0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views19 pages

Chapter 2

This document discusses the development of dynamic models for process control, specifically focusing on a blending process and a stirred-tank heating process. It outlines systematic approaches for model development, including mass and energy conservation laws, degrees of freedom analysis, and assumptions for specific processes. The document also includes equations relevant to the modeling of these processes, emphasizing the importance of understanding dynamic behavior in chemical engineering.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views19 pages

Chapter 2

This document discusses the development of dynamic models for process control, specifically focusing on a blending process and a stirred-tank heating process. It outlines systematic approaches for model development, including mass and energy conservation laws, degrees of freedom analysis, and assumptions for specific processes. The document also includes equations relevant to the modeling of these processes, emphasizing the importance of understanding dynamic behavior in chemical engineering.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Process Control

Chapter 2

Lecture 2

1
Development of Dynamic Models
Illustrative Example: A Blending Process
Chapter 2

An unsteady-state mass balance for the blending system:

rate of accumulation   rate of   rate of 


 = −  (2-1)
 of mass in the tank  mass in  mass out 
2
or
d (Vρ )
= w1 + w2 − w (2-2)
dt
where w1, w2, and w are mass flow rates.

The unsteady-state component balance is:


Chapter 2

d (Vρx )
= w1x1 + w2 x2 − wx (2-3)
dt

The corresponding steady-state model was derived in Ch. 1 (cf.


Eqs. 1-1 and 1-2).
0 = w1 + w2 − w (2-4)
0 = w1x1 + w2 x2 − wx (2-5)

3
A Systematic Approach for Developing
Dynamic Models
1. State the modeling objectives and the end use of the
model.
2. Draw a schematic diagram of the process and label
Chapter 2

all process variables.


3. List all of the assumptions that are involved in
developing the model
4. Determine whether spatial variations of process
variables are important. If so, a partial differential
equation model will be required.
5. Write appropriate conservation equations (mass,
component, energy, and so forth).
4
A Systematic Approach for Developing
Dynamic Models

6. Perform a degrees of freedom analysis to ensure


that the model equations can be solved.
Chapter 2

7. Simplify the model.


8. Classify inputs as disturbance variables or as
manipulated variables.

5
Degrees of Freedom Analysis

1. Determine the number of equations NE and the number


of process variables NV. Note that time t is not
considered to be a process variable because it is
Chapter 2

neither a process input nor a process output.


2. Calculate the number of degrees of freedom, NF = NV -
NE.
3. Identify the NE output variables that will be obtained
by solving the process model.
4. Identify the NF input variables that must be specified
as either disturbance variables or manipulated
variables, in order to utilize the NF degrees of freedom.
6
Conservation Laws
Theoretical models of chemical processes are based on
conservation laws.

Conservation of Mass
 rate of mass  rate of mass  rate of mass 
Chapter 2

 = −  (2-6)


accumulation   in   out 

Conservation of Component i
rate of component i  rate of component i 
 = 
 accumulation   in 

rate of component i  rate of component i 


− +  (2-7)
 out   produced 
7
Conservation of Energy
The general law of energy conservation is also called the First
Law of Thermodynamics. It can be expressed as:
rate of energy  rate of energy in  rate of energy out 
 = − 
 accumulation   by convection   by convection 
Chapter 2

net rate of heat addition   net rate of work 


   
+  to the system from  + performed on the system  (2-8)
 the surroundings   by the surroundings 
   

The total energy of a thermodynamic system, Utot, is the sum of


its internal energy, kinetic energy, and potential energy:

U tot = U int + U KE + U PE (2-9)

8
It is appropriate to make two assumptions:

1. Changes in potential energy and kinetic energy can be


neglected because they are small in comparison with changes
in internal energy.
2. The net rate of work can be neglected because it is small
compared to the rates of heat transfer and convection.
Chapter 2

For these reasonable assumptions, the energy balance in


Eq. 2-8 can be written as

dU int 
dt
(
= − wH + Q) (2-10)
 = denotes the difference
U int = the internal energy of
between outlet and inlet
the system conditions of the flowing

H = enthalpy per unit mass streams; therefore

w = mass flow rate ( )
-Δ wH = rate of enthalpy of the inlet
Q = rate of heat transfer to the system stream(s) - the enthalpy
of the outlet stream(s) 9
The analogous equation for molar quantities is,
dU int
dt
(
= − wH )
  +Q (2-11)

where H is the enthalpy per mole and w is the molar flow rate.

In order to derive dynamic models of processes from the general


Chapter 2

energy balances in Eqs. 2-10 and 2-11, expressions for Uint and Ĥ
or H are required, which can be derived from thermodynamics.

The Blending Process Revisited


For constant  , Eqs. 2-2 and 2-3 become:
dV
 = w1 + w2 − w (2-12)
dt
 d (Vx )
= w1x1 + w2 x2 − wx (2-13)
dt 10
Equation 2-13 can be simplified by expanding the accumulation
term using the “chain rule” for differentiation of a product:
d (Vx ) dx dV
 = V + x (2-14)
dt dt dt
Substitution of (2-14) into (2-13) gives:
dx dV
Chapter 2

V +  x = w1x1 + w2 x2 − wx (2-15)
dt dt
Substitution of the mass balance in (2-12) for  dV/dt in (2-15)
gives:
dx
V + x ( w1 + w2 − w ) = w1x1 + w2 x2 − wx (2-16)
dt
After canceling common terms and rearranging (2-12) and (2-16),
a more convenient model form is obtained:
dV 1
= ( w1 + w2 − w ) (2-17)
dt 
dx w1 w2
= ( x1 − x ) + ( x2 − x ) (2-18)
dt V  V 11
Chapter 2 Stirred-Tank Heating Process

Figure 2.3 Stirred-tank heating process with constant holdup, V.


12
Stirred-Tank Heating Process (cont’d.)

Assumptions:

1. Perfect mixing; thus, the exit temperature T is also the


temperature of the tank contents.
Chapter 2

2. The liquid holdup V is constant because the inlet and


outlet flow rates are equal.
3. The density  and heat capacity C of the liquid are
assumed to be constant. Thus, their temperature
dependence is neglected.
4. Heat losses are negligible.

13
Model Development - I
For a pure liquid at low or moderate pressures, the internal energy
is approximately equal to the enthalpy, Uint  H, and H depends
only on temperature. Consequently, in the subsequent
development, we assume that Uint = H and Uˆ int = Hˆ where the
Chapter 2

caret (^) means per unit mass.


A differential change in temperature, dT, produces a
corresponding change in the internal energy per unit mass, dUˆ int ,
dUˆ int = dHˆ = CdT (2-29)

where C is the constant pressure heat capacity (assumed to be


constant). The total internal energy of the liquid in the tank is:

U int = VUˆ int (2-30)


14
Model Development - II
An expression for the rate of internal energy accumulation can be
derived from Eqs. (2-29) and (2-30):
dU int dT
= VC (2-31)
dt dt
Chapter 2

Suppose that the liquid in the tank is at a temperature T and has an


enthalpy, Ĥ . Integrating Eq. 2-29 from a reference temperature
Tref to T gives,
(
Hˆ − Hˆ ref = C T − Tref ) (2-32)
where Hˆ ref is the value of Ĥ at Tref. Without loss of generality, we
assume that Hˆ ref = 0 .

(
Hˆ = C T − Tref ) (2-33)
15
Model Development - III
For the inlet stream

(
Hˆ i = C Ti − Tref ) (2-34)

dU int 
( )
Chapter 2

= − wH + Q (2-10)
dt

( ) ( ) (
− wHˆ = w C Ti − Tref  − w C T − Tref 
    ) (2-35)

Finally, substitution of (2-31) and (2-35) into (2-10)


dT
V C = wC (Ti − T ) + Q (2-36)
dt

16
Degrees of Freedom Analysis for the Stirred-Tank
Model:
3 parameters: V , ,C
4 variables: T , Ti , w, Q
1 equation: Eq. 2-36
Chapter 2

Thus the degrees of freedom are NF = 4 – 1 = 3. The process


variables are classified as:
1 output variable: T
3 input variables: Ti, w, Q

For temperature control purposes, it is reasonable to classify the


three inputs as:
2 disturbance variables: Ti, w
1 manipulated variable: Q
17
Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR)
Chapter 2

Fig. 2.6. Schematic diagram of a CSTR.

18
CSTR: Model Development
Assumptions:
1. Single, irreversible reaction, A → B.
2. Perfect mixing.
3. The liquid volume V is kept constant by an overflow line.
4. The mass densities of the feed and product streams are equal
and constant. They are denoted by .
Chapter 2

5. Heat losses are negligible.


6. The reaction rate for the disappearance of A is r, and given by,
r = kcA (2-62)
where r  =  moles of A reacted per unit time, per unit volume, cA
is the concentration of A (moles per unit volume), and k is the rate
constant (units of reciprocal time).
7. The rate constant has an Arrhenius temperature dependence:
k = k0 exp(-E/RT ) (2-63)
where k0 is the frequency factor, E is the activation energy,
and R is the the gas constant.
19

You might also like