0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views5 pages

Problem7 3 Complete Guide

The document provides a complete solution guide for Problem 7-3 from Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design, focusing on shaft design under applied torque and bending moments. It includes calculations for applied loading, stress concentration factors, endurance limits, and static and fatigue analyses, ultimately determining a shaft diameter of 2.138 inches as the governing design parameter. The guide emphasizes the importance of considering fatigue failure in design decisions.

Uploaded by

kalahanmoonga82
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views5 pages

Problem7 3 Complete Guide

The document provides a complete solution guide for Problem 7-3 from Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design, focusing on shaft design under applied torque and bending moments. It includes calculations for applied loading, stress concentration factors, endurance limits, and static and fatigue analyses, ultimately determining a shaft diameter of 2.138 inches as the governing design parameter. The guide emphasizes the importance of considering fatigue failure in design decisions.

Uploaded by

kalahanmoonga82
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

SHIGLEY'S MED · CHAPTER 7 · SHAFT DESIGN

Problem 7-3 — Complete Solution Guide


From first principles · DE-ASME Elliptic Criterion · Full iteration

00 Problem Statement & Given Information

KNOWN VALUES

SYMBOL DESCRIPTION VALUE SOURCE

T Applied torque 3000 lbf·in Problem statement

F Tangential gear force 1064 lbf Computed below

L Moment arm 4 in Problem statement

Sut Ultimate tensile strength 80 kpsi Problem / material

Sy Yield strength 60 kpsi Problem / material

n Design safety factor 2.5 Problem statement

Fillet type Sharp shoulder fillets — Problem statement

01 Compute the Applied Loading

GEAR FORCE FROM TORQUE

A helical/spur gear transmits torque through a tangential force. With pressure angle φ = 20°:

Fo rce eq uil ibr ium

\[ F\cos(20°)\cdot\frac{d}{2} = T \quad\Rightarrow\quad F = \frac{2T}{d\cos 20°} =


\frac{2(3000)}{6\cos 20°} \]

F F = 1064 lbf

BENDING MOMENT AT CRITICAL SECTION

\[ M_C = F \times L = 1064 \times 4 \]

MC M = 4257 lbf·in

LOADING CLASSIFICATION (FOR FATIGUE)

For a rotating shaft with constant load direction:

COMPONENT MEAN (SUBSCRIPT M) AMPLITUDE (SUBSCRIPT A)

Bending moment M Mm = 0 Ma = 4257 lbf·in

Torque T Tm = 3000 lbf·in Ta = 0

Rotating shaft → bending stress is fully reversed (mean=0, amplitude=full). Torque is steady (mean=full,
amplitude=0).
02 Stress Concentration Factors

THEORETICAL FACTORS — TABLE 7-1 (SHARP FILLET AT SHOULDER)

FACTOR TYPE VALUE

Kt Bending (theoretical) 2.7

Kts Torsion (theoretical) 2.2

NOTCH SENSITIVITY — FIGS. 6-20 & 6-21 (SUT = 80 KPSI)

SYMBOL DESCRIPTION VALUE

q Notch sensitivity (bending) 0.8

qs Notch sensitivity (shear/torsion) 0.9

FATIGUE STRESS CONCENTRATION — EQ. 6-32

Eq . 6 -32

\[ K_f = 1 + q(K_t - 1) = 1 + (0.8)(2.7 - 1) = 1 + 1.36 \]

KF Kf = 2.4

Eq . 6 -32 (s hea r)

\[ K_{fs} = 1 + q_s(K_{ts} - 1) = 1 + (0.9)(2.2 - 1) = 1 + 1.08 \]

KFS Kfs = 2.1

03 Endurance Limit Se

UNCORRECTED ENDURANCE LIMIT

Eq . 6 -8 — f or S u t ≤ 200 k psi

\[ S_e' = 0.5\, S_{ut} = 0.5(80) = 40\text{ kpsi} \]

MARIN CORRECTION FACTORS

FACTOR NAME FORMULA / SOURCE VALUE

ka Surface (machined) 2.70 · Sut−0.265 — Table 6-2 0.845

kb Size factor (d/0.3)−0.107 — Eq. 6-20 0.816


assume d = 2 in initially

kc Load Bending = 1 1.0

kd Temperature Room temp = 1 1.0

ke Reliability 50% = 1 (unless stated) 1.0

kf Miscellaneous =1 1.0

Eq . 6 -18 — Cor rected e nduran ce lim it

\[ S_e = k_a\,k_b\,k_c\,k_d\,k_e\,k_f\,S_e' = (0.845)(0.816)(1)(1)(1)(1)(40) \]

SE Se = 27.6 kpsi
04 Part (a) — Static Analysis Using Fatigue Factors

Uses the von Mises maximum stress approach with M = Mm + Ma and T = Tm + Ta. Since this is a
static check with fatigue concentration factors, set M = Ma = 4257 lbf·in and T = Tm = 3000 lbf·in.

VON MISES STRESS — EQ. 7-15

Eq . 7 -15 — Von Mises a lterna ting s tress a mplitude

\[ \sigma'_{max} = \left[\left(\frac{32\,K_f M}{\pi d^3}\right)^2 + 3\left(\frac{16\,K_{fs}\,T}{\pi


d^3}\right)^2\right]^{1/2} \]

SAFETY FACTOR — EQ. 7-16

Eq . 7 -16

\[ n = \frac{S_y}{\sigma'_{max}} \]

SOLVE FOR DIAMETER D

Re arr ang ed for d

\[ d = \left\{\frac{16\,n}{\pi\,S_y}\left[4(K_f M)^2 + 3(K_{fs}\,T)^2\right]^{1/2}\right\}^{1/3}


\]

Su bst itu tin g v alues

\[ d = \left\{\frac{16(2.5)}{\pi(60\,000)}\left[4(2.4\times4257)^2 +
3(2.1\times3000)^2\right]^{1/2}\right\}^{1/3} \]

ANS (A) d = 1.700 in


Static check with fatigue factors

05 Part (b) — DE-ASME Elliptic Fatigue Criterion

The ASME Elliptic criterion is more accurate than Goodman for ductile steels. It uses both Se and Sy as
boundaries.

DE-ASME ELLIPTIC — EQ. 7-12 (WITH MM = TA = 0)

Eq . 7 -12 — Gen eral for m

\[ \frac{1}{n} = \left[\left(\frac{32\,K_f M_a}{\pi d^3 S_e}\right)^2 +


\left(\frac{16\,K_{fs}\,T_m}{\pi d^3 S_y}\right)^2\right]^{1/2} \cdot \frac{\pi d^3}{1} \]

Eq . 7 -12 — Sol ved for d

\[ d = \left\{\frac{16\,n}{\pi}\left[4\left(\frac{K_f M_a}{S_e}\right)^2 +
3\left(\frac{K_{fs}\,T_m}{S_y}\right)^2\right]^{1/2}\right\}^{1/3} \]

ITERATION 1 — INITIAL ESTIMATE (D = 2 IN ASSUMED FOR KB)

Su bst itu tin g S e = 27 .6 kp si, S y = 6 0 kpsi

\[ d = \left\{\frac{16(2.5)}{\pi}\left[4\left(\frac{2.4(4257)}{27\,600}\right)^2 +
3\left(\frac{2.1(3000)}{60\,000}\right)^2\right]^{1/2}\right\}^{1/3} \]

D ITER 1 d = 2.133 in

ITERATION 2 — REVISE KB WITH D = 2.133 IN


\[ k_b = \left(\frac{2.133}{0.3}\right)^{-0.107} = 0.809 \] \[ S_e = 0.845(0.809)(40) = 27.3\text{
kpsi} \]

\[ d = \left\{\frac{16(2.5)}{\pi}\left[4\left(\frac{2.4(4257)}{27\,300}\right)^2 +
3\left(\frac{2.1(3000)}{60\,000}\right)^2\right]^{1/2}\right\}^{1/3} \]

ANS (B) d = 2.138 in


Converged — no further iteration needed

06 Summary & Design Decision

Part (a) — Static Check

d = 1.700 in

Uses Sy as failure boundary. Conservative for static overload only.

Part (b) — Fatigue (ASME Elliptic)

d = 2.138 in

Uses Se and Sy. Governs because fatigue is more critical here.

⚠ Part (b) governs — d = 2.138 in is larger, meaning fatigue failure controls the design. Always use the larger of
the two calculated diameters.

FULL SOLUTION ROADMAP

Find F, M, T → Get Kt, Kts → Find q, qs → Calc Kf, Kfs → Find Se → Apply Eq. 7-12 → Iterate d

07 Quick-Reference Tables

TABLE 6-2 — SURFACE FACTOR KA = A · SUTB

SURFACE FINISH A (KPSI) B

Ground 1.34 −0.085

Machined / Cold-drawn 2.70 −0.265

Hot-rolled 14.4 −0.718

As-forged 39.9 −0.995

TABLE 7-1 — STRESS CONCENTRATION FACTORS FOR SHOULDER FILLETS

FILLET TYPE KT (BENDING) KTS (TORSION)

Sharp (r/d ≈ 0.02) 2.7 2.2

Well-rounded (r/d ≈ 0.1) ~1.65 ~1.5

SIZE FACTOR KB — EQ. 6-20

RANGE FORMULA

0.11 ≤ d ≤ 2 in k = 0.879 d−0.107


b

2 < d ≤ 10 in k = 0.91 d−0.157


b
or equivalently kb = (d/0.3)−0.107

SHIGLEY 'S M ECHANIC AL ENG INEERING DES IGN · PROB LEM 7-3 · CO MPLETE REFERE NCE GUIDE

You might also like