SHIGLEY'S MED · CHAPTER 7 · SHAFT DESIGN
Problem 7-3 — Complete Solution Guide
From first principles · DE-ASME Elliptic Criterion · Full iteration
00 Problem Statement & Given Information
KNOWN VALUES
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION VALUE SOURCE
T Applied torque 3000 lbf·in Problem statement
F Tangential gear force 1064 lbf Computed below
L Moment arm 4 in Problem statement
Sut Ultimate tensile strength 80 kpsi Problem / material
Sy Yield strength 60 kpsi Problem / material
n Design safety factor 2.5 Problem statement
Fillet type Sharp shoulder fillets — Problem statement
01 Compute the Applied Loading
GEAR FORCE FROM TORQUE
A helical/spur gear transmits torque through a tangential force. With pressure angle φ = 20°:
Fo rce eq uil ibr ium
\[ F\cos(20°)\cdot\frac{d}{2} = T \quad\Rightarrow\quad F = \frac{2T}{d\cos 20°} =
\frac{2(3000)}{6\cos 20°} \]
F F = 1064 lbf
BENDING MOMENT AT CRITICAL SECTION
\[ M_C = F \times L = 1064 \times 4 \]
MC M = 4257 lbf·in
LOADING CLASSIFICATION (FOR FATIGUE)
For a rotating shaft with constant load direction:
COMPONENT MEAN (SUBSCRIPT M) AMPLITUDE (SUBSCRIPT A)
Bending moment M Mm = 0 Ma = 4257 lbf·in
Torque T Tm = 3000 lbf·in Ta = 0
Rotating shaft → bending stress is fully reversed (mean=0, amplitude=full). Torque is steady (mean=full,
amplitude=0).
02 Stress Concentration Factors
THEORETICAL FACTORS — TABLE 7-1 (SHARP FILLET AT SHOULDER)
FACTOR TYPE VALUE
Kt Bending (theoretical) 2.7
Kts Torsion (theoretical) 2.2
NOTCH SENSITIVITY — FIGS. 6-20 & 6-21 (SUT = 80 KPSI)
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION VALUE
q Notch sensitivity (bending) 0.8
qs Notch sensitivity (shear/torsion) 0.9
FATIGUE STRESS CONCENTRATION — EQ. 6-32
Eq . 6 -32
\[ K_f = 1 + q(K_t - 1) = 1 + (0.8)(2.7 - 1) = 1 + 1.36 \]
KF Kf = 2.4
Eq . 6 -32 (s hea r)
\[ K_{fs} = 1 + q_s(K_{ts} - 1) = 1 + (0.9)(2.2 - 1) = 1 + 1.08 \]
KFS Kfs = 2.1
03 Endurance Limit Se
UNCORRECTED ENDURANCE LIMIT
Eq . 6 -8 — f or S u t ≤ 200 k psi
\[ S_e' = 0.5\, S_{ut} = 0.5(80) = 40\text{ kpsi} \]
MARIN CORRECTION FACTORS
FACTOR NAME FORMULA / SOURCE VALUE
ka Surface (machined) 2.70 · Sut−0.265 — Table 6-2 0.845
kb Size factor (d/0.3)−0.107 — Eq. 6-20 0.816
assume d = 2 in initially
kc Load Bending = 1 1.0
kd Temperature Room temp = 1 1.0
ke Reliability 50% = 1 (unless stated) 1.0
kf Miscellaneous =1 1.0
Eq . 6 -18 — Cor rected e nduran ce lim it
\[ S_e = k_a\,k_b\,k_c\,k_d\,k_e\,k_f\,S_e' = (0.845)(0.816)(1)(1)(1)(1)(40) \]
SE Se = 27.6 kpsi
04 Part (a) — Static Analysis Using Fatigue Factors
Uses the von Mises maximum stress approach with M = Mm + Ma and T = Tm + Ta. Since this is a
static check with fatigue concentration factors, set M = Ma = 4257 lbf·in and T = Tm = 3000 lbf·in.
VON MISES STRESS — EQ. 7-15
Eq . 7 -15 — Von Mises a lterna ting s tress a mplitude
\[ \sigma'_{max} = \left[\left(\frac{32\,K_f M}{\pi d^3}\right)^2 + 3\left(\frac{16\,K_{fs}\,T}{\pi
d^3}\right)^2\right]^{1/2} \]
SAFETY FACTOR — EQ. 7-16
Eq . 7 -16
\[ n = \frac{S_y}{\sigma'_{max}} \]
SOLVE FOR DIAMETER D
Re arr ang ed for d
\[ d = \left\{\frac{16\,n}{\pi\,S_y}\left[4(K_f M)^2 + 3(K_{fs}\,T)^2\right]^{1/2}\right\}^{1/3}
\]
Su bst itu tin g v alues
\[ d = \left\{\frac{16(2.5)}{\pi(60\,000)}\left[4(2.4\times4257)^2 +
3(2.1\times3000)^2\right]^{1/2}\right\}^{1/3} \]
ANS (A) d = 1.700 in
Static check with fatigue factors
05 Part (b) — DE-ASME Elliptic Fatigue Criterion
The ASME Elliptic criterion is more accurate than Goodman for ductile steels. It uses both Se and Sy as
boundaries.
DE-ASME ELLIPTIC — EQ. 7-12 (WITH MM = TA = 0)
Eq . 7 -12 — Gen eral for m
\[ \frac{1}{n} = \left[\left(\frac{32\,K_f M_a}{\pi d^3 S_e}\right)^2 +
\left(\frac{16\,K_{fs}\,T_m}{\pi d^3 S_y}\right)^2\right]^{1/2} \cdot \frac{\pi d^3}{1} \]
Eq . 7 -12 — Sol ved for d
\[ d = \left\{\frac{16\,n}{\pi}\left[4\left(\frac{K_f M_a}{S_e}\right)^2 +
3\left(\frac{K_{fs}\,T_m}{S_y}\right)^2\right]^{1/2}\right\}^{1/3} \]
ITERATION 1 — INITIAL ESTIMATE (D = 2 IN ASSUMED FOR KB)
Su bst itu tin g S e = 27 .6 kp si, S y = 6 0 kpsi
\[ d = \left\{\frac{16(2.5)}{\pi}\left[4\left(\frac{2.4(4257)}{27\,600}\right)^2 +
3\left(\frac{2.1(3000)}{60\,000}\right)^2\right]^{1/2}\right\}^{1/3} \]
D ITER 1 d = 2.133 in
ITERATION 2 — REVISE KB WITH D = 2.133 IN
\[ k_b = \left(\frac{2.133}{0.3}\right)^{-0.107} = 0.809 \] \[ S_e = 0.845(0.809)(40) = 27.3\text{
kpsi} \]
\[ d = \left\{\frac{16(2.5)}{\pi}\left[4\left(\frac{2.4(4257)}{27\,300}\right)^2 +
3\left(\frac{2.1(3000)}{60\,000}\right)^2\right]^{1/2}\right\}^{1/3} \]
ANS (B) d = 2.138 in
Converged — no further iteration needed
06 Summary & Design Decision
Part (a) — Static Check
d = 1.700 in
Uses Sy as failure boundary. Conservative for static overload only.
Part (b) — Fatigue (ASME Elliptic)
d = 2.138 in
Uses Se and Sy. Governs because fatigue is more critical here.
⚠ Part (b) governs — d = 2.138 in is larger, meaning fatigue failure controls the design. Always use the larger of
the two calculated diameters.
FULL SOLUTION ROADMAP
Find F, M, T → Get Kt, Kts → Find q, qs → Calc Kf, Kfs → Find Se → Apply Eq. 7-12 → Iterate d
07 Quick-Reference Tables
TABLE 6-2 — SURFACE FACTOR KA = A · SUTB
SURFACE FINISH A (KPSI) B
Ground 1.34 −0.085
Machined / Cold-drawn 2.70 −0.265
Hot-rolled 14.4 −0.718
As-forged 39.9 −0.995
TABLE 7-1 — STRESS CONCENTRATION FACTORS FOR SHOULDER FILLETS
FILLET TYPE KT (BENDING) KTS (TORSION)
Sharp (r/d ≈ 0.02) 2.7 2.2
Well-rounded (r/d ≈ 0.1) ~1.65 ~1.5
SIZE FACTOR KB — EQ. 6-20
RANGE FORMULA
0.11 ≤ d ≤ 2 in k = 0.879 d−0.107
b
2 < d ≤ 10 in k = 0.91 d−0.157
b
or equivalently kb = (d/0.3)−0.107
SHIGLEY 'S M ECHANIC AL ENG INEERING DES IGN · PROB LEM 7-3 · CO MPLETE REFERE NCE GUIDE