0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views9 pages

ESG Notes

The document provides an overview of sustainability, CSR, and ESG, emphasizing the importance of integrating environmental, social, and governance factors into business practices. It outlines key milestones in sustainability, the evolution from CSR to ESG, and the significance of materiality in identifying impactful ESG issues for long-term value creation. Additionally, it discusses the importance of stakeholder engagement and the assessment process for prioritizing ESG risks and opportunities.

Uploaded by

Somali Guchhait
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views9 pages

ESG Notes

The document provides an overview of sustainability, CSR, and ESG, emphasizing the importance of integrating environmental, social, and governance factors into business practices. It outlines key milestones in sustainability, the evolution from CSR to ESG, and the significance of materiality in identifying impactful ESG issues for long-term value creation. Additionally, it discusses the importance of stakeholder engagement and the assessment process for prioritizing ESG risks and opportunities.

Uploaded by

Somali Guchhait
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION TO nt embedde e

SUSTAINABILITY, CSR & ESG d in sustainab


global ility
Slide 1: Meaning of Sustainability
policy
Definition

 Sustainability refers to balanced


Slide 3: Global Milestones in Sustainability
development that integrates
environmental protection, social 1962 – Silent Spring
well-being, and economic growth
 Rachel Carson exposed harmful
over the long term.
effects of pesticides (DDT).
 It ensures that current development
 Triggered environmental awareness.
does not compromise future
generations' ability to meet their own  Led to formation of US EPA (1970).
needs (Brundtland Report, 1987).
1972 – Stockholm Conference
Key Interpretation
 First global environmental summit.
 Earlier development focused mainly
on economic growth, ignoring social  Resulted in formation of UNEP.
and environmental costs.  Linked environment with
 This led to climate change, development.
biodiversity loss, inequality, and 1987 – Brundtland Report
resource depletion.
 Introduced concept of sustainable
Example development.
 The Industrial Revolution boosted  Linked poverty, inequality, and
economic growth but caused environment.
pollution, unsafe working conditions,
and social inequality. 1992 – Rio Earth Summit

Slide 2: Evolution of Sustainability  Produced:

Phase Focus Explanati Example o Agenda 21


on o UNFCCC
Early Nature Focus National o Rio Declaration
Conserva protec only on parks like
tion tion forests, Yellowsto  Foundation for Kyoto Protocol & Paris
wildlife, ne, Jim Agreement.
biodiversi Corbett
Slide 4: MDGs vs SDGs
ty
MDGs SDGs
Integrate 3 Environm Green
d Pillars ent + Revolutio Focus on developing Universal (all
Approach Economy n nations countries)
+ Society
Social development Integrated 3 pillars
Global SDGs Sustainab UN SDGs,
Moveme ility corporat Limited environment Strong climate
focus action  Schools, health camps, tree
plantation.
Siloed goals Interconnected
goals Audit Findings

2000–2015 2015–2030  High emissions.

 Poor safety.

Slide 5: Paris Agreement (2015)  No ESG reporting.

Objectives  Governance weaknesses.

 Limit warming below 2°C, target ESG Improvements


1.5°C.
 Energy-efficient machines → 18%
 Peak emissions ASAP. emission cut.

 Climate neutrality by mid-century.  Supplier audits.

Mechanisms  ESG reporting (GRI + SEBI BRSR).

 NDCs – country-wise climate plans.  Board-level sustainability committee.

 Climate finance – $100 billion per Results


year.
 Regained clients.
India’s Commitments
 Attracted ESG investors.
 50% renewable energy by 2030.
 Cost reduction.
 45% emission intensity reduction.
 Brand reputation improved.
 Carbon sink: 2.5–3 billion tonnes CO₂.
Slide 8: Tata Motors – CSR to ESG
Slide 6: CSR vs ESG
CSR Programs
CSR ESG
 Vasundhara – tree plantation.
Voluntary Mandatory / investor-  Amrutdhara – water.
driven
 Aadhar, Kaushalya – education.
Philanthropy Data-driven
based ESG Integration

Project-based Embedded in  AI ESG platform – Prakriti.


operations
 Net zero targets.
Focus on image Focus on risk & value  Supply chain audits.
Community focus Stakeholder focus  Circular economy.

Slide 9: CSR + ESG Integration Strategy


Slide 7: CSR to ESG – Automotive Case CSR ESG
CSR Strengths Builds Builds resilience
 ₹8 crore spent annually. goodwill
Social focus Operational focus  Growth through sustainability.

Mandatory 2% Investor-driven CHAPTER 2 – MATERIALITY,


METHODOLOGIES, RISKS & OPPORTUNITIES
Balanced Strategy IN ESG
 Use CSR as pilot projects for ESG. 1. CONCEPT OF MATERIALITY IN ESG
 Solar microgrids → factory renewable Meaning of Materiality
transition.
 Materiality refers to the process of
 Water projects → plant recycling. identifying ESG issues that are most
Slide 10: ESG Philosophy relevant, significant, and impactful
for a company’s long-term value
Core Belief creation.
 Business responsibility goes beyond  These issues are those that can
profit. directly or indirectly influence:
 Promotes stakeholder capitalism. o Financial performance
Slide 11: ESG Pillars o Regulatory compliance
Environmental o Corporate reputation
 Carbon footprint o Investor confidence
 Resource efficiency  Materiality ensures companies focus
 Waste management on what truly matters instead of
reporting everything superficially.
 Biodiversity protection
Key Characteristics
Social
 Material issues differ across industries
 Fair wages depending on operations, geography,
 Safety and stakeholder expectations.

 Diversity  Materiality is:

 Community engagement o Dynamic – changes with


regulations, climate risks,
Governance social movements
 Board independence o Stakeholder-driven –
influenced by investors,
 Ethical practices
customers, employees,
 Transparency communities
 Shareholder rights o Strategy-linked – connected
to core business decisions
Slide 12: Patagonia Case
2. PURPOSE & IMPORTANCE OF MATERIALITY
 1% revenue to environment.
Strategic Importance
 Worn Wear program.

 Political activism.
 Helps management align ESG Renewable Energy Company
priorities with business strategy.
 Key characteristics:
 Enables companies to:
o Large land footprint
o Integrate sustainability into
o Climate-dependent revenue
decision-making
o Remote workforce
o Identify growth opportunities
linked to ESG  Material ESG issues:
Financial Importance o Land acquisition conflicts
 Investors increasingly consider o Biodiversity loss
material ESG issues before:
o Worker safety (wind turbines,
o Investing heights)
o Lending o Solar panel waste
o Valuing companies  Why material:
 Poor handling of material issues may o Land protests can delay
lead to: projects
o Higher cost of capital o Accidents affect operations &
reputation
o Investor exit
Packaged Food Company
o Lower valuations
 Key characteristics:
Operational Importance
o Heavy water consumption
 Helps companies:
o Dependence on farmers
o Detect regulatory risks early
o Brand-sensitive products
o Avoid penalties, shutdowns,
and lawsuits  Material ESG issues:
o Improve operational efficiency o Water efficiency
Reporting Importance o Sustainable sourcing
 Prevents: o Plastic packaging waste
o Boilerplate disclosures o Nutrition & sugar content
o Greenwashing  Why material:
 Ensures reports focus on: o Social media backlash impacts
sales
o High-impact ESG topics
o Regulations on plastic & sugar
o Stakeholder expectations
Logistics Company
3. SECTOR-WISE MATERIALITY (INDUSTRY
COMPARISON)  Key characteristics:
o Diesel fleets  Major concerns:

o Driver workforce o Unsafe working conditions

o Accident exposure o Excessive overtime

 Material ESG issues: o Harassment cases

o Carbon emissions o Fair wages

o Road safety  Business impact if ignored:

o Driver welfare o Strikes

o Electrification o High turnover

 Why material: o Productivity loss

o Accidents cause legal & brand Global Buyers


damage
 Characteristics:
o Client pressure for EV fleets
o Strict ESG standards
Banking Company
o Brand reputation sensitive
 Key characteristics:
 Major concerns:
o Low direct emissions
o Water use
o High indirect influence
o Chemical discharge
 Material ESG issues:
o Cotton traceability
o Responsible lending
o Carbon footprint
o Data privacy
 Business impact if ignored:
o AML/KYC compliance
o Order cancellations
 Why material:
o Supplier blacklisting
o Funding polluting firms causes
Local Communities
reputational damage
 Characteristics:
o Cyber risks affect customer
trust o Depend on groundwater
4. STAKEHOLDER-CENTRIC MATERIALITY o Sensitive to pollution
(BlueRiver Textiles Case)  Major concerns:
Workers o Effluent discharge
 Characteristics: o Air pollution
o Rural women o Noise
o Contract labor  Business impact:
o Income dependent o Protests
o Government intervention Framewor SASB GRI
k
Investors

 Characteristics:
6. WHY MATERIALITY IS CRITICAL
o Long-term return focus
Resource Allocation
o ESG framework adoption
 Companies have limited budgets.
 Major concerns:
 Materiality ensures:
o Governance quality
o Funds are spent on high-
o Climate risks
impact issues
 Business impact:
o Avoids wasting money on
o Capital withdrawal irrelevant initiatives

o Stock price fall Investor Decisions

Regulators  ESG scores now influence:

 Characteristics: o Mutual funds

o Compliance focus o Pension funds

 Major concerns: o Sovereign funds

o Waste disposal  Strong materiality analysis:

o Labor laws o Improves investor trust

o Fire safety Risk Management

 Business impact:  Identifies:

o Penalties o Climate risks

o Shutdowns o Labor unrest

5. FINANCIAL vs IMPACT MATERIALITY o Governance failures

Aspect Financial Impact  Enables:


Materiality Materiality
o Preventive action
Meaning Issues Issues
o Crisis avoidance
affecting affecting
profits society 7. EVOLUTION OF MATERIALITY

Focus Investors Communities ESG Earlier Now Impact


Issue View
Time Short– Long term
medium Climate Seen as Treated Higher
term Change a distant as an insuranc
future immedia e cost,
Examples Carbon tax Pollution
risk te asset
business
risk damage o Governance

Human Consider Recogniz Boycotts  Outcome:


Rights ed NGO ed as ,
o Comprehensive ESG issue list
concern legal & lawsuits
reputatio STEP 3 – Assess Business Relevance
nal risk
 Qualitative:
Workpla Optional Linked to Talent
o Department interviews
ce HR performa retentio
Diversity practice nce & n, o Peer benchmarking
innovatio producti
n vity  Quantitative:

Corporat Complia Key Sharehol o KPIs


e nce investor der o Risk modeling
Governa requirem trust confiden
nce ent factor ce  Factors considered:

o Financial risk

8. MATERIALITY ASSESSMENT PROCESS o Reputation

(Stepwise Framework) o Regulation

STEP 1 – Stakeholder Engagement  Outcome:

 Objective: o Impact scoring

o Capture diverse perspectives STEP 4 – Prioritization

 Activities:  Tool:

o Surveys o Materiality matrix

o Interviews  Logic:

o Workshops o High stakeholder concern

o Focus groups o High business impact

 Outcome:  Classification:

o Stakeholder priority list o High priority

STEP 2 – Identify ESG Issues o Medium priority

 Reference: o Low priority

o GRI standards STEP 5 – Reporting & Disclosure

o SASB maps  Frameworks:

 Categories: o GRI

o Environmental o SASB

o Social o CDP
 Key elements: 11. ESG RISKS

o Strategy Environmental Risks

o KPIs  Pollution

o Targets  Oil spills

 Outcome:  Resource depletion

o Transparent ESG report  Example:

9. MATERIALITY MATRIX o BP oil spill

Axes Social Risks

 X-axis → Business impact  Unsafe labor

 Y-axis → Stakeholder concern  Human rights violations

Quadrants  Example:

 High–High: o Rana Plaza

o Immediate action Governance Risks

 High–Low:  Fraud

o Monitor  Corruption

 Low–High:  Example:

o Stakeholder engagement o Volkswagen scandal

 Low–Low: 12. ESG RISK MITIGATION

o Track only Environmental

10. MICROSOFT MATERIALITY MATRIX  EMS systems

High Priority Issues  Renewable energy

 Data privacy  Example:

 Climate emissions o Apple carbon neutrality

 Responsible AI Social

Medium Priority Issues  Supplier audits

 Workforce diversity  Labor codes

 Supply chain ethics  Example:

Reason for prioritization o Nestlé

 Regulatory exposure Governance

 Brand reputation  Independent boards

 Technology ethics  Ethics committees


 Example:  SMART targets:

o Unilever o Measurable goals

13. ESG OPPORTUNITIES  Cross-functional teams:

Environmental o ESG across departments

 Renewable energy adoption  Board oversight:

 Circular economy o Strategic control

 Green products

 Examples:

o IKEA

o Tesla

o Unilever

Social

 Diversity & inclusion

 Community development

 Employee well-being

 Examples:

o Microsoft

o Starbucks

o Salesforce

Governance

 Ethical leadership

 Board diversity

 Transparency

 Examples:

o Johnson & Johnson

o Accenture

o Danone

14. INTEGRATING ESG INTO CORPORATE


STRATEGY

 Scenario analysis:

o Future climate risks

You might also like