Scribd
Upload
4 views1 page

Asignment 1

The document presents mathematical equations related to a fuzzy logic system and confusion matrix data for a predictive model. It includes a comparison of different recommendation methods based on metrics like HR and NDCG across various datasets, highlighting improvements of the CFNet method over existing approaches. The results indicate varying levels of performance across datasets, with CFNet showing notable enhancements in certain measures.

Uploaded by

truong17052003
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
4 views1 page

Asignment 1

The document presents mathematical equations related to a fuzzy logic system and confusion matrix data for a predictive model. It includes a comparison of different recommendation methods based on metrics like HR and NDCG across various datasets, highlighting improvements of the CFNet method over existing approaches. The results indicate varying levels of performance across datasets, with CFNet showing notable enhancements in certain measures.

Uploaded by

truong17052003
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

n

X
ẑ˙1 (t) = µi (s(t)){Āi11 ẑ1 (t) + Āi12 ẑ2 (t) + B̄i1 u(t)
i=1
+ Āhi11 ẑ1 (t − h(t)) + Āhi12 ẑ2 (t − h(t)) + F̄i1 fˆa (t)
+ K1i eω1 (t) + K2i eω1 (t − h(t))}, (1a)
ωˆ1 (t) = C̄11 zˆ1 (t), (1b)
eω1 (t) = ω1 (t) − ωˆ1 (t), (1c)
n
X
fˆa (t) = fˆa (t − τ ) + µi (s(t))Ki eωi (t), (1d)
i=1

X N

ė (t) = µi (s(t)) { (Āi22 − L1i C̄22 )ez2 (t)

z


 2



 i=1
+ (Āhi22 − L2i C̄22 )ez2 (t − h(t))



 + Āi21 ez1 (t) + Āhi21 ez1 (t − h(t))

+ Ē2 d(t) } ,





eω2 (t) = C̄22 ez2 (t).

TABLE I
C ONFUSION M ATRIX

Predicted
N=986
No Yes
No TN = 27 FP = 176
Actual
Yes FN = 9 TP = 774

Fuzzy αθ
logic rules NN NZ NP ZN ZZ ZP PN PZ PP
NN u1 u1 u2 u1 u2 u3 u2 u3 u4
NN u1 u1 u2 u1 u2 u3 u2 u3 u4
NZ u1 u2 u3 u2 u3 u4 u3 u4 u6
NP u2 u3 u4 u4 u4 u6 u4 u6 u3
ZN u1 u2 u3 u2 u3 u4 u3 u4 u6
α̇θ̇ ZZ u2 u3 u4 u3 u4 u6 u4 u6 u3
ZP u3 u4 u6 u4 u6 u3 u5 u3 u7
PN u4 u1 u4 u3 u4 u6 u4 u5 u3
PZ u2 u3 u6 u4 u6 u3 u5 u3 u7
PP u4 u5 u3 u5 u6 u7 u3 u6 u7

TABLE II
C OMPARISON RESULTS OF DIFFERENT METHODS IN TERMS OF
NDCG@10 AND HR@10.

Existing methods CFNet Improvement of


Datasets Measures
ItemPop eALS DMF NeuMF CFNet CFNet-rl CFNet-ml CFNet vs. NeuMF
HR 0.4535 0.7018 0.6565 0.7210 0.7127 0.7073 0.7253 0.6%
ml-1m
NDCG 0.2542 0.4280 0.3761 0.4387 0.4336 0.4264 0.4416 0.7%
HR 0.6628 0.8265 0.8840 0.8868 0.8840 0.8834 0.8995 1.4%
lastfm
NDCG 0.3862 0.5162 0.5804 0.6007 0.6001 0.5919 0.6186 3.0%
HR 0.2483 0.3711 0.3744 0.3891 0.3947 0.4071 0.4116 5.8%
AMusic
NDCG 0.1304 0.2352 0.2149 0.2391 0.2504 0.2420 0.2601 8.8%
HR 0.2840 0.3717 0.3535 0.3650 0.3746 0.3931 0.4150 13.7%
AToy
NDCG 0.1518 0.2434 0.2016 0.2155 0.2271 0.2293 0.2513 16.6%

You might also like