Scribd
Upload
6 views12 pages

Module 10

The document discusses Stephen Krashen's Input Hypothesis, emphasizing the significance of comprehensible input in second language acquisition (SLA). It highlights the importance of providing language input that is slightly beyond the learner's current level and the complementary role of output in the learning process. Teachers are encouraged to create a supportive environment that balances both input and output for effective language learning.

Uploaded by

Ana Leah Ramos
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
6 views12 pages

Module 10

The document discusses Stephen Krashen's Input Hypothesis, emphasizing the significance of comprehensible input in second language acquisition (SLA). It highlights the importance of providing language input that is slightly beyond the learner's current level and the complementary role of output in the learning process. Teachers are encouraged to create a supportive environment that balances both input and output for effective language learning.

Uploaded by

Ana Leah Ramos
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Principles and

Theories of Language
Acquisition and
Learning
Module 10

The Input Hypothesis and


Comprehensible Input
Objectives:
• Understand Stephen Krashen’s Input Hypothesis and its significance in
SLA.
• Discuss the importance of providing comprehensible input in language
learning.
What is Second Language Acquisition
(SLA)?
• Definition:
• The process of learning a language other than the mother
tongue.
• Importance:
• Essential in multilingual education, migration, and global
communication.
• Two key processes:
• Acquisition (natural learning) vs. Learning (formal instruction)
Stephen Krashen’s Input Hypothesis
• Core idea:
• Language acquisition
occurs when learners are
exposed to language input
that is just slightly beyond
their current level (i+1).
• Emphasizes natural,
meaningful communication.
• Acquisition is subconscious;
learning is conscious.
Key Features of Comprehensible Input
• Understandable but challenging
(i+1)
• Accompanied by visuals, gestures,
or context
• Low affective filter:
• motivation, self-confidence, low
anxiety
• Examples:
• simplified speech, visual aids,
scaffolded tasks
Input vs. Output
Krashen (Input) Swain (Output)

Focuses on understanding language Focuses on using language

Language acquisition happens through Output is essential for internalizing


input grammar

Learner listens and reads Learner speaks and writes

• Both are complementary in SLA.


Classroom Implications
• Teachers should:
• Use clear, meaningful language
• Provide rich input: stories, dialogues, media
• Use visuals, repetition, and context clues
• Foster a low-stress environment
• Input alone is not enough; output and interaction help complete
the learning loop.
Discussion Prompt
• “Think about your language learning
experiences. What helped you
understand and acquire a new
language the most—input or
output?”
Summary
• Input Hypothesis is central to
Krashen’s SLA theory.
• Comprehensible input is necessary
for language acquisition.
• Swain’s Output Hypothesis
reminds us that interaction and
expression also matter.
• Balance both input and output for
effective language learning.
References
• Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language
Acquisition. Pergamon.
• Swain, M. (2000). “The Output Hypothesis and Beyond: Mediating
Acquisition Through Collaborative Dialogue.” In Sociocultural
Theory and Second Language Learning, pp. 97–114.

You might also like