0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views5 pages

Written Assignment Unit II

The document is a reflective assignment on leadership development, emphasizing the importance of understanding one's ideal self, real self, and the feedback from others to bridge the gap between them. The author identifies key areas for personal growth, including confidence, assertive communication, and strategic thinking, and outlines a learning agenda focused on enhancing these skills. Ultimately, the reflection underscores that effective leadership is a continuous process of self-awareness and intentional growth.

Uploaded by

Jessrel Alba
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views5 pages

Written Assignment Unit II

The document is a reflective assignment on leadership development, emphasizing the importance of understanding one's ideal self, real self, and the feedback from others to bridge the gap between them. The author identifies key areas for personal growth, including confidence, assertive communication, and strategic thinking, and outlines a learning agenda focused on enhancing these skills. Ultimately, the reflection underscores that effective leadership is a continuous process of self-awareness and intentional growth.

Uploaded by

Jessrel Alba
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

1

WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT UNIT II

University of the People

BUS 4405-01 Leadership

Dr. Mohamed Bah, Instructor

Jessrel A. Alba

February 7, 2026
2

Leadership development and personal effectiveness require deliberate self-reflection, honest

feedback, and purposeful action. After reviewing the reading on leadership development and

personal effectiveness, particularly the sections on the ideal self, real self, and learning agenda, I

was able to reflect deeply on my current leadership capacity and the direction I aspire to move

toward. The framework emphasizes that effective leadership growth begins with understanding

who we want to be, recognizing who we currently are, and intentionally closing the gap between

the two through continuous learning and behavioral change.

Completing the questionnaire on my ideal self helped clarify the type of leader I aspire to

become. My ideal self reflects a leader who is values-driven, emotionally intelligent, adaptable,

and focused on long-term impact rather than short-term outcomes. I envision myself as someone

who communicates clearly, inspires trust, and empowers others to perform at their best. I value

integrity, accountability, empathy, and collaboration, and I want these qualities to consistently

guide my decisions and behavior. This ideal image is strongly aligned with principle-centered

leadership and emphasizes influence through credibility rather than authority. It also reflects a

desire to balance performance with well-being, both for myself and for those I work with.

The questionnaire on my real self provided a more grounded and sometimes challenging

perspective. While I do demonstrate responsibility, reliability, and commitment to quality in my

work, the results highlighted areas where my behavior does not always align with my ideal

vision. I tend to focus heavily on task completion and accuracy, sometimes at the expense of

broader strategic thinking or proactive communication. I am dependable and conscientious, but I

occasionally hesitate to assert my ideas or take the lead in uncertain situations. This gap suggests
3

that while my intentions and values are aligned with my ideal self, my confidence and

consistency in demonstrating leadership behaviors still need development.

To deepen this understanding, I sought open and honest feedback from three people representing

different areas of my life. A close friend described me as thoughtful, supportive, and reliable, but

noted that I sometimes underestimate my abilities and hold back from fully expressing my

opinions. A family member emphasized my strong sense of responsibility and empathy, while

also pointing out that I can be overly self-critical and hesitant to ask for help. A colleague

highlighted my attention to detail, professionalism, and willingness to support the team, but

observed that I could be more visible in group discussions and more proactive in sharing ideas.

This three-hundred-sixty-degree feedback reinforced many of the patterns identified in my self-

assessment and provided valuable external confirmation of both my strengths and development

areas.

Analyzing my ideal self, real self, and the feedback together revealed several key gaps. The most

significant gap lies in confidence, assertive communication, and leadership presence. While I

possess strong foundational values and technical competence, I do not always project the

confidence or influence associated with my ideal leadership image. Another gap involves

strategic perspective. I often focus on immediate tasks rather than stepping back to consider

broader implications, opportunities for improvement, or long-term goals. At the same time, the

analysis also highlighted strengths that form a solid base for development, including integrity,

reliability, empathy, and a strong work ethic.

Using the learning agenda framework, I developed a personal plan to build on my strengths and

reduce the gaps between my ideal and real self. A key focus of my learning agenda is
4

strengthening self-confidence and communication skills. This involves intentionally speaking up

in meetings, sharing ideas even when they are not fully formed, and seeking constructive

feedback on my contributions. By gradually increasing my visibility and voice, I can build

confidence through experience rather than waiting for confidence to appear on its own.

Another important element of my learning agenda is developing a more strategic mindset. I plan

to do this by setting aside regular time for reflection, reviewing outcomes rather than just tasks,

and asking broader questions about processes, impact, and improvement. Engaging more actively

in discussions about goals and future plans will help me move beyond operational thinking and

align more closely with my ideal leadership vision.

Emotional intelligence also plays a critical role in my development plan. Strengthening self-

awareness, self-regulation, and empathy will help me manage stress, respond more effectively to

challenges, and build stronger relationships. As Goleman emphasizes, emotional intelligence is a

key driver of leadership effectiveness, and developing it will support both personal growth and

collective excellence. Practicing active listening, being mindful of emotional triggers, and

responding thoughtfully rather than reactively are specific behaviors I intend to cultivate.

Finally, accountability and continuous learning are central to sustaining progress. I plan to

regularly revisit my learning agenda, reflect on changes in my behavior, and seek ongoing

feedback from trusted individuals. Leadership development is not a one-time exercise but a

continuous process of alignment between values, actions, and goals. By consciously working to

bridge the gap between my ideal and real self, I can become a more effective, confident, and

authentic leader.
5

In conclusion, this reflective process reinforced that leadership effectiveness begins with self-

knowledge and intentional growth. The comparison between my ideal self, real self, and external

feedback provided clarity on where I stand and where I need to go. By building on my strengths

and addressing identified gaps through a structured learning agenda, I can move closer to the

leader I aspire to be and contribute more meaningfully to my organization and community.

References

Goleman, D. (1998). What makes a leader? Harvard Business Review.

[Link]

West-Burnham, J., & Ireson, J. (n.d.). Leadership development and personal effectiveness.

National College for School Leadership. [Link]

Ruderman, M. N., Hannum, K., Leslie, J. B., & Steed, J. L. (2001). Making the connection:

Leadership skills and emotional intelligence. Leadership in Action, 21(5), 3–7.

[Link]

emotional-intelligence/

You might also like