stock indexes (known as index tracking

strategy) and constructing efficient portfolios with no human intervention. In

this regard, Kim and Kim (2020) suggest focussing on optimising AI

algorithms to boost index- tracking performance. Soleymani and Vasighi

(2020) recognise the importance of clustering algorithms in portfolio

management and propose a clustering approach powered by a membership

function, also known as fuzzy clustering, to further improve the selection of

98
less risky and most profitable assets. For this reason, analysis of asset

volatility through deep learning should be embedded in portfolio selection

models (Chen and Ge 2021).

AI and performance, risk, default valuation.

Bankruptcy and performance prediction models rely on binary classifiers

that only provide two outcomes, e.g. risky–not risky, default–not default,

good–bad performance. These methods may be restrictive as sometimes

there is not a clear distinction between the two categories (Jones et al.

2017). Therefore, prospective research might focus on multiple outcome

domains and extend the research area to other contexts, such as bond

default prediction, corporate mergers, reconstructions, takeovers, and credit

rating changes (Jones et al. 2017). Corporate credit ratings and social

media data should be included as independent predictors in credit risk

forecasts to evaluate their impact on the accuracy of risk-predicting models

(Uddin et al. 2020). Moreover, it

99
is worth evaluating the benefits of a combined human–machine approach,

where analysts contribute to variables’ selection alongside data mining

techniques (Jones et al. 2017). Forthcoming studies should also address

black box and over-fitting biases (Sariev and Germano 2020), as well as

provide solutions for the manipulation and transformation of missing input

data relevant to the model (Jones et al. 2017).

AI and cryptocurrencies.

The use of AI in the cryptocurrency market is in its infancy, and so are the

policies regulating it. As the digital currency industry has become

increasingly important in the financial world, future research should study

the impact of regulations and blockchain progress on the performance of AI

techniques applied in this field (Petukhina et al., 2021). Cryptocurrencies,

and especially Bitcoins, are extensively used in financial portfolios. Hence,

new AI approaches should be developed in order to optimise cryptocurrency

portfolios (Burggraf 2021).

AI and derivatives.

This research stream examines derivative pricing models based on AI. A

valuable research area that should be further explored concerns the

incorporation of text-based input data, such as tweets, blogs, and

comments, for option price prediction (Jang and Lee 2019). Since derivative

pricing is an utterly complicated task, Chen and Wan (2021) suggest

10
studying advanced AI designs that minimise computational costs.
0
Funahashi (2020) recognises a typical human learning process (i.e.
recognition by differences) and applies it to the model, significantly

simplifying the pricing problem. In the light of these considerations,

prospective research may also investigate other human learning and

reasoning paths that can improve AI reasoning skills.

AI and credit risk in banks.

Bank default prediction models often rely solely on accounting information

from banks’ financial statements. To enhance default forecast, future work

should consider market data as well (Le and Viviani 2018). Credit risk

includes bank account fraud and financial systemic risk. Fraud detection

based on AI needs further experiments in terms of training speed and

classification accuracy (Kumar et al. 2019). Early warning models, on the

other hand, should be more sensitive to systemic risk. For this reason,

subsequent studies ought to provide a common platform for modelling

10
1
systemic risk and visualisation techniques enabling interaction with both

model parameters and visual interfaces (Holopainen and Sarlin 2017).

AI and investor sentiment analysis.

Sentiment analysis builds on text-based data from social networks and

news to identify investor sentiment and use it as a predictor of asset prices.

Forthcoming research may analyse the effect of investor sentiment on

specific sectors (Houlihan and Creamer 2021), as well as the impact of

diverse types of news on financial markets (Heston and Sinha 2017). This is

important for understanding how markets process information. In this

respect, Xu and Zhao (2022) propose a deeper analysis of how social

networks’ sentiment affects individual stock returns. They also believe that

the activity of financial influencers, such as financial analysts or investment

advisors, potentially affects market returns and needs to be considered in

financial forecasts or portfolio management.

AI and foreign exchange management.

This research stream investigates the application of AI models to the Forex

market. Deep networks, in particular, efficiently predict the direction of

change in forex rates thanks to their ability to “learn” abstract features (i.e.

moving averages) through hidden layers. Future work should study whether

these abstract features can be inferred from the model and used as valid

input data to simplify the deep network structure (Galeshchuk and

10
Mukherjee 2017). Moreover, the performance of foreign exchange trading
2
models should be assessed in financial distressed times. Further research
may also compare the predictive performance of advanced times series

models, such as genetic algorithms and hybrid NNs, for forex trading

purposes (Amelot et al. 2021).

10
3
 Chapter-4

Data Analysis and Findings

Key Insights from Data Analysis (With Values).

1. Descriptive Statistics:

Table 1: Descriptive Statistics of AI Adoption.

Statistic Value

Mean 3.8

Median 4.0

Mode 4

Standard Deviation 0.92

i. Mean AI adoption score across all firms: 3.8 out of 5.

ii. Standard deviation: 0.92, indicating moderate variability in AI usage.

10
iii. Median: 4.0, suggesting AI use is above average for most firms. 4
iv. Mode: 4, reaffirming that many firms use AI frequently.

v. AI adoption rate: Large firms: ~70%. SMEs: ~35%. IT/Finance

sectors: ~75–80%, Agriculture/Manufacturing sectors: ~25–

35%.

10
5
 2. Inferential Statistics:

Table 2: Correlation & Regression Results.

Variable Relationship Method Value(s)

AI Usage & Decision Accuracy Pearson's r 0.71 (p < 0.01)

AI→ Financial Decision Accuracy Regression R² = 0.504, β = 0.65, t = 8.21,

p < 0.001

Forecast Error Before vs After AI t-test Mean ↓ 28%, t = 7.89, p < 0.01

A. Correlation & Regression Analysis (Objective 2 / H₁):

i. Pearson’s correlation coefficient between AI usage frequency and

decision accuracy: r = 0.71 (p < 0.01) → Strong, positive correlation.

ii. Simple linear regression:

iii. R² = 0.504, indicating 50.4% of variance in financial decision accuracy

is explained by AI adoption level.

10
6
iv. Regression coefficient (β) = 0.65, t = 8.21, p < 0.001 → Significant
 predictive relationship.

Interpretation: AI tools are highly influential in enhancing financial decision-

making precision.

B. T-Test (H₁):

I. Paired samples t-test comparing forecasting error pre- and post-AI

implementation:

a. Mean error reduction = 28%,

b. t = 7.89, df = 119, p < 0.01

10
7
 Conclusion: Statistically significant improvement in accuracy due to AI

adoption.

C. ANOVA (H₂):

Table 3: ANOVA and Ordinal Logistic Results.

Analysis Variables Results

Type Compare

ANOVA Decision time by AI F (2,197) = 18.7, p < 0.01

adoption level

Chi square Perception of AI vs χ² (3) = 14.56, p = 0.002

Job Role

Ordinal Predictors of AIFirm size β = 0.44, Digital readiness β = 0.39

Logistic Satisfaction

(both p < 0.01), R² = 0.36

10
8
1. One-way ANOVA comparing decision-making time across three groups:

Non-adopters, Partial adopters, and Full adopters:

a. F (2, 197) = 18.7, p < 0.01

b. Mean turnaround time:

a. Non - adopters: 5.1 days.

b. Partial adopters: 4.2 days.

c. Full adopters: 3.5 days.

10
9
 2. Post-hoc Tukey test confirms significant differences between all three

groups.

Conclusion: AI significantly reduces decision-making time.

D. Chi-Square Test (H₃):

I. Association between perception of AI usefulness (Agree vs. Disagree) and

job role (executives

vs. analysts): χ² (3) = 14.56, p = 0.002.

Interpretation: Positive perception of AI is significantly more prevalent among

executives.

E. Ordinal Logistic Regression (H₃):

i. Dependent variable: Likert-scale satisfaction (1–5) with AI usage.

Predictors: Digital skills, role type, firm size.

11
ii. Findings:
0
 a. Firm size (β = 0.44, p < 0.01).

b. Digital readiness (β = 0.39, p < 0.01).

c. Job role not significant (β = 0.12, p = 0.18).

iii. Nagelkerke R² = 0.36.

Conclusion: Larger firms and higher digital competence predict higher

satisfaction with AI systems.

11
1
F. Factor Analysis (Objective 2):

Table 4: Factor Analysis and Multivariate Regression.

Test Type Result Summary Notes

Factor Analysis 3 factors (Predictive accuracy, 75% variance explained, KMO =

Speed, Usability) 0.82

Multivariate R² = 0.49, βs (Firm Size = 0.43, p < 0.01

Regression Industry

= 0.31,

Digital Readiness = 0.39),

Interaction β

= 0.24

I. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) on 10 AI functionality items revealed 3

main components:

a. Factor 1 (Predictive accuracy) – Eigenvalue = 3.4, explains 34% variance.

b. Factor 2 (Operational speed) – Eigenvalue = 2.6, explains 26% variance.

11
2
 c. Factor 3 (User-friendliness & integration) – Eigenvalue = 1.5, explains

15% variance.

II. KMO = 0.82, Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity p < 0.001.

Conclusion: AI effectiveness is determined by accuracy, speed, and usability.

3. Multivariate Regression (H₄):

I. Predictors: Firm size, Industry type (coded), Digital readiness.

II. Model Summary: a. R² = 0.49, Adjusted R² = 0.47, F(3, 196) = 61.7, p <

0.01.

11
3
III. Significant predictors:

a. Firm size (β = 0.43, p < 0.01).

b. Industry type (β = 0.31, p < 0.01).

c. Digital readiness (β = 0.39, p < 0.01) .

IV. Interaction effect: Digital readiness × Firm size (β = 0.24, p < 0.05) .

Conclusion: All predictors significantly influence AI adoption levels.

Discussion of Results with Literature Support .

Objective 1 / Hypothesis 1:

A. The finding that AI significantly improves decision accuracy aligns with

Davenport & Ronanki (2018), who observed similar accuracy

enhancements in financial decision models through machine learning.

B. Zhou et al. (2020) found AI tools reduce human biases and improve

forecasting, corroborating the 28% error reduction found in this study.

11
Objective 2 / Hypothesis 2: 4
A. The result that AI reduces decision-making time by 30% is supported

by Brynjolfsson & McAfee (2017), who emphasized the role of AI in real-

time data processing and automation.

B. The positive impact on efficiency confirms Chen, Chiang, & Storey

(2012), who identified faster financial analysis as a key benefit of AI-driven

decision support systems.

Objective 3 / Hypothesis 3:

A. The mixed perception of AI—with strong support but ethical concerns—

is consistent with Binns et al. (2018), who discuss issues of algorithmic

fairness and transparency.

B. Jobin, Ienca, & Vayena (2019) also identified that data privacy and potential

job displacement

are major barriers to full AI adoption, which matches this study’s qualitative

insights.

11
5
Objective 4 / Hypothesis 4:

A. The sectoral variation and influence of firm size and digital readiness

reflect findings from Bughin et al. (2018), who showed that large, tech-

savvy firms dominate AI adoption.

B. Chatterjee et al. (2021) further support the notion that digital maturity

enhances AI adoption,

aligning with this study’s regression results.

Findings of the Study.

i. AI Adoption in Indian Businesses:

a. AI adoption in financial decision-making is increasing but varies widely

across sectors and firm sizes. Large firms and technology-intensive

industries (IT, banking, finance) exhibit high AI integration, with around 70%

using AI for budgeting, forecasting, and risk assessment.

b. Smaller firms and traditional sectors (agriculture, manufacturing) show

limited AI adoption, mainly due to infrastructure, cost, and digital literacy

challenges.

ii. Impact of AI on Decision Accuracy, Speed, and Quality:

a. AI adoption significantly improves financial decision accuracy, reducing

11
6
forecasting errors by an average of 28% (p < 0.01).
b. Decision-making time is reduced by approximately 30%, with AI firms

averaging 3.5 days versus 5 days for non-adopters (F(1,198) = 18.7, p <

0.01).

c. AI-driven predictive analytics and automation enhance decision quality,

especially in firms using machine learning and real-time data processing.

iii. Perceptions of Financial Professionals on AI:

a. Majority (about 75-76%) of financial professionals view AI as a valuable

tool that improves efficiency and decision quality.

b. Ethical concerns are prominent, with around 60% worried about

algorithmic bias, transparency, and data privacy issues.

c. Over half (54%) express concerns about job displacement due to AI

integration.

11
7
d. Challenges such as integrating AI with existing systems and training

needs are commonly reported.

iv. Sectoral Differences and Influencing Factors on AI Adoption:

a. IT, finance, and e-commerce sectors lead in AI adoption with rates over

75%, supported by higher digital readiness and skilled workforce.

b. Manufacturing, agriculture, and small-scale retail sectors lag, with adoption

rates below 35%.

c. Larger firms are 2.5 times more likely to adopt AI than smaller firms.

d. Technological readiness (infrastructure, skills, innovation culture)

significantly moderates AI adoption, amplifying the effects of firm size and

industry type.

Summary of major findings.

a. AI adoption in financial decision-making is significantly higher in large

firms and technology driven industries compared to smaller firms and

traditional sectors.

b. Use of AI tools improves the accuracy of financial forecasts and reduces

errors by approximately 28%.

c. AI integration accelerates decision-making processes, cutting down the

time taken by nearly 30%. 11

8
d. Financial professionals generally perceive AI as a useful tool but express

concerns about ethical issues, data privacy, and job displacement.

e. Sectoral differences in AI adoption are influenced by firm size, industry

type, and technological readiness, with digitally mature organizations

leading AI integration.

f. Ethical and operational challenges remain barriers to full AI adoption despite

evident benefits.

11
9
 CHAPTER- 5

RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Recommendations for Future AI Integration

a. Adopt hybrid AI-human decision frameworks to balance AI efficiency

with human ethical oversight.

b. Prioritize transparency and explainability in AI algorithms to reduce

bias and build user confidence.

c. Implement continuous training programs for financial professionals on

AI capabilities and ethical considerations.

d. Invest in scalable AI solutions tailored to different business sizes and

industry needs.

e. Encourage pilot projects and phased AI rollouts to manage risks and

evaluate performance before full implementation.

5.2 Implications for Business and Policy Makers

12
0
a. Businesses should invest in digital infrastructure and AI training
programs to enhance AI adoption and financial decision quality.

b. Policymakers need to develop clear regulations addressing data privacy,

ethical AI use, and transparency to build trust in AI-driven financial

systems.

c. Support mechanisms for SMEs should be introduced to reduce barriers to

AI adoption, ensuring more inclusive technological growth.

d. Industry-specific AI guidelines could help sectors with low adoption rates

to implement AI effectively and responsibly.

e. Encouraging collaboration between AI developers and financial

professionals can improve AI

tools’ relevance and usability.

12
1
5.3 Suggestions for Further Research

a. Explore the long-term impact of AI on employment patterns within

financial departments across various industries.

b. Investigate the effectiveness of AI in improving financial decision-making

in small and medium enterprises (SMEs).

c. Study the role of organizational culture and leadership in facilitating or

hindering AI adoption.

d. Examine the implications of AI-driven financial decisions on corporate

governance and accountability.

e. Assess customer perceptions and trust levels in AI-assisted financial

services in the Indian context.

12
2
 CHAPTER- 6

CONCLUSION

Despite its recent advent, Artificial Intelligence has revolutionised the entire

financial system, thanks to advanced computer science and Big Data

Analytics and the increasing outflow of data generated by consumers,

investors, business, and governments’ activities. Therefore, it is not

surprising that a growing strand of literature has examined the uses,

benefits and potential of AI applications in Finance. This paper aims to

provide an accurate account of the state of the art, and, in doing so, it would

represent a useful guide for readers interested in this topic and, above all,

the starting point for future research. To this purpose, we collected a large

number of articles published in journals indexed in Web of Science (WoS),

and then resorted to both bibliometric analysis and content analysis. In

particular, we inspected several features of the papers under study,

identified the main AI applications in Finance and highlighted ten major

research streams. From this extensive review, it emerges that AI can be

regarded as an excellent market predictor and contributes to market stability

by minimising information asymmetry and volatility; this results in profitable

investing systems and accurate performance evaluations. Additionally, in

the risk management area, AI aids with bankruptcy and credit risk prediction
12
in both corporate and financial institutions; fraud detection and early 3
 warning models monitor the whole financial system and raise expectations

for future artificial market surveillance. This suggests that global financial

crises or unexpected financial turmoil will be likely to be anticipated and

prevented.

All in all, judging from the rapid widespread of AI applications in the financial

sphere and across a large variety of countries, and, more in general, based

on the growth rate exhibited by technological progress over time, we expect

that the use of AI tools will further expand, both geographically, across

sectors and across financial areas. Hence, firms that still struggle with

coping with the latest wave of technological change should be aware of that,

and try to overcome this burden in order to reap the potential benefits

associated with the adoption of AI and remain competitive. In the light of

these considerations, policymakers should motivate companies, especially

those that have not adopted yet, or have just begun to introduce AI

applications, to catch

12
4
up, for instance by providing funding or training courses aimed to

strengthen the complex skills required by employees dealing with these

sophisticated systems and languages.

This study presents some limitations. For instance, it tackles a significant

range of interrelated topics (in particular, the main financial areas affected

by AI which have been the main object of past research), and then presents

a concise description for each of them; other studies may decide to focus

on only one or a couple of subjects and provide a more in-depth account of

the chosen one(s). Also, we are aware that technological change has been

progressing at an unprecedented fast and growing pace; even though we

considered a significantly long time-frame and a relevant amount of studies

have been released in the first two decades of the XXI century, we are

aware that further advancements have been made from 2021 (the last year

included in the time frame used to the select our sample); for instance, in

the last few years, AI experts, policymakers, and also a growing number of

scholars have been debating the potential and risks of AI-related devices,

such as chatGBT and the broader and more elusive “metaverse” (see

for instance Mondal et al. 2023 and Calzada 2023, for an overview).

Hence, future contributions may advance our understanding of the

implications of these latest developments for finance and other important

fields, such as education and health.

12
5
 CHAPTER-7

REFERENCES

Accenture. (2022). AI in financial planning: How intelligent automation is

changing corporate finance.

Aggarwal, N., & Sharma, T. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in financial

reporting: The Indian corporate experience. Journal of Emerging Technologies

in Accounting, 20(1),45–64.

Bansal, R., & Trivedi, N. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Indian banking:

Regulatory dilemmas and future frameworks. Asian Journal of Regulatory

Affairs, 9(2), 112–127.

Bhardwaj, A., & Kumar, R. (2021). Ethical challenges and regulatory

needs in artificial intelligence deployment in finance. Journal of Financial

Innovation and Ethics, 9(1), 45–61.

Bhat, M. A., & Sharma, D. (2020). Artificial Intelligence and its application in

financial markets.

International Journal of Finance and Management, 12(3), 56–65.

Bose, A., & Roy, A. (2022). Artificial intelligence in credit risk assessment: An
12
Indian fintech perspective. Journal of Banking Technology, 3(1), 45-63.
6
Brynjolfsson, E., & McElheran, K. (2019). The rapid adoption of data-driven

decision-making.

American Economic Review, 109(5), 133–139.

Choudhury, R., & Roy, P. (2021). Sentiment analysis for investment

prediction using AI: A study of Indian stock markets. International Journal of

Finance & Economics, 26(4), 5872-5889.

Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of

artificial intelligence. Yale University Press.

Data Security Council of India. (2022). Cybersecurity and AI: Trends and

Threats in Financial Systems. DSCI Annual Report.

Deloitte. (2020). AI-powered finance: The future of financial forecasting.

Deloitte Insights.

12
7
Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-

training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv

preprint arXiv:1810.04805.

Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, D. L., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., & Grover, P.

(2021). Artificial intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging

challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy.

International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994.

Ghosh, R., & Dubey, S. (2022). Role of artificial intelligence in detecting

financial frauds in Indian banks. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(3), 788–802.

Ghosh, T., & Saha, P. (2021). Impact of artificial intelligence on financial

forecasting: A case study of Indian enterprises. Indian Journal of Financial

Studies, 45(2), 104-117.

Gupta, R., Sharma, A., & Bhatt, M. (2022). Fraud detection using AI in

Indian financial institutions. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 11(1), 22–36.

Jain, R., & Aggarwal, S. (2021). AI for risk management in emerging

markets: A comparative study. Risk Management Journal, 14(2), 89-102.

Jain, V., & Sinha, K. (2024). Legal accountability in AI-based financial

services in India. Indian Law Review, 10(1), 44–63.

Kaplan, A. (2020). The disruptive role of AI in investment management.

Harvard Business Review, 98(6), 54–62.

KPMG India. (2022). AI in finance: Unlocking performance through data-

driven decisions. KPMG Insights Report.

12
8
Kumar, V., & Malhotra, A. (2020). Role of Artificial Intelligence in Indian
Banking Sector.

International Journal of Research in Engineering, Science and Management,

3(9),

Lo, A. W. (2019). Adaptive markets: Financial evolution at the speed of

thought. Princeton University Press. Marr, B. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in

Practice: How 50 Companies are Already Using AI and Machine Learning to

Deliver Real Business Results. Wiley.

McKinsey & Company. (2022). Trust in AI-driven financial systems: A

consumer perspective. McKinsey Global Institute.

12
9
Mehta, A., & Singh, R. (2020). Government initiatives and the rise of artificial

intelligence in Indian businesses. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration,

42(3), 203–216.

Mehta, D. (2024). Implementation of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act

2023: Implications for AI systems. Journal of Data Law and Policy, 6(1), 23–

39.

Mehta, D., & Bansal, R. (2023). Readiness for AI adoption in financial

sectors of India: A comparative industry analysis. Indian Journal of Business

Research, 15(1), 89–108.

Mehta, R., & Gupta, S. (2021). Impact of AI on Indian banking and finance

sector. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 8(4),

1225–1232.

Mishra, V., & Rajan, K. (2021). AI adoption in Indian BFSI sector: A

comparative study of banks and NBFCs. International Journal of Financial

Innovation, 8(2), 122–139.

Mitra, S., & Sinha, R. (2020). AI and financial inclusion in India: Challenges

and opportunities.

Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting and Finance, 9(2), 130-148.

Muthukrishnan, K., & Pandey, R. (2021). Machine learning models in loan

default prediction: Evidence from Indian NBFCs. Finance India, 35(4), 1221-

1240.

13
Nair, R., & Roy, A. (2022). Bias in AI-based lending systems: A socio-technical
0
analysis in Indian financial institutions. Journal of Ethics and Technology, 13(3),
98–114.

Narayanan, A., & Ghosh, S. (2023). Barriers to AI implementation in

financial decision-making: A study of Indian SMEs. Journal of Technology

Management & Innovation, 18(1), 35–48.

NASSCOM. (2021). AI Adoption in Indian Enterprises: Trends and Roadmap.

Nasscom. (2021).

State of AI in Indian startups. National Association of Software and Service

Companies.

Patel, R., & Menon, S. (2021). AI and ROI: Financial metrics in the age of

automation. Finance India, 35(3), 402–418.

PwC. (2021). AI for compliance and fraud detection: A guide for Indian

financial services.

PricewaterhouseCoopers India.

Raghavan, M. (2021). Fintech innovations and AI in Indian startups: A critical

evaluation. Asian Journal of Business and Technology, 14(4), 88–103.

13
1
Raghavan, M., & Iyer, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence and decision-making

efficiency: A study of Indian financial enterprises. South Asian Journal of

Management, 30(2), 115–134.

Rao, K. N., & Singh, P. (2022). Exploring challenges in AI implementation

for Indian SMEs.

Journal of Small Business Technology and Development, 30(1), 94–110.

Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2020). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (4th

ed.).

Pearson. Saxena, A. (2022). Retail finance and artificial intelligence: A future-

oriented analysis.

Retail Management Review, 6(1), 54–70.

Saxena, S., & Raj, A. (2022). Enhancing financial decision-making through AI:

Evidence from Indian enterprises. International Journal of Finance and

Technology, 2(4), 301–318.

Sen, M., & Iyer, R. (2023). Transparency and explainability in AI-based credit

systems: An Indian context. International Journal of Financial Technology, 7(2),

77–93.

Sharma, P., & Jain, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence in finance: Changing

paradigms in decision- making. Journal of Business Analytics and Intelligence,

6(2), 117–129.
13
2
Sharma, V., & Gupta, R. (2023). AI adoption and data breaches in
Indian fintech firms.

Cybersecurity India Journal, 5(4), 51–69.

Singh, P., & Dubey, R. (2022). Role of AI in financial management in Indian

hospitals. Healthcare Financial Review, 5(2), 71–89.

Singh, P., Sharma, R., & Kohli, D. (2021). AI-driven credit scoring and its

effect on lending performance: Evidence from Indian banks. Banking and

Finance Review, 13(4), 205–224.

Sundararajan, R., & Kumar, N. (2022). Democratizing credit through AI: A

study of Indian fintech startups. Journal of Digital Finance and Innovation, 3(3),

95–111.

Suresh, H., & Guttag, J. V. (2021). A framework for understanding unintended

consequences of machine learning. Communications of the ACM, 64(2), 62–

71.

Verma, S., & Bansal, A. (2023). Machine learning in fraud detection: Case

studies from Indian fintech. Cyber Risk Review, 7(1), 18–35.

13
3
Zhang, Y., Zohren, S., & Roberts, S. (2020). Deep reinforcement learning

for trading. The Journal of Financial Data Science, 2(2), 25–40.

Abdou HA, Ellelly NN, Elamer AA, Hussainey K, Yazdifar H (2021)

Corporate governance and earnings management Nexus: evidence from

the UK and Egypt using neural networks. Int J Financ Econ 26(4):6281–

6311. [Link]

Abedin MZ, Guotai C, Moula F, Azad AS, Khan MS (2019) Topological

applications of multilayer perceptrons and support vector machines in

financial decision support systems. Int J Financ Econ 24(1):474–507.

[Link]

Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2020) The wrong kind of AI? Artificial intelligence

and the future of labor demand. Cambr J Reg Econ Soc, Cambr Pol Econ

Soc 13(1):25–35

Amelot LM, Subadar Agathee U, Sunecher Y (2021) Time series modelling,

narx neural network and HYBRID kpca–svr approach to forecast the foreign

exchange market in Mauritius. Afr J Econ Manag Stud 12(1):18–54.

[Link]

Biju AKVN, Thomas AS, Thasneem J (2020) Examining the research

taxonomy of artificial intelligence, deep learning & machine learning in the

financial sphere—a bibliometric analysis. Qual Quant Online First.

[Link]

Bucci A (2020) Realized volatility forecasting with neural networks. J Financ

Econom 3:502– 13
4
531. [Link]
Buchanan, B. G. (2019). Artificial intelligence in finance - Alan Turing

Institute.

[Link]

nce_-

_turing_report_0.pdf.

Burggraf T (2021) Beyond risk parity – a machine learning-based

hierarchical risk parity approach on cryptocurrencies. Finance Res Lett

38:101523. [Link]

Caglayan M, Pham T, Talavera O, Xiong X (2020) Asset mispricing in peer-

to-peer loan secondary markets. J Corp Finan 65:101769.

[Link]

13
5
Calzada I (2023) Disruptive technologies for e-diasporas: blockchain, DAOs,

data cooperatives, metaverse, and ChatGPT. Futures 154:103258.

[Link]

Cao Y, Liu X, Zhai J, Hua S (2022) A Two-stage Bayesian network model

for corporate bankruptcy prediction. Int J Financ Econ 27(1):455–472.

[Link]

Chen S, Ge L (2021) A learning-based strategy for portfolio selection. Int Rev

Econ Financ 71:936–942. [Link]

Chen Y, Wan JW (2021) Deep neural network framework based on

backward stochastic differential equations for pricing and hedging American

options in high dimensions. Quant Finance 21(1):45–67.

[Link]

Corazza M, De March D, Di Tollo G (2021) Design of adaptive Elman

networks for credit risk assessment. Quantitative Finance 21(2):323–

340. [Link]

Cucculelli M, Recanatini M (2022) Distributed Ledger technology systems in

securities post- trading services. Evid Eur Global Syst Banks Eur J Finance

28(2):195–

218. [Link]

D’Hondt C, De Winne R, Ghysels E, Raymond S (2020) Artificial intelligence

alter egos: Who

13
might benefit from robo-investing? J Empir Financ 59:278– 6
299. [Link]

Deku SY, Kara A, Semeyutin A (2020) The predictive strength of mbs yield

spreads during asset bubbles. Rev Quant Financ Acc 56(1):111–142.

[Link]

Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM (2021) How to

conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. J Bus Res

133:285–

296. [Link]

Durango-Gutiérrez MP, Lara-Rubio J, Navarro-Galera A (2021) Analysis of

default risk in microfinance institutions under the Basel Iii framework. Int J

Financ

Econ. [Link]

13
7
Frankenfield, J. (2021). How Artificial Intelligence Works. Retrieved

June 11, 2021, from

[Link]

Frino A, Garcia M, Zhou Z (2020) Impact of algorithmic trading on speed of

adjustment to new information: Evidence from interest rate derivatives. J Futur

Mark 40(5):749–

760. [Link]

Funahashi H (2020) Artificial neural network for option pricing with and

without asymptotic correction. Quant Finance 21(4):575–592.

[Link]

Hentzen JK, Hoffmann A, Dolan R, Pala E (2022a) Artificial intelligence in

customer-facing financial services: a systematic literature review and

agenda for future research. Int J Bank Market 40(6):1299–1336.

[Link]

Houlihan P, Creamer GG (2021) Leveraging social media to predict

continuation and reversal in asset prices. Comput Econ 57(2):433–453.

[Link]

Huang X, Guo F (2021) A kernel fuzzy twin SVM model for early warning

systems of extreme financial risks. Int J Financ Econ 26(1):1459–1468.

[Link]

Huang Y, Kuan C (2021) Economic prediction with the fomc minutes: an

application of text mining. Int Rev Econ Financ 71:751–761.

13
[Link] 8
IBM Cloud Education. (2020). What are Neural Networks?

Retrieved May 10, 2021, from

[Link]

Jain A, Jain C, Khanapure RB (2021) Do algorithmic traders improve liquidity

when information asymmetry is high? Q J Financ 11(01):1–32.

[Link]

Jang H, Lee J (2019) Generative Bayesian neural network model for risk-

neutral pricing of American index options. Quant Finance 19(4):587–

603. [Link]

Jones S, Wang T (2019) Predicting private company failure: a multi-class

analysis. J Int Finan Markets Inst Money 61:161–188.

[Link]

Kim S, Kim S (2020) Index tracking through deep latent representation

learning. Quant Finance 20(4):639–652.

[Link]

13
9
Kumar G, Muckley CB, Pham L, Ryan D (2019) Can alert models for fraud

protect the elderly clients of a financial institution? Eur J Finance

25(17):1683–

1707. [Link]

Lahmiri S, Bekiros S (2019) Can machine learning approaches predict

corporate bankruptcy? evidence from a qualitative experimental design.

Quant Finance 19(9):1569–

1577. [Link]

Le HH, Viviani J (2018) Predicting bank failure: An improvement by

implementing a machine- learning approach to classical financial ratios. Res Int

Bus Financ 44:16–

25. [Link]

Li J, Li G, Zhu X, Yao Y (2020) Identifying the influential factors of commodity

futures prices through a new text mining approach. Quant Finance

20(12):1967–

1981. [Link]

Martinelli A, Mina A, Moggi M (2021) The enabling technologies of industry 4.0:

examining the seeds of the fourth industrial revolution. Ind Corp Chang 2021:1–

28. [Link]

14
Mondal S, Das S, Vrana VG (2023) How to bell the cat? a theoretical review 0
of generative artificial intelligence towards digital disruption in all walks of

life. Technologies

11(2):44. [Link]

Mselmi N, Lahiani A, Hamza T (2017) Financial distress prediction: the

case of French small and medium-sized firms. Int Rev Financ Anal

50:67–

80. [Link]

Papadimitriou T, Goga P, Agrapetidou A (2020) The resilience of the US

banking system. Int J Finance Econ. [Link]

Parot A, Michell K, Kristjanpoller WD (2019) Using artificial neural

networks to forecast exchange rate, including Var-vecm residual

analysis and prediction linear combination. Intell Syst Account Finance

Manage 26(1):3–15. [Link]

14
1
Petukhina AA, Reule RC, Härdle WK (2020) Rise of the machines? intraday

high-frequency trading patterns of cryptocurrencies. Eur J Finance 27(1–

2):8–

30. [Link]

Petukhina A, Trimborn S, Härdle WK, Elendner H (2021) Investing with

cryptocurrencies – evaluating their potential for portfolio allocation

strategies. Quant Finance 21(11):1825– 1853.

[Link]

PricewaterhouseCoopers- PwC (2020). How mature is AI adoption in

financial services? Retrieved May 15, 2021, from

[Link] adoption-

[Link].

Qi M, Maddala GS (1999) Economic factors and the stock market: a new

perspective. J Forecast 18(3):151–166. [Link]

131x(199905)18:[Link];2-v

Raj M, Seamans R (2019) Primer on artificial intelligence and robotics. J Organ

Des 8(1):1–

14. [Link]

Rasekhschaffe KC, Jones RC (2019) Machine learning for stock selection.

Financ Anal J 75(3):70–88. [Link]

Van Roy V, Vertesy D, Damioli G (2020). AI and robotics innovation. In K.

14
F., Zimmermann (ed.), Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and 2
Population Economics (pp. 1–35) Springer Nature

Sabău Popa DC, Popa DN, Bogdan V, Simut R (2021) Composite financial

performance index

prediction – a neural networks approach. J Bus Econ Manag 22(2):277–

296. [Link]

Sariev E, Germano G (2020) Bayesian regularized artificial neural networks

for the estimation of the probability of default. Quant Finance 20(2):311–

328. [Link]

Soleymani F, Vasighi M (2020) Efficient portfolio construction by means OF

CVaR and K - means++ CLUSTERING analysis: evidence from the NYSE.

Int J Financ

Econ. [Link]

14
3
Szczepański, M. (2019). Economic impacts of artificial intelligence. Retrieved

May 10, 2021,

from[Link]

EPRS_BRI(2019)6379 67_EN.pdf

Tao R, Su C, Xiao Y, Dai K, Khalid F (2021) Robo advisors, algorithmic

trading and investment management: Wonders of fourth industrial

revolution in financial markets. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 163:120421.

[Link]

Tashiro D, Matsushima H, Izumi K, Sakaji H (2019) Encoding of high-

frequency order information and prediction of short-term stock price by deep

learning. Quant Finance 19(9):1499–1506.

[Link]

Trinkle BS, Baldwin AA (2016) Research opportunities for neural networks:

the case for credit. Intell Syst Account Finance Manage 23(3):240–254.

[Link]

Uddin MS, Chi G, Al Janabi MA, Habib T (2020) Leveraging random forest in

micro-enterprises credit risk modelling for accuracy and interpretability. Int J

Financ

Econ. [Link]

Wall LD (2018) Some financial regulatory implications of artificial intelligence.

J Econ Bus 100:55–63. [Link]

Wei L, Li G, Zhu X, Li J (2019) Discovering bank risk factors from financial

14
statements based on a new semi-supervised text mining algorithm. 4
Account Finance 59(3):1519–

1552. [Link]

Xu Y, Zhao J (2022) Can sentiments on macroeconomic news explain stock

returns? evidence from social network data. Int J Financ Econ 27(2):2073–

2088. [Link]

Xu D, Zhang X, Feng H (2019) Generalized fuzzy soft sets theory-based

novel hybrid ensemble credit scoring model. Int J Financ Econ 24(2):903–

921. [Link]

Yin H, Wu X, Kong SX (2020) Daily investor sentiment, order flow

imbalance and stock liquidity: Evidence from the Chinese stock market. Int J

Financ

Econ. [Link]

14
5
Zhang Y, Chu G, Shen D (2021) The role of investor attention in

predicting stock prices: the long short-term memory networks

perspective. Financ Res Lett

38:101484. [Link]

Zhao Y, Stasinakis C, Sermpinis G, Shi Y (2018) Neural network copula

portfolio optimization for exchange traded funds. Quant Finance 18(5):761–

775. [Link]

Zheng X, Zhu M, Li Q, Chen C, Tan Y (2019) Finbrain: When finance

meets ai 2.0. Front Inform Technol Electr Eng 20(7):914–924.

[Link]

14
6