Topic: Should Students Use Mobile Phones at School?
Introduction
Mobile phones have become an important part of modern life. Many students bring their phones to
school every day. Some people believe phones are useful for learning, while others think they are
distracting. (Thesis Statement: Students should be allowed to use mobile phones at school because
they help learning, improve communication, and provide quick access to information.)
Body Paragraph 1 – PEEL
Point: First, mobile phones can support students’ learning.
Evidence: Many educational applications and online resources are available on smartphones. Students
can use dictionaries, calculators, and learning apps.
Explanation: These tools help students understand lessons better and learn independently. For example,
they can quickly search for meanings or explanations during their study time.
Link: Therefore, mobile phones can become helpful learning tools in the classroom.
Body Paragraph 2 – PEEL
Point: Another reason is that mobile phones improve communication.
Evidence: Students can contact their parents or teachers in emergencies or important situations.
Explanation: This helps students feel safer because they know they can reach someone quickly if
necessary.
Link: As a result, mobile phones provide better safety and communication for students.
Counter-Argument Paragraph
Some people argue that mobile phones should not be allowed in schools because they can distract
students from studying. Students might spend time playing games or using social media during lessons.
However, schools can solve this problem by creating clear rules, such as allowing phones only for
learning purposes. Therefore, the disadvantages can be controlled.
Conclusion
In conclusion, mobile phones can be valuable tools for students when used responsibly. They help
students learn better, communicate easily, and access information quickly. Although some people worry
about distractions, proper school rules can reduce these problems. For these reasons, mobile phones
should be allowed in schools.
A blank argumentative essay template for students
An argumentative essay with gaps (for classroom exercises)
PEEL paragraph practice activities for your lesson.
Agree or Disagree Essay
Question:
Some people think that university education should be free for everyone. Do you agree or disagree?
Introduction
Education plays an important role in personal and national development. However, university education
is often very expensive, which makes it difficult for many students to continue their studies. (Thesis
Statement: I agree that university education should be free for everyone because it provides equal
opportunities and benefits society as a whole.)
Body Paragraph 1 – PEEL
Point: Free university education creates equal opportunities for all students.
Evidence: Many talented students from poor families cannot afford tuition fees and therefore cannot
attend university.
Explanation: If education is free, students will be able to study based on their ability and hard work
rather than their financial situation. This allows more people to achieve their dreams.
Link: Therefore, free university education promotes fairness and equal access to learning.
Body Paragraph 2 – PEEL
Point: Another reason is that free higher education benefits society.
Evidence: When more people are educated, a country can have more skilled workers such as doctors,
engineers, and teachers.
Explanation: These professionals contribute to economic growth and social development. An educated
population can solve problems and improve the quality of life in a country.
Link: As a result, free university education can help a nation develop more successfully.
Counter-Argument
Some people argue that university education should not be free because it would cost the government a
lot of money. They believe students should pay for their own education. However, education should be
seen as an investment for the future. Governments can benefit from educated citizens through higher
productivity and economic growth.
Conclusion
In conclusion, free university education can provide equal opportunities for students and bring long-term
benefits to society. Although it may require significant government funding, the positive effects on
national development make it worthwhile. For these reasons, I strongly agree that university education
should be free for everyone.
Agree/Disagree type of argumentative essay (IELTS and academic writing).
Argumentative essay format:
1. Introduction
Background sentence(s) about the topic
Thesis Statement → your clear position (agree or disagree)
Example from the essay:
“I agree that university education should be free for everyone because it provides equal opportunities
and benefits society as a whole.”
→ This is the Thesis Statement.
2. Body Paragraph 1 (PEEL)
P – Point: Main reason supporting your argument
E – Evidence: Example or fact
E – Explanation: Explain the evidence
L – Link: Connect back to thesis
3. Body Paragraph 2 (PEEL)
Same structure:
Point
Evidence
Explanation
Link
4. Counter-Argument Paragraph
Present the opposite opinion
Then refute or respond to it.
Example:
“Some people argue that university education should not be free…”
5. Conclusion
Restate the thesis
Summarize the main ideas
Final opinion
✅ Standard Argumentative Structure
1. Introduction (with Thesis Statement)
2. Body Paragraph 1 (PEEL)
3. Body Paragraph 2 (PEEL)
4. Counter-Argument + Refutation
5. Conclusion
Question:
Some people believe that online learning is better than traditional classroom learning. Do you agree or
disagree?
Introduction
Education has changed significantly with the development of technology. Nowadays, many students
study through online platforms instead of attending traditional classes. While some people think online
learning is more effective, others prefer face-to-face education. (Thesis Statement: I believe that
traditional classroom learning is better than online learning because it provides direct interaction with
teachers and creates a more disciplined learning environment.)
Body Paragraph 1 – PEEL
Point: One main advantage of classroom learning is direct interaction with teachers.
Evidence: In a physical classroom, students can ask questions immediately and receive clear explanations
from their teachers.
Explanation: This interaction helps students understand difficult concepts more easily and allows
teachers to check whether students truly understand the lesson.
Link: Therefore, face-to-face learning improves communication and understanding in the learning
process.
Body Paragraph 2 – PEEL
Point: Another reason is that traditional classrooms encourage discipline and focus.
Evidence: When students attend classes at school, they follow schedules, classroom rules, and teacher
supervision.
Explanation: These factors reduce distractions such as social media or games, which are common during
online learning. As a result, students are more likely to concentrate on their studies.
Link: Thus, classroom learning helps students develop better study habits.
Counter-Argument
Some people argue that online learning is better because it is flexible and convenient. Students can
study from home and access many online resources. However, without proper supervision, many
students lose motivation and become distracted. Therefore, the advantages of online learning may not
always lead to effective learning.
Conclusion
In conclusion, although online learning offers flexibility, traditional classroom education provides
stronger interaction and better discipline for students. These factors play an important role in effective
learning. For these reasons, I believe that traditional classroom learning is more beneficial than online
learning.
“I agree that university education should be free for everyone because it provides equal opportunities
and benefits society as a whole.” continue writing for this
Topic: Some people think that university education should be free for everyone. Do you agree or
disagree?
Introduction
Education plays a vital role in the development of individuals and society. However, university education
is often expensive, which prevents many students from continuing their studies. I agree that university
education should be free for everyone because it provides equal opportunities and benefits society as
a whole. (Thesis Statement)
Body Paragraph 1 – PEEL
Point: First, free university education provides equal opportunities for all students.
Evidence: Many talented students from low-income families cannot afford university tuition fees.
Explanation: If higher education is free, students will be able to continue their studies based on their
ability and academic performance rather than their financial situation. This allows capable students to
achieve their goals and improve their future.
Link: Therefore, free university education ensures fairness and equal access to education.
Body Paragraph 2 – PEEL
Point: Another important reason is that free education benefits society.
Evidence: When more people can attend university, a country will have more skilled professionals such
as doctors, engineers, teachers, and scientists.
Explanation: These educated individuals contribute to economic development, technological progress,
and social improvement. As a result, the whole country can grow and become more competitive globally.
Link: Thus, free university education helps build a stronger and more productive society.
Counter-Argument
Some people argue that university education should not be free because it would place a heavy financial
burden on the government. They believe students should pay for their own education. However,
governments often invest money in many public services, and education should be considered one of the
most important investments for a nation’s future.
Conclusion
In conclusion, free university education offers equal learning opportunities and produces more educated
citizens who can contribute to society. Although it requires government funding, the long-term benefits
are much greater. Therefore, university education should be free for everyone.