Safety Management Plan: SMP Narayanposhi Iron & Manganese Mines
Safety Management Plan: SMP Narayanposhi Iron & Manganese Mines
Safety Management Plan based on Risk Assessment has been formulated for Narayanposhi
Iron & Manganese Mines of JSW Steel Ltd. Entire procedure has been done as suggested vide
DGMS technical Circular NO.03 of 2019, DGMS Cir. 05 of 2016, DGMS (Tech) (S&T) Cir
No 2 of 2011 & 13 of 2002. A safety management system should set the customs, framework
and action necessary to ensure that mining operations are carried out safely. Safety
management Plan has been prepared by adopting the following steps:
1.1 Objectives
1) Reviewing Health and safety status of Narayanposhi Iron & Manganese Mines in
general’
2) Defining the roles and responsibilities at all levels in the mine management.
7) Design Monitoring process for all identified hazards with or without residual risks.
9) Designing safety clearance procedure of new equipment’s, work methods and materials
used.
[Publish Date] 1
SMP Narayanposhi Iron & Manganese Mines
The roles of the key staffs (owner, agent, manager, supervisor, safety officer, Engineer,
workman inspector, trade union representative, mechanic, operator, workers, contractor etc.)
have been defined specifically in the safety management system for ease of implementation
and monitoring.
The mine management has a generic obligation to engage competent staff & employees to
provide and maintain a safe place of work with proper equipment and facilities. The initiatives
at strategic level in matter of Occupational Health and Safety need to be consolidated by sound
management response. The safety management team with assistance and advice of Internal
Safety Organization and Pit Safety Committee facilitate development of hazard management
plan for different areas of mine operations, in conformation with statutory guide lines.
Regulators and experts from scientific and research organizations may play the role of a
counsellor and assist the process from outside. Identification of major/principal hazards
followed by assessment of risks and development of hazard reduction plan will be key
ingredients of Hazard Management Plan. Hazard reduction plans will indicate control measures
for identified hazards and persons with appropriate competencies responsible for implementing
them within a specified time period. Auditing by internal and external agencies at regular
intervals will help in maximizing the benefits in terms of reducing lost time injury and fatalities.
In the effective management of safety, all mine personnel have different roles to play but still
have the same objectives. They also share a duty of care to:
During formulation of strategies to ensure the health & safety the employees of Mine, following
two points have been considered: -
a) Compliance to various applicable statutes as a pre-requisite.
b) Creation of safety culture in the organization for prevention of any accidents.
Following established methods of risk control have been considered while preparing this Risk
Management Plan:
● Elimination
● Substitution
● Separation
● Administration
● Training
● Use of PPEs
[Publish Date] 3
SMP Narayanposhi Iron & Manganese Mines
During the risk assessment, following details related to mine were studied:
a) Various permissions/ exemptions granted in relation to the working of the mine by,
DGMS & other statutory authorities and company guidelines related to safety.
Contraventions pointed out by inspecting authorities from DNRMS during inspections
and compliance reports submitted by management.
b) Accident statistics of the mine for last 3 years.
c) Minutes of the safety committee meetings.
d) Inspection Reports of the Workmen Inspectors.
e) Requirement and availability of statutory manpower.
f) Emergency Plan, Safe Operating Procedures (SOP), Codes of Practice (COP) in force
at the mine.
g) Results of air borne dust survey, its monitoring and arrangements for dust suppression.
h) Results of measurement for ambient air quality, illumination & noise survey.
i) Water spraying arrangements for dust suppression
j) Existing mining system including drilling, blasting, mucking and transportation.
k) Existing strata control system including rock instrumentations.
l) Mine Management & Safety Organization at the mine.
m) Danger of inundation/fire, etc.
Hazard identification has been done through work process evaluation, consultation with the
employees and previous experience of accidents/incidents at Narayanposhi Iron &Manganese
Mines. The following hazards and hazardous issues were noted, tabulated and risk ranking was
done considering both the likelihood and the potential consequences: -
1.4.3 Definition
1. HAZARD is a source of potential harm, injury or loss.
2. RISK is a combination of the likelihood of specific unwanted event and the potential
consequences that could occur.
3. RISK ASSESSMENT is a process that involves measurement of risk to determine
priorities and to enable identification of appropriate level of risk and to mitigate it.
4. RISK RATING is a category or level of risk assigned to a following risk assessment.
5. RISK CONTROL is an implementation of strategies to prevent or control hazards.
6. RISK MANAGEMENT is an overall description of the steps taken to manage risk, by
identifying hazards and implementing control in the workplace.
7. RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS is a methodical examination of each and every
aspect of work undertaken on a regular basis of identifying hazards, to determine and to
review the implementation of risk rating controls from previous risk assessment process.
8. CONSEQUENCE is the outcome of an event or situation expressed qualitatively or
quantitatively, being a loss, injury, shortcoming or gain.
9. LIKELIHOOD is used as a qualitative description of probability and frequency.
10. PROBABILITY: The term probability can be defined as the likelihood of a specific
outcome, measured by the ratio of specific outcomes to the total number of possible
outcomes.
● Risks are categorized according to the level of risk i.e., highest to lowest, which enables
one to establish risk which need immediate attention or may be managed in an ongoing
manner.
Risk >200 (Say): - Requiring Immediate attention
Risk <200&>20: - Requiring Management Action
Risk <20: - to be watched and reviewed
One lost time injury 0.001 Practically impossible 0.5 Once in 5 years 1.5
[Publish Date] 6
SMP Narayanposhi Iron & Manganese Mines
4 >5-10 Low
5 ≤5 Very low
1.4.6 Abbreviations
[Publish Date] 7
SMP Narayanposhi Iron & Manganese Mines
Name of the mine: Name of the Company: M/s JSW Steel Ltd.
Date Conducted: 28/10/2022 Location: Narayanposhi Mine
Assessment Team
1. Mines Manager
2. Mechanical Engineer
3. Safety Officer
4. Blasting Incharge
7. Geologist
8. Mine Foreman
9. Mines Foreman
10. Blasting Foreman
Facilitators
Sl. No. Name Designation
1. AVP, Mine
2. AVP, Safety and Operations.
3. NIT Rourkela
4. Research Assistant, NIT Rourkela
[Publish Date] 8
SMP Narayanposhi Iron & Manganese Mines
Hazar % Of Ri
S
Hazardous d Worker Exp sk
L Conse Proba
issues/activ identifi Associated hazards s osur Sc Significance
N quence bility
ities cation Expose e or
o.
code d e
NRPL
Struck by moving machine parts 1 10 7 70
D01
NRPL
Hit by drilling cuttings, 0.1 10 7 70
D02
Requiring
NRPL Explosion due to Drilling at
5 10 1 50 Management
D03 misfire/freeze holes
Action
NRPL
Topple of machine from bench 1 10 7 70
D04
NRPL
Trapping of body parts 0.3 10 7 21
D05
Large NRPL To be watched
Dust Very 0.1 10 7 7
D06 and reviewed
1 diameter Low, <
5% Requiring
drilling NRPL
Slip and hit by tools 1 10 3 30 Management
D07
Action
NRPL To be watched
Noise 0.1 10 7 7
D08 and reviewed
NRPL To be watched
Vibration: Machine vibration 0.1 10 10 10
D09 and reviewed
Requiring
NRPL
failure in pneumatic line 1 10 7 70 Management
D10
Action
NRPL To be watched
Leg stuck in hole 0.1 10 7 7
D11 and reviewed
NRPR 35
Slope failure Requiring
F01 5 10 7 0
immediate
NRPR 35
Bench side failure attention
F02 5 10 7 0
Rock Maximu
Requiring
NRPR m
failure at Toppling of rock/fall of undressed rock Management
2 F03 >4
active pit 1 10 7 70 Action
0
zone NRPR Escape route and haulage road % To be watched
F04 obstruction 0.3 10 3 9 and reviewed
Requiring
NRPR
Berm failure Management
F05
1 10 3 30 Action
Requiring
NRPD 15
Failure of dump slope 5 10 3 Management
CM01 0
Action
Requiring
Dump NRPD Toppling/fall of equipment during dump
High 1 10 7 70 Management
constructio CM02 terracing/dumping
3 >20- Action
n and
40% Requiring
monitoring NRPD
Struck by rock fall 1 10 7 70 Management
CM03
Action
NRPD To be watched
Excess dust (Health Hazard) 0.01 10 3 3
CM04 and reviewed
NRPL Toppling of loader during 10
1 10 10
E01 loading/Excavator 0
NRPL
Struck by boom 1 10 7 70
E02
Loading/ex
NRPL
cavation Fire on loader 1 10 3 30 Requiring
E03 Medium
4 with Management
NRPL >10-
inadequate Fall of rock on operator cabin 1 10 3 30 Action
E04 20%
constraints
NRPL Collision with other HEMM during
1 10 3 30
E05 shifting
NRPL
Hit by spillage 1 10 7 70
E06
[Publish Date] 9
SMP Narayanposhi Iron & Manganese Mines
[Publish Date] 10
SMP Narayanposhi Iron & Manganese Mines
NRPL 6. To be watched
Spillage of explosive 0.3 3 7
B08 3 and reviewed
NRPL 10 To be watched
Dust 0.3 5 7
B10 .5 and reviewed
NRPL 10 To be watched
Noise 0.3 5 7
B11 .5 and reviewed
NRPL 10 To be watched
Toxic-& Non-toxic Fumes 0.3 5 7
B12 .5 and reviewed
Requiring
NRPL
Improper/poorly designed shelter house 5 5 1 25 Management
B13
Action
Requiring
NRPL Presence of persons/working within 17
5 5 7 Management
B14 danger zone during blasting 5
Action
NRPL To be watched
Slip and heat by tools 1 5 3 15
B15 and reviewed
NRPL 10 To be watched
Leg stuck in hole 0.3 5 7
B16 .5 and reviewed
[Publish Date] 11
SMP Narayanposhi Iron & Manganese Mines
Name of the Company: M/s JSW Steel Ltd, Name of the Mine: Narayanposhi Iron &
Revision: 0
Manganese Mines
Calculated Risk
Haz. No. Hazard Mechanisms Risk Comments
Cons Exps Prob
Rating
[Publish Date] 12
SMP Narayanposhi Iron & Manganese Mines
[Publish Date] 13
SMP Narayanposhi Iron & Manganese Mines
(a) Frame a blasting protocol comprising the SOP framed & circulated
A. If necessary, modify the statutory obligations and submit to mine
blasting protocol. manager/ agent for approval as well as order
for implementation.
(b) Allocation of authorized mining mate,
[Link] a system for implementation foreman and assistant managers as face Authorised persons are observing
supervisors for observing the compliance of the design and implementing
of blasting protocol. blasting protocols.
the designed and implemented blasting
protocols.
(c) Examination of the face condition by face
supervisor (w. r. t- loose rock formation, Benudhar Mohanta
support condition of face, accumulation of
C. Prepare and implement a system of Already implemented & being
water, condition of blast hole, cable used for
servicing of exploders as per OEM’s blasting and its lay out, condition of Ohm- followed
stipulations. meter, exploder etc.) before commencement
of charging and due submission of the filled
checklist to the blasting in charge.
(d) Checking and ensuring by face supervisor
D. Competent Persons will be allocated for the availability of blasting tools like: Implemented
for supervision. Special care to be Exploder, ohm meter etc. before
commencement of work.
[Publish Date] 14
SMP Narayanposhi Iron & Manganese Mines
taken for checking the contrabands (e) Assess the current system of handing over-
and mobile phones and use of PPE. taking over of the exploder key by blasters
for its effectiveness
(f) Adherence to relevant provisions of
NRSOP 08 by supervisors, blasters and
blaster helpers
[Publish Date] 15
SMP Narayanposhi Iron & Manganese Mines
[Publish Date] 16
SMP Narayanposhi Iron & Manganese Mines
[Publish Date] 17
SMP Narayanposhi Iron & Manganese Mines
[Publish Date] 19
SMP Narayanposhi Iron & Manganese Mines
[Publish Date] 20
SMP Narayanposhi Iron & Manganese Mines
[Publish Date] 21
SMP N