PRESENTATION SCRIPT | Techniques of Data Collection in Educational Research

PRESENTATION SCRIPT
Techniques of Data Collection in Educational Research

Topic Techniques of Data Collection in Educational Research (A Focus on

Quantitative Approaches)

Course Research Methodology in Language Educational

Lecturer Dr. BUKHORI S, Pd., [Link]

Presenter [Your Name]

Student ID [Your Student ID]

Date [Presentation Date]

Estimated Time 15–20 minutes (excluding Q&A session)

HOW TO READ THIS SCRIPT

SPEAK Words to be spoken aloud. Read naturally and confidently.

NOTE Stage directions and delivery guidance. Do NOT read aloud — for presenter only.

TIP Suggested gestures, pacing, or eye-contact advice for that slide.

TRANSITION Cue to click and advance to the next slide.

WARNING Critical moments that require special emphasis or care in delivery.

Research Methodology in Language Educational | Dr. BUKHORI S, Pd., [Link]

PRESENTATION SCRIPT | Techniques of Data Collection in Educational Research

SLIDE
Title Slide
1

Stand confidently at the podium or in front of the screen. Make brief eye contact with the audience.
NOTE
Wait for the room to settle before speaking.

Assalamu'alaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuh.

Good morning / good afternoon, everyone — and a very warm welcome to all of
you.
Allow me to introduce myself. My name is [Your Name], and today I will be
presenting on the topic of Techniques of Data Collection in Educational Research,
SPEA with a specific focus on quantitative approaches.
K
This presentation has been prepared as part of the course Research Methodology in
Language Educational, under the esteemed guidance of our lecturer, Dr. Bukhori S,
Pd., [Link].
I hope that by the end of our session today, we will all leave with a clearer and
more practical understanding of how data is systematically and rigorously collected
in quantitative educational research. Thank you for being here.

Smile and maintain an open, welcoming posture. Do not rush. Let your opening words land before
TIP
moving on.

TRAN
SITIO
Click to advance to Slide 2 — Table of Contents.
N

SLIDE
Table of Contents
2

Gesture toward the screen as you name each topic. This helps the audience build a mental map of
TIP
the session.

SPEA
K Before we dive into the main content, allow me to walk you briefly through the
structure of today's presentation so that we can all follow the flow more easily.
This presentation is organized into five main topics — each representing a key
quantitative data collection technique used in educational research.
First — Tests, which include achievement tests, aptitude tests, diagnostic tests, and
proficiency tests.

Research Methodology in Language Educational | Dr. BUKHORI S, Pd., [Link]

PRESENTATION SCRIPT | Techniques of Data Collection in Educational Research

Second — the Closed-Ended Questionnaire in the form of a Scale — specifically

the Likert Scale, the Semantic Differential Scale, and the Guttman Scale.
Third — Structured Observation — a systematic, coded approach to recording
observable behaviors in educational settings.
Fourth — the Structured Interview — a standardized, fixed-order questioning
protocol.
And fifth — Documents — the use of existing records and institutional data as a
source of quantitative data.
Following these five techniques, we will compare them side by side, discuss how to
select the most appropriate technique for a given study, and close with a summary
conclusion.
Let us begin with the first technique.

TRAN
SITIO
Click to advance to Slide 3 — Section Divider: Tests.
N

SECTION 01 — TESTS
Slides 3–4 | Measuring student achievement, ability, and performance

SLIDE
Tests — Section Divider
3

NOTE Pause briefly here. Let the section number and title register with the audience before speaking.

Our first quantitative data collection technique is the Test.

Tests are perhaps the most familiar data collection instrument in educational
SPEA settings — virtually every student around the world has experienced multiple forms
K
of testing throughout their academic journey.
But what exactly is a test in the context of quantitative research? And what are its
various types? Let us explore this on the next slide.

TRAN
SITIO
Click to advance to Slide 4 — Tests: Definition and Types.
N

SLIDE
Tests: Definition and Types
4

Research Methodology in Language Educational | Dr. BUKHORI S, Pd., [Link]

PRESENTATION SCRIPT | Techniques of Data Collection in Educational Research

Point to the 'Definition' box on the left side of the screen when reading the definition. Then direct
TIP
attention to the right side when discussing the four types.

▸ Definition of a Test

According to Anastasi and Urbina — in their landmark reference Psychological

Testing, seventh edition, published in 1997 — a test is defined as a systematic
procedure for measuring a sample of behavior or knowledge in order to evaluate a
construct of interest.
SPEA
K
In simpler terms: a test is a structured instrument designed to produce a numerical
score that reflects a student's knowledge, skill, or ability.
In quantitative research, it is precisely this numerical score that is then subjected to
statistical analysis to answer the research questions.

▸ Four Types of Tests in Educational Research

There are four major types of tests commonly used in educational research, as
outlined by Gronlund and Waugh in Assessment of Student Achievement, ninth
edition, 2009.
First — the Achievement Test. This measures what a student has already learned in
a specific subject area or curriculum. A classic example is an end-of-semester
English grammar examination — it assesses the extent to which students have
mastered the material taught.
Second — the Aptitude Test. Unlike an achievement test, an aptitude test measures
SPEA
K a person's potential or natural capacity to learn something. The focus is not on what
has already been learned, but on the learner's capability to learn in the future.
Third — the Diagnostic Test. This type of test is specifically designed to identify a
student's particular areas of strength and weakness. Teachers often administer
diagnostic tests at the beginning of a course to understand each student's starting
point and tailor instruction accordingly.
And fourth — the Proficiency Test. This assesses whether a learner has reached a
specified standard of mastery in a skill or domain. Well-known examples in
language education include the TOEFL and IELTS examinations.

▸ Advantages and Limitations

SPEA
K Why do we use tests in quantitative educational research? The primary advantage is

Research Methodology in Language Educational | Dr. BUKHORI S, Pd., [Link]

PRESENTATION SCRIPT | Techniques of Data Collection in Educational Research

objectivity — test scores are standardized and allow direct comparison across
individuals, groups, and time periods.
However, we must also recognize their limitations. Cohen, Manion, and Morrison
— in Research Methods in Education, eighth edition, 2018 — remind us that tests
can carry cultural or socioeconomic biases that disadvantage certain groups of
students. Additionally, test anxiety may negatively affect student performance, and
tests do not always capture the full complexity of a learner's understanding.
For these reasons, the selection of any test instrument must always be carefully
matched to the specific research questions and the context in which it will be used.

TRAN
SITIO
Click to advance to Slide 5 — Section Divider: Questionnaire.
N

SECTION 02 — QUESTIONNAIRE (SCALE)

Slides 5–6 | Measuring attitudes, opinions, and perceptions

SLIDE
Questionnaire (Scale) — Section Divider
5

NOTE Brief pause — allow the audience to read the section title before you begin speaking.

Our second technique is the Closed-Ended Questionnaire — particularly in the form

of a measurement Scale.
While tests measure knowledge and cognitive ability, scales are designed to
SPEA
K measure something more subjective — the attitudes, opinions, beliefs, and
perceptions of respondents.
This makes them one of the most widely used instruments in educational research,
valued for their efficiency and flexibility.

TRAN
SITIO
Click to advance to Slide 6 — Scale Types.
N

SLIDE
Closed-Ended Questionnaire: Scale Types
6

TIP Point to each of the three scale cards one by one, from left to right, as you describe each type.

Research Methodology in Language Educational | Dr. BUKHORI S, Pd., [Link]

PRESENTATION SCRIPT | Techniques of Data Collection in Educational Research

▸ What is a Closed-Ended Questionnaire?

A questionnaire is a research instrument consisting of a set of questions used to

SPEA collect data from respondents. In quantitative research, a closed-ended
K
questionnaire restricts respondents to pre-determined answer options — this enables
responses to be converted into numbers and analyzed statistically.

▸ The Likert Scale

The first and most widely used type of scale is the Likert Scale, developed by
Rensis Likert in 1932.
In a Likert scale, respondents indicate the degree to which they agree or disagree
SPEA with a given statement — typically on a continuum from 1, meaning Strongly
K
Disagree, to 5, meaning Strongly Agree.
For example, in a study examining student motivation, a researcher might present
the statement: 'I enjoy learning English' — and ask students to rate their level of
agreement on this five-point scale.

▸ The Semantic Differential Scale

The second type is the Semantic Differential Scale.

This instrument places two opposite adjectives — or bipolar descriptors — at each
end of a rating scale. Respondents then rate an object, concept, or experience
SPEA somewhere between those two poles.
K
For instance, a researcher might ask students to rate the atmosphere of their
classroom along dimensions such as 'boring — exciting' or 'tense — relaxed.' This
scale is particularly useful for measuring attitudes and the meaning individuals
attach to their experiences.

▸ The Guttman Scale

The third type is the Guttman Scale. This scale arranges items in a hierarchical
order — from the simplest or least extreme, to the most complex or most extreme.
SPEA
K The underlying logic is this: if a person agrees with a more extreme item, they will
automatically agree with all less extreme items below it. This makes the Guttman
Scale a very precise, unidimensional measurement tool.

▸ Design Considerations and Validation

Research Methodology in Language Educational | Dr. BUKHORI S, Pd., [Link]

PRESENTATION SCRIPT | Techniques of Data Collection in Educational Research

Regardless of which scale type is selected, two points are consistently emphasized
by leading scholars.
First, Robert DeVellis — in Scale Development: Theory and Applications, fourth
edition, 2016 — stresses that every scale instrument must be pilot tested before use
in the actual study, and its reliability must be established through Cronbach's Alpha
SPEA
K — a measure of the instrument's internal consistency.
Second, Dillman, Smyth, and Christian — in their comprehensive survey design
guide published in 2014 — emphasize that the clarity of each item and the balance
of response options are critical determinants of data quality. A poorly worded item
or an unbalanced response scale can fundamentally compromise the integrity of the
data collected.

TRAN
SITIO
Click to advance to Slide 7 — Section Divider: Structured Observation.
N

SECTION 03 — STRUCTURED OBSERVATION

Slides 7–8 | Systematic recording of behavior in educational settings

SLIDE
Structured Observation — Section Divider
7

Our third technique is Structured Observation.

Unlike naturalistic observation used in qualitative research — where a researcher
SPEA
K records anything and everything that occurs in an open-ended manner — structured
observation in quantitative research uses a pre-designed coding system or recording
sheet to capture specific, measurable, and countable behaviors in a consistent way.

TRAN
SITIO
Click to advance to Slide 8 — Structured Observation: Types and Application.
N

SLIDE
Structured Observation: Types and Application
8

Use the left column of the slide for observation types, and the right column for instruments. Adjust
TIP
your gestures accordingly.

▸ Three Approaches to Structured Observation

Research Methodology in Language Educational | Dr. BUKHORI S, Pd., [Link]

PRESENTATION SCRIPT | Techniques of Data Collection in Educational Research

There are three main approaches to structured observation, as elaborated by

Bakeman and Gottman in Observing Interaction, second edition, 1997.
First — Event Sampling. In this approach, the observer records every single
occurrence of a target behavior whenever it appears during the observation period.
For example, if a researcher is studying disruptive behavior in a classroom, they
would record every instance of a student speaking without permission.
SPEA Second — Time Sampling. Here, the observer records whether a specific behavior
K
is occurring at pre-set time intervals. For instance, every five minutes the observer
checks and notes whether the observed student is on-task or off-task. This approach
is particularly efficient for extended observation sessions.
Third — Duration Recording. This approach measures how long a behavior lasts. If
a researcher wants to know how many minutes students spend engaged in
collaborative discussion during a lesson, duration recording is the appropriate
method.

▸ Common Observation Instruments

To carry out structured observation, researchers rely on standardized instruments.

Observation Checklists are simple yes-or-no recording forms used to note the
presence or absence of specific behaviors.
Rating Scales allow the observer to assess the quality or intensity of a behavior
SPEA
K along a continuum.
More sophisticated category systems include the Flanders Interaction Analysis
Categories — or FIAC — which codes verbal interactions between teachers and
students; and the Classroom Assessment Scoring System — or CLASS — which
provides a comprehensive assessment of instructional quality.

▸ Two Critical Cautions

SPEA
K There are two important issues that every researcher using structured observation
must address.
First — Inter-rater Reliability. Before any observation instrument is used in a study,
two or more trained observers must independently code the same behaviors and
achieve consistent results. This is a non-negotiable standard of rigor.
Second — the Hawthorne Effect — the well-documented tendency for people to
change their behavior simply because they know they are being observed. Robson,
in Real World Research, third edition, 2011, recommends that researchers build in a

Research Methodology in Language Educational | Dr. BUKHORI S, Pd., [Link]

PRESENTATION SCRIPT | Techniques of Data Collection in Educational Research

habituation period — time during which the observer is present but not yet
recording data — so that participants can become accustomed to the observer's
presence before actual data collection begins.

TRAN
SITIO
Click to advance to Slide 9 — Section Divider: Structured Interview.
N

SECTION 04 — STRUCTURED INTERVIEW

Slides 9–10 | A standardized, fixed-order questioning protocol

SLIDE
Structured Interview — Section Divider
9

Our fourth technique is the Structured Interview.

While interviews are commonly associated with qualitative research, the structured
SPEA
K interview is a quantitative data collection tool — because its strictly standardized
and controlled format produces data that is directly comparable across participants
and amenable to statistical analysis.

TRAN
SITIO
Click to advance to Slide 10 — Structured Interview: Key Characteristics.
N

SLIDE
Structured Interview: Key Characteristics
10

TIP Direct attention to the four cards on the slide as you discuss each characteristic in turn.

▸ What is a Structured Interview?

In a structured interview, the interviewer asks every respondent the exact same set
SPEA
of questions, in the exact same order, using the exact same wording.
K
This is what distinguishes it from semi-structured or unstructured interviews, where
questions may vary from one participant to the next.

▸ Four Key Characteristics

SPEA
K The first characteristic is the Fixed Protocol. Every respondent receives identical

Research Methodology in Language Educational | Dr. BUKHORI S, Pd., [Link]

PRESENTATION SCRIPT | Techniques of Data Collection in Educational Research

questions in an identical sequence — this ensures that any differences in responses

genuinely reflect differences in participants' views, rather than being an artifact of
how the question was phrased.
The second characteristic is the use of Closed-Ended Items. Questions in a
structured interview typically offer predetermined response categories — for
example, 'yes or no', or 'on a scale of one to five'. This makes responses directly
convertible into numerical data.
The third characteristic — and this is critically important — is Interviewer
Training. Fowler and Mangione, in Standardized Survey Interviewing, published in
1990, which remains a cornerstone reference in the field, emphasize that
interviewer variability is one of the greatest threats to the validity of survey data.
Interviewers must therefore be extensively trained to follow the protocol strictly —
they must not prompt, paraphrase, or suggest answers, and must treat every
respondent with equal neutrality.
And the fourth characteristic is Data Comparability. As a direct result of this
standardization, data collected from all participants can be compared directly —
enabling the application of statistical tests to identify patterns and differences across
groups.

▸ Advantages and Limitations

The structured interview offers clear advantages: it tends to yield higher response
rates than written questionnaires, and it allows the interviewer to clarify questions if
a respondent appears confused.
SPEA
K However, it also comes with notable limitations: interviews are time-consuming
and costly to administer at scale. Additionally, the presence of an interviewer may
trigger social desirability bias — the tendency for respondents to answer in ways
they believe are expected of them, rather than expressing their genuine views.

TRAN
SITIO
Click to advance to Slide 11 — Section Divider: Documents.
N

SECTION 05 — DOCUMENTS
Slides 11–12 | Analyzing existing records and institutional data

SLIDE
Documents — Section Divider
11

Research Methodology in Language Educational | Dr. BUKHORI S, Pd., [Link]

PRESENTATION SCRIPT | Techniques of Data Collection in Educational Research

NOTE This is the fifth and final technique. Keep your energy and enthusiasm up for this last section.

Our fifth and final technique is Document Analysis.

This approach involves the systematic examination of documents that already exist
— records, reports, and institutional data — to extract relevant, quantifiable
SPEA information.
K
What sets document analysis apart from the previous four techniques is that the
researcher does not actively generate new data through tests, questionnaires,
observation, or interviews. Instead, the researcher works with data that has already
been produced.

TRAN
SITIO
Click to advance to Slide 12 — Document Analysis: Types and Process.
N

SLIDE
Document Analysis: Types and Process
12

Explain the three document types first, then walk through the five-step content analysis process
TIP
shown at the bottom of the slide.

▸ Types of Documents in Educational Research

In educational research, documents take many forms.

Primary Documents are original records created at the time of an event or by direct
participants. Examples include student grade books, attendance registers, test score
reports, and individual academic records.
SPEA Secondary Documents interpret or analyze primary sources. Examples include
K
institutional policy analyses, program evaluation reports, and curriculum review
documents.
Official Statistics refer to large-scale data sets compiled by institutions — such as
national graduation rates, student enrollment figures, and educational funding
allocations.

▸ The Content Analysis Process

SPEA
K When using documents as a source of quantitative data, the primary method applied
is Content Analysis — a systematic, replicable technique for counting and
measuring specific, pre-defined elements within a collection of documents.

Research Methodology in Language Educational | Dr. BUKHORI S, Pd., [Link]

PRESENTATION SCRIPT | Techniques of Data Collection in Educational Research

The process follows five sequential steps.

Step one — Define the Categories: What exactly will you count or code? For
instance, the frequency of specific vocabulary items, or the occurrence of particular
themes.
Step two — Develop the Coding Scheme: Create a clear and detailed set of rules for
classifying each unit of text or data.
Step three — Pilot the Scheme: Test it on a small sample of documents first to
check whether the categories are sufficiently clear and workable in practice.
Step four — Apply the Scheme Systematically across the full set of documents
included in the study.
And step five — Establish Inter-coder Reliability: Ask a second coder to
independently apply the same scheme, then compare results to verify consistency.

▸ Advantages and Limitations

The great advantage of document analysis — as Linda Prior highlights in Using

Documents in Social Research, 2003 — is that it is a non-reactive method. The
documents exist independently of the research process, and their content has not
been created or altered for the purposes of the study. This eliminates certain forms
of bias inherent in self-report methods.

SPEA Document analysis also allows researchers to access historical data that would
K
otherwise be impossible to collect through primary means.
However, Bowen — in his widely cited 2009 article on document analysis as a
research method — cautions that documents may be incomplete, selectively
preserved, or not fully representative of the population under study. Researchers
must therefore always critically evaluate the authenticity, accuracy, and
representativeness of every documentary source they use.

TRAN
SITIO
Click to advance to Slide 13 — Comparative Overview.
N

SECTION — — COMPARISON & SELECTION GUIDE

Slides 13–14 | Comparing techniques and choosing the right one

SLIDE
Comparative Overview — All Five Techniques
13 Side by Side

Research Methodology in Language Educational | Dr. BUKHORI S, Pd., [Link]

PRESENTATION SCRIPT | Techniques of Data Collection in Educational Research

Do not re-explain each technique in full here. This slide is for comparison. Read the table row by
NOTE
row, highlighting key differences and trade-offs.

SPEA Now that we have examined all five techniques individually, let us step back and
K
compare them side by side.

▸ Reading the Comparison Table

From this table, we can immediately see the distinct characteristics of each
technique at a glance.
Tests and Questionnaires are best suited for large sample sizes. Both are efficient,
scalable, and produce scores or numerical ratings that are ready for statistical
analysis. Tests offer objective measurement but may not fully capture the depth of
student understanding. Questionnaires are cost-effective and far-reaching, but limit
respondents to predetermined response options.
Structured Observation and Structured Interviews are typically used with small to
medium-sized samples. Observation provides direct, first-hand evidence of
SPEA
K behavior as it occurs — but is time-intensive and susceptible to observer effects.
The Structured Interview yields high response rates and allows for clarification —
but is more expensive and may introduce social desirability bias.
Document Analysis is highly flexible in terms of sample size — it depends entirely
on the number of documents available. Its key strength is its non-reactive nature
and access to historical data. Its limitation is that documentary sources may be
incomplete, biased in their original creation, or not fully representative.
As Creswell and Creswell emphasize in Research Design, fifth edition, 2018, the
choice of data collection technique must always be guided by the research questions
— not by researcher habit or convenience.

TRAN
SITIO
Click to advance to Slide 14 — How to Select the Right Technique.
N

SLIDE
How to Select the Right Technique
14

Speak at a slower, measured pace on this slide. This is a synthesis slide — every point matters and
NOTE
needs time to land.

SPEA
K A question that naturally arises is: how do we actually decide which technique to

Research Methodology in Language Educational | Dr. BUKHORI S, Pd., [Link]

PRESENTATION SCRIPT | Techniques of Data Collection in Educational Research

use in a given study? There are six key factors that every researcher must consider
carefully.

Factor one — Research Questions. This is always the starting point — and it cannot
be bypassed. What exactly are you trying to find out? Are you measuring
knowledge? Attitudes? Observable behavior? Or data that already exists in
institutional records? Your research question determines everything that follows.
Factor two — the Nature of the Variable. If the variable of interest is cognitive
achievement or knowledge — use a Test. If it is attitudes, opinions, or perceptions
— use a Scale or Questionnaire. If it is classroom behavior — use Structured
Observation. If you need standardized, individual responses — use a Structured
Interview. And if the data you need already exists in institutional records — use
Document Analysis.
Factor three — Population Size. For large groups — such as hundreds of students
across multiple schools — tests and questionnaires are the most practical choices.
For smaller, more focused groups — such as a single classroom or a group of
SPEA
teachers — interviews or observations may be entirely feasible.
K
Factor four — Available Resources. Be honest about the budget, time, and
personnel available to you. Structured interviews and observation sessions require
significantly more resources than surveys or document analysis.
Factor five — Validity and Reliability. Whatever technique you choose, you must
pilot test your instrument and establish its psychometric properties before collecting
real data. Bryman — in Social Research Methods, fifth edition, 2016 — makes it
very clear: reliability and validity are not optional extras. They are fundamental
requirements of any rigorous research endeavor.
And factor six — Ethics. Every data collection process involving human
participants must be conducted according to established ethical principles.
Participants must give informed consent — consent based on a full and genuine
understanding of what their participation involves. Their data must be treated with
strict confidentiality. And the researcher must ensure that no harm or discomfort
results from their participation.

TRAN
SITIO
Click to advance to Slide 15 — Conclusion.
N

SECTION — — CONCLUSION & CLOSING

Slide 15 | Five key takeaways and closing remarks

Research Methodology in Language Educational | Dr. BUKHORI S, Pd., [Link]

PRESENTATION SCRIPT | Techniques of Data Collection in Educational Research

SLIDE
Conclusion
15

WAR THIS IS YOUR MOST IMPORTANT MOMENT. Slow your pace significantly. Make direct eye contact
NING
with the audience. Deliver each point with full confidence and calm.

SPEA We have now reached the conclusion of this presentation. Allow me to bring
K
everything together with five key takeaways from today's discussion.

First — each quantitative data collection technique has unique strengths that make
it best suited for specific research questions and contexts. There is no universally
superior technique. The best tool is always the one that most closely fits the
research problem at hand.
Second — instrument design, piloting, and psychometric validation are not optional
stages that can be skipped or treated lightly. They are absolutely essential to
producing data that is reliable, valid, and trustworthy. Whether designing a test, a
Likert scale, an observation checklist, or a structured interview schedule — every
instrument demands careful and rigorous development.
Third — triangulation. Incorporating more than one data collection technique
SPEA
K within a single study significantly strengthens both the credibility and the
completeness of research findings. When multiple, independent sources of evidence
converge on the same conclusion, our confidence in that conclusion becomes
substantially greater.
Fourth — technology is continuously opening new and exciting possibilities in
educational research. Online survey platforms, Computerized Adaptive Testing, and
automated observation systems now allow researchers to collect data at greater
scale, with greater speed, and with unprecedented precision.
And fifth — always remember that technique selection must be driven by your
research questions, your specific research context, and the resources available to
you. Never choose a method simply because it is familiar or feels convenient.

SPEA
K That brings us to the end of today's presentation. I sincerely hope that this session
has provided you with a clear and practical foundation for understanding
quantitative data collection in educational research.
I would like to express my heartfelt gratitude to Dr. Bukhori S, Pd., [Link] for the
guidance and direction provided throughout this course, and to all of you for your
time and attention today.

Research Methodology in Language Educational | Dr. BUKHORI S, Pd., [Link]

PRESENTATION SCRIPT | Techniques of Data Collection in Educational Research

I am now happy to open the floor for any questions, comments, or discussion.
Wassalamu'alaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuh. Thank you very much.

After finishing, smile and gesture an invitation for questions. Stand calmly and wait. Do not rush to
TIP
fill the silence.

TRAN
SITIO
Click to advance to Slide 16 — References.
N

SLIDE
References
16

This slide is displayed during the Q&A session. You do NOT need to read the references aloud unless
NOTE
a specific one is asked about.

For those who wish to explore any of these topics in greater depth, the complete list
of references used in this presentation is displayed here. All references follow APA
format and are drawn from peer-reviewed textbooks and journal articles in the field
of educational research methodology.
SPEA
K I would particularly recommend Creswell and Creswell's Research Design for a
comprehensive overview of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods
approaches — as well as Cohen, Manion, and Morrison's Research Methods in
Education, which provides an excellent in-depth treatment of all the techniques we
discussed today.

Research Methodology in Language Educational | Dr. BUKHORI S, Pd., [Link]

PRESENTATION SCRIPT | Techniques of Data Collection in Educational Research

— END OF SCRIPT —
Estimated presentation duration: 15–20 minutes (excluding Q&A)
Rehearsal tip: Practice at least 2–3 times before the day of your presentation. Time each section separately.
Key references: Creswell & Creswell (2018) · Cohen, Manion & Morrison (2018) · Anastasi & Urbina (1997) · DeVellis (2016) ·
Fowler & Mangione (1990) · Prior (2003) · Robson (2011) · Bowen (2009)

Research Methodology in Language Educational | Dr. BUKHORI S, Pd., [Link]