0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views5 pages

Assignment

The assignment requires a group of five students to develop a 3-5 year strategic direction for a real healthcare organization, focusing on strategic management rather than descriptive analysis. Students must conduct interviews, gather contextual information, and structure their report into five sections, including strategic issues, external realities, internal capabilities, strategic alternatives, and an action blueprint. The final deliverable includes a report and presentation, with specific evaluation criteria emphasizing analytical depth, evidence integration, and clarity of strategic choices.

Uploaded by

niyatisingh25
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views5 pages

Assignment

The assignment requires a group of five students to develop a 3-5 year strategic direction for a real healthcare organization, focusing on strategic management rather than descriptive analysis. Students must conduct interviews, gather contextual information, and structure their report into five sections, including strategic issues, external realities, internal capabilities, strategic alternatives, and an action blueprint. The final deliverable includes a report and presentation, with specific evaluation criteria emphasizing analytical depth, evidence integration, and clarity of strategic choices.

Uploaded by

niyatisingh25
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Assignment Details

Assignment: Strategic Positioning & Future Direction of a Health


Care Organization

Group Size: 5 students

Duration: 6 weeks (to be uploaded by 15th April 2026)

Deliverables: Report + Presentation

What This Assignment Is About

In this course, we’ve studied strategic management as a structured and


integrated process. Now it’s your turn to apply it to a real organization.

Select a real healthcare organization and develop a clear,


defensible 3–5 year strategic direction for it.

The objective is not writing a profile or doing a descriptive SWOT/PESTLE.


You are also not summarizing the organization.

You are looking at the broad question: What should this


organization do strategically — and why?

Step 1: Choose an Organization

You may select:

 A multi-specialty hospital

 A specialty clinic (cardiac, oncology, fertility, etc.)

 A diagnostic chain

 A public hospital

 A telehealth provider

 A healthcare NGO

 A day-care surgical center

 Etc

The organization must be real and currently operating. You can also select
your current organization.

Step 2: Gather Context Material

You are expected to:

 Conduct 1–2 semi-structured interviews (manager, doctor,


administrator, industry expert)
 You can use publicly available sources

 Collect local service area information (demographics, competitors,


media coverage, policy context)

You are not required to access internal financials or confidential


documents.

However, all claims must be supported by either: interview insight, public


data and credible secondary source.

Report Structure (Keep It to ~18–20 Pages)

You must structure your report under the following five sections:

Section I: The Strategic Issue (15%)

What is the single most important strategic issue this organization must
resolve in the next 3–5 years?

Explain:

 Why this issue matters now

 What makes it urgent

 What uncertainty surrounds it

 One assumption leadership may be making that deserves scrutiny

Section II: External & Competitive Reality (20%)

Define:

 The service area (geographic + service scope)

 The 4–6 environmental forces that truly matter

Then:

 Identify the top 3 competitors (justify your choice)

 Map competitors across two dimensions that matter in this specific


context

 Identify one structural opportunity or threat emerging in the service


area

Avoid generic textbook templates. Focus only on what changes the


strategy.

Section III: Internal Capabilities & Competitive Relevance (20%)

Examine:
 How value is delivered

 What the organization claims as strengths

 What you observed or learned from interviews

Then answer:

Which strengths are truly competitively relevant — and which are


overstated?

Identify:

 3 competitively relevant strengths

 3 key weaknesses

 Evidence supporting each

This is about judgment, not listing. Justify your judgment.

Section IV: Alternatives & Choice (25%)

Develop two realistic strategic paths.

For each:

 Strategic logic

 Risks

 Resources required

 Likely stakeholder resistance

Then Choose one option.

Be explicit about:

 Trade-offs

 What must be stopped

 Why this option fits best given your earlier analysis

Hint: If your recommendation could apply to any hospital anywhere, it’s


too generic.

Section V: 18-Month Action Blueprint (20%)

Outline the following:

 3–5 prioritized initiatives

 Logical sequencing

 Who must lead each initiative


 One implementation risk most likely to derail the strategy

 One early success indicator

Thin of the questions:

If leadership fails to manage this properly, what will fail first?

Evidence Appendix (Required)

Attach:

 Interview summaries

 Data sources

 Competitor evidence

 Demographic or regulatory references

Final Presentation

Be prepared to answer:

 What assumption changed during your analysis?

 What insight came specifically from your interview?

 What is the weakest part of your own strategy?

 If the environment shifts, how vulnerable is your strategy?

Evaluation Criteria

Weig
Criteria
ht

Analytical depth 25%

Integration of
20%
evidence

Quality of strategic
20%
choice

Clarity of trade-offs 15%

Implementation
10%
realism

Insight & reflection 10%

What Will Not Score Well


 Generic SWOT or PEST or Poeter summaries

 Description without prioritization and logic

 Strategy without trade-offs

 Recommendations without evidence or being very generic

 Broad statements like “improve quality” or “expand services”

What is being Tested:

Your ability to:

 Think strategically under uncertainty

 Integrate multiple lenses

 Make choices

 Defend trade-offs

 Translate analysis into action

 Engage with real-world complexity

You might also like