AS.470.609.

51 Leadership Skills in the 21st Century

Instructor: Michael Eric Siegel, Ph.D.

Assignment 1 (Question 2)

GUAN Tong

Leadership and Its Impact on Organizations

Abstract

Leadership shapes organizational direction, culture, and performance. Drawing on

foundational scholarship and applied analyses from management and leadership

literatures, this article synthesizes how leaders bring out the best in staff, form and

communicate vision, navigate change and crises, confront resource shortfalls, and

measure success. Special attention is paid to how leaders’ self‑development and

crucible experiences shape capacity, and how presidential level criteria (policy,

politics, structure, process) illuminate leadership impact in public and nonprofit

organizations.

Introduction

Leadership matters because it turns strategy into sustained performance and converts

individual effort into coordinated organizational action. Scholars distinguish

leadership from management, emphasize emotional intelligence, and show how

visionary practices and catalytic mechanisms convert aspiration into results (Kotter,

1990; Goleman, 1998; Collins, 1999). This article integrates classic and contemporary

readings to explain concrete steps leaders take, surprises they encounter, the role of

training and self‑knowledge, and the measures by which they judge success. The

article also notes limits and tensions in the literature.

1
How leaders bring out the best in staff

Leaders enable staff performance through four related practices. First, they set clear

direction. Kotter (1990) distinguishes leadership, which sets direction and aligns

people, from management, which plans and controls. Second, leaders enable

autonomy and provide needed resources. Kouzes and Posner (1995) argue that

enabling others to act builds trust and removes obstacles. Third, leaders model desired

behavior and institutionalize values. Collins and Porras (1994) show that embedding

core ideology and systems empowers staff beyond any single leader’s tenure. Fourth,

leaders recognize contribution, which sustains motivation.

Emotional intelligence supports these practices. Leaders who show self‑awareness,

empathy, and social skill create climates where staff feel understood and motivated

(Goleman, 1998). For example, a public university provost who holds monthly open

forums and then reallocates small discretionary funds to faculty initiatives

demonstrates both listening and concrete support. That practice increased faculty

engagement in the example and improved cross‑unit collaboration.

Surprises leaders face in organizational roles

Leaders often face unexpected challenges when they assume authority. New

executives report poor information signals and high costs to issuing directives. Porter,

Lorsch, and Nohria (2004) document these surprises for new CEOs, including

difficulty knowing what is really happening inside an organization. Hill (2007) finds

similar surprises at the managerial level. New managers discover that authority alone

does not secure commitment. They must build influence and trust, which proves

2
harder than they expected. These realities mean leaders should invest early in

listening systems and reliable feedback channels.

Preparation, education, and gaps in training

Formal education provides valuable theory and technical skill, but it often falls short

on political navigation and ambiguity management. The transition literature explains

that academic programs rarely replicate the interpersonal demands of senior roles

(Hill, 2007). Kotter (1990) and Mintzberg (2003) emphasize practical experience.

Mintzberg recommends cultivating multiple “minds” that combine self‑management,

organizational analysis, and relationship management. Bennis and Thomas (2002)

argue that crucible experiences, such as setbacks or adversity, form leaders in ways

coursework does not. Consequently, leaders frequently report wishing for more

preparation in stakeholder politics, rapid decision making, and handling ambiguity.

Leadership programs in the public sector could address these gaps through

simulations and structured mentoring.

What leaders must learn about themselves

Ascending to leadership forces self‑assessment. Drucker (1999) advises leaders to

manage themselves by identifying strengths, work styles, values, and suitable contexts.

Without such self‑knowledge, leaders risk misaligned careers and poor decisions.

Goleman (1998) adds that self‑regulation is essential for composure under pressure.

Bennis and Thomas (2002) show how crucibles reveal character and produce durable

lessons. For instance, a nonprofit director who survived a funding shortfall and then

revised governance procedures often emerges more candid and decisive. Overall,

reflection, feedback, and confronting adversity are necessary for leadership growth.

3
Developing and communicating a vision

Vision mobilizes organizations by concentrating attention and guiding choices. Siegel

(2012) presents policy, or vision, as a core leadership criterion. Collins and Porras

(1994) describe how visionary organizations pair core ideology with an envisioned

future and set ambitious long‑term goals. Kouzes and Posner (1995) recommend

narratives that link vision to employees’ values and daily work, converting abstract

aims into concrete priorities. Communication must also include institutional

mechanisms. Collins (1999) explains how catalytic incentives and aligned systems

translate vision into measurable action. For example, a municipal agency that ties

small grant decisions to clear strategic outcomes can make a broad vision operational

and observable.

Dealing with rapid change

Effective change leadership combines adaptive orientation with disciplined process.

Kotter (1990) argues that leadership’s main task is coping with change by setting

direction and aligning people. Mintzberg (2003) urges leaders to manage change

while keeping contextual awareness and strong relationships. Heames and Harvey

(2006) emphasize cultural adaptability in global and diverse environments. Together,

these authors imply that leaders must balance urgency and deliberation. In practice, an

agency responding to a natural disaster must set immediate priorities while

maintaining transparent decision processes to preserve legitimacy.

Handling budgetary shortfalls and serious challenges

4
Resource constraints test management systems and leadership judgment. Leaders

must prioritize mission‑critical activities, communicate tradeoffs transparently, and

design incentives that reinforce strategic aims. Collins (1999) stresses aligning

incentives with strategy so scarce resources support core objectives. Porter et al.

(2004) warn that leaders must manage the symbolic consequences of tough decisions;

consistent messaging preserves trust. In public and nonprofit settings, political

dynamics complicate choices. Siegel (2012) emphasizes that leaders must structure

governance and build coalitions to implement difficult fiscal changes. For example, a

trade association that convenes stakeholders to co‑design budget cuts often preserves

more trust than a top‑down approach.

Measuring success

Leaders measure success across multiple dimensions, including mission impact,

organizational health, cultural alignment, and operational metrics. Collins and Porras

(1994) argue that visionary organizations value enduring performance and fidelity to

core ideology over short‑term gains. Siegel’s (2012) four criteria—policy, politics,

structure, process—provide a practical evaluation framework in public contexts.

Kouzes and Posner (1995) recommend combining quantitative metrics with

qualitative indicators such as employee engagement and narratives of enabled action.

Using both types of measures gives a fuller picture of leadership impact.

Leadership development and stages of advancement

Leadership development unfolds in stages, from individual contributor to manager to

executive. Each stage requires different skills. Hill (2007) documents common pitfalls

in the transition to managing others and stresses trust building and influence.

5
Mintzberg (2003) suggests that perspective widens as leaders advance; they must

adopt context and change mindsets. Bennis and Thomas (2002) show that crucible

experiences often accelerate maturation and the integration of technical competence

with moral clarity. Career development thus combines formal learning, incremental

experience, and formative life events.

Critical comparison and limits

The literature contains complementary insights but also tensions. Kotter (1990)

highlights the necessity of distinct leadership activities aimed at change, while

Mintzberg (2003) warns against separating leadership and management too sharply.

Kotter focuses on mobilizing people for change, whereas Mintzberg emphasizes

integration of roles and continuous managerial judgment. This tension suggests

leaders should avoid rigid role separation. They need both visioning capacity and

everyday managerial competence. A balanced approach reduces the risk that bold

vision will outpace an organization’s ability to implement it.

Conclusion

Leadership profoundly influences organizations by shaping vision, culture, and

performance. Effective leaders articulate clear direction, enable staff through trust and

systems, respond to surprises with listening and transparent messaging, and align

resources with strategic priorities. Siegel’s (2012) framework, policy, politics,

structure, process, is useful for assessing leadership in public and nonprofit settings

because it links vision to implementation and organizational design. As a practical

recommendation, public sector leaders should institutionalize vision by combining

catalytic incentives, routine stakeholder briefings, and mixed quantitative and

6
qualitative performance measures. These steps will help translate purpose into

sustained organizational results.

7
References

Bennis, W. G., & Thomas, R. J. (2002). Crucibles of leadership. Harvard Business

Review.

Collins, J. (1999). Turning goals into results: The power of catalytic mechanisms.

Harvard Business Review, 77(4), 71.

Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (1994). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary

companies (New ed., Vol. 2). HarperBusiness.

Drucker, P. (1999). Managing oneself. Harvard Business Review, March/April.

Goffee, R., & Jones, G. (2000). Why should anyone be led by you? Harvard Business

Review, September/October.

Goleman, D. (1998). What makes a leader? Harvard Business Review,

November/December.

Heames, J. T., & Harvey, M. (2006). The evolution of the ‘executive’ from the 20th

century manager to the 21st century global leader. Journal of Leadership and

Organizational Studies, 13(2).

Hill, L. A. (2007). Becoming the boss. Harvard Business Review, January.

8
Kotter, J. P. (1990). What leaders really do. Harvard Business Review,

November/December.

Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (1995). The leadership challenge: How to keep getting

extraordinary things done in organizations (2nd ed.). Jossey‑Bass.

Mintzberg, H. (2003). The five minds of a manager. Harvard Business Review,

November.

Porter, M. E., Lorsch, J. W., & Nohria, N. (2004). Seven surprises for new CEOs.

Harvard Business Review, October.

Siegel, M. E. (2012). The president as leader. Pearson Education.

Sinek, S. (2009). Start with why [Video]. TED Conferences.

[Link]