0% found this document useful (0 votes)
29 views6 pages

Problems MPC

The document discusses the calculation of equilibrium income, savings, and the effects of changes in investment and consumption functions on national income using formulas for the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) and the multiplier. It provides step-by-step solutions to various scenarios, including changes in consumption behavior and tax rates, illustrating how these factors influence equilibrium income and the multiplier effect. Additionally, it includes diagrams to visualize the changes in equilibrium income across different cases.

Uploaded by

Nutan Tigga
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
29 views6 pages

Problems MPC

The document discusses the calculation of equilibrium income, savings, and the effects of changes in investment and consumption functions on national income using formulas for the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) and the multiplier. It provides step-by-step solutions to various scenarios, including changes in consumption behavior and tax rates, illustrating how these factors influence equilibrium income and the multiplier effect. Additionally, it includes diagrams to visualize the changes in equilibrium income across different cases.

Uploaded by

Nutan Tigga
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Problems

Formulas:

ΔC
 MPC=
ΔY
where ΔC is the change in consumption, and ΔY is the change in income.

ΔY
 Multiplier=
ΔI
Refers to how a change in investment (ΔI) leads to a change in national income or output.
1 1
Or Multiplier= =
1-MPC 1-c

 New equilibrium = △Y0 = Y’0 − Y0

1. Suppose the consumption function is given by C =100 +.8Y, while investment is


given by I =50
a. What is the equilibrium level of income in this case?
b. What is the level of saving in equilibrium?
c. If, for some reason, output is at the level of 800, what will the level of involuntary
inventory accumulation be?
d. If I rises to 100 what will the effect be on the equilibrium income?
e. What is the value of the multiplier, , here?
f. Draw a diagram indicating the equilibria in both (a) and (d).

a. Consumption function: 𝐶=100+0.8𝑌


Solution:

Investment (autonomous): 𝐼=50

Basic AD model without G and NX


AD=C+I
= 100+0.8Y+50
= 150+0.8Y

Equilibrium condition: Y=AD


Y=150+0.8Y
Y-0.8Y=150
0.2Y=150
Y=150/0.2
Y= 750
b. Since TA=TR=0, it follows that S=YD-C=Y-C

S=Y-C

S=Y-(100+0.8𝑌)

S=Y-0.8Y-100

S=0.2Y-100

S=0.2(750)-100

S=150-100=50

or

S=Y-C

C=100+0.8Y

C=100+0.8(750)

C=100+600=700

S=750-700= 50

c. If the level of output is Y=800, then

C=100+0.8Y

C=100+0.8(800)
C=100+640=740
AD=C+I
AD=740+50=790

UI=Y-AD
UI=800-790=10
This means firms are producing more than is being purchased.

d. AD’=C+I’
AD’= 100+0.8Y+100
AD’= 200+0.8Y
Equilibrium condition: Y=AD’
Y=200+0.8Y
Y-0.8Y=200
0.2Y=200
Y=200/0.2
Y= 1000

e. 𝐶=100+0.8𝑌
MPC or c= 0.8
Multiplier= 1/1-c
= 1/1-0.8
= 1/0.2= 5

f.
AD=Y
AD
AD1=200+0.8Y

AD0=150+0.8Y

200

150

750 1000 Income, Y

2. Suppose the consumption behavior in problem 1 changes so that C =100 + .9Y,


while I remains at 50.

a. Is the equilibrium level of income higher or lower than it was in problem 1(a)?
Calculate the new equilibrium level, Y’, to verify this.
b. Now suppose investment increases to I =100, just as in problem 1(d). What is the new
equilibrium income?
c. Does this change in investment spending have more or less of an effect on Y than it
did in problem 1? Why?
d. Draw a diagram indicating the change in equilibrium income in this case.

a. Consumption function: 𝐶=100+0.9𝑌


Solution

Investment (autonomous): 𝐼=50

Basic AD model without G and NX


AD=C+I
= 100+0.9Y+50
= 150+0.9Y

Equilibrium condition: Y=AD


Y=150+0.9Y
Y-0.9Y=150
0.1Y=150
Y=150/0.1
Y= 1500

Since the MPC has increased from 0.8 to 0.9, the size of the multiplier is now larger and we
should therefore expect a higher equilibrium income level than in 1.a

b. Y=1500; Y’=?
I= 50; I’= 100 so ∆ I= 50
ΔY
Multiplier=
ΔI
1
Multiplier= = 1/1-0.9=10
1-c
Y= I

△Y0 = Y’0 − Y0
Y= 10x50= 500

500=Y’-1500
Y’= 2000

c. Y= I
Y= 5x50= 250

Y’= 10x50= 500

Since the size of the multiplier has doubled from 5 to 10, the change in output (Y) that
results from a change in investment (I) now has also doubled from 250 to 500.

d. AD=Y

AD AD1=200+0.9Y

AD0=150+0.9Y

200

150

Income, Y
1500 2000
3. Now we look at the role taxes play in determining equilibrium income. Suppose we
have an economy described by the following functions:

C =50 +.8YD

I =70

G=200

TR=100

t=0.20 or 20%

a. Calculate the equilibrium level of income and the multiplier in this model.
b. Calculate also the budget surplus, BS.
c. Suppose that t increases to .25. What is the new equilibrium income? The new
multiplier?
d. Can you explain why the multiplier is 1 when t= 1?

Solution

a. AD=C+ I +G
AD=50+.8 YD +70+200
AD= 320+.8[(1-.20)Y+100]
AD= 320+0.8[(0.8)Y+100]
e. AD= 320+0.64Y+80
AD= 400+.64Y

Equilibrium
Y=AD
Y=400+.64Y
Y-0.64Y=400
0.36Y=400
Y=1111.11

Multiplier= 1/1-c
=1/1-0.64
=2.777 or 2.78
c. AD=C+ I +G
AD=50+.8 YD +70+200
AD= 320+.8[(1-.25)Y+100]
AD= 320+0.8[(0.75)Y+100]
AD= 320+0.6Y+80
AD= 400+0.6Y

Equilibrium
Y=AD
Y=400+.6Y
Y-0.6Y=400
0.4Y=400
Y’=1000

Multiplier= 1/1-c
=1/1-.6
=1/0.4
= 2.5

The size of the multiplier is now reduced to 2.5.

d. If the income tax rate is t = 1, then all income is taxed. There is no induced spending and
equilibrium income only increases by the change in autonomous spending, that is, the size of
the multiplier is 1.

You might also like