DYNAMIC CHART
Trend: (xu hướng: tăng hay giảm)
A và B tăng:
C và D giảm:
Order: (thằng nào có sự tăng nhiều nhất / nhanh nhất, thằng nào có sự tăng thấp
nhất hoặc ít nhất / có thằng nào có số liệu bằng nhau ko)
A tăng nhiều nhất trong tất cả các năm. D giảm sâu nhất.
In addition, although coffee C experienced a downward trend, it was still the most
expensive drink among all in the final year.
I. INTRODUCTION & OVERVIEW
Introduction
The given chart illustrates the changes in the cost of four distinctive types of coffee
(A, B, C, and D) in the United Kingdom over a two-decade period, from 1990 to
2010.
Overview
Overall, it is clear that the prices of coffee A and B rose, while the figures for coffee C
and D declined throughout the 20-year period. Noticeably, coffee A recorded the
most dramatic growth in its valuation.
II. BODY 1 & BODY 2
Body 1:
Beginning with the two categories that increased, Coffee A saw the most
significant jump in the price, starting at £1.10 in 1990 and increasing dramatically
to £2.50 by 2010. In contrast, the value of Coffee B experienced only a slight
increase over the same period. Its price began at £1.99 in the first year and finished
at £2.10 in 2010, remaining relatively stable.
Report trend + so lieu, so sanh
Body 2:
Turning to the remaining two types, Coffee C was firstly the most expensive drink,
standing at £4.50 in 1990. However, its cost fell gradually to £3.20 two decades
later. Similarly, though coffee D had second highest price, at £3.00, in the first year,
its figure dropped sharply over the period and ended at the lowest point on the
chart at £1.20 in 2010.
Report trend + so lieu, so sanh
STATIC CHART
Intro:
The given table gives information how much four different car companies, namely…
spent on different kinds of advertising in the United Kingdom in 2002.
Overview:
Overall, it is clear that all four corporations allocated the majority of their budgets to
/ most of their money on TV advertising, while very little was spent on cinema and
outdoor. Furthermore, the expenditures of all four companies on radio were identical
/ the same in 2002.
Body 1: Renault + Vauxhall
Bắt đầu với Renault và Vauxhall, thằng đầu tiên thì bỏ hầu hết tiền để quảng cáo
trên báo chí (số liệu), so với thằng sau (số liệu). Ngược lại, thằng Vauxhall nó chi
nhiều tiền hơn để quảng cáo trên TV (số liệu) so với thằng Renault (số liệu). Cả 2
công ty đều chi số tiền giống nhau cho việc quảng cáo ngoài trời (số liệu) và trên
radio (số liệu).
Starting with Renault and Vauxhall, the former expended most of its budget to
advertising on news (...). which was much higher than the latter (...). In contrast,
Vauxhall’s expenditure on TV was greater than Renault, at … and … respectively.
Moreover, both firms allocated the same amount of money to promoting their cars
outdoors and on radio, at exactly … and …. apiece.
Spend money on = allocate money to = allot money to = invest money in
Expenditure = spending = allocation
Starting with Renault and Vauxhall, the former spent the most on press advertising
($45 million), which was much higher than the latter’s ($8 million). In contrast,
Vauxhall allocated more to TV ($65 million) compared to Renault ($59 million). Both
companies alloted similar small amounts to advertising outside ($7 million) and
Radio ($15 million).
Report so lieju + so sanh.
Body 2: Rover + Cetirizine
Chuyển qua Rover vs Cetirizine, cả 2 đứa đều bỏ ra 0 đồng cho quảng cáo trên
cinema và chỉ có 15 triệu cho radio. Với 70 triệu, cái khoản chi của Cetirizine cho
quảng cáo trên TV nhiều hơn so với thằng Rover, số liệu của Rover. Tuy nhiên, Rover
lại bỏ nhiều tiền hơn Cetirizine để quảng cáo trên báo, số liệu thằng Rover +
Cetirizine respectively. Trong khi đó, cả 2 công ty đều đầu tư một khoản tiền nhỏ vô
việc quảng cáo ở ngoài, chỉ từ 2-3 triệu.
Turning to Rover and Cetirizine, both companies expended $0 on Cinema and
exactly $15 million on Radio. Standing at $70 million, Cetirizine’s expenditure on TV
was significantly more than Rover’s, which was $45 million. However, Rover
invested more money to newspaper advertising than Cetirizine, at $38 million and
$12 million respectively. Meanwhile, both companies spent a small amount of money
on outdoor advertising, around $2-$3 million.