Program logic temporary template
INPUTS ACTIVITIES OUTPUTS
1. Radio system to be Setting the systems up, 1. Prevention and
located at the coordinating with UNICEF. informations about
UNICEF school. Buy, deliver and set up the incoming cyclones
2. satellite phone to be gear. Give relevant training via radio system at
given to the principal to the people in charge of the UNICEF School
of the school. the systems. Test run. 2. 24/7 availability for
3. Siren and Schedule and run regular more efficiency
emergency tests to verify the effectivity. 3. Informations for the
generator to be Preparing for the community about the
located in the school workshops. Run risks and the
yard. consultation with selected possible responses
4. Availability of the people in the community 4. Presence of expert >
school to do the (chiefs and representatives more accurate
meetings. of every category, women). informations
5. Flyers and posters to Work with chiefs (tribal and 5. Community
communicate with religious) to make participation in
the community. participation successful and workshops and
6. Experts to find make sure that at least one community-led
suitable responses to representative per solutions for disaster
the environment and household is present preparedness.
context (experts on (otherwise need to appoint a 6. Trained Staff and
cyclones, social delegate).Announcements students
workers [cultural of the community workshops 7. Everyone will have
sensitive, disability, (through leaders, religion, knowloedge of their
gender]). social groups, people actions prior to the
7. People should be walking around the event actually
hired who are able to households and let them do happening
handle the radio it. Confirm location and find 8. Plan B to be used if
systems the experts. Follow up there is any mishap
8. Training should be sessions to verify the reach in the actual plan
provided to the of the knowledge and if being setup
teachers and there is any feedback.
students Workshops. Although run
9. A beta test should be by experts in cyclone first
conducted covering response. the approach will
the use of satellite be participatory, asking the
phones, use of community based on
sirens and experience what are the
emergency issues and how they could
generator and the be solved using local
training of the people infrastructure. Trying to
in the school to avoid integrate the technical
any problems in advice with the local
emergency resources and lifestyle.
situations. Identifying the people that
would need extra care and
who would look after them
(included substitutes).
Identify refuges (potentially
the school). Identify safe
places to store food, water
and medical tools. Verify
that every household has
access to a refuge and
assign each household to
one (make lists).
Identify people in charge
of every refuge. They will
read the list and make sure
all people are present. Make
sure that each refuge has at
least one assigned person
with medical knowledge
(Collaboration with Uniting
World). Identify
communication networks to
make sure the news reach
everyone.
Safe storage location.
Identify safe places to store
fresh water and food once
the alert has been sent.
Training
Training of the staff and
students before occurance
of an event so they have an
idea of what to do prior to
actually doing it.
Unit testing
Testing of the equipment
that will be used in the
emergency situations
Identify post emergency
events
A plan B to be setup in case
of any mishap occuring
while the emergency
situation is underway
SHORT TERM OUTCOMES LONG TERM OUTCOMES
● Effective and well-implemented ● Solomon Islands’ people are more
informational system of cyclone aware of the risks of getting hit by a
prevention cyclone, how to react and to
● Workshops and meetings accessible response
to everyone with a fluid diffusion of ● Less casualties due to cyclones
knowledge and informations ● Well-implemented routine
● Establish disaster response and addressing the cyclones problem
implement in the community via ● Community able to recover more
cyclone drill quickly from cyclones and tropical
● Everyone has knowledge and is storms due to disaster preparedness
ready to help themselves and others ● Plan B to be used if plan A fails
● Necessary testing is done prior to ● Better use of resources if another
the events happening disaster comes
STAKEHOLDERS TARGET GROUPS
● UNICEF (they have the school) ● Community members of Solomon
● Uniting World (they run the medical Islands
clinic) ● People expected to be affected by
● Bureau of Meteorology in Solomon disaster
Islands
● Community leaders (tribal and
religious)
● Experts for the workshops
○ Cyclone experts (Red
Cross?)
○ Disaster response specialist
○ Gender and disability aware
social workers
○ Trainers
● Satellite companies
● Staff and students
● Community
ASSUMPTIONS
1. communications from the central meteorological office are in time.
2. the systems are functioning, well kept and properly used.
3. the principal and the others responsible for the systems attend and remember the
training sessions, act promptly and attend their duties systematically.
4. the satellite phone is kept charged and in someone’s possession at anytime after
hours.
5. significant participation of the community.
6. active engagement of the people during the workshops.
7. availability of location for the set up of the radio, syren and emergency generator.
8. availability of location for the workshops.
9. collaboration of the local leaders.
10. collaboration of Uniting World to help in the identification/training of people with first
aid knowledge.
11. that early warning system and disaster plan will reduce casualties/negative impacts
from cyclones etc
12. that the community will be able to implement disaster response in event of natural
disaster
13. The systems are capable of geting notified of the incoming disaster
14. Community people will collaborate with each other
B. Activity Monitoring Matrix
DATA PEOPLE TIME
LOG
Ref.
No. Activity Indicator Source of Who is the Responsibilit Reporting Who will Collection Analysis Deadline
Data, means change y to Collect Tool use the data Frequency
of directed at? info? and
verification analysis?
1.1 Output: Two new Women’s Protection Centers (WPC) with a micro credit fund will be established, and the funding
line of at least three existing WPCs will be increased in order to improve services for women migrant
workers
1.1. Carry out baseline # of likely and Household Project team Survey Yr1 Q1, and post
1 study on current returned case study Pilot WPC report Project project End of
performance of migrant surveys communitie Manager in Yr 1, Q1
WPC, use of workers s consultation
remittances, and receiving Annual with:
migration-related micro loans or Impact and External Evaluative Yr 1, Q1
micro credits in remittances assessment - the UNDP
consultants Report
project area. and/or training evaluation project
from pilot funders and
NB. # of families phase decision
(Info. will also be and women makers
used for evaluative aware of WPC
studies) program and -Project
opportunities Training Project team Project accountant Yr 1, Q1
in area course leader Management
reports Information
Comparison System (MIS)
of previous M&E
and current Report
baseline % of
women
Collection of Yr 1, Q1 and as
migrating or
secondary Project Analysis available thereafter
being
data Manager Report
trafficked
(baseline)
Audit and
budget Project MIS
performance External Project M & E Report Yr 1, Q1
of WPCs audit and Manager
internal
budget
reports of
pilot phase
1.1. Select Poverty Project
2 communities for 2 WPC analysis on High Project team Analysis Manager in Yr 1, Q1
establishment of communities migrant migrant leader Report consultation
Yr1, Q2
new WPC and chosen workers and communitie with:
setting up WPC female s
councils through WPC councils headed - WPC
elections. selected households Council
Selection criteria leaders
will be a) high - Steering
share of migrants Committee
Progress Project Project MIS Mid and end of Q1
and b) number of
Report Manager M & E Report
female-headed
households.
1.1.3 Select 3 communities 3 WPC Performance Project
with existing WPC for communities reports Manager in
Pilot WPC Project Project Yr1, Q1
funding increase. chosen for consultation
communities Manager Manager
Selection criteria for increased with: Yr1,
MIS M & E
the increase of micro funding. end of
Report
credit fund will be Funding Project -Project Q1
previous performance/ situation Manager accountant
current funding Project Yr1, Q1
reports MIS M & E
situation as well as Manager - Steering and 6
Report
above criteria. Committee monthly
Poverty Use pilot
analysis on phase data
Project team Analysis
migrant
leader Report
workers and
female headed
households
1.1. WPC with new # of WPC
4 credit line to workers
Progress WPC Project Manager Project MIS Project Quarterly Yr 1, end
provide services for trained on
reports workers in M&E manager of Q1
migrant workers credit
new WPC Report
(e.g. migration management.
communitie
loans) are trained
s
on the management # of pre-
of this credit line. departure
-And
They will also training Training Project team leaders Project MIS Quarterly
migrant
facilitate pre- sessions course M&E
community
departure training conducted by reports Report
in new
for migrants (e.g. WPC.
WPC areas
loan holders).
# of likely and
returned
migrant
workers
receiving pre-
departure
training
1.2 Output: Staff of all existing WPCs (30 plus 2 newly established WPCs) will be trained on services related to migration,
micro credits for migration and re-investment of remittances.
1.2. Select trainers with Yr 1, end
1 knowledge on Q2
10 trainers Progress WPC Project Project MIS M & E Report Project Yr 1 Q2
migration, micro-
identified report workers Manager Manager
credits and
remittances.
1.2. Develop training Yr 1, end
2 programme in Q2 and
Training Materials Pilot WPCs Project Project MIS M & E Report Project Yr 1, Q2
consultation with every 6
program and Manager manager in
WPC using “train months
developed existing consultation
the trainer thereafte
WPC with WPC
approach.” r
10 initial workers project
trainers trained Training Project Project MIS M & E Report leaders and Yr 1, Q2
report team steering and 6
leaders committee monthly
thereafter
WPC
Capacity and
Project Assessment report Pre
Competence
team project
Review
leaders and
annually
thereafter
1.2. Implement trainings # of training
3 in communities activities/
Progress Women Project Project MIS M & E Report Project Quarterly Yr 2,
through WPC. courses
report migrant Manager manager in start of
conducted by
workers in consultation Q1 and
the 32 WPCs
all WPC with project semi-
communitie team annually
# of workers s leaders thereafte
who received r
Training Project Project MIS M & E Report 6 monthly
training
course team
reports leader
Budget Project Project MIS M & E Report Quarterly
Report Manager
Impact Project Assessment Report Annually
assessment team
leaders
1.3 Output : A new hospital will be established for the affectees that may be used if any incident is reported
1.3 Carry on study on
.1 already Project End of
Audit on Internal case WPC Project Survey report Yr 1 Q1
established Manager in Yr 1,
performance study workers Manager
hospitals and how consultatio Q1
of the surveys
can they help in n with:
hospitals, WPC Project
building a new
how many Communit tam Project MIS M & E Report
hospital that can - the UNDP
patients are ies
withstand the project
admitted
disaster and help funders
daily and how Assessment report
people in need and
many get out
happy decision
makers
Audit of staff,
nurses, Progress - WPC
doctors and report Council
other leaders
necessary
people in a
hospital
Check used
equipment Impact
and how can assessment
this be used
for the new
hospital
1.3 Establishment of An area is Internal case Survey report Yr 1,
.2 a new disaster cleared , study end Q2
WPC Project Project Yearly
proof hospital contracts are surveys
workers Manager Manager in
given to
consultatio
different
n with:
companies
for the
- Steering
building
Committee
structure and
completion of
- the UNDP
the hospital
project
funders
Testing Annual External Yearly
done on the Impact and Stakehold Evaluation Report
assessment ers
walls to see
evaluation Impact asessment
if the from pilot
hospital phase
can
withstand
any type of
disaster
New Collection of Project
equipment secondary Team Project Management
data Information System (MIS) M
shifted to
& E Report
the new
hospital
Project Yearly
External Manager Analysis Report
audit and
internal
budget
reports of
pilot phase
1.3 Hiring and Hiring of Funding Pilot Project Yr 1 Q1 Yr 1,
.4 training of staff new staff analysis WPCs Project Project MIS M & E Report manager end
reports and Manager in Q2
existing consultat
Training of Training WPC ion with Yr 1 Q1 Yr 1,
new staff Course workers project end
Project Assessment report
Reports team team Q2
leaders leaders
Performanc
e reports
1.4 Output: Testing of equipment
1.4 Testing of Radio Response Commu Project Assessment report Project One time Year
.1 Radio System system Report nity team manager End
tested in all and radio
expected company
conditions
1.4 Testing of Satellite Response Commu Project Assessment report Project One time Year
.2 Satellite phone phones test Report nity team manager End
from both and
sender and satellite
receiver company
ends
1.4 Testing of Siren Siren and Response Commu Project Assessment report Project One time Year
.3 and emergency emergency Report nity team manager End
generator generators
tested in all
necessary
conditions