ATKINS

Cell Antenna Modifications for Boca Raton Reservoir

Tank Seismic [Link] for Structural Modifications

Booth & Suarez for AT&T Mobility

Poway, California

July 25,2012
 Booth & Suarez for ATiH Mobility
ATKINS
Boca R<;wn Tank Rese""oir

Cell Antenna Modifications for Boca Raton Reservoir

Tank Seismic Analysis for Structural Modifications

A Report Prepared by

Atkins

On Behalf of

Booth & Suarez for AT&T Mobility

325 Carlsbad Village, Suite D2
Carlsbad, California 92008

Atkins
3570 Carmel Mountain Rd
Suite 300
San Diego, CA 92130

Tel: + 1 8585141007

Page 2
Booth & Suarez br I\T&T Mobility ATKINS
Boca Raton Tank Reservoir

Contents

Section Page
1. Introduction " 4
1.1 Objective 4
1.2 Methodology 4

2. Design Parameters 4
3. Conclusion 4

Appendices
Appendix A Seismic Analysis
A.1 Anchored Tank Seismic Analysis per AWWA D1 00-11 A-1

Page 3
Booth 0-. Suarez for AT&T Mobility ATKINS
Boca Raton Tank Reservoir

1. Introduction
1.1 Objective
AT&T and Verizon desire to add cell antennas to an existing water tower structure owned by the City of
Poway. The existing water tank reservoir consists of a steel plate shell, floor, and roof structure. The
tank was originally constructed in 1959, but has been upgraded as recently as 2008.

AT&T and Verizon would like to add up to 40 cell antennas along the top perimeter of the tower. The
heaviest cell antenna proposed weighs 84 Ibs and each antenna unit has two (2) RRUS units weighing 64
Ibs each. Adding for the weight of wiring, cables, and additional framing to mount the antennas and other
components, the total weight for each unit is approximately 287 Ibs for a total of up to 11.48 kips total for
all 40 antennas. This configuration was used as the controlling condition for analysis.

Atkins NA has been contracted to provide a seismic analysis for the proposed modifications of the
existing tank structure per the current code, AWWA 0100-11.

1.2 Methodology
A seismic analysis in this calculations package was performed using AWWA 0100-11, which is the
current governing code for water storage tanks. The weight and location of the antennas was calculated
and added to the tank seismic calculations per design standards.

2. Design Parameters
The structures were designed using the following parameters.

Oesign Code 2010 California Building Code

Design Standard AWWA D1 00-11

Seismic Loads
Importance Factor 1.25
Site Class Definition B
Site Coefficient, Fa 1.0
Site Coefficient, Fv 1.0
Mapped short period spectral Accel,Ss 1.04 g
Mapped one-second period spectral Accel, S1 0.37 g

3. Conclusion
The Boca Raton tank reservoir can withstand the additional loads generated from the proposed cell
antennas, with the dominate load being seismic. The calculated resistance to sliding, overturning, shell
compression, foundation analysis, and rock anchors are all within allowable parameters per AWWA
0100- 11. Additional cross check calculations using the API code (from which the AWWA was derived)
have been performed to verify the veracity of the AWWA calculations. The additional checks are in
agreement with the AWWA calculations.

Page 4
 Appendix A.1
Anchored Tank Seismic Analysis
Per AWWA D100-11
 BOCA RATON Siesmic Retrofrt
ATKINS 1 MG Steel Weld on Grade Tank Prepared by: DMM
Date: 7/20/2012

ANCHORED ANALYSIS
GROUNO-SUPORTEO. FLAT-BOTTOM TANKS (AWWA Sec. [Link]. 0100·11)

INPUT VALUE

D:= 77ft Tank Diameter

~:= 32ft Tank Height

ft.,:= 31 ft Liquid Height

t s := 0.5in Shell Bottom Cour~;E:

tb:= 0.5in Bottom Plate Thickness

t s1 5ft:= 0.50in Bottom Shell Thickness at 5ft tall

t s2_5ft := 0.375in

. (ts1 5ft· 5ft + ts2 5ft' 5ft)] .

t avg := 0.25m + H = 0.387·m Averagf: Thickness of Shell
[ t

L a := [Link] Total Width Annular Ring

tl' := O.1875in Roof Plate Thickness

Fy :== 30000psi Min Yield Strength of Tank or Bottom Annular Ring

"Iwater ;= 6204pcf Liquid Weight Density

fJ1:= 1.00 Liquid Specific Gravity

"IsteeI := 490pcf Shell Weight Density

E := 29000ksi Shell Modulus of Elasticity

~:== 0.5% Damping Ratio

~liquid := 2.00% Damping Liquid-fill Cell

wwaII:= 14in Width of Ringwall

N_anchor := 45 Number of Anchors

Ilfriction := 004 Coeff. of Friction at Tank Bottom

I
Boca Raton Anchored Analysis & Anchor Chair Design [Link] Page 1/12
 BOCA RATON Siesmic Retrofit
ATKINS 1 MG Steel Weld on Grade Tank Prepared by: DMM
Date: 7/20/2012

PARAMETERS
P:= "t'water"H = 13,433·psi Hydrostatic Pressure

WT:~ ~W''''''G'H.(,,:2) ~ [Link] Total weight of tank contents, Eq 13-27

Ws := ("t'steer7r·[Link]) = 118,417·kip Shell Weight

W,:~ [~"oer,,{~r(t,)]~ 35.652·kip

Roof Weight

;Want:= 28711I!Jf _~~&I"",e.:..fi:.,-,-,ntenna

Mant ;;::: 4@1

W~l'l1:= ;WalilfNal~t= !r148'·kip

(Ws+Wr+Want)
Wt := ;::: 684.361·PLF Sh(~U weight per foot
7r·D

Wf := "t'steer7r{~r·(tb) = 95.1·kip Floor Weight

( ( D)l
tanh 0.866·-
1 Effective impulsive weight,
Wi := i
. { D > 1.333,
H l D)' 0.866·-
.. H

H
.WT,(I - 0.218. [Link] ;::: [Link]
H) .
Eq 13-24/25

c := 0.23{~}tanh(3.67' ~}WT;::: 4636.6·kip

Effective convective weight,
W Eq 13-26

Xi:;::: i{(~) > 1.33,0.375.H,(0.5 - 0.094· ~}HJ = 11.625·ft Eq 13-28/29

._ [ (COSh(3.67~) - 1)]
Eq 13-30
c
X '- 1.0 - (H). ( H)'H = 17.816·ft
3.67· - ·smh 3.67·-
D D

Boca Raton Anchored Analysis & Anchor Chair Design [Link] Page 2/12
 BOCA RATON Siesmic Retrofit
ATKINS 1 MG Steel Weld on Grade Tank Prepared by: DMM
Date: 7/20/2012

SEISMIC DESIGN INPUT: (AWWA Section 13.5)

Seismic zone 4 and Site Class B
IE :== 1.25 Seismic Use Group II, See S,K;t[on 13.2 Table 24
Ss:== 1.04 Per Soils Report
SI :== 0.37 Per Soils Report
Fa :== 1.0 Per Soils Report
Fy:== 1.0 Per Soils Report
Ri :== 3.0
Sec 13.2.6 Table 28
R c :== 1.5
A:= 1.5 Sec [Link].2

U:== ~ Sec [Link]

3
SMS:== Fa·S s == 1.04 Eq 13-5

SM]:== Fy,S I == 0.37 Eq 13-6

SDS :== U-S MS == 0.693 Eq 13-7

Sm:~ U.S M1 == 0.247 Eq 13-8

fp := 0.065 Figure 5

== 5.336 s Fir~]t Mode Sloshing Wave Period, Eq 13-22

Region-Dependent transition period for longer period ground

motion in seconds, shown in Figure 19

Design spectral response acceleration for convective

components at the first mode sloshing wave period Tc,
Eq 13-12/13
Natural Period, From API 650 Appendix E, Sec E.4.5.1

Design spectral response acceleration for impulsive

components at the natural period of the structure Ti,
Eq 13-9

Impulsive design acceleration, Eq 13-17

Convective design acceleration, Eq 13-18

I
Boca Raton Anchored Analyti. & Anchor Chair Design [Link] Page 3/12
 BOCA RATON Siesmic Retrofit
ATKINS 1 MG Steel Weld on Grade Tank Prepared by: DMM
Date: 7/20/2012

CALCULATED FORCES

M s := [J[~'{Ws'XCg + Wr"~ + WrXi + WanrXant)]2 + {Ac·Wc·Xc)2J = 1091O.9·kip·ft

Design Overturning Moment at the
bottom of the shell Eq. 13-23

Design shear at top of foundation

due to horizontal design
acceleration, Eq. 13-31
SLIDING (AWWA Sec [Link])
Ay := [Link] = 0.097 AWWA Sec. [Link], Pg 147

Vallow := tan(30deg).{W s + Wr + Wi + Wc + Want)·{l - [Link]) = 4926.7·kip Allowable lateral shear, Eq 13-57

Vallow_mc:= lJfriction'{Ws + Wr + WT + W f + Want) = 3707.4·kip

if(Vf < Vallow' "Sliding OK" , "NG"T = "Sliding OK" I

V Note: DC indicates a ratio of demand over
SlidingDC:= _ _ f_ = 0.186 capacity. A under 1.0 indicates an acceptable
V allow condition

if(Vf < V allow mc' "Sliding OK" , "NG") = "Sliding OK" I

Note: DC indicates a ratio of demand over
V capacity. A under 1.0 indicates an acceptable
jSlidingfricOC:= f = 0.247
condition
I Vallow fric

SLOSHING WAVE HEIGHT (AWWA Sec [Link])

Convective Design Acceleration for sloshing,
Ar·~ ;lTc <4'{'KSnr::}4h.s;,r ;~2] ~ 0.065 Eq 13-53/54

Sloshing wave height above MOL, Eq 13-52

0w:= if[SDS ~ 0.33,0.7([Link]),[Link]] = 1.751·ft

if( Ow ~ (Ht - H), "OK" , "Design Roof for sloshing" J= "Design Roof for sloshing" I

Boca Raton Anchored Analysis & Anchor Chair Design [Link] Page 4/12
 ATKINS BOCA RATON Siesmic Retrofit
1 MG Steel Weld on Grade Tank Prepared by: DMM
Date: 7/20/2012

RESISTANCE TO OVERTURNING (AWWA Sec [Link].1)

W L := [ 7.9plf· -:-.
In
( tb)~Y H
- . ·-·G
pSI ft
= 3809.2·plf Resisting force of the bottom annulus. Eq 13-37

. (W > 1.28plf·-·G·-,
W L max := If H D 1.28plf·-·Q.-,
H D W ) = 3055.4·plf
- L ft ft ft ft L

Check Thickness of Bottom vs. Shell Bottom

if(tb > t s' "NG, Bottom Thicker than Shell" , "OK") = "OK" I Course Sec. [Link].2
Fy . _
1_ Required width of bottom annulus measured from
= 3.36·ft
psi H. the inside of the shell, Eq 13-38
G
ft

L max := 0.035·D = 2.695·ft

if( L req > L max , "[Link]>[Link], Tank must be anchored" •"OK" ) = "[Link]>[Link], Tank must be anchored" I
L max Note: DC indicates a ratio of demand over
LengthDC := - - = 0.802
L req capacity. A under 1.0 indicates an acceptable
condition

SHELL COMPRESSION IN ANCHORED TANKS: (AWWASec [Link].1 and Sec [Link].4)

M s = 10910.86·kip·ft Design Overturning Moment at the

bottom of the shell Eq. 13-23
2
Mr := D {Wr(1.0 - 0.4.-\,) + wL_max] = 22015.27·kip·ft Resisting Moment, Eq 13-36

J < 0.785, No uplift

Eq 13-36
0.786<J<1.54 shell uplifts, but tank stable
J>1.54 tank not stable

J
/ifl J 1 < 1.54, (if( J 1 < 0.785. "No Uplift" , "ShelI uplifts, but tank stable" )). ""Tank Not Stable" = "No Uplift" I
Pressure-stabilizing buckling coefficient,
P (R)2
Pc := -. - = 0.395
E ts Eq 13-50/51

,6,Cc:= i{PC:S: O.064,[0.n-(pc O.84)]'min[0.22'[([Link](Pc + 0.0018)) + 0.194]] = 0.152

Critical buckling stress increase for self-anchored

tanks caused by pressure, Eq 13-49

CTall ow := 1750000'~'[1 + 500oo.(~)21psi

12·R J= 12·R
158·psi Allowable Local Buckling compressive Stress
Eq 3-11

,6,<T cr)
CTalIow due se:= 1.33· ( <Tallow + - - = 3392'psi Eq 13-47 for Mechanically Anchored Tanks
- - \, 2
<Tallow_due_se_ := 1.33<Tallow = 209.997·psi Eq 13-48 for Self-Anchored Tanks

Ws Wr ) lbf Weight of the Tank and portion of the

wt := ( - +- = 636.904·-
'Tr·D 'Tr·D ft Roof reacting on the Shell

I
Boca Raton Anchored Analysis & Anchor Chair Design [Link]
Page 5/12
 BOCA RATON Siesmic Retrofit
ATKINS 1 MG Steel Weld on Grade Tank Prepared by: DMM
Date: 7/20/2012

Ms] 1
lJ"c1:= wr(l + [Link] ) + 1.273·- . - - = 41.726·psi
Max longitudinal shell compression stress
[ D2 [Link] at the bottom of the shell when there is no
uplift, Eq 13-39

lJ" '= [Wr(l + [Link]) + WL max _ W

c2' 2.3 L_max 12.t -
J._
1- _ 48. i Max longitudinal shell compression stress
ps at the bottom of the shell when there is
0.607 - 0.18667·J 1 s uplift, Eq 13-40

lJ"actual:= if(11 ::;; 0.785 ,<Tc1,<Tc2) = 41.726·psi

if <Tactual::;; <TaIlow due se' if(<Tactual < 0, "N/A Tank is uplifting", "OK" H,IING" T= "OK" 1
<Tactual Note: DC indicates a ratio of demand over
<TsheIlDC := = 0.012 capacity. A under 1.0 indicates an acceptable
<TaIlow due se
condition

FOUNDATION ANALYSIS
? ?
Afud := 'IT·R- = 4656.626·fC Area of Foundation
Allowable Soil Pressure, From Geotech Report
Qall ow := 3400psf
Allowable Seismic shell compressive stress, Eq. 13-48
Qseismic:= (1.33·Qallow) = 4522.0·psf

(WT + Wf ) Pressure of full tank contents + roof over foundation

QfiIl := = 1954.8·psf
Afud
According to the Geotech reports, there is
Qring:= (....3....
wwall
+ 0.5 Qfill] = 1564'psf concrete ring wall of 14" wide and 3D" deep.

3
'ITR .3 Section Modulus of Shell
SsheIl := - - = 77448998.8·m
4
Ms Pressure from Overturning from bottom of shell
Qover:= -s--
sheIl

Qmax := Qfill + Qring + Qover = 3762.3·psf Maximum soil pressure

Qmin := Qfill + Qring - Qover = 3275A'psf Minimum soil pressure (negative means uplift)

'\ max <

if/IQ . . "OK" , "NG")-
- QseismiC' - "OK" I
Qmax Note: DC indicates a ratio of demand over
One := = 0.832 capacity. A under 1.0 indicates an acceptable
Qseismic
condition

Boca Raton Anchored Analysis & Anchor Chair Design [Link] Page 6/12
 BOCA RATON Siesmic Retrofit
ATKINS 1 MG Steel Weld on Grade Tank Prepared by: DMM
Date: 7/20/2012

RESISTANCE TO OVERTURNING FOR ANCHORED TANKS

Anchored Tension in Anchored Tank
Distance between bolts (2' greater than tank
BC:= D + 2ft = 79·ft diameter)

Sanchor:= Roun..1f('IT' BC ),0.5ft = 5.5.ft1 Anchor spacing

1 N anchor J
Tension in Anchor Bolt, empty tank configuration
Tb ,", S"'Oh",{L273' : ; - w,J = 9.l·kip for uplift

Tb kip
Sb:= = 1.7·- Tension per foot of shell circumference
Sanchor ft

Rock Anchor
I1so ft rock:= 1000psf at hI := 3.0ft From Geotech Report

I1hard rock := 10000psf

4 inch diameter hole in rock for
am;hor

Required rock anchor length

0.43.h req = l.536·ft

Checks := if(Sanchor > 0.43· h req , "Allowable Anchor Capacity Estimated as Individual Anchor" ,"Continuous Anchor System" )
IChecks = "Allowable Anchor Capacity Estimated as Individual Anchor" I
Anchor system behavior, per
geotech report

Shell Compression in Anchored tank

1.273·- + Wt
Ms2 J Ms 1 kip
Wr(1 + [Link]) + 1.273·-·-- = 1.101·-
Uactuall := ( D = 42.042·psi D2 ts ft
[Link] 12·-
in

Fa:= if~G-pCf'H-(~)21J 20000Op'i.[800000p.{~

s
> )].((400000PSi. t
s
HJJ~
D + 2·G-D·-
= 432.9·psi
. t
s

Allowable Shell Compression

I
Boca Raton Anchored Analysis & Anchor Chair Design Antenna.•mod Page 7/12
 BOCA RATON Siesmic Retrofit
ATKINS 1 MG Steel Weld on Grade Tank Prepared by: DMM
Date: 7/20/2012

ANCHOR CHAIR DESIGN

ASSUMPTIONS
REFERENCE: "Anchor Bolt Chairs, " Part V of "Usefull information on the Design of Plate Structures," Steel Plate
Engineering Data, Volume 2

1" DIA. DYWIDAG ANCHOR (ASTM A722 STEEL)

d anch := 1.0in Anchor Bolt Diameter

f y := 60ksi Yield Strength of anchor bolt

2
A b := O.85in Cross sectional area of anchor bolt

Tb = 9.121·kip Actual Bolt Tension Load - Service

T allow := [Link] .Ab = 30.6·kip ASD Allowable tension on bolt

f ya := [Link] = 36·ksi
ASD Allowable stress
INPUT VALUES

a:= llin Top-Plate Width Along Shell

b:= 15in Top-Plate Length in radial direction

fj~= 1.25in Top-Plate Thickness

d:= danch Anchor Bolt Diameter

J1.A:= 12in Anchor Bolt Eccentricity

iv,:= 8.0in To Distance between vertical plates (preferred g = d + 1) [Add't distance

may be required for maintenance)

h:= 24in Chair Height

j := 1.0in Vertical-Plate Thickness

k top := 14.5in Vertical-Plate Thickness @ Top

Bottom or base plate thickness
~= O.5in

J:.w.:= 25ksi Allowable shell plate stress

Fb := [Link]" 1.33 = 23.94·ksi Allowable bearing stress in Chair plate

Tallow = 30.6· kip Maximum Allowable Anchor bolt load

R = 38.5·ft Nominal shell radius either to insido or centerline of plate (radius normal to cone at
bottom end for conical shells)

tshell := 0.5in Shell thickness

k bot := [Link] Vertical Plate Width

wassum := 0.3125in Assumed Weld Size

I
Boca Raton Anchored Analysis & Anchor Chair Design [Link] Page 8/12
 BOCA RATON Siesmic Retrofit
ATKINS 1 MG Steel Weld on Grade Tank Prepared by: DMM
Date: 7/20/2012

TOP PLATE DESIGN:

emin := 0.88·d + 0.557in = 1.437·in

~in := [~ + (tin)] = 0.625·in

factual := b - e - 2.2 = 2.5-in
'\ actual > f mm'
ifff . "OK" , "NG" J-
\ - "OK" I
f min Note: DC indicates a ratio of demand over
fDC := - - = 0.25 capacity. A under 1.0 indicates an acceptable
factual
condition

1.
g max := a - 2 'J· - 2 -m 8.
2 = ·m

groin:= d + lin = 2·in

(T
top -'pI '-l
'- ( Tb
factuarc
2)'') (0 'J'7C
,J l,r
g - [Link]'Uanch ) -- 649'
f\ " " .J
. .' ks'! Eq 7-1

Smax := 25ksi

croin.:= [( ~b J.(0.375. g - 0.22d anch )lo.5 = [Link] USE: top plate thickness of 1-1/4 inches
Smax factual J
CHAIR HEIGHT:

hI = 24 Chair Height
lin
Z:= = 0.94 Reduction Factor, Equation 5-4

O.l77a.m) .(m)2
- .
+ 1.0m
( ~[Link] tb

Sallow := 25.0ksi Allowable stress in Tank Shell Plate

3
+ [Link] = 8.822·ksi Stress at point, Eq 5-3
~[Link]

lif{S < Sallow' "OK" ,"NG") = "OK" I

S Note: DC indicates a ratio of demand over
SOC:= - - = 0.353 capacity. A under 1.0 indicates an acceptable
Sallow
condition

I
Boca Raton Anchored Analysis & Anchor Chair Design [Link] Page 9/12
 BOCA RATON Siesmic Retrofit
ATKINS 1 MG Steel Weld on Grade Tank Prepared by: DMM
Date: 7/20/2012

VERTICAL SIDE PLATE DESIGN:

jmin := max[0.04·(h - c), 0.5in] = O.9l·in Minimum vertical prate thickness, Page 43

ktop_min := b - 0.5in = 14.5·in Top of plate width

ktop + kbot) . Average plate width

k avg := ( 2 = 8.75·m

T
ifI j-k ~ _b_ "OK" "NG" = "OK" Check for V(jliiGal Side Plate Design, Page 43
avg 25ksi' ,

Tb
Note: DC indiGatF)S a ratio of demand over
25ksi capacity. A under 1.0 indicates an acceptable
k OC := -.- - = 0.042 condition
J .k avg

STRESS IN WELD ALONG TOP PLATE

Tb kip Eq 5-5
w := = 0.155·-
v (a + 2·h) in

Eq 5-6
Tb.e] kip
wh := = 0.169·-
[ 2 in
a·h + 0.667·(h)
Eq 5-7
I 2 2 kip
w:= I wv + wh = 0.229·-.-
V In

Eq 5-8
wall ow := 13.6ksj.0.707,wassum = 3.005. ~ip
In

if(wall ow ~ w, "OK, use 5/16th fillet weld" ,"NG"} = "OK, use 5/16th fillet weld" I
w Note: DC indicates a ratio of demand over
Weld OC := - - = 0.076 capacity. A under 1.0 indicates an acceptable
wallow
condition

I
Boca Raton Anchored Analysis & Anchor Chair Design [Link] Page 10/12
 BOCA RATON Siesmic Retrofit
ATKINS 1 MG Steel Weld on Grade Tank Prepared by: DMM
Date: 7/20/2012

STRESS CHECK IN THE SHELL: Design of Welded Structures Sec 6.6

P = 13.433·psi Internal Hydrostatic Pressure
rc := R = 38.5·ft
Radius of tank shell
t s1 := 0.75in
Thickness of shell
d 1 := 24in Height of supporfldlarr welded to shell

J..i= Tb = 9.121·kip Load on support/chair

e:= 90deg
Angle of load on SllpportJehair
~= 12in Distance from shell to load on
.&..:= Oin support/chair

n:= 48 Number of supports/chairs

K 1 := 0.1592·n = 7.642 Values for calculating tension and moment for various support
configurations, per Table 1 on Pg. 6.6-3
K 2 := 0.6735· n ( - 1.13) = 0.008

Shell Tangential Stress, Page 6.6-1

Shell Longitudinal Stress, Page 6.6-1

F1 := T-cos(9) = O·kip Horizontal Component Force, Page 6.6-1

F2 := T·sin(9) = 9.121·kip
Vertical Component Force, Page 6.6-1

M h := a·F2 + b.F 1 = 109.447·kip·in Total moment acting on support/chair, Page 6.6-1

.[
eeff:= If 12.ts1 ~ M(M) ] .
--2-' --2- ,12.ts1 = 9·Jll Effective eccentricity of support/hanger, Pg. 6.6-2

f'= FI =[Link] Assumed distribution of radial forces, Pg 6.6-2

a'
d 1 + eeff in
6·Mh ki Assumed distribution of radial forces, Pg. 6.6-2
fb := = 0.474.""£'
(d 1 + eeff)·(d 1 + 2.e eff) in
kip
f 1 := fa + fb = 0.474·-.- Resulting radial forces, Pg. 6.6-3
III

J..i= KI'fl·lin = 4·kip Tangential Tensile Force, see Table Ion Pg. 6.6-3

2
A:= (linHsI = [Link] Area of 1" thick ring of shell

I
Boca Raton Anchored Analysis & Anchor Chair Design [Link] Page 11/12
 BOCA RATON Siesmic Retrofit
ATKINS 1 MG Steel Weld on Grade Tank Prepared by: DMM
Date: 7/20/2012

ICTCT := ~ = 4.827. kS i Resulting Tensile Stress, see Table I on Pg. 6.6-3

.Mw= K2 ·fr rc·lin = 1.857·kip·in Bending Moment in Ring, see Table I on Pg. 6.6-3

(t
(1 in)· s I)2 . 3 Section Modulus of 1" thick ring of shell
,t:= = 0.094·m
6

Resulting bending stress, see Table I on Pg. 6.6-3

ICTC := CTCp + CTcb = [Link] Total tangential stress in section of critical shell ring

CTC - CTmp
Shear Stress, Pq. [Link].<1
T
max := 2
= 11.972·ks

'\' cb < Fb' "OK" • "NG") = "OK"

Checkstressb .'= if{CT I
Note: DC indicates a ratio of demand over
CTcb
Stressb DC := - = 0.827 capacity. A under 1.0 indicates an acceptable
Fb condition

CheckstressP:= if{CTCp < Fb •"OK" •"NG") = "OK" I

CTCp Note: DC indicates a ratio of demand over
StressPDC := -
J:'.
= 0.346 capacity. A under 1. \) indicates an acceptable
• lJ condition

.\ max < Fb· "OK" , "NG")-

Checkshear''= if{T - "OK" I
Tmax Note: DC indicates a ratio of demand over
ShearDC := - - = 0.5 capacity. A under 1.0 indicates an acceptable
Fb condition

I
Boca Raton Anchored Analysis & Anchor Chair Design Antenna.•mcd Page 12/12
PROPOSED ATt:T MOBlUlY ANTENNAS &; RRU UNITS
WITH SCREENS FACADE MOUNTED 10 EXISTING
32'-0· HIGH WATER TANK. PAINT 10 MATCH WATER
TANK.

TOP OF WATER TANK

r EXISTING SLOSHING
BRACKET BEAM (W8l<31)
(lYPICAL)

1---1 l--------i

b EXISTING WATER TANK

I RING PLATES
Go
DC2-48-60-0-9E
SURGE SUPPRESSOR

EXISTING WATER TANK

RiNG PLATES

PROPOSED (8)
RRUS-11 UNITS PER
SEClOR, MOUNTED TO
ANTENNA UOUNTING
PIPE BELOW ANTENNAS

PROPOSED R.F. MOLDED _ _- - J

~BERGLASS LOUVERED
VENT SCREEN (iYPICAL)
HORIZONTAL CABLE TRAY
MOUNTED TO EXISTING
PROPOSED VEIrnCAL CABlE CHASE _ _---J BEAM SUPPORTS
EXTENDED TO ANTENNA. SHROUD 10
BE PAINTED 10 MATCH ADJACENT
WATER TANK WALL SURFACES (lYPICAL)

TYPICAL ANTENNA ELEVATION

 TOP Of WAID TANK

AUG~ WITH TOP

OF «I\TER TANK

lYPICAL>-'..,....,.1/..,-."'·-G...

2"; SCHEDULE 8~ STEEL

PIPE STEMS (TYPICAl.)

- 2."; SCHEDULE 80 GALVANIZED

PIPE FOR ANTENNA h10UNT

EXISl1NG 2-1/4"
• 1/." 'THICK ANTENNA DOWNTlLJ IlAACKET
WATER TANK RING
P1J,TES
('lYPICAL OF 4)

PROPOSED ANTENNA ATIACHED TO PIPE

h10UNT WITH SUPPUEO ANTENNA HARDWARE
PAOOEl> TO IIATCH WAltR TANK.

t------- 1- 1/4' THICK. 8" • 12" STEEL

PLATE ATIACHEO WI1ll 3/4'; 101.8.
(l'fPICAL or 4)

"o o

{
EXISlING 2-1/4"

f
• 1/4" 'THICK
WA'ltR TANK RING
PlAT£S
(TYPICAL OF 4)
RRUS-ii ijNITS MVV"IW iC ANTENNA
MOUNT1NG PIPE [Link] ANTENNAS
(8 RRU UNITS PER SECTOR)

PROPOSED HORIZONTAL COAXIAL EXISTING TANK WALL

CABLE TRAY h10UNTED TO STEEL
PLATE. SEE DETAIL

PROPOSED VERTICAl. ~ CA8l.E

TRAY BEYOItl.

: RRUS-11 UNITS MOUNIED TO ANTENNA

MOUNT1NO Pl'E BELOW ANIINNI\S
: (8 RRU UNITS pER SECTOR)

-'\.-- +If-_+_LL..L J~PROPOSED R.F. [Link] FIBERGLASS

LDUVEREll VENT' SCREEN
(SHOWN DASHED)

TYPICAL ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAIL

AIR-2l 8FT
MECI-tA~~ICAL DATA

SIZE:
;
H = 2.40 f\v~ (8')
1
VV = 0.307 M (12')

I o = a.225M
v
r Ir~ I....JT*·
\N c, . . -' -,
38 KG (84 LBS)
. ~
(9")

~ f\l\AX \'VI~~D-LOAD~*:
1,270 ~~

• ' ( - ~:~ ' ; .1:l f i,·\;.:r

.... lC- 8.i: ," .... :~~!!'s:/IC~_·
\;O':';lfJ[J :... Pi:cl., ~:.~1 i;'if,C'~
:: .. -. -.. "" :' '.". ,I ~ • "-.oJ I "

DESIGN ANTENNA CUTSHEET

 -
I
.....

u
FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW TOP VIEW

WEIGHT: 63.8 LaS.

REMOTE ANTENNA UNIT (RRUS-11)

 EXISTING TANK

PROPOSED CELL
ANTENNA

,
[
0
I
IX)

Ir
- -
0
I

'"- '--- -
>-
~
>
«
~
>-
.....J
0
0 m
l..1... ~
I 0 W
(f)
N (f)
I"") ~
w «
~
zw «z
ANTENNA WEIGHT = 8 4 LBS 0 zw
0 ~
(2) RRUS-11 UNITS = 128 LBS I 0
z
~
WIRING AND CABLES = 2 5 LBS «
FRAMING - 5 o LBS """
N
0 l..1...
MAX TOTAL WEIGHT = 2 87 LBS I 0
LD
N
2

SCHEMATIC CELL ANTENNA CONFIGURATION

FOR CENTER OF GRAVITY DEPICTION ONLY