7.
PRESS TYPE
Press Technology:
Press Type Typical SPM Range Best For
Mechanical (flywheel) 30-120 SPM General purpose, most common
Servo-electric 10-150 SPM* Precise control, variable speed
Hydraulic 10-60 SPM Heavy forming, deep drawing
High-speed mechanical 150-400 SPM Electronics, thin materials
Transfer press 15-45 SPM Large automotive parts
*Servo presses can vary speed by operation - faster for piercing, slower for forming
8. FEEDING SYSTEM
Feed Method Impact:
Roll Feed (Most Common):
Speed: 40-150 SPM
Limitation: Grip release and re-grip time
Best for: Standard progressive dies
Air Feed:
Speed: 80-200 SPM
Limitation: Material weight, precision
Best for: Light, thin materials
Hitch Feed (Mechanical):
Speed: 30-100 SPM
Limitation: Mechanical linkage
Best for: Medium duty applications
Servo Feed:
Speed: 10-150 SPM (variable)
Limitation: Acceleration/deceleration
Best for: Precise positioning, varying pitch
PRESS STROKE RATE CALCULATION
Theoretical Maximum SPM:
Formula:
SPM_max = 60 / (t_feed + t_stroke + t_dwell)
Where:
t_feed = Strip feed time (seconds)
t_stroke = Press ram up/down time (seconds)
t_dwell = Dwell time at bottom (seconds)
Example Calculation:
Given:
Press stroke: 100mm
Feed length: 60mm
Material: 2mm mild steel
Operations: 10 stations
Time Breakdown:
Press Stroke Time:
Assume press speed: 150 mm/sec average
Up/down travel: 100mm × 2 = 200mm
t_stroke = 200 / 150 = 1.33 seconds
Feed Time:
Roll feed speed: ~300 mm/sec
Feed length: 60mm
t_feed = 60 / 300 = 0.20 seconds
Dwell Time:
Forming operations need dwell: 0.05 seconds
t_dwell = 0.05 seconds
Total Cycle Time:
t_total = 1.33 + 0.20 + 0.05 = 1.58 seconds
Maximum SPM:
SPM_max = 60 / 1.58 = 38 SPM
Practical Operating Speed:
Add 20% safety margin
SPM_actual = 38 × 0.8 = 30-32 SPM
MALAYSIAN INDUSTRY STANDARDS
Typical Speeds by Sector:
Automotive (Malaysia):
Small brackets: 50-70 SPM
Structural parts: 30-45 SPM
Safety parts: 25-35 SPM (conservative for quality)
Proton/Perodua suppliers typically: 35-55 SPM average
Electronics (Penang/Melaka):
Terminals/connectors: 120-180 SPM
Lead frames: 100-150 SPM
Small precision parts: 80-120 SPM
Appliances:
Washing machine parts: 40-60 SPM
Air conditioner brackets: 45-65 SPM
SPEED OPTIMIZATION STRATEGIES
How to Increase SPM (Without Sacrificing Quality):
1. Reduce Feed Length
Optimize strip layout for shorter pitch
10mm reduction in pitch = ~5-10% SPM increase
2. Use Idle Stations
Spread operations over more stations
Reduces force per station
Allows faster press cycling
3. Servo Feed System
Faster acceleration/deceleration
Precise positioning
Can gain 10-20% speed
4. Upgrade Press
Modern servo press vs old mechanical
Higher speed capability
Variable speed by operation
5. Improve Lubrication
Better strip lubrication = less friction
Faster feeding = 5-10% SPM gain
6. Pilot System Optimization
Quick-entry pilots (chamfered)
Reduces positioning time
Smoother feeding
7. Tool Design
Minimize forming operations
Use cam instead of air bends where possible
Reduce dwell time needs
PRODUCTION CALCULATION EXAMPLES
Example 1: Automotive Bracket
Specifications:
Part: Door hinge bracket
Material: 1.8mm CRCA
Progressive die: 10 stations
Operating speed: 55 SPM
Efficiency: 85% (accounting for setup, maintenance, breaks)
Daily Production:
Working hours: 16 hours (2 shifts)
Available minutes: 16 × 60 = 960 minutes
Actual running time: 960 × 0.85 = 816 minutes
Parts per day = 816 × 55 = 44,880 parts
Monthly (22 working days) = 44,880 × 22 = 987,360 parts
≈ 1 million parts/month
Example 2: Electronics Terminal
Specifications:
Part: Connector terminal
Material: 0.3mm brass
Progressive die: 8 stations
Operating speed: 140 SPM
Efficiency: 90%
Daily Production:
Working hours: 20 hours (continuous with shift overlap)
Available minutes: 20 × 60 = 1,200 minutes
Actual running time: 1,200 × 0.90 = 1,080 minutes
Parts per day = 1,080 × 140 = 151,200 parts
Monthly = 151,200 × 22 = 3.33 million parts/month
SPEED LIMITATIONS & SAFETY
Why Not Always Run Maximum Speed?
1. Tool Life
Higher speed = more wear
Punch life: 100k parts at 80 SPM vs 150k parts at 50 SPM
Balance speed vs tool maintenance cost
2. Quality Concerns
Too fast = burr issues, dimensional drift
Feeding errors increase with speed
Parts may not eject cleanly
3. Safety
Higher speed = more kinetic energy
Tool breakage more catastrophic
Operator safety risk
4. Material Handling
Scrap removal can't keep up
Parts collection system overwhelmed
Manual operations bottleneck
5. Press Limitations
Mechanical wear increases exponentially
Vibration and noise issues
Press not rated for sustained high speed
INTERVIEW ANSWER GUIDE
Q: "What's the typical stroke rate for progressive dies?"
Good Answer:
"Progressive die stroke rates vary significantly based on multiple factors. Generally:
Light duty (thin electronics parts): 100-150 SPM
Medium automotive brackets (1-2mm): 50-70 SPM
Heavy structural parts (2-4mm): 30-45 SPM
Very heavy forming/drawing: 15-30 SPM
The main factors affecting speed are material thickness and hardness, number of stations,
part complexity, and feeding system. For example, a 10-station progressive die for
automotive bracket in 2mm mild steel typically runs at 50-60 SPM in Malaysian
manufacturing.
It's important not to run at maximum theoretical speed - we typically operate at 80-85% of
maximum to balance productivity with tool life, quality, and safety. Higher speed increases
wear and can cause quality issues."
Q: "How do you determine the optimal SPM for a new tool?"
Good Answer:
"I determine optimal SPM through systematic approach:
1. Calculate theoretical maximum based on press stroke time, feed time, and any dwell
requirements
2. Apply safety factors (typically 15-20%) for reliable operation
3. Consider material limitations - harder materials need slower speed
4. Evaluate tool complexity - more stations or forming operations reduce speed
5. During tryout, start conservative (60-70% of theoretical max)
6. Gradually increase speed while monitoring:
Part quality (burr, dimensions)
Feeding reliability
Tool temperatures
Vibration and noise
7. Find sweet spot where productivity is high but quality is consistent and tool wear is
acceptable
For example, recent project: Automotive bracket progressive die (12 stations, 2mm DP590):
Theoretical max: 65 SPM
Started tryout: 40 SPM
Gradually increased: 45, 50, 55 SPM
Optimal found: 52 SPM (quality stable, tool temps acceptable)
Production setting: 50 SPM (4% safety margin)
This balances productivity (50 × 60 × 16 hrs = 48k parts/day) with tool life and quality
consistency."
QUICK REFERENCE TABLE
SPM by Application (Summary):
Application Material Thickness Stations Typical SPM
Electronics terminals 0.2-0.5mm 6-10 120-160
Connector pins 0.3-0.8mm 8-12 100-140
Auto small brackets 1.0-2.0mm 8-12 50-70
Auto structural 2.0-3.5mm 10-15 30-50
Heavy automotive 3.0-5.0mm 12-20 20-35
Appliance parts 0.8-2.0mm 6-10 45-65
Deep drawn cups 1.0-3.0mm 8-15 15-30
PRODUCTION PLANNING FORMULA
Quick Production Estimate:
Daily Production = SPM × 60 min/hr × Hours/day × Efficiency
Where:
- SPM = Strokes per minute
- Hours/day = Shift hours (8, 16, or 24)
- Efficiency = 0.80-0.90 (80-90%)
Example:
SPM = 55
Hours = 16 (two 8-hour shifts)
Efficiency = 0.85
Daily = 55 × 60 × 16 × 0.85 = 44,880 parts
Monthly (22 days) = 987,360 parts
Would you like me to create:
1. SPM optimization calculator (Excel tool)?
2. Production capacity worksheet with multiple scenarios?
3. Tool life vs. SPM analysis chart?
4. Press selection guide based on SPM requirements?
Let me know what would be most helpful!