Scribd
Upload
6 views2 pages

Order

The case Roshni Devi vs. State of Haryana involves a civil dispute stemming from an agreement made in 1999. Mediation efforts have failed as both parties are not interested in settling. The court modified an interim order allowing the petitioner to be released on bail if arrested, provided she joins the investigation and adheres to specific conditions.

Uploaded by

Saumya
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
6 views2 pages

Order

The case Roshni Devi vs. State of Haryana involves a civil dispute stemming from an agreement made in 1999. Mediation efforts have failed as both parties are not interested in settling. The court modified an interim order allowing the petitioner to be released on bail if arrested, provided she joins the investigation and adheres to specific conditions.

Uploaded by

Saumya
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

205

CRM-M-54440-2025

ROSHNI DEVI V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.

Present :- Mr. D.P.S. Bajwa, Advocate


for the petitioner.

Mr. Sumit Jain, Addl. AG, Haryana.

Mr. Satish Kumar Garg, Advocate


for respondent No.2-complainant.

****

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dispute is

purely of civil nature. He has submitted that the agreement between the

petitioner and the complainant-respondent No.2 had taken place in the

year 1999.

Vide orders dated 12.01.2026 and 02.02.2026, the matter was

referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre at Narwana. Report

from the Mediator has been received which transpires that the parties are

not interested to settle the case.

Learned State counsel has submitted before this Court that by

virtue of the interim order, this Court directed that no coercive action shall

be taken against the petitioner but there was no order for joining

investigation.

In view of the above, interim order dated 25.09.2025 is

modified to the extent that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be

released on interim bail subject to the satisfaction of the

Arresting/Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall join investigation

before the Investigating Agency/Officer. She shall abide by the following

conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) of Bhartiya Nagarik

Suraksha Sanhita, 2023:-

MAMTA
2026.02.18 16:42
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CRM-M-54440-2025 -2-

(i) That the petitioner shall make herself available for


interrogation by a police officer as and when required.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any
inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with
the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing
such facts to the court or to any police officer.

(iii) That the petitioner shall not leave India without prior
permission of the court.

List on 17.03.2026.

( RAJESH BHARDWAJ )
17.02.2026 JUDGE
m. sharma

MAMTA
2026.02.18 16:42
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document

You might also like