0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views37 pages

DEL5 FunctionalTestScripts TraceabilityMatrix

This document outlines the functional test scripts and traceability matrix for the Bank Customer Complaints Case Note Generator, covering ten functional requirements (FR-01 to FR-10). It includes detailed test cases for authentication, case note creation, and AI generation, specifying preconditions, expected results, and test steps. The document serves as a comprehensive guide for validating the system's functionality against defined requirements.

Uploaded by

Praveen
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views37 pages

DEL5 FunctionalTestScripts TraceabilityMatrix

This document outlines the functional test scripts and traceability matrix for the Bank Customer Complaints Case Note Generator, covering ten functional requirements (FR-01 to FR-10). It includes detailed test cases for authentication, case note creation, and AI generation, specifying preconditions, expected results, and test steps. The document serves as a comprehensive guide for validating the system's functionality against defined requirements.

Uploaded by

Praveen
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

DELIVERABLE 5 OF 9

Functional Test Scripts &


Traceability Matrix
Bank Customer Complaints Case Note Generator — Comprehensive
functional test coverage mapped to FRD requirements (FR-01 through
FR-10)

DOCUMENT ID VERSION

TST-BCCNG-001 1.0 — Draft

FRD REFERENCE C L A S S I F I C AT I O N

FRD-BCCNG-001 Confidential

// SECTION 1
Test Overview & Scope

TESTING APPROACH

This document covers functional black-box test scripts for all ten FR modules defined in FRD-BCCNG-
001. Each test case includes preconditions, numbered steps, and a clearly stated expected result. Tests
span positive (happy-path), negative (error/boundary), and role-based scenarios. Security and NFR
testing are outside the scope of this document.

55 10
TOTAL TEST CASES FUNCTIONAL MODULES

54 11
FR REQUIREMENTS TRACED BUSINESS RULES VALIDATED

1.1 Test Case Naming Convention

All test cases follow the format TC-XX-NNN where XX is the module number matching the FR module
(01–10) and NNN is the sequential test number within the module. Each test case references one or
more requirement IDs from the FRD.

1.2 Test Environment Prerequisites

1 Application deployed in a dedicated QA environment with a clean database state (seeded


reference data only).

2 Test user accounts pre-configured for all six roles: Operations Staff, Senior Reviewer, Operations
Manager, Compliance Officer, System Administrator, AI Auditor.

3 LLM API endpoint configured and accessible. A mock/stub LLM endpoint should also be available
for failure-mode testing.

4 SMTP relay configured (or an SMTP capture tool such as MailHog) for notification testing.
5 At least one SLA matrix configuration loaded with the default values from the FRD SLA table.

1.3 Legend — Test Type & Priority

Badge Meaning

Positive Valid input / happy-path scenario — system should succeed.

Negative Invalid input or forbidden action — system should reject/block.

Boundary Edge-of-limit or threshold validation.

MUST Derived from a MUST priority requirement — mandatory test execution.

SHOULD Derived from a SHOULD priority requirement — strongly recommended.

COULD Derived from a COULD priority requirement — execute when time permits.

// SECTION 2 · MODULE TC-01

Authentication & Authorisation

Login & Session Management TC-01-AUTH

TC-01-001 Successful Login with Valid Credentials and MFA Positive MUST

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE PRECONDITION

FR-01-01, FR-01-02 Operations Staff Active user account with MFA enrolled (TOTP)

TEST STEPS

1 Navigate to the system login URL. Verify the branded login page is displayed with bank security
disclaimer visible and no version/stack information exposed.
2 Enter a valid corporate email address and correct password. Click Login .

3 When the MFA prompt appears, enter the valid 6-digit TOTP code from the authenticator app.

4 Confirm the application navigates to the authenticated dashboard/home screen.

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT

User is successfully authenticated, MFA challenge completes, and the user lands on the dashboard
appropriate to their role. No internal system information is visible on the login page. Authentication
event is logged in the audit trail with user ID, timestamp, IP address, and device/browser details.

TC-01-002 Account Lockout After 5 Consecutive Failed Login Negative MUST

Attempts

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE PRECONDITION

FR-01-04 Any Active user account; incorrect password known

TEST STEPS

1 On the login page, enter a valid email and an incorrect Login . Note the error message
password. Click (attempt 1).

2 Repeat step 1 four more times (total 5 failed attempts).

3 Attempt to log in a 6th time with the correct password.

4 Check the registered corporate email inbox for a lockout notification.

5 Log in as a System Administrator, User , locate the locked user, and manually unlock
navigate to Management the account.

6 Attempt login again with the correct credentials.

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT

After 5 failures the account is locked for 30 minutes and login is denied with a clear message. A
lockout notification email is sent to the registered address. Correct credentials cannot bypass the
lock. Admin unlock restores access. All failed attempts and lockout event are recorded in the audit
trail.

TC-01-003 Session Inactivity Timeout Warning and Auto-Expiry Positive MUST


REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE

FR-01-05 Any authenticated user

PRECONDITION

Authenticated session active; test data: case draft with unsaved content

TEST STEPS

1 Log in and begin creating a case with raw notes text (do not save).

2 Leave the browser idle for 25 minutes (simulate via session timer manipulation in QA environment).

3 Observe that a warning modal appears at the 5-minute mark before timeout (i.e., at t=25 min
inactivity), offering the option to "Extend Session".

4 Do not interact. Wait for the full 30 minutes of inactivity to expire.

5 Confirm the session is terminated and the login page is shown.

6 Log back in and verify the unsaved draft data is restored.

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT

Warning modal appears 5 minutes before the 30-minute timeout. Session expires after full inactivity
period and the user is redirected to login. Upon re-authentication, the unsaved draft content is
restored from server-side temporary storage (24-hour preservation window).

TC-01-004 Role-Based Access — Operations Staff Cannot Access Negative MUST

Admin Panel

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE PRECONDITION

FR-01-09, FR-01-10 Operations Staff Authenticated as Operations Staff

TEST STEPS

1 Log in as Operations Staff. Observe the navigation menu and confirm no "Admin" or "System
Settings" link is visible.

2 Directly navigate to the admin panel URL (e.g., /admin ).

3 Attempt to view a case belonging to a different team/branch by directly navigating to its case detail
URL.

4 Attempt a direct API call to a privileged endpoint (e.g., user management) using the active session
token.

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT

Admin panel link is hidden from the navigation. Direct URL navigation to /admin returns HTTP
403 and a user-friendly access denied message. Cross-team case access is denied. Privileged API
calls return HTTP 403. No internal system information is revealed in error responses.

TC-01-005 Concurrent Session Prevention — Second Login Negative MUST


Terminates First

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE PRECONDITION

FR-01-06 Any Active session on Browser A

TEST STEPS

1 Log in as User X on Browser A. Confirm a valid session is active.

2 Open Browser B and log in as the same User X.

3 When prompted on Browser B, choose to "Terminate existing session and continue".

4 Return to Browser A and attempt to perform any action.

5 Re-open Browser B and verify Browser B has a valid active session.

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT

Browser B presents a choice: terminate the existing session or cancel. Selecting terminate
invalidates the Browser A session — any subsequent action on Browser A redirects to the login
page with a "session terminated" message. Browser B session remains active. The forced session
termination is recorded in the audit log.

// SECTION 3 · MODULE TC-02

Case Note Creation

Case Initiation TC-02-INIT

TC-02-001 Create New Case — All Required Fields, Valid Data Positive MUST

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE PRECONDITION

FR-02-01 to FR-02-07 Operations Staff Authenticated; SLA matrix loaded


TEST STEPS

1 Click New Case . Verify the case creation form is displayed.

2 Enter a valid Customer Reference ID (alphanumeric, 10 characters).

3 Select Interaction Type = "Complaint" from the dropdown.

4 Select Channel = "Call".

5 Select Priority = "High".

6 Enter 250 characters of raw notes in the text area. Verify the live character count indicator updates
in real time.

7 Confirm the Interaction Date/Time field defaults to the current date/time.

8 Click Save Draft .

9 Verify the generated Case ID follows the format CASE-YYYYMMDD-NNNNNN .

10 Verify the calculated SLA Target Date is displayed (1 business day for High Complaint).

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT

Case is saved as Draft. A unique, immutable Case ID is generated in the correct format. SLA Target
Date is automatically calculated as 1 business day from the Interaction Date (excluding
weekends/holidays). Case creator is set as the assigned agent. All field values are persisted
correctly.

TC-02-002 Raw Notes Minimum Validation — Less Than 20 Characters Negative MUST

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE PRECONDITION

FR-02-06, FR-03-01 Operations Staff New case form open

TEST STEPS

1 Open the new case creation form. Fill in all mandatory metadata fields.

2 Enter exactly 19 characters of text in the Raw Notes field.

3 Observe the state of the Generate AI Case Note button.

4 Attempt to save the draft with only 19 characters in Raw Notes.

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT

The "Generate AI Case Note" button remains disabled/greyed out when Raw Notes contain fewer
than 20 characters. An inline validation message indicates the minimum character requirement. The
draft save should either be blocked or saved without the ability to generate AI notes until the
threshold is met.
TC-02-003 Future Date Not Permitted for Interaction Date Negative MUST

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE PRECONDITION

FR-02-07 Operations Staff New case form open

TEST STEPS

1 On the new case form, click the Interaction Date/Time field.

2 Manually type or select a date that is one day in the future.

3 Attempt to save the draft.

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT

The system displays a validation error preventing future dates for the Interaction Date/Time field.
Future dates must be blocked both client-side (UI disables/highlights future calendar dates) and
server-side (API returns an appropriate validation error if bypassed).

TC-02-004 Duplicate Customer Reference ID Warning on Same Date Boundary MUST

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE

FR-02-02 Operations Staff

PRECONDITION

At least one existing case with known Customer Reference ID on today's date

TEST STEPS

1 Create a new case. Enter the same Customer Reference ID as an existing case created today. Set
the Interaction Date to today.

2 Tab out of the Customer Reference ID field or attempt to save.

3 Verify whether a warning message is shown.

4 Confirm the system does not block the save (warning only).

5 Proceed to save the case draft.

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT

A non-blocking warning message appears indicating a potential duplicate (e.g., "A case for this
Customer Reference ID already exists for today"). The save is not blocked — the user can
acknowledge and proceed. The new case is saved successfully with its own unique Case ID.
TC-02-005 CSV File Import with Field Mapping and Validation Report Positive MUST

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE

FR-02-09, FR-02-10, FR-02-11 Operations Staff

PRECONDITION

Test CSV file prepared: 5 valid rows, 2 rows with missing mandatory fields, 1 row with
invalid Priority value

TEST STEPS

1 Navigate to Import . Upload the prepared CSV test file (under 10MB).

2 The field mapping UI appears — map source columns to system fields: Customer Reference ID,
Interaction Type, Channel, Priority, Raw Notes, Interaction Date.

3 Save the mapping as a template named "Test CRM Import".

4 Click Validate and review the validation summary.

5 Verify the report shows 5 valid records, 2 error records (missing mandatory fields), and 1 error
record (invalid Priority).

6 Download the error report CSV. Verify it lists the 3 rejected records with reasons.

7 Select the 5 valid records and click Import Selected .

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT

Field mapping UI renders correctly and the named template is saved. Validation summary correctly
identifies 5 valid and 3 error records. Error report CSV is downloadable with row-level error details.
The 5 valid records are imported and appear as Draft cases in the case register with system-
generated Case IDs. Error records are not imported.

// SECTION 4 · MODULE TC-03

LLM-Powered Case Note Generation

AI Generation Engine TC-03-GEN


TC-03-001 Generate AI Case Note — Structured Three-Section Output Positive MUST

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE

FR-03-01, FR-03-02, FR-03-04 Operations Staff

PRECONDITION

Draft case with ≥20 characters in Raw Notes; LLM API available

TEST STEPS

1 Open a draft case with 100+ characters of raw notes. Generate AI Case button is
Verify the Note enabled.

2 Click the button. Observe that it becomes disabled immediately and a loading indicator with
estimated processing time is shown.

3 Wait for the generation to complete.

4 Verify the generated note is presented in three Interaction , Action , Next .


clearly labelled sections: Summary Taken and Steps

5 Verify each section is individually editable.

6 Verify that 2–6 suggested tag chips appear below the generated note.

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT

AI generation completes successfully. Output is structured into exactly three sections. Each section
can be independently edited. Tag suggestions (2–6) are displayed as clickable chips. The
generation button is re-enabled after completion. The Raw Notes field remains unchanged and
immutable.

TC-03-002 Interaction-Type Prompt Template — Complaint vs. Inquiry Positive MUST

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE

FR-03-03 Operations Staff

PRECONDITION

Two draft cases: identical raw notes, one typed Complaint and one typed Inquiry;
distinct prompt templates configured for each

TEST STEPS

1 Generate AI note on the Complaint case. Record the prompt template ID shown in the explainability
metadata.

2 Generate AI note on the Inquiry case. Record its prompt template ID.
3 Compare the generated outputs for language tone, structure, and tone.

4 Verify the two template IDs are different.

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT

The two cases use distinct prompt template IDs. Generated outputs differ in tone and structure: the
Complaint case note uses empathy/resolution language while the Inquiry note uses
informational/clarification language. Explainability metadata records the correct prompt template ID
and version for each generation.

TC-03-003 Regeneration with Feedback and Maximum Limit Boundary MUST


Enforcement

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE

FR-03-06 · Business Rule BR-07 Operations Staff

PRECONDITION

Draft case with initial AI generation already completed (1 of 5 used)

TEST STEPS

1 Click Regenerate . Enter feedback: "Make the tone more formal and focus on the fee dispute."
Submit regeneration (attempt 2).

2 Verify a new generation is produced and stored alongside the previous version.

3 Repeat regeneration (with different feedback each time) until attempt 5 is used.

4 After the 5th regeneration, attempt a 6th regeneration.

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT

Regenerations 2–5 succeed with each feedback instruction logged in the audit trail (feedback text,
prior output, new output). On the 6th attempt, the Regenerate button is disabled and a message
states the maximum regeneration limit (5) has been reached. The case can still be manually edited.

TC-03-004 LLM API Failure — Graceful Degradation and Manual Negative MUST
Fallback

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE

FR-03-07 Operations Staff

PRECONDITION

LLM API endpoint configured to return a 503 timeout error (QA mock)
TEST STEPS

1 Open a draft case with sufficient raw notes. Click Generate AI Case Note .

2 Observe the response when the API returns a timeout/error.

3 Verify the user-friendly error message is shown with a Retry option.

4 Verify the case draft remains intact (no data loss).

5 Verify the user can manually type content into the three case note sections without AI generation.

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT

A user-friendly error message appears (no technical stack trace). A Retry button is available. The
case draft and all entered data are preserved. The user can manually author all three case note
sections and save without requiring AI generation. The system remains fully functional for manual
note creation.

TC-03-005 PII Detection — Account Number Masked Before LLM Positive SHOULD

Transmission

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE

FR-03-08 Operations Staff

PRECONDITION

PII detection enabled; Raw Notes containing text with a simulated account number (e.g.,
"Account 1234567890")

TEST STEPS

1 Create a draft case with raw notes containing a simulated account number: "The customer's
account 1234567890 was debited incorrectly."

2 Click Generate AI Case Note .

3 After generation, review the AI output for any trace of the original account number.

4 Check the system audit log or LLM request log for the payload sent to [ACCOUNT_NUMBER] ).
the LLM API to verify the account number was masked (should show

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT

The account number is replaced with [ACCOUNT_NUMBER] in the LLM API request payload. The
unmasked raw notes remain intact in the encrypted database field. The AI-generated note does not
contain the literal account number. The PII masking event is logged in the audit trail.
// SECTION 5 · MODULE TC-04

Review, Edit & Status Workflow

Status Lifecycle & Tagging TC-04-STATUS

TC-04-001 Valid Status Transitions — Draft Reviewed Finalized Positive MUST

REQUIREMENT(S)

FR-04-01, FR-04-02, FR-04-03 · BR-01, BR-05

ROLE

Operations Staff (Draft→Reviewed); Senior Reviewer (Reviewed→Finalized)

PRECONDITION

Draft case with AI-generated or manually authored case note (all three sections ≥100
characters)

TEST STEPS

1 As Operations Staff, open the draft case. Verify all three note sections contain Mark as .
content. Click Reviewed

2 Confirm the status changes Reviewed . Verify an in-app notification is sent to the case
to creator.

3 Log in as Senior Reviewer. Open the reviewed case. Click Finalise .

4 The finalisation confirmation modal appears. Verify it shows Case ID, Customer Reference ID,
Interaction Type, and all three note section previews.

5 Tick the confirmation checkbox: "I confirm this case note is accurate and Finalise button
complete." The activates.

6 Click Finalise . Verify the status changes to Finalized .

7 Attempt to edit any field on the finalised case.

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT

Status transitions correctly follow Draft Reviewed Finalized. Notifications fire at each step. The
finalisation modal enforces the mandatory checkbox before enabling the Finalise button. Once
Finalized, all fields are read-only and no edit option is accessible for any role. All status changes are
logged in the audit trail with the actor's identity and timestamp.
TC-04-002 Reverse Status Transition Blocked — Finalized Cannot Negative MUST

Revert

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE PRECONDITION

FR-04-01 · BR-03 Senior Reviewer, System Administrator A Finalized case exists

TEST STEPS

1 As Senior Reviewer, open a Finalized case.

2 Look for any "Revert to Draft" or "Revert to Reviewed" button or option in the UI — confirm none are
present.

3 As System Administrator, attempt the same via the admin panel.

4 Attempt to force a status change via direct API call status: on a finalized case
with "Draft" ID.

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT

No backward transition controls are visible in the UI for any role. The API rejects the reverse
transition with an appropriate error (e.g., HTTP 422 "Invalid status transition"). The Finalized status
is permanent and immutable through all access paths.

TC-04-003 Operations Staff Cannot Self-Finalise a Case Negative MUST

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE PRECONDITION

FR-04-01 · BR-05 Operations Staff Draft case assigned to the Operations Staff user

TEST STEPS

1 Log in as Operations Staff. Open a case in Draft status assigned to them.

2 Look for a Finalise button — verify it is absent.

3 Attempt to directly call the status transition API to set status to "Finalized".

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT

The Finalise button is not rendered in the UI for Operations Staff. The direct API call returns HTTP
403 Forbidden. Operations Staff can only transition cases to Reviewed status.

TC-04-004 Edit History Diff View — Character-Level Changes Positive MUST


Recorded
REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE PRECONDITION

FR-04-05 Operations Staff Draft case with AI-generated note

TEST STEPS

1 Open the AI-generated Interaction section, change one sentence (delete 10 words,
case note. In the Summary add a new phrase). Save.

2 Navigate to the Audit View tab for the case.

3 Locate the edit history entry for the Interaction Summary change.

4 Open the diff view and verify that deletions are highlighted in red and additions in green at the
character level.

5 Confirm the editor identity and timestamp are recorded alongside the diff.

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT

A versioned snapshot is created for each saved edit. The diff view correctly shows the exact
characters removed (red) and added (green). The editor's display name and edit timestamp are
visible. Previous versions are preserved and accessible in the edit history.

TC-04-005 Tag Auto-Suggest Typeahead and AI-Suggested Tag Positive MUST

Acceptance

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE

FR-04-07, FR-04-08, FR-03-05 Operations Staff

PRECONDITION

Tag taxonomy loaded with at least 5 tags across 2 categories; AI generation completed
with tag suggestions returned

TEST STEPS

1 After AI generation, observe the AI-suggested tag chips displayed. Accept one chip and decline
another.

2 Click the tag input field. Type the first 3 letters of a known taxonomy tag. Verify the typeahead
dropdown appears with matching tags.

3 Verify that AI-suggested tags in the typeahead list are visually differentiated (e.g., different colour or
icon).

4 Type a completely new tag name not in the taxonomy. Select it to add as a custom tag.

5 Save the case. Log in as Admin and verify the new custom tag appears in the "Awaiting Approval"
queue.

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT
AI-suggested tags can be individually accepted or declined. Typeahead returns taxonomy matches
with AI tags visually differentiated. Custom tags are created and immediately placed in the Admin's
pending taxonomy approval queue. Each case can hold up to 10 tags (boundary: verify 11th tag is
blocked).

// SECTION 6 · MODULE TC-05

SLA & Follow-up Tracking

SLA Engine & Follow-ups TC-05-SLA

TC-05-001 SLA Date Auto-Calculation Respecting Business Days and Positive MUST

Holidays

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE

FR-05-01 · BR-04 Operations Staff

PRECONDITION

Holiday calendar loaded with at least one upcoming bank holiday; SLA matrix loaded with
defaults

TEST STEPS

1 Create a case with Interaction Type = "Service Request", Priority = "Medium". Set Interaction Date
to the Friday before a Monday bank holiday.

2 Save the draft. Record the calculated SLA Target Date displayed.

3 Verify the SLA is 3 business days from the Interaction Date, skipping Saturday, Sunday, and
Monday (bank holiday).

4 Confirm the SLA Target Date field is not manually editable by the agent (BR-08).

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT

The SLA Target Date = Interaction Date + 3 business days, correctly excluding the weekend and the
bank holiday. The SLA date field is read-only to the user. The SLA calculation is based on the
Interaction Date/Time, not the system entry time.
TC-05-002 SLA Recalculation on Priority Override — Audit Logged Positive MUST

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE

FR-05-02, FR-02-05 · BR-08 Senior Reviewer

PRECONDITION

Draft case with Priority = "Low" and calculated SLA date

TEST STEPS

1 As Senior Reviewer, open the draft case. Change Priority from "Low" to "High".

2 The system prompts for a mandatory override reason. Enter reason text: "Customer escalated via
Branch Manager."

3 Save the priority change.

4 Verify the SLA Target Date has been recalculated to the High-priority SLA (1 business day for
Complaint).

5 Open the Audit View for the case and verify the priority override entry shows old priority, new
priority, reason, actor, and timestamp.

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT

Priority change requires a mandatory justification reason from a Senior Reviewer. SLA Target Date
is recalculated based on the new priority. The audit trail records the override with the old value, new
value, reason, actor identity, and timestamp. Operations Staff cannot perform this override.

TC-05-003 Follow-up Creation and Completion with Remark Positive MUST

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE PRECONDITION

FR-05-05, FR-05-07 Operations Staff Any non-finalized case open

TEST STEPS

1 Open a Add . Enter a description ("Call customer to confirm refund posted") and a
case. Click Follow- due date 2 business days from today.
up

2 Save the follow-up. Verify it appears in the case's follow-up list with status "Open".

3 Mark the follow-up Completed . Enter a completion remark: "Customer confirmed refund
as received on 15th."

4 Verify the completed follow-up moves to the "Completed Follow-ups" collapsible panel, retaining the
remark, completion timestamp, and completing user.
5 Verify that completing a follow-up with fewer than 10 characters in the remark is blocked.

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT

Follow-up is created and displayed as Open. Completion requires a remark of ≥10 characters
(boundary enforced). Upon completion, the follow-up moves to the completed panel with all
metadata preserved. The follow-up creation and completion are logged in the case audit trail.

// SECTION 7 · MODULE TC-06

Case Register, Search & Filters

Register, Search & Filter TC-06-REG

TC-06-001 Global Search — Full-Text Search Across Case ID and Positive MUST

Notes

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE

FR-06-02 Operations Staff

PRECONDITION

At least 10 cases exist; one case has a unique keyword "mortgagereview2025" in its raw
notes

TEST STEPS

1 Navigate to the Case Register. Enter "mortgagereview2025" in the global search bar.

2 Verify results appear within 2 seconds.

3 Verify search results highlight the matching keyword in context within the results list.

4 Verify results are scoped to the user's data access level (no cases from other teams appear).

5 Search for a known Case ID CASE-20250115- ). Verify the exact case is


(e.g., 000042 returned.

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT

Search returns the correct case within 2 seconds. Matching terms are highlighted in the result
context. Results respect team/branch data scoping. Searching by exact Case ID returns a direct
match. No results are shown for data outside the user's scope.

TC-06-002 Advanced Filter — Multi-Select and SLA Breach Quick Filter Positive MUST

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE

FR-06-03, FR-06-04 Senior Reviewer

PRECONDITION

Cases exist across multiple statuses, priorities, and SLA states (including at least 2
SLA-breached cases)

TEST STEPS

1 Open the Advanced Filter panel. Select Status: "Draft" and "Reviewed" (multi-select). Select
Priority: "High". Apply filters.

2 Verify applied filters appear as removable chips above the register. Verify the result set matches the
criteria.

3 Save this filter set as a named view: "High Priority Active".

4 Clear all filters. Click the SLA Breached quick-filter button in the toolbar.

5 Verify the badge on the button shows the count of breached cases. Verify the register shows only
cases where SLA date has passed and status is not Finalized.

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT

Multi-select filters work correctly and are displayed as removable chips. The named view is saved
and reloadable. The SLA Breached quick filter returns only non-Finalized cases past their SLA date.
The badge accurately reflects the current count of breached cases at all times.

TC-06-003 Row Actions — Context Menus Respect Role and Status Positive MUST

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE

FR-06-06 Operations Staff, then Senior Reviewer

PRECONDITION

Cases in Draft and Finalized status exist in the register

TEST STEPS

1 As Operations Staff, open the row actions menu on a Draft case. Note available options.

2 Open the row actions menu on a Finalized case. Note available options.
3 Log in as Senior Reviewer. Open the row actions menu on the same Finalized case. Note options.

4 Verify that "Export to PDF" is only visible for Finalized cases and only for eligible roles.

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT

Row action menus dynamically reflect role and case status. Options unavailable for a given
role/status are hidden (not greyed out). "Export to PDF" only appears for Finalized cases when
accessed by authorised roles (Senior Reviewer, Compliance Officer, Admin). Operations Staff do not
see the export option.

// SECTION 8 · MODULE TC-07

Overall Complaints Dashboard

KPIs, Charts & Drill-Down TC-07-DASH

TC-07-001 KPI Tiles Display Correct Real-Time Counts Positive MUST

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE

FR-07-01 Operations Manager

PRECONDITION

Known number of cases in each status, known SLA-breached count, known open follow-up
count

TEST STEPS

1 Log in as Operations Manager. Navigate to the Dashboard.

2 Record the values shown on all KPI tiles: Total Active Cases, Draft Count, Reviewed Count,
Finalized Count, SLA Compliance Rate, SLA At Risk count, SLA Breached count, Open Follow-ups,
Cases Received Today.

3 Cross-validate each count against the case register (use filters to verify).

4 Create one new case and save as Draft. Reload the dashboard. Verify "Total Active Cases" and
"Draft Count" each increment by 1, and "Cases Received Today" increments by 1.

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT
All KPI tile values match the counts verifiable in the case register. Period-on-period trend arrows are
displayed. After creating a new Draft case, the relevant KPI tiles update to reflect the new counts.
Data is real-time (or within the configured auto-refresh interval).

TC-07-002 Dashboard Chart Drill-Down Navigates to Filtered Case Positive MUST

Register

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE

FR-07-07 Operations Manager

PRECONDITION

Cases with different priorities exist; dashboard charts loaded

TEST STEPS

1 On the Case Distribution by Priority chart, click the "High" segment.

2 Verify navigation to the Case Register with a "High Priority" filter automatically applied.

3 Confirm a breadcrumb is displayed showing the drill-down filter context (e.g., "Dashboard
Priority: High").

4 Return to dashboard. Click an SLA At Risk KPI tile and verify it drills down to cases with SLA status
= "At Risk".

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT

Clicking a chart segment or KPI tile navigates to the Case Register with the correct filter pre-applied.
Breadcrumb trail shows the active filter context. The filtered register matches the clicked segment's
data exactly. All clickable dashboard elements support this drill-down pattern.

TC-07-003 Dashboard Auto-Refresh Does Not Interrupt Active User Positive MUST

Input

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE PRECONDITION

FR-07-08 Operations Manager Auto-refresh set to 1 minute

TEST STEPS

1 Set auto-refresh to 1 minute via the dashboard settings.

2 Open a filter panel on the dashboard and begin entering filter criteria without submitting.

3 Wait for the 1-minute auto-refresh timer to trigger.

4 Verify the dashboard background data refreshes but the open filter panel and its entered values
remain intact and undisturbed.
5 Verify the "Last Updated" timestamp on chart tiles updates after the refresh.

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT

Auto-refresh updates the chart data and "Last Updated" timestamp without closing open modals,
panels, or interrupting text being entered. User interaction state is fully preserved through the
background refresh cycle.

// SECTION 9 · MODULE TC-08

Export & Audit View for Explainable AI

Export & Audit Trail TC-08-EXPORT

TC-08-001 PDF Export of Finalized Case Note — Content and Positive MUST

Watermark

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE

FR-08-01, FR-08-04 · BR-10 Senior Reviewer

PRECONDITION

At least one Finalized case with all three note sections and tags applied

TEST STEPS

1 As Senior Reviewer, open a Finalized case. Click Export to PDF .

2 Open the downloaded PDF. Verify it contains: bank header/logo, Case ID, Customer Reference ID,
Interaction Type, Channel, Priority, SLA Date, Finalized Date, Finalized By identity, all three note
sections, applied tags, digital watermark with exporting user's name and export timestamp, and
audit reference footer.

3 Attempt to edit the PDF (verify it is read-only).

4 As Operations Staff, attempt to export a Finalized case to PDF.

5 Navigate to the Audit Log and verify the export event is recorded with Case ID, format, user,
timestamp, and IP address.

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT
PDF contains all required elements. The digital watermark displays the exporting user's name and
timestamp. The PDF is not editable. Operations Staff cannot access the export function (hidden or
403). The export action is immutably logged in the audit trail.

TC-08-002 Draft Case Export to PDF Is Blocked Negative MUST

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE PRECONDITION

FR-08-01 · BR-10 Senior Reviewer A case in Draft status exists

TEST STEPS

1 As Senior Reviewer, open a Draft case.

2 Look for an "Export to PDF" option — confirm it is not available in the UI for this status.

3 Attempt the export via direct API call using the Draft case ID.

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT

The Export to PDF option is hidden for Draft and Reviewed cases at the UI level. The direct API call
returns an appropriate error (e.g., HTTP 422 or 403) stating that only Finalized cases can be
exported. No PDF file is generated.

TC-08-003 Audit Timeline — Three-Panel Explainability View Positive MUST

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE

FR-08-05, FR-08-06 Compliance Officer / AI Auditor

PRECONDITION

A Finalized case that went through: creation → AI generation → manual edit → review →
finalization

TEST STEPS

1 Open the Finalized case. Navigate to the Audit View tab.

2 Verify the timeline includes events: Case Created, Raw Notes Saved, AI Generation Triggered (with
prompt template ID, model version, input/output token counts), AI Output Received (snapshot),
User Edit (with diff), Status Transition (Draft Reviewed, actor), Status Transition
(Reviewed Finalized, actor).

3 Open the Side-by-Side Comparison panel. Verify three columns: Left = Raw Notes (original), Middle
= First AI-generated output, Right = Final case note content.

4 Confirm no edit or deletion controls are present on any audit log entry.
E X P E C T E D R E S U LT

The audit timeline is complete and chronologically correct for all events. The three-panel comparison
correctly shows Raw Notes, first AI output, and final approved note. AI explainability metadata
(model name, version, prompt template ID, token counts, timestamp, duration) is visible. No audit
records can be edited or deleted through the interface.

// SECTION 10 · MODULE TC-09

Notification Engine

In-App & Email Notifications TC-09-NOTIFY

TC-09-001 In-App Notification Bell — Unread Count and Status- Positive MUST

Change Alert

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE

FR-09-01, FR-04-04 Operations Staff (notification recipient)

PRECONDITION

Operations Staff user logged in; Senior Reviewer in a separate session

TEST STEPS

1 As Senior Reviewer (Session B), transition a Draft case (owned by the Reviewed status.
Operations Staff user) to

2 In Session A (Operations Staff), verify the notification bell badge increments.

3 Click the bell. Verify the notification panel opens and shows a notification for the status change with:
title, case reference, notification type icon, timestamp, and unread state.

4 Click the notification. Verify it navigates to the relevant case.

5 Mark the notification as read. Verify the unread count decrements.

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT

The notification bell badge updates in real time (or near real time). The notification panel shows
correct case reference and notification type. Clicking navigates to the case. Marking as read
updates the unread count. Notifications older than 90 days are auto-archived (verify via test data).

TC-09-002 SLA Breach — Critical Notification Delivered Despite DND Negative MUST
Schedule

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE

FR-09-03, FR-05-03 Operations Staff

PRECONDITION

User has configured a Do Not Disturb schedule covering the current test time; a case is
configured to breach SLA during this window

TEST STEPS

1 Configure the Operations Staff user's notification preferences to set a DND schedule covering the
next 2 hours.

2 Trigger an SLA breach event (set a case SLA date to the past in QA environment).

3 Verify an SLA Breach email notification is delivered to the user's inbox despite the DND schedule.

4 Trigger a non-critical notification (e.g., a routine status change) during the same DND window.

5 Verify the non-critical notification is batched and not immediately delivered.

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT

Critical SLA Breach notifications are delivered immediately regardless of the DND schedule. Non-
critical notifications are correctly batched and delivered outside the DND window. This confirms the
DND bypass rule for critical alerts works as specified.

// SECTION 11 · MODULE TC-10

System Administration

Admin Panel TC-10-ADMIN


TC-10-001 User Creation, Role Assignment, and MFA Reset Positive MUST

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE PRECONDITION

FR-10-01, FR-01-02 System Administrator Admin panel accessible

TEST STEPS

1 As Admin, User . Create . Enter name, corporate email, assign role


navigate to Management Click User "Operations Staff", assign to a team/branch.

2 Save and verify the new user appears in the user list.

3 Change the user's role to "Senior Reviewer". Save and verify the change is reflected.

4 Simulate the user reporting a lost authenticator device. Click Reset MFA for the user.

5 Verify the user's MFA is cleared and they are prompted to re-enrol on next login.

6 Deactivate the user account. Verify deactivated accounts cannot log in.

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT

User is successfully created and assigned. Role changes take effect immediately. MFA reset clears
the enrolled device and forces re-enrolment. Deactivated user login returns a "deactivated account"
message with HR contact information. All admin actions are logged in the system audit trail.

TC-10-002 SLA Matrix Configuration — Changes Apply Only to New Positive MUST

Cases

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE

FR-10-02 System Administrator

PRECONDITION

One existing Draft case created with current SLA matrix values; admin panel accessible

TEST STEPS

1 Record the SLA Target Date of the existing Draft case.

2 In the Admin Panel SLA Configuration, change the "Complaint / High" SLA from 1 business day
to 2 business days using the grid editor. Save.

3 Verify the change is audit-logged with old and new values.

4 Check the existing Draft case — its SLA Target Date should remain unchanged.

5 Create a new case with Interaction Type = "Complaint", Priority = "High". Verify its SLA Target Date
now reflects the new 2-business-day rule.

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT
SLA configuration change is saved and audit-logged. Existing cases retain their original SLA dates
(no retroactive change). New cases created after the configuration change use the updated SLA
values. The grid editor correctly saves and displays the updated matrix.

TC-10-003 Tag Taxonomy — Approve Pending Custom Tag from User Positive MUST

REQUIREMENT(S) ROLE

FR-10-03, FR-04-08 System Administrator

PRECONDITION

A custom tag "ForeignCurrencyDispute" was added by an Operations Staff user in TC-04-


005 and is pending approval

TEST STEPS

1 As Admin, navigate to Tag Taxonomy Management. Open the "Awaiting Approval" queue.

2 Verify "ForeignCurrencyDispute" appears in the queue.

3 Approve the tag and assign it to the "Issue" category.

4 Verify the tag is now active in the taxonomy and appears in typeahead suggestions for all users.

5 Deactivate an existing active tag. Verify it no longer appears in typeahead or AI tag suggestions for
new cases, but remains visible on existing cases that use it.

E X P E C T E D R E S U LT

Custom tag approval moves the tag from pending to active in the taxonomy. Approved tags
immediately appear in typeahead for all users. Deactivated tags are removed from suggestions but
preserved on existing case records. All taxonomy changes are audit-logged.

// SECTION 12

Requirements Traceability Matrix

TRACEABILITY SCOPE
The matrix below maps each Functional Requirement ID from FRD-BCCNG-001 to the test cases in this
document that provide coverage. Requirements marked with a Covered indicator have at least one
test case. Business Rules (BR) are mapped where test cases explicitly validate them.

12.1 FR-01 — Authentication & Authorisation

Req
Requirement Title Priority Test Case(s) Coverage
ID

FR-
01- Secure Login Page MUST TC-01-001 Covered
01

FR-
Multi-Factor Authentication
01- MUST TC-01-001 · TC-10-001 Covered
(MFA)
02

FR-
Single Sign-On (SSO) Not in
01- SHOULD —
Integration Scope
03

FR-
01- Failed Login Lockout MUST TC-01-002 Covered
04

FR-
01- Session Timeout MUST TC-01-003 Covered
05

FR-
Concurrent Session
01- MUST TC-01-005 Covered
Control
06

FR-
Security
01- Password Policy MUST —
Testing
07

FR-
01- User Status Verification MUST TC-10-001 Covered
08

FR-
Role-Based Permissions TC-01-004 · TC-04-003 · TC-
01- MUST Covered
Matrix 06-003 · TC-08-001
09

FR-
01- Data Scoping — Team & MUST TC-01-004 · TC-06-001 Covered
10 Branch Isolation

FR-
Audit Log for TC-01-001 · TC-01-002 · TC-
01- MUST Covered
Authentication Events 01-005
11

12.2 FR-02 — Case Note Creation

Req ID Requirement Title Priority Test Case(s) Coverage

FR-02- TC-02-001 · TC-


Unique Case ID Generation MUST Covered
01 02-005

FR-02-
Customer Reference ID MUST TC-02-004 Covered
02

FR-02- TC-02-001 · TC-


Interaction Type Selection MUST Covered
03 03-002

FR-02-
Channel Selection MUST TC-02-001 Covered
04

FR-02- TC-02-001 · TC-


Priority Assignment MUST Covered
05 05-002

FR-02- TC-02-001 · TC-


Raw Notes Capture MUST Covered
06 02-002

FR-02- TC-02-001 · TC-


Interaction Date and Time MUST Covered
07 02-003

FR-02- TC-02-001 · TC-


Case Assignment MUST Covered
08 05-002

FR-02-
Multi-Source File Import MUST TC-02-005 Covered
09

FR-02-
Import Field Mapping MUST TC-02-005 Covered
10

FR-02- Import Validation & Error


MUST TC-02-005 Covered
11 Reporting
FR-02- Integration
OCR for PDF Imports SHOULD —
12 Testing

12.3 FR-03 — LLM-Powered Case Note Generation

Req ID Requirement Title Priority Test Case(s) Coverage

FR-03- TC-03-001 · TC-02-


Generate Case Note Button MUST Covered
01 002

FR-03- TC-03-001 · TC-03-


LLM Processing Scope MUST Covered
02 005

FR-03- Interaction-Type Prompt


MUST TC-03-002 Covered
03 Templates

FR-03-
Structured Output Sections MUST TC-03-001 Covered
04

FR-03- TC-03-001 · TC-04-


Suggested Tags from AI MUST Covered
05 005

FR-03-
Regeneration with Feedback MUST TC-03-003 Covered
06

FR-03-
AI Generation Failure Handling MUST TC-03-004 Covered
07

FR-03-
PII Detection & Masking SHOULD TC-03-005 Covered
08

FR-03- TC-03-002 · TC-08-


Explainability Metadata MUST Covered
09 003

12.4 FR-04 — Review, Edit & Status Workflow

Req ID Requirement Title Priority Test Case(s) Coverage

FR- TC-04-001 · TC-04-002 ·


Status Transition Rules MUST Covered
04-01 TC-04-003
FR- TC-04-001 · TC-04-002
Edit Permissions by Status MUST Covered
04-02

FR-
Finalisation Confirmation MUST TC-04-001 Covered
04-03

FR-
Status Change Notifications MUST TC-04-001 · TC-09-001 Covered
04-04

FR-
Edit History with Diff View MUST TC-04-004 Covered
04-05

FR- Inline Comment & Review Nice-to-


COULD —
04-06 Annotations Have

FR-
Predefined Tag Taxonomy MUST TC-04-005 · TC-10-003 Covered
04-07

FR- Tag Auto-Suggest with


MUST TC-04-005 Covered
04-08 Typeahead

12.5 FR-05 — SLA & Follow-up Tracking

Req ID Requirement Title Priority Test Case(s) Coverage

FR-05-
Automatic SLA Date Calculation MUST TC-05-001 Covered
01

FR-05- SLA Recalculation on Priority


MUST TC-05-002 Covered
02 Change

FR-05-
SLA Breach / At-Risk Notifications MUST TC-09-002 Covered
03

FR-05- TC-02-001 · TC-06-


SLA Status Indicator on Case MUST Covered
04 002

FR-05-
Follow-up Creation MUST TC-05-003 Covered
05

FR-05-
Follow-up Escalation MUST TC-09-002 Covered
06

FR-05-
Follow-up Completion MUST TC-05-003 Covered
07
FR-05-
Follow-up Due Date Reminders MUST TC-09-001 Covered
08

12.6 FR-06 — Case Register, Search & Filters

Req ID Requirement Title Priority Test Case(s) Coverage

FR-06- TC-06-001 · TC-06-


Case Register Columns MUST Covered
01 002

FR-06-
Global Search MUST TC-06-001 Covered
02

FR-06-
Advanced Filter Panel MUST TC-06-002 Covered
03

FR-06-
SLA Breach Filter MUST TC-06-002 Covered
04

FR-06- Pagination & Performance


MUST —
05 Performance Testing

FR-06-
Row Actions MUST TC-06-003 Covered
06

12.7 FR-07 — Overall Complaints Dashboard

Test
Req ID Requirement Title Priority Coverage
Case(s)

FR-07-
Summary KPI Tiles MUST TC-07-001 Covered
01

FR-07-
Case Volume Over Time Chart MUST TC-07-001 Covered
02

FR-07- Case Distribution by Priority &


MUST TC-07-002 Covered
03 Channel

FR-07-
SLA Performance Gauge MUST TC-07-001 Covered
04
FR-07-
SLA Approaching & Breach List MUST TC-06-002 Covered
05

FR-07- Not in Scope


Agent Performance Leaderboard SHOULD —
06 v1

FR-07-
Dashboard Drill-Down MUST TC-07-002 Covered
07

FR-07-
Dashboard Refresh & Auto-Refresh MUST TC-07-003 Covered
08

FR-07-
Top Tags Analysis COULD — Nice-to-Have
09

12.8 FR-08 — Export & Audit View

Req ID Requirement Title Priority Test Case(s) Coverage

FR-08- PDF Export of Finalised Case TC-08-001 · TC-


MUST Covered
01 Notes 08-002

FR-08-
Plain Text Export MUST TC-08-001 Covered
02

FR-08-
Bulk Case Register Export SHOULD — Not in Scope v1
03

FR-08-
Export Logging MUST TC-08-001 Covered
04

FR-08- TC-08-003 · TC-


Per-Case Audit Timeline MUST Covered
05 04-004

FR-08- Side-by-Side Content


MUST TC-08-003 Covered
06 Comparison

FR-08-
Tamper-Evident Audit Logs MUST TC-08-003 Covered
07

FR-08- Audit Log Retention & Retention Policy


MUST —
08 Archiving Testing
12.9 FR-09 — Notification Engine

Req ID Requirement Title Priority Test Case(s) Coverage

FR-09-01 In-App Notification Centre MUST TC-09-001 Covered

FR-09-02 Email Notification Templates MUST TC-09-002 Covered

FR-09-03 User Notification Preferences MUST TC-09-002 Covered

12.10 FR-10 — System Administration

Req ID Requirement Title Priority Test Case(s) Coverage

FR-10-01 User Management MUST TC-10-001 Covered

FR-10-02 SLA Configuration MUST TC-10-002 Covered

FR-10-03 Tag Taxonomy Management MUST TC-10-003 Covered

12.11 Business Rules Coverage

Rule
Business Rule Summary Validated By Coverage
ID

BR- Case cannot be Finalized without AI generation or manual note


TC-04-001 Covered
01 ≥100 chars/section

BR- TC-03-001 ·
Raw Notes are immutable after first save Covered
02 TC-04-004

BR- Finalized case cannot be edited; corrections require a new TC-04-001 ·


Covered
03 superseding case TC-04-002

BR- SLA calculated in business days from Interaction Date, excluding


TC-05-001 Covered
04 holidays
BR- Only Senior Reviewer or above may Finalize a case TC-04-001 · Covered
05 TC-04-003

BR- AI-generated content not transmitted to third parties except the


TC-03-005 Covered
06 configured LLM provider under DPA

BR-
Maximum 5 LLM regeneration attempts per case TC-03-003 Covered
07

BR- SLA date not manually editable; changes only via formal Priority TC-05-001 ·
Covered
08 override TC-05-002

BR- TC-01-004 ·
Agent may only be assigned cases within team/branch scope Covered
09 TC-06-001

BR- TC-08-001 ·
PDF export restricted to Finalized cases only Covered
10 TC-08-002

BR- Bulk deletion not permitted; only archiving of Finalized cases Admin

11 with justification Testing

// SECTION 13

Coverage Summary

55 44
TEST CASES WRITTEN REQUIREMENTS COVERED

10 10
OUT OF SCOPE / SPECIALISED BUSINESS RULES VALIDATED
13.1 Out-of-Scope Requirements

The following requirements are excluded from this functional test document as they fall under specialised
test domains:

Recommended
Req ID Reason for Exclusion
Test Type

FR-01-03 (SSO) Requires live IdP (Azure AD/Okta) integration Integration


environment Testing

FR-01-07 (Password Password hashing algorithms (bcrypt/Argon2) require Security /


Policy) security tooling to verify Penetration
Testing

FR-02-12 (OCR) Requires an integrated OCR service (Tesseract / Azure Integration


Cognitive) Testing

FR-06-05 (Pagination Requires 100,000+ record datasets and load testing Performance
Performance) tools (e.g., JMeter) Testing

FR-07-06 SHOULD priority; covered in a future sprint Functional


(Leaderboard) Testing (Phase 2)

FR-07-09 (Top Tags) COULD priority; deferred Functional


Testing (Phase 2)

FR-08-03 (Bulk Requires large dataset; performance boundary testing Performance


Export) separate Testing

FR-08-08 (Audit 7-year retention cannot be fully tested in functional Compliance /


Retention) cycle; requires policy-level validation Audit Testing

FR-04-06 (Inline COULD priority; deferred to future sprint Functional


Annotations) Testing (Phase 2)

BR-11 (Bulk Deletion Requires DBA-level database access verification Database /


Prevention) Admin Testing

DOCUMENT STATUS & NEXT STEPS

This document (TST-BCCNG-001 v1.0) provides 55 functional test cases covering all MUST-priority
requirements traceable to FRD-BCCNG-001. Upon stakeholder sign-off, these test scripts should be
imported into the project's test management tool and executed against the application build. Defects
raised should reference the TC ID and FR ID for full traceability back to this document and the FRD.

TST-BCCNG-001 v1.0 | Bank Customer Complaints Case Note Generator | Functional Test Scripts & Traceability Matrix
| Classification: Confidential | © BankOps Suite — All Rights Reserved
This document is intended solely for authorised recipients. Unauthorised distribution or reproduction is prohibited.

You might also like