0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views3 pages

Jainbabu

The document discusses the historical development and differences between the Shwetambar and Digambar sects of Jainism, including their clothing practices, beliefs about women's salvation, and the compilation of religious texts. It outlines the split between the sects, the establishment of various branches and lineages, and the evolution of the Shwetambar community into Chaityavasi monks. Additionally, it mentions the emergence of pseudo-Jain sects and their unique beliefs and practices.

Uploaded by

snktpandey27
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views3 pages

Jainbabu

The document discusses the historical development and differences between the Shwetambar and Digambar sects of Jainism, including their clothing practices, beliefs about women's salvation, and the compilation of religious texts. It outlines the split between the sects, the establishment of various branches and lineages, and the evolution of the Shwetambar community into Chaityavasi monks. Additionally, it mentions the emergence of pseudo-Jain sects and their unique beliefs and practices.

Uploaded by

snktpandey27
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

​Page 53: The Split and Early Lineage​

​●​ I​n a specific context, it is written describing the Shramanas of that time that they tie a​
​waist cloth (​​Kativastra​​) without any specific reason.​
​●​ ​In this way, they first started wearing a loincloth; but later, the Shwetambars began​
​wearing white clothes.​
​●​ ​About 1000 years after the Nirvana of Mahavira, the compilation of the eleven​​Angas​
​was systematically done based on the memory of the monks, which the Digambars do​
​not follow.​
​●​ ​Along with the wearing of clothes, literary differences also became a cause for the split​
​between Shwetambars and Digambars.​
​●​ ​Therefore, the time of their split, based on epigraphical evidence, occurred before the​
​1st Century AD​​.​
​●​ ​According to the Shwetambar sect, women can also achieve the attainment of salvation​
​(​Moksha​​). Additionally, taking food is not an obstacle​​to​​Keval-Gyana​​(supreme​
​knowledge).​
​●​ ​Conversely, the people of the Digambar sect did not believe in these two principles.​
​●​ ​The history of the Shwetambar sect is found chronologically in the​​Kalpasutra​​, which​
​mentions 4,200 disciples of the Ganadhara named Gautama after Mahavira.​

​Page 54: Historical Outline and Sub-divisions​

​​ S
● ​ hravastika and three other branches and 'Ganika' etc., four lineages were established.​
​●​ ​A branch named 'Madav Gana' was established by one of his disciples, Rishi Gupta.​
​●​ ​Looking at the names of these branches and sub-branches, it is known that besides​
​geographical differences, sub-branches were also established based on 'Gotras'.​
​●​ ​The 'Povik Gana' was established by Sthavir Suhasthi, from which branches like​
​Uchchanagari and Vidyadhari emerged.​
​●​ ​Similarly, various branches, lineages, and clans were established by different Acharyas.​
​These appear to be various divisions of the Shwetambar sect.​
​●​ ​The history of this sect is known from the​​Sthaviravali​​of the​​Kalpasutra​​and inscriptions​
​found from the Kankali Tila (mound) of Mathura.​

​Page 55: Comparison of Principles​

​●​ A ​ ccording to this sect (Shwetambar), the attainment of salvation was not possible​
​through the hard penance of Shramanas alone; they followed the​​Middle Path​​.​
​●​ ​This created a contrast with the Digambar Acharyas who promoted nudity.​
​●​ ​To make the religion popular and successful, Shwetambar Acharyas allowed wearing​
​clothes and allowed women to enter the Sangha.​
​​ T
● ​ he Shwetambar sect accepted that a​​Kevali​​(liberated soul) could still consume food.​
​●​ ​The Digambar sect strictly rejects three things: wearing clothes, salvation for women,​
​and food intake by a​​Kevali​​.​
​●​ ​These fundamental differences created a deep gulf between the two sects, leading to​
​different codes of conduct (​​Acharavalis​​).​

​Page 56 & 57: The Chaityavasi Sect​

​●​ 1 ​ . Chaityavasi Shwetambar Sect:​​The monks of the Shwetambar​​sect who remained​


​are called​​Jati​​or​​Shripujya​​.​
​●​ ​Their history begins around 550 years after the Nirvana of Mahavira.​
​●​ ​Some monks with "dry conduct" (strict) gave up the life of wandering and began living​
​permanently in temples (​​Chaityas​​) or monasteries for​​the purpose of stability.​
​●​ ​Because they resided in a​​Chaitya​​, they were called​​Chaityavasi​​.​
​●​ ​Gradually their numbers grew, and they even authored a scripture named​​Nigam​​.​
​●​ ​In the​​Sambodhi Prakaran​​, it is mentioned that Chaityavasi​​monks live in temples,​
​perform Puja and Aarti, and use "Dev-Dravya" (temple funds).​
​●​ ​They were different from the wandering Shramanas who moved from place to place.​

​Page 58 & 59: Evolution of the Shwetambar Community​

​●​ I​n this way, the Shwetambar Shramana community was divided into two parts: one that​
​supported the wandering tradition (​​Vihar​​) and another​​that resided permanently in​
​temples/monasteries (​​Chaityas​​).​
​●​ ​It was here that the creation of their literature and education began.​
​●​ ​According to this Shramana community, the first Jina Rishabhdev and the last Jina​
​Mahavira preached the doctrine of​​Achelatva​​(nudity),​​but the 22 Tirthankaras in​
​between preached both​​Sachel​​(clothed) and​​Achel​​(unclothed)​​doctrines.​
​●​ ​Digambars do not agree with this; according to them, all 24 Tirthankaras preached only​
​the​​Achel​​(nudity) doctrine.​

​Page 60: The Digambar Mula Sangha​

​●​ A ​ ccording to some thinkers, the rule of residing in temples mentioned in​​Ratnamala​
​belongs to the Shwetambar Chaityavasis.​
​●​ ​In the Digambar sect, there is no mention of such a belief, but there are hints that some​
​Digambars imitated these principles.​
​●​ ​The developed form of this in the Digambar sect was the​​Bhattarak​​system, which was​
​later opposed by the​​Terapanth​​movement.​
​●​ A
​ charya Indranandi mentions that Acharya​​Arhatbali​​divided the Mula Sangha into four​
​branches to avoid sectarianism:​​Nandi, Sen, Dev, and​​Simha​​.​

​Page 61 & 62: The Four Pseudo-Jain Sanghas (Jainabhas)​

​●​ T ​ he​​Darshansar​​mentions the origin of certain Sanghas​​called 'Jainabhas'​


​(Pseudo-Jains):​​Shwetambar, Yapaniya, Dravid, Mathur,​​and Kastha​​.​
​●​ ​Dravid Sangha:​​Founded by Vajranandi (disciple of​​Poojyapada) in South Mathura.​
​They believed seeds have no life.​
​●​ ​Yapaniya Sangha:​​Founded by Shwetambar monk Shri Kalash​​in Kalyan Nagar (205​
​years after Vikram). They wore clothes but followed some Digambar practices.​
​●​ ​Kastha Sangha:​​Founded by Kumar Sen in Vikram Samvat​​643. They used 'Chamar'​
​instead of peacock feathers.​
​●​ ​Mathur Sangha:​​Founded by Ramsen Munis in Mathura​​(200 years after Kastha​
​Sangha). They abandoned the use of the 'Peechi' (feather broom) entirely.​
​●​ ​Bhillak Sangha:​​Founded by Veera Chandramuni on the​​Vindhya mountains. He​
​preached among the Bhil tribes.​

You might also like