0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views15 pages

Week11Part2 AdvancedPerformanceEvaluation

The document discusses advanced performance evaluation techniques in portfolio management, including style analysis, market timing, and performance attribution procedures. It highlights the importance of understanding selection bias, changing portfolio composition, and the decomposition of performance into various components. Key methodologies such as regression analysis for market timing and performance attribution against a benchmark are also presented.

Uploaded by

200588tran.huong
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views15 pages

Week11Part2 AdvancedPerformanceEvaluation

The document discusses advanced performance evaluation techniques in portfolio management, including style analysis, market timing, and performance attribution procedures. It highlights the importance of understanding selection bias, changing portfolio composition, and the decomposition of performance into various components. Key methodologies such as regression analysis for market timing and performance attribution against a benchmark are also presented.

Uploaded by

200588tran.huong
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Portfolio Performance Evaluation

Part 2: Advanced Performance Evaluation


Lecturer: Ilaria Piatti
School of Economics and Finance
Overview

• Style Analysis

• Performance Measurement with Changing Portfolio Composition

• Market Timing

• Performance Attribution Procedures


Selection Bias and Portfolio Evaluation

• Selection Bias:

− In selecting outperforming funds recall that performance in one period is not predictive of
future performance!

− Survivorship bias: limiting a sample of funds to those for which returns are available over
an entire sample period
Style Analysis
• Style analysis was introduced by William Sharpe (1992) as a tool to systematically
measure the exposures of managed portfolios

• The idea is to regress fund returns on indexes representing a range of asset classes

• The regression coefficient to each index is the fund’s implicit allocation to that style

• The R-squared of the regression is the return variability due to style choice rather than
security selection

• The intercept of the regression is the average return from security selection
Style Analysis - Example
Sharpe’s style analysis
Example
Style Analysis for Fidelity’s Magellan Fund: Example
Style analysis for Fidelity’s Magellan Fund:

(Table 6)
Changing Portfolio Composition
• One potential problem of risk-adjustment techniques is that portfolio risk is assumed
constant over the period under analysis. . .

• Not a reasonable assumption when the time interval is long and the manager can
change portfolio composition!

• It’s important for actively managed portfolios to keep track of portfolio composition
and changes in portfolio average return and risk

• For example, if the manager decides to increase β to profit from a bullish market, the
Sharpe ratio of the full period might give misleading results
Changing Portfolio Composition - Example
Example
• Suppose that the Sharpe ratio of the market is SM = 0.4

• One year, the portfolio manager executes a low-risk strategy, with mean returns of 1%
and standard deviation of 2% ⇒ SP = 0.5

• Over the following year the manager executes a high-risk strategy with mean of 9%
and standard deviation 18% ⇒ SP = 0.5

• Over the 2 years (8 quarters) the mean and standard deviation are 5% and 13.42%
⇒ SP = 0.37
Changing Portfolio Composition - Example
Changing Portfolio Composition
Example
Market Timing

• Market timing involves shifting funds between a market index portfolio and a safe
asset, depending on whether the market index is expected to outperform

• Suppose an investor holds only the market index portfolio and T-Bills

• If the investor could correctly time the market, the β should increase with market
returns!
Market Timing Market Timing
Market Timing

• Treynor and Mazuy (1966) estimated the regression line:

rP − rF = a + b (rM − rF ) + c (rM − rF )2 + eP
• c > 0 implies market timing ability!

• Henriksson and Merton (1981) estimated a portfolio characteristic line as in Panel C:

rP − rF = a + b (rM − rF ) + c (rM − rF )D + eP
• D is a dummy variable that equals 1 when rM − rF > 0 and 0 otherwise
• The beta is b in bear markets and b + c in bull markets ⇒ c > 0 implies market
timing ability!
Performance Attribution Procedures

• Performance attribution attempts to decompose overall performance into different


components, that may be identified with a particular level of the portfolio selection
process

• A common attribution system decomposes performance into three components:


1. Broad allocation choices across equity, fixed income and money market
2. Industry (sector) choice within each market
3. Security choice within each sector
Performance Attribution Procedures

• Attribution method explains the difference between a managed portfolio P and a


benchmark portfolio B (Bogey)

• Bogey is designed to measure the returns the portfolio manager would earn if she were
to follow a completely passive strategy

• In this context, ’passive’ has two attributes:


1. Allocation of funds across asset classes is set in accord with a notion of usual allocation
across sectors
2. Within each asset class, the portfolio manager holds an indexed portfolio
Performance Attribution Procedures - Example
Performance Attribution Example
Example
Performance of the managed portfolio vs the Bogey:

(Table 7)
Performance Attribution Procedures - Example
Example
Performance Attribution Example
Performance attribution to asset allocation and security selection:

You might also like