0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views4 pages

Final Report TaskApp

Uploaded by

dieuthanhvn1006
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views4 pages

Final Report TaskApp

Uploaded by

dieuthanhvn1006
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Final Report: Task Management App for

Students
1. Introduction (~1 page)
Design Problem:
Students often juggle multiple assignments, exams, and extracurricular activities across different
platforms, leading to missed deadlines and stress.

Target Users:
Undergraduate and graduate students aged 18–28 who manage coursework and personal tasks
digitally.

High-Level Design:
The Task Management App consolidates class schedules, assignments, and reminders into one
platform.

Key Tasks:
1. Add and manage assignments.
2. Set reminders and deadlines.
3. Organize tasks by subject/course.
4. Collaborate with peers on group projects.

2. Research Methods and Design Methods (~1–2 pages)


Research Methods:
- Interviews: 6 students (3 undergraduates, 3 graduates) were interviewed to explore pain
points in task management.
- Surveys: 25 survey responses collected on preferred features.
- Heuristic Evaluation: Existing apps (Google Tasks, Notion, Trello) were reviewed for usability
issues.
- Micro-Usability Test: Early prototype tested with 3 students.
- Needs Assessment: Identified recurring problems such as fragmented tools and notification
overload.

Design Methods:
- Initial Sketches: Brainstormed multiple layout options.
- Low-Fidelity Wireframes: Created digital wireframes showing task lists and reminders.
- Medium-Fidelity Prototype: Added interaction elements and navigation flows.
[Insert illustrations/screenshots of sketches, wireframes, and prototypes here].

3. User Needs Analysis (~1–2 pages)


Findings:
- Students need a centralized platform for tasks (Interview Quote: 'I use three different apps for
deadlines and still miss things').
- They want prioritization features (Survey: 72% requested priority labels).
- Collaboration is crucial for group projects (Interview: 'It’s hard to know who’s doing what
without constant messaging').

These findings shaped the design goals by emphasizing simplicity, prioritization, and
collaboration.

See Appendix for Personas and Scenarios.

4. Competitive Analysis (~½ page)


Competitors:
- Google Tasks: Simple, but lacks collaboration.
- Trello: Great for group projects, but overwhelming for individuals.
- Notion: Flexible, but steep learning curve.

Best Practices:
- Clean task lists, drag-and-drop organization, mobile notifications.

Opportunities:
- Combine simplicity of Google Tasks with Trello’s collaboration and Notion’s flexibility.

5. Design Goals (~½ page)


1. Centralize academic and personal tasks in one app.
2. Provide clear prioritization and reminders.
3. Support group project collaboration.
4. Minimize cognitive load with a clean UI.

6. Prototype (~up to 10 pages)


Key Tasks:
1. Add a new task.
2. Edit deadlines and reminders.
3. Organize tasks by subject.
4. Share a task with a group.
5. Mark a task as complete.

Screenshots:
[Insert screenshots of dashboard and task creation screen].

Task Flows:
- Adding a task (screenshots linked with arrows).
- Sharing with a group (screenshots linked with arrows).

7. Final Usability Test (~1–3 pages)


Goals:
Evaluate ease of use for adding tasks, organizing them, and sharing with peers.

Participants:
5 students (3 undergrads, 2 grads) from target population.

Process:
Remote usability test with prototype. Participants asked to complete 3 tasks while screen and
audio recorded.

Results:
- Task success rate: 90%.
- Average completion time: 1.5 minutes per task.
- Errors: 2/15 attempts (both related to group sharing).

Key Findings:
1. Students struggled to locate group-sharing feature → Add clearer icon and tooltip.
2. Some confusion about task priority labels → Redesign labels to be more intuitive.
3. Positive feedback on clean interface → Retain minimalist design.

Recommendations:
Clarify collaboration tools, simplify priority system, keep UI clean.

8. Next Steps (~1 page)


1. Refine group-sharing interface.
2. Improve priority labeling.
3. Expand testing with a larger and more diverse student group.
4. Explore calendar integration with university systems.
Appendix
Personas:
- Persona 1: Alice, 19, undergrad biology major, manages multiple labs and courses.
- Persona 2: David, 24, graduate engineering student, juggles research and part-time work.

Scenarios:
- Scenario 1: Alice adds and prioritizes multiple assignments for different courses.
- Scenario 2: David shares tasks with his thesis group to coordinate responsibilities.

You might also like