University of Antique

COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION

Sibalom, Antique

Course Code: ENGL 14

Course Title: Teaching and Assessment of Grammar
Instructor: Grace C. Pastolero
Report No.: 1
Topic/s: Issues of Grammar Teaching and Assessment
Discussants: 1. Tom Mahinay
2. Jonabele I. Macias
3. Kirsten Jazzel Magbanua
4. Hanna Mae Armeña
5. Jessyl Ann Gavilangoso
6. Sarah Mae S. Fadol
7. Charlene Heart Palacios

Issues of Grammar Teaching and Assessment

1. Why should we teach grammar?

A. Sentence Machine Argument

This argument means that grammar works like a machine that helps us create sentences.
Without grammar, we may know many words, but we won’t know how to arrange them
properly to express ideas.

B. Fine-tuning Argument
Grammar helps us become more clear and precise when we speak or write. Sometimes, a
small change in grammar can change the meaning of a sentence. Teaching grammar helps
learners avoid confusion and misunderstandings.

C. Fossilization Argument
This argument explains what happens when learners stop improving even though they keep
using the language. This is called fossilization. If grammar is not taught, learners may get used
to incorrect forms and repeat them again and again.
Teaching grammar helps learners move beyond this “plateau” and continue improving.

A plateau is the point where a learner feels stuck—no longer getting better, even though they
are still using the language.

D. Advance-Organizer Argument
Grammar acts as a guide or roadmap. When learners are taught grammar, they start to notice
patterns in the language. Later, when they encounter similar structures, they can use them
independently.

E. Discrete Item Argument

This argument says that language becomes easier when grammar is taught in small, clear
parts. Grammar breaks language into rules, making it less overwhelming.

1
 University of Antique
COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION
Sibalom, Antique

Instead of seeing English as one big confusing system, learners see it as manageable pieces.

F. Rule-of-Law Argument
Grammar provides structure not only for learners but also for teachers. It helps teachers
organize lessons clearly and systematically, making classroom instruction more effective.

G. Learner Expectations Argument

Many learners expect grammar to be part of language learning. When grammar is not taught,
they may feel unsatisfied or think they are not really learning English.

Teaching grammar meets learners’ expectations and builds trust in the teacher.

2. Pedagogical Issues

Pedagogical issues in grammar teaching refer to the challenges and concerns educators
face when designing and implementing effective grammar instruction in language learning.
Teaching grammar is not always easy because teachers must consider how students learn,
how grammar is used in communication, and how to correct errors without discouraging
learners. Below are the common pedagogical issues teachers face.

1. Balancing Form and Function

This issue refers to the challenge of teaching grammar rules (form) while also teaching how
grammar is actually used in communication (function).
If teachers focus only on rules, students may know grammar but cannot use it in real
conversation. If teachers focus only on communication, students may speak but with many
grammatical mistakes. Therefore, teachers must balance understanding the structure and
using the structure meaningfully.

2. Scaffolding Learning
Scaffolding means teaching step-by-step, starting from simple grammar structures and
gradually moving to more complex ones.
This idea comes from Lev Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development, which states that
learners understand better when lessons move from what they already know to what they are
ready to learn next.

If grammar lessons jump too quickly to difficult topics, students may become confused.
Example: Teaching Relative Clauses
A relative clause adds extra information about a noun. However, they can be difficult for
learners, so teachers introduce them gradually.

This teaching strategy is influenced by Lev Vygotsky, who explained that learners understand
best when lessons move step-by-step within their Zone of Proximal Development.

Example
Step 1: Subject Relative Clause (Easiest)
The man who lives next door is a doctor.
Structure:
• Noun + who + verb

2
 University of Antique
COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION
Sibalom, Antique

Explanation:
“Who lives next door” describes the man.
Here, who functions as the subject of the clause.
Meaning:
• Which man?
• The man who lives next door.
Students learn that who refers to people.

Step 2: Object Relative Clause

Example:
The book that I read was exciting.
Structure:
• Noun + that + subject + verb

Explanation:
In the clause that I read, the object is book.

Meaning:
• Which book?
• The book that I read.
This is harder because the noun being described becomes the object inside the clause.

Step 3: Non-Defining Relative Clause (More Complex)

Example:
My sister, who lives in Canada, is visiting next month.

Explanation:
This clause gives extra information, not essential information.

Difference:

Defining clause
• The student who studies hard will pass.
(Important information)

Non-defining clause
• My sister, who lives in Canada, is visiting.
(Additional information)
Teachers introduce this last because it involves:
• punctuation
• meaning differences
• more complex grammar

3. Handling Learners’ Errors

Another issue in grammar teaching is how teachers correct students’ mistakes.
Some scholars like John Truscott argue that too much correction can discourage students,
while others like Dana Ferris believe constructive feedback helps learners improve.
The challenge is correcting errors without damaging students’ confidence.

Example: Correcting a Student Essay

Imagine a student writes:

3
 University of Antique
COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION
Sibalom, Antique

She go to school yesterday and she don't understand the lesson.

There are multiple errors:

• go → went
• don't → didn't
• sentence structure

Situation 1: Excessive Correction

Teacher marks everything:
• She go → went
• she don't → didn't
• sentence structure correction
• punctuation correction
• vocabulary correction

The paper becomes full of red marks.

According to John Truscott, this type of correction can overwhelm learners and make them feel
they are failing.

Students may:
• lose motivation
• fear writing
• focus only on avoiding mistakes

Situation 2: Constructive Feedback

The teacher focuses on important grammar issues.

Example feedback:
• highlight patterns
• give examples
• encourage improvement

4. Spoken vs. Written Grammar

Grammar used in spoken conversation is often different from formal written grammar.
According to Ronald Carter and Michael McCarthy, spoken English has its own patterns such
as:
• shortened forms
• informal expressions
• incomplete sentences

Teachers must help students understand that not all spoken grammar follows formal writing
rules.

Example: “Gonna grab some coffee, want?”

In casual speech, people shorten sentences to speak faster.

Full formal sentence:

I am going to grab some coffee. Do you want some?

But in natural conversation, speakers reduce it to:

4
 University of Antique
COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION
Sibalom, Antique

Gonna grab some coffee, want?

Why This Happens

Spoken grammar often uses:

1. Contractions
• going to → gonna
• want to → wanna

2. Ellipsis (missing words)

Example:
Full sentence: Do you want some coffee?

Spoken version: Want some coffee?

The subject and auxiliary verb are removed because the meaning is still clear in context.

Why Must Teachers Teach This?

If teachers only teach formal grammar, students may struggle with real conversations.
Research by Ronald Carter and Michael McCarthy shows spoken English has its own
grammatical patterns.

Students must learn:

• formal grammar for writing
• conversational grammar for speaking

5. Cultural Sensitivity

Students from different cultures may have different ways of expressing ideas, which can affect
how they use grammar in English. According to Roby Marlina, teachers should recognize
different varieties of English and cultural communication styles. Some cultures prefer indirect
communication, while English often uses direct statements.
Teachers must be sensitive so students do not feel uncomfortable using the language.

Example: Direct vs Indirect Communication

English communication often prefers direct statements.

Example:
I need help.
This is clear and normal in English-speaking cultures.

Cultural Differences
In some cultures, direct statements may seem rude or too strong.

A student might say:

Maybe someone could help me.
or
I was wondering if help is possible.

5
 University of Antique
COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION
Sibalom, Antique

These expressions show politeness and indirectness.

Teaching Challenge
Students may feel uncomfortable using direct English forms.
According to Roby Marlina, teachers should recognize different cultural communication styles
and varieties of English.

Teachers should explain:

• when directness is appropriate
• how politeness works in English

Example teaching strategy:

• role-play conversations
• compare polite vs direct requests

6. Technology Integration

Modern grammar teaching often includes technology, such as digital tools and online learning
platforms. However, teachers must ensure technology supports learning rather than replacing
effective teaching.

Technology can:
• provide interactive activities
• give instant feedback
• make grammar practice more engaging

Example: Using Grammar-Checking Software

Students write essays using digital tools like grammar checkers.

Example sentence written by student:

She go to school yesterday.

The software suggests:

She went to school yesterday.

Benefits
Technology helps students:

1. Identify errors immediately

2. Learn grammar patterns
3. Practice independently

It also allows teachers to assign:

• interactive grammar quizzes
• online exercises
• digital writing feedback

Possible Problem:
If students rely too much on technology, they may not fully understand the grammar rule.

Example:
Student accepts corrections without understanding why.
6
 University of Antique
COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION
Sibalom, Antique

Therefore, teachers must:

• explain grammar rules
• use technology as a support tool
Technology should enhance learning, not replace teaching.

3. Sequencing

Sequencing means arranging lessons or topics in the correct order, usually from simple to
more difficult so that students can understand the lesson step by step.

In grammar instruction, sequencing means that teachers teach the easier grammatical forms
first before introducing more complex structures. This helps learners build their understanding
gradually.

Example: A teacher will teach grammar in this order:

1. Words (nouns, verbs)

2. Simple sentences – “She runs.”

3. Sentences with details – “She runs every morning.”

4. Complex sentences – “She runs every morning because she wants to stay healthy.”

So, sequencing helps students learn grammar in a clear and organized way, making the
learning process easier and less confusing. Sequencing is the process of arranging grammar
lessons from simple to more complex so students can learn step by step.

First, grammar instruction must be developmentally appropriate. This means that the grammar
lessons should match the age, ability, and understanding level of the learners. Teachers
should not immediately teach very difficult grammar rules if the students are still learning the
basic ones. Learning should be given step by step so students will not get confused.

Second, we have sequencing. Sequencing means arranging lessons from simple to complex.
In grammar teaching, simpler grammatical forms should be taught first before introducing more
complicated sentence structures.

For example, a teacher should first teach simple sentences like:

“She runs.” or “The dog barks.”

After students understand this, the teacher can then introduce more complex sentences, such
as:

“She runs every morning because she wants to stay healthy.”

Another important idea is scaffolding. Scaffolding means that teachers support students while
they are learning and gradually remove that support once students become more confident.
Teachers do this by considering the learners’ prior knowledge—which means what the
students already know—and their language proficiency level, or how well they can use the
language.

7
 University of Antique
COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION
Sibalom, Antique

For example, if students already know basic verbs, the teacher can guide them to form longer
sentences or use different tenses.

In summary, grammar should be taught: according to the learners’ level, from simple to
complex, and with guidance from the teacher to help students understand better.

Importance of Sequencing

Sequencing is important in grammar instruction because it helps students learn lessons in an

organized and effective way.

First, sequencing enhances memory and understanding by connecting new material to prior
knowledge. This means that students can understand new grammar lessons better when they
are related to what they already know. When teachers start with familiar concepts, it becomes
easier for learners to remember and understand new information.

Second, sequencing encourages coherence and alignment in learning. This means that the
lessons are arranged in a clear and logical order. Each topic is connected to the next one, so
learning becomes more organized and meaningful.

Third, sequencing prevents cognitive overload through manageable pacing. Cognitive overload
happens when students receive too much information at once and become confused. By
teaching grammar step by step, students can process the information better without feeling
overwhelmed.

How Sequencing Applies to Grammar Teaching and Assessment

Sequencing is also important not only in teaching grammar but also in assessing students’
learning.

First, teachers should establish a logical teaching order of grammar structures. This means
grammar lessons should be arranged from simple to more complex structures. For example,
teachers may first teach parts of speech and simple sentences, then move to compound or
complex sentences. This logical order helps students understand grammar step by step.

Second, teachers should assess skills in a similar sequence—from receptive to productive

skills. Receptive skills refer to understanding grammar, such as when students read or listen
and recognize correct grammar. Productive skills refer to using grammar, such as when
students write sentences or speak using the correct grammar.

For example:

Students may first identify correct grammar in a sentence (receptive skill).

Then later they are asked to create their own sentences using that grammar rule (productive
skill).

Third, teachers should use assessments to guide and adjust instructional sequencing. This
means that the results of quizzes, exercises, or tests help teachers know whether students are
ready to move to the next lesson or if they still need more practice. If students are struggling,
the teacher may review the topic before introducing a more difficult one.

8
 University of Antique
COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION
Sibalom, Antique

The Sequence as an Issue in Teaching Grammar and Assessment

When teaching grammar, sequencing is important because it helps teachers organize lessons
and assessments in a way that students can understand easily.

a. Identifying foundational concepts

First, teachers need to identify the basic or foundational concepts of grammar. These are the
simple ideas that students must learn first before moving to more difficult ones.

For example, students should first learn nouns, verbs, and simple sentences before studying
complex sentence structures.

b. Structuring teaching order

After identifying the basic concepts, teachers must arrange the lessons in the correct order.
Grammar topics should be taught from simple to complex so that students can gradually build
their knowledge.

c. Scaffolding learning appropriately

Teachers should also provide support or guidance to students while they are learning. This
support helps students understand the lesson better. As students improve, the teacher slowly
reduces the support so they can work independently.

d. Aligning assessments with the instructional sequence

Finally, the assessments should match the order of the lessons. This means that tests,
quizzes, or activities should measure the grammar topics that students have already learned,
starting from basic to more advanced skills.

Examples of Sequencing in Grammar

To better understand sequencing, here are examples of how it is used in grammar teaching
and grammar assessment.

1. Grammar Teaching Example

In teaching grammar, the teacher should start with the basic concepts before moving to more
complex structures.

For example, the sequence can be:

First, teach parts of speech such as nouns, verbs, and adjectives.

Next, introduce the simple present tense.

Then teach subject–verb agreement so students know how verbs match the subject.

After that, move to the simple past tense.

Then explain the use of adjectives and adverbs.

9
 University of Antique
COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION
Sibalom, Antique

Finally, students can learn how to form complex sentences.

This sequence helps students build their grammar knowledge step by step.

2. Grammar Assessment Example

Sequencing is also used in assessments. Teachers should assess students from easier tasks
to more challenging ones

For example, the assessment may start with:

Multiple-choice questions where students recognize the correct tense.

Error correction, where students identify and fix grammar mistakes.

Short guided writing, where students write a few sentences using the target tense.

Free composition, where students write a paragraph or short text using the grammar they
learned.

This sequence allows teachers to see if students can recognize, understand, and eventually
use grammar correctly in their own writing.

4. Choice of Methods

Grammar instruction plays an important role in developing learners’ communication skills.

Modern grammar teaching focuses not only on rules but also on helping students understand
how language works in meaningful contexts. Different teaching methods support learners’
grammatical competence, engagement, and metalinguistic awareness.
These grammar teaching methods help learners understand grammar not merely as a set of
rules, but as an effective tool for better communication.
a. Diagraming Sentences
This method involves visually mapping the structure of and relationships between different
aspects of sentences. Visual approaches such as grammar concepts maps enhance students'
metalinguistic awareness and correlate with higher grammar achievement scores.
Metalinguistic awareness allows learners to analyze sentence structure consciously and
internalize grammatical systems (Jones & Oakey, 2024).
b. Learning Through Writing
Students are encouraged to explore language through creative reading.
● Contextualized grammar instruction embedded within tasks has been shown to enhance
learner's writing and grammatical control (Myhill, Jones & Lines, 2018; Myhill et al.,
2012)
This method encourages students to learn grammar through actual writing tasks rather than
memorization.
● Grammar is taught within meaningful contexts
● Students improve both writing skills and grammatical accuracy
● Promotes creativity and authentic language use
Example:
Students write a short narrative while focusing on correct verb tense usage
c. Deductive Method
The deductive method of teaching grammar, where the teacher presents the rule explicitly
before students practice it. It is a teacher-centered approach, an efficient method that allows

10
 University of Antique
COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION
Sibalom, Antique

for quick explanations followed by controlled practice activities to reinforce understanding,

such as gap-fills, sentence transformations, or translation exercises.
Example:
The teacher explains how to form the past simple tense (e.g., adding -ed for regular verbs),
gives sample sentences, and then asks students to complete exercises using the correct verb
forms.
d. Inductive Method
Inductive grammar teaching, also known as rule-discovery learning, involves presenting
learners with examples and context first so they can identify and formulate grammatical rules
on their own. This learner-centered approach increases engagement, develops critical thinking
skills, and supports better long-term retention compared to simply memorizing rules. In this
process, the teacher serves as a facilitator, guiding students from observation to forming
generalizations about the language.
Example:
Students read several sentences using the present perfect tense and identify how it is formed
and when it is used, then state the rule based on their observations.
e. Interactive Method
Learners acquire grammar through active participation, collaboration, and real-time
communication, often using games, group work, role-plays, and technology- based activities.
The goal is to make grammar engaging and learner-centered.

5. Patterns and Reasons, Not Rules

Grammar has traditionally been taught as a set of rules that must be strictly followed. This
approach, however, has several limitations and may hinder students' ability to effectively
develop their writing skills. Teaching grammar through patterns and reasons, on the other
hand, allows students to understand the underlying principles and apply them flexibly in their
writing. It is beneficial in language learning. As important as teaching grammar is helping
students, especially beginners, understand why things are the way they are. (Larsen-Freeman,
2003)

ISSUES IN PATTERN AND REASONS, NOT RULES

1.) OVEREMPHASIS ON MEMORIZATION

Traditional grammar teaching often relies on rote memorization of rules, which can lead
to superficial understanding and difficulty in applying grammar in real-life situations

•Explanation
Traditional grammar instruction relies heavily on rote memorization (e.g., lists of rules, verb
conjugations, or punctuation guidelines) with little focus on [Link] can recall rules
but can’t adapt them to real-world situations where language is fluid and context-dependent.

Example:
A college freshman memorizes the rule "Use ‘fewer’ for countable nouns, ‘less’ for uncountable
nouns" but writes "There are less students in class today" because they don’t understand why
the distinction exists (countable nouns can be numbered; uncountable cannot).

-Root cause
They memorized the rule without connecting it to the pattern of counting vs. measuring.

-Patterns-and-reasons fix

11
 University of Antique
COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION
Sibalom, Antique

The instructor has students sort nouns into "countable" (students, books, chairs) and
"uncountable" (water, time, knowledge), then practice using fewer/less in sentences tied to real
contexts (e.g., "Fewer tickets are available" vs. "Less time remains").

2.) OVEREMPHASIS ON ACCURACY

Grammar instruction often prioritizes accuracy over fluency, leading to students being
hesitant to use grammar structures in real-life situations.

•Explanation
When instruction prioritizes "perfect" grammar over communication, learners avoid complex
structures or taking risks in their writing/speech. This stifles fluency and expression, as
learners fear making mistakes more than conveying their message.

Example:
A high school student writing a personal essay avoids using participial phrases ("Walking to
school, I saw a bird") or relative clauses ("The park where I play has a lake") because they
were taught to focus on "error-free" writing. Their essay ends up with simple, repetitive
sentences like "I walk to school. I see a bird. The park is nice."

-Patterns-and-reasons fix
The teacher assigns a "fluency draft" where students focus only on telling their story, then
revises later to refine grammar. They praise bold attempts at complex structures, even if
imperfect—e.g., "Walking to school, the bird I saw was blue" becomes a teaching moment to
explain dangling modifiers ("While I was walking to school, I saw a blue bird").

3.) INCONSISTENCY IN LANGUAGE USE

English grammar is full of exceptions and irregularities, which can be confusing for
leamers

•Explanation
English grammar is full of exceptions to "rules" (e.g., irregular verbs, pluralization, or word
usage). These inconsistencies confuse learners who expect uniformity, but they follow their
own patterns rooted in history, culture, or communication needs.

Example:
A non-native English learner memorizes "Add -ed to form past tense" but struggles with "go-
went-gone," "eat-ate-eaten," and "swim-swam-swum"—viewing them as random exceptions.

-Patterns-and-reasons fix
The instructor groups irregular verbs by their internal patterns:
- Vowel change: sing-sang-sung, ring-rang-rung (Old English umlaut pattern)
- No change: cut-cut-cut, hit-hit-hit (verbs describing actions where the past and present are
indistinguishable)
- Foreign origins: buy-bought-bought (from Old Norse)

4.) LACK OF EXPLICIT PATTERN INSTRUCTION

Students may struggle to identity and apply grammar patterns if they have not been
explicitly taught.

•Explanation
12
 University of Antique
COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION
Sibalom, Antique

Learners can’t identify or apply grammar patterns if they’re not taught explicitly. Many lessons
focus on individual rules without showing how structures connect or repeat across texts and
contexts.

Example:
A college student writing a research paper consistently misuses commas in compound
sentences, writing "The study was significant and it changed our understanding" (missing a
comma before and) or "The data was collected, but it was not analyzed" (using a comma
correctly sometimes but not understanding why).

-Patterns-and-reasons fix
The instructor explicitly teaches the pattern for compound sentences: [Independent clause],
[coordinating conjunction (FANBOYS: for, and, nor, but, or, yet, so)] [independent clause].
They have students analyze published academic papers to find examples of this pattern, then
practice writing their own.

5.) LACK OF CONTEXTUAL UNDERSTANDING

Grammar rules are often taught in isolation, without considering the context in which
they are used. This can make it challenging for students to apply grammar correctly in
their writing.

•Explanation
Grammar taught in isolation (e.g., worksheets with decontextualized sentences) doesn’t
transfer to real use. The same structure can have different meanings or uses depending on the
audience, purpose, or genre.

Example:
A high school student learns "Use simple present tense for facts" and writes "The character
feels sad and cries" in a narrative essay about a past event—because they don’t understand
that past tense is used for storytelling, while present tense is used for literary analysis ("The
character feels sad to show her grief").

-Patterns-and-reasons fix
The teacher has students compare two texts: a news article (past tense for events: "The fire
broke out yesterday") and a textbook (present tense for facts: "Fire requires oxygen to burn").
They discuss how context shapes tense choice.

CONCLUSION
Teaching grammar through patterns and reasons offers several advantages over a rule-based
approach. It promotes contextual understanding, flexibility. and effective communication in
writing. By focusing on patterns and reasons, students can develop their writing skills in a more
meaningful and engaging way.

13
 University of Antique
COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION
Sibalom, Antique

6. From Structuralism to Transformational Generative Grammar

Grammar teaching did not always focus on understanding meaning. In the early 20th century,
language was studied mainly as a system of structures and patterns. This approach is called
Structuralism. Later, in the 1950s, a new theory emerged — Transformational Generative
Grammar — which focused more on how the human mind produces language.

What is Structuralism? (Influenced by Ferdinand de Saussure)

Structuralism is a linguistic approach that began in the early 20th century. It was mainly
influenced by the Swiss linguist Ferdinand de Saussure. Structuralism views language
as a system of signs. Instead of focusing on whether grammar is “right” or “wrong,” it
studies how language elements relate to each other.

Structuralism says that language works like a system or structure, where every word is
connected to other words. Meaning does not exist in a word by itself. Instead, meaning
comes from differences and relationships within the system.

So:
• We know what “cat” means because it is not “bat,” “hat,” or “cap.”
• Words are understood based on their position and difference in the language system.
• Language is studied by examining patterns, structures, and relationships, not by
focusing on isolated words.

Saussure introduced the idea of the linguistic sign, which has two parts: signifier and
signified
a. Signifier
This is the form of the word — the sound we hear or the letters we see.
b. Signified
This is the concept or idea that comes to our mind when we hear or see the word.
Example:
Word: “tree”
● Signifier → the word or sound tree
● Signified → the mental image or idea of a tree
The important idea is that the word itself is not the object, but a symbol representing the
idea.

Descriptive vs. Prescriptive Grammar

Structuralism studies how people actually use language, not how they are told to use it.

Prescriptive Grammar
This tells people what is correct or incorrect.
Example:
Teacher says:
❌ “Don’t say ain’t.”
✔ “Say isn’t instead.”

Descriptive Grammar (Structuralist approach)

14
 University of Antique
COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION
Sibalom, Antique

This studies how people really speak, even if it breaks formal rules.
Example:
People commonly say:
✔ “I ain’t going.”
A structuralist linguist will study why people say it, instead of simply saying it is wrong.

In the 1950s, American linguist Noam Chomsky introduced Transformational Generative

Grammar. Chomsky proposed that humans are born with an inborn ability to learn language.
Because of this ability, people can create and understand unlimited sentences, even
sentences they have never heard before.

So instead of just memorizing sentences, the brain uses rules to form new ones.
1. Language Uses Rules to Create Sentences
People do not memorize every sentence they speak. Instead, they use grammar rules
to build sentences.

Example:
From a few words and rules, we can create many sentences:
● The boy is eating.
● The girl is eating.
● The dog is eating.
● The boy is eating rice.
● The boy is eating rice in the kitchen.

Example:
● I like apples.
● I like apples and bananas.
● I like apples and bananas that my mother bought yesterday.
●
Sentences can grow and change, but they follow grammar rules. We can keep
expanding sentences endlessly.

2. Deep Structure and Surface Structure

Chomsky explained that sentences have two levels:

Deep structure – the basic meaning of the sentence.

Surface structure – how the sentence actually appears or is spoken.

Example:
● Active: The dog chased the cat.
● Passive: The cat was chased by the dog.

3. Transformational Rules
Transformations are rules that change the structure of a sentence without changing its
meaning.
The sentence form changes, but the idea stays the same.
The meaning remains related, but the structure changes. This shows that grammar is
not just memorizing patterns — it involves understanding how sentences are formed in
the mind.

15
 University of Antique
COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION
Sibalom, Antique

Example 1: Active to Passive Voice

Active sentence:
● The police caught the thief.
Passive sentence:
● The thief was caught by the police.

The structure changes, but the meaning is the same.

Example 2: Statement to Question

Statement:
● She is reading a book.
Question:
● Is she reading a book?

The structure changes to ask a question, but the basic meaning remains.

Example 3: Affirmative to Negative

Affirmative:
● They are happy.
Negative:
● They are not happy.
The structure changes by adding not, modifying meaning but keeping the same
sentence framework.

Universal Grammar is the idea that all humans are born with a natural ability to learn
language.
According to this theory:
● Children do not learn language only through memorization.
● The human brain already contains basic grammatical knowledge.
● This allows children to learn any language naturally.

Even though languages around the world are different, they share common grammatical
features because humans have the same mental language capacity.

Example 1: Children Learning Language

Children learn to speak without formal grammar lessons. They can:
● Form sentences they have never heard before.
● Understand new sentences easily.
Example:
A child who hears:
● “I am eating.”
● “She is running.”
Can later say:
● “They are playing.”

Example 2: Similar Structures Across Languages

Languages differ, but many share patterns such as:
● nouns,
● verbs,
● subjects,
● actions.

16
 University of Antique
COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION
Sibalom, Antique

Example:
● English: The boy eats rice.
● Filipino: Kumakain ng kanin ang bata.
●
Different order, but both express the same basic structure: someone performs an
action.
.

1. Structuralism Approach
Structuralism studies language at a specific point in time. It focuses on how parts of
language relate to each other within the system.

This is called synchronic analysis, meaning language is examined as it is used now,

not how it developed over time.

Example
A structuralist studies patterns like:
● The boy runs.
● The girl runs.
● The dog runs.
The focus is on the sentence pattern:
The + noun + verb
The goal is to describe language patterns and structures.

2. Transformational Generative Grammar Approach

This approach studies how sentences are formed in the mind and how they can change
or be generated.
It includes looking at how sentences can be transformed and how language works in
human cognition.
This approach considers how language can change and develop, sometimes described
as including a diachronic perspective.

Example
From one basic idea, speakers can produce:
● The boy kicked the ball.
● The ball was kicked by the boy.
● Did the boy kick the ball?
The focus is on mental grammar processes that allow sentence formation.

Explanation of Each Aspect

1. Focus
● Structuralism: Focuses on language patterns and sentence structures.
● Transformational Grammar: Focuses on the mental grammar system that allows
people to produce sentences.
Example:
Structuralism studies patterns like:
● The boy runs.
● The girl runs.
Transformational grammar studies how the brain creates new sentences using rules.

17
 University of Antique
COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION
Sibalom, Antique

2. Method
● Structuralism: Describes how sentences are structured.
● Transformational Grammar: Explains how sentences are formed and generated.
Example:
Structuralism describes sentence order: Subject + Verb + Object.
Transformational grammar explains how sentences change:
● John kicked the ball.
● The ball was kicked by John.
3. Learning Approach
● Structuralism: Learning happens through pattern practice and repetition.
● Transformational Grammar: Learning happens through understanding rules and
meaning.
Example:
Students repeat sentence patterns vs. students understanding how to form new
sentences.
4. Teaching Method
● Structuralism: Teaching uses drills and repetition.
● Transformational Grammar: Teaching includes sentence analysis and
transformation exercises.
Example:
Drill: Repeat sentence patterns.
Transformation: Change active to passive sentences.

1. From Memorization to Understanding

In traditional grammar teaching, students often memorized rules and forms.

Traditional Example
Students memorize:
● Subject–Verb Agreement rules
● Verb tenses
● Grammar formulas
Example exercise:
✔ Memorize: He goes, not He go.
But students sometimes memorize rules without knowing how to use them in real
communication.

Modern Approach
Teaching now focuses on understanding how sentences are formed and used.

Example:

Instead of memorizing rules, students learn patterns by using language:

● He plays football.
● She plays football.
● They play football.
Students discover how verbs change depending on the subject.
2. Inductive Learning
Inductive learning means students discover grammar rules through examples, rather
than receiving rules first.

Example of Inductive Learning

Teacher gives sentences:

18
 University of Antique
COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION
Sibalom, Antique

● She is eating.
● They are eating.
● We are eating.
Students observe the pattern and realize:
✔ “is” is used for singular
✔ “are” is used for plural
The rule is discovered, not memorized first.

1. Traditional Grammar Assessment

In many schools, grammar tests focus on memorizing rules and choosing correct forms.

Example of Traditional Test Items

Students answer questions like:
● Choose the correct verb:
She (go/goes) to school.
● Identify the correct sentence.
● Fill in blanks using grammar rules.
These tests measure whether students remember rules, but they may not show if
students can actually use grammar in real communication.

Problem with Traditional Assessment

A student may pass grammar tests but still struggle to:
● Speak correctly,
● Write naturally,
● Use grammar in real conversations.
So memorization does not always mean real understanding.
2. Contextualized Assessment (Modern Approach)
Modern assessment checks if learners can use grammar correctly in real situations, not
just in isolated sentences.

Example
Instead of filling blanks, students may be asked to:
● Write a short paragraph,
● Create a dialogue,
● Describe an event,
● Write a message or story.

Example task:
“Describe what you did yesterday.”
Students must correctly use past tense while communicating meaning.

Structuralism built the foundation for studying language patterns, while transformational
grammar added understanding of how language works in the human mind.
The transition shifted grammar teaching: From memorizing patterns To understanding
how language is formed and used. This evolution continues to influence how we teach
and assess grammar today.

7. Fossilization

Language learning requires ongoing adjustment and improvement. Although learners often
progress quickly at first, many reach a stage where improvement slows or stops despite

19
 University of Antique
COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION
Sibalom, Antique

continued practice. This stage, called fossilization, occurs when recurring errors or non-native
language patterns become fixed and difficult to correct.

Example: A learner of English keeps saying “She go to school every day” instead of “She
goes to school every day.”

Even after years of learning English, the mistake continues. This repeated, hard-to-change
error is an example of fossilization.

Key Characteristics

● Errors stabilize despite constant exposure to correct forms.

● Learners can still communicate fluently, but with non-native-like patterns.
● Affects all levels of proficiency, including advanced learners.
● More common in adult learners but can also affect children under certain conditions.

Historical Context and Theoretical Roots

Larry Selinker introduced the concept of fossilization in 1972, explaining that language learners
develop an interlanguage that combines elements of their first and second languages. Some
features of this system may stabilize too early, causing certain errors to persist even with
continuous exposure to the target language.
Later, ZhaoHong Han expanded the concept, noting that fossilization can occur at different
language levels and may be influenced by cognitive, social, and emotional factors.

Types of Fossilization

a) Pronunciation Fossilization

● Persistent issues with sounds, stress, or intonation.

● Example: A Japanese learner pronouncing “rice” and “lice” identically due to L1
phonetic constraints.
● Often the hardest type to overcome because pronunciation habits form early.

b) Grammatical Fossilization

● Stabilization of incorrect structures or verb conjugations.

● Example: Saying “He go to work every day” instead of “He goes to work every day”.

c) Lexical Fossilization

● Using incorrect word choices or collocations habitually.

● Example: “I did a party” instead of “I had a party”.

d) Pragmatic Fossilization

● Misusing language in social contexts despite knowing the “correct” form.

20
 University of Antique
COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION
Sibalom, Antique

● Example: Using overly direct requests in English because the learner’s L1 culture
prefers directness.

Causes of Fossilization

a) First Language Transfer

● Learners naturally map L1 rules onto L2.

● If incorrect patterns aren’t corrected early, they become ingrained.

Examples:

● A Spanish speaker says “I have 20 years” instead of “I am 20 years old.”

● A French speaker says “I am agree” instead of “I agree.”

b) Communicative Comfort Zone

● Once learners can convey meaning successfully, they may stop striving for accuracy.
● Over time, these habitual errors become automatic.

Examples:

● Saying “He go to school every day” because the message is clear, even though it
should be “He goes to school every day.”
● Using “She happy” instead of “She is happy” in casual conversation.

c) Limited Corrective Feedback

● Without frequent correction, learners reinforce incorrect patterns.

● Self-study environments and immersion without instruction often worsen this.

Examples:

● A learner writing “I did a party” repeatedly in a diary or blog without correction.

● Saying “He no like it” while speaking online with friends and never receiving corrections.

d) Affective Barriers

● Psychological factors like anxiety, fear of embarrassment, or low motivation can prevent
learners from taking risks and experimenting with accurate forms.

Examples:

● A shy learner continues saying “I can plays piano” instead of “I can play piano” because
they avoid speaking in class.
● Avoiding complex sentence structures in speech due to fear of making mistakes.

21
 University of Antique
COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION
Sibalom, Antique

e) Age and Neuroplasticity

● Adults are more prone to fossilization due to reduced neuroplasticity.

● Children typically achieve native-like pronunciation more easily but can still fossilize in
grammar or pragmatics if exposed inconsistently.

Examples:

● An adult consistently pronounces “three” as “tree.”

● A child learning English at school only hears limited phrases and says “He goed to
school” repeatedly.

f) Instructional Limitations

● Overemphasis on passing exams or memorizing rules instead of practical usage.

● Lack of authentic input results in limited language restructuring.

Examples:

● Classroom drills teach verb conjugation in isolation, but learners still say “She go to
market” in conversation.
● Students memorize vocabulary lists but say unnatural phrases like “I am agree” when
speaking.

Fossilization vs. Temporary Plateaus

Fossilization is often confused with learning plateaus, but they differ fundamentally:

Aspect Fossilization Learning Plateau

Duration Long-term or permanent Temporary

Reversibility Hard to overcome Easier to surpass

Cause Stabilized incorrect forms Motivation or exposure issues

Example Stuck at intermediate level but

later improves
Always says “she go” after
years of learning

Cognitive Mechanisms Behind Fossilization

a) Automatization

When incorrect forms are practiced repeatedly, they become automatic. Breaking these
patterns requires conscious re-learning.

b) Reduced Noticing
22
 University of Antique
COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION
Sibalom, Antique

According to Schmidt’s Noticing Hypothesis (1990), learners must notice the gap between their
language and the target form. Without awareness, errors persist.

c) Working Memory Limits

Complex grammar rules require cognitive resources. Learners often simplify structures,
unintentionally reinforcing incorrect forms.

Real-World Examples

Native Language Common Fossilized Error Correct Form

Spanish “She have two brothers” “She has two brothers”

Korean “He married with her” “He married her”

Chinese “I very like music” “I really like music”

German “I become tired” “I get tired”

How Fossilization Affects Learners

Fossilization doesn’t always stop communication, but it limits proficiency:

● Pronunciation issues reduce clarity in speech.

● Grammar fossilization lowers writing accuracy.
● Pragmatic errors affect cross-cultural communication.
● Confidence dips when learners notice persistent mistakes.

Preventing Fossilization

a) Early Intervention

Correcting mistakes immediately before they become automatic habits.

Example:
A beginner keeps saying “She don’t like coffee.”
After the teacher corrects it once, the learner writes 5 new sentences like:

● She doesn’t like tea

● She doesn’t like chocolate

b) High-Quality Feedback

Detailed correction that explains why something is wrong and how to fix it.

23
 University of Antique
COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION
Sibalom, Antique

Example:

A learner writes: “He married with her.”

Instead of just correcting it, the teacher explains:

→ In English, “marry” does not need “with”.

→ Correct form: “He married her.”

c) Diverse and Authentic Input

Exposure to real-life language from native sources to learn natural patterns.

Example:
A learner reads online articles and notices phrases like:

● make a decision
● take a break
They realize their usual phrase “do a decision” is incorrect and adjust naturally through
repeated exposure.

d) Mindful Practice

Deliberate, focused practice where the learner pays attention to accuracy.

Example:
A learner struggles with pronunciation of /θ/ (as in think).
They:

● practice in front of a mirror

● slow down speech
● repeat: think, thought, three
instead of speaking quickly and incorrectly (tink, tree).

e) Task Variety

Using multiple skills (speaking, listening, reading, writing) to reinforce correct language.

Example:
To learn polite requests, a learner:

● listens to dialogues (“Could you help me?”)

● reads examples online
● writes their own requests
● role-plays asking a teacher politely

This prevents them from always saying direct forms like “Help me.”

Overcoming Fossilization
24
 University of Antique
COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION
Sibalom, Antique

● Identify Persistent Errors

○ Record yourself and analyze speech or writing patterns.
● Re-learn the Rules
○ Revisit grammar, phonetics, or usage notes for problem areas.
● Focused Drills
○ Practice minimal pairs for pronunciation.
○ Write and rewrite sentences with corrected forms.
● Guided Output Practice
○ Join conversation groups with instructors who correct in real time.
○ Engage in role-play and debates to apply corrections actively.
● Raise Metalinguistic Awareness
○ Learn why forms are correct, not just what is correct.

Role of Teachers and Learning Tools

● Teachers provide structured input and targeted correction.

● AI-powered platforms track recurring errors and offer personalized exercises.
● Combining human instruction with technology yields the best results.
● Speech recognition apps highlight pronunciation gaps.
● Adaptive learning platforms analyze mistakes and tailor practice.
● Corpora-based dictionaries provide real-life examples to replace fossilized patterns.

While fossilization remains common, data-driven learning tools make it easier to notice and
correct persistent errors than ever before.

25